Now roof to protect 'much-loved' theatre
Work to replace the roof of a theatre is expected to finish in March, officials have said.
The Plowright Theatre, Scunthorpe, was built in 1958, but a recent survey found the existing roof had reached the end of its lifespan.
North Lincolnshire Council, which owns the building, said it could no longer continue with patchwork repairs due to the risk of leaks damaging the auditorium, performance equipment and other parts of the interior.
The £160,000 funding for the project has come from the government's Shared Prosperity Fund.
The venue, which is named in honour of the late actress Dame Joan Plowright, has been described by the council as an "essential part of Scunthorpe's entertainment scene".
Councillor John Davison, cabinet member for culture, heritage and arts, said: "This investment is fantastic news for the Plowright Theatre and for the local community.
"By replacing part of the roof now, we are protecting this much-loved venue and ensuring it remains a vibrant space for live performances in North Lincolnshire."
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Acting legend Dame Joan Plowright dies at 95
Victorian theatre to reopen after 8-year renovation
Dancing dads take to stage to help 'leaky' school
North Lincolnshire Council
Scunthorpe Theatres
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
‘The Life of Chuck' Review
[The plot of The Life of Chuck will be discussed below; read on at your own risk.] THE LIFE OF CHUCK IS SIMULTANEOUSLY EFFECTIVE—it jerks those tears—and almost terrifyingly ineffective, a movie that feints at a sort of transcendent human depth but has a nullity at its center that undercuts the entire premise upon closer examination. To understand why, you'll need to know the broad strokes of the plot, including the first act twist; I think everything discussed here will be painfully obvious to any viewer about ten minutes into the movie, but still, caveat emptor. We open on 'Act Three: Thanks, Chuck,' witnesses to a world on the precipice of collapse. Marty Anderson's (Chiwetel Ejiofor) America is much like ours, if ours had everything go wrong at once. California has collapsed into the ocean; wildfires rage through the Midwest; the rest of the world is starving; and, worst of all, as the film begins the internet has collapsed. The one constant? Advertisements—on billboards, radio stations, and network-TV test patterns—thanking Chuck Krantz (Tom Hiddleston) for '39 great years.' Retirement ads? At a time like this? Why, he looks like he's 39 himself, not a 39-year veteran of the bank—or maybe accountancy or life insurance firm; no one actually seems to know the guy—where he works. Why are these ads everywhere? And is that a tear in his eye? Hm, something feels strange about this. It's almost as if, yes, obviously, Chuck is dying, and this is all in his mind. Indeed, he dies, and we travel backwards through time from there: The second act focuses on a near-miraculous day in the life of Chuck, in which he, a distraught passerby, and a drumming busker engage in a crowd-pleasing dancing exhibition; the first on his childhood with his doting grandparents in their darling Victorian home, one with a terrifying mystery in the attic cupola. Keep up with all our coverage of politics and pop culture—join Bulwark+ today: As I said, The Life of Chuck is effective in that it acknowledges early death is intrinsically unfair, and writer-director Mike Flanagan, adapting a Stephen King short story, understands how to milk this for all its worth. We see Chuck full of life, dancing up a storm on a random street corner, the audience cheering along. It's a great set piece: well-staged, perfectly edited. I'm a sucker for a good drum solo, and while I'm not one for dancing, I still appreciate seeing rhythm on the screen. We also see Chuck near death, his child and his wife weeping over him, damning the unfairness of it all. We see Chuck as a child, full of hope for the future. We know how that turns out. Mistiness, achieved. However, rather than serving as a 'life-affirming masterpiece,' as the advertising for The Life of Chuck has promised, the whole charade feels weirdly empty, bereft of greater meaning. And that's because the universe that Chuck has created in his mind—the one where we meet Marty and his ex-wife, who reconcile at their end—has no resonance through the rest of the film, no real connection to his life or what he accomplished or who he loved. A hippy-dippy teacher in Chuck's elementary school informs him that Walt Whitman's 'I am large, I contain multitudes' refers not to the inherent contradictions of life—the different roles we play, the hypocrisies we reconcile internally—but to an actual universe created by the randomly firing neurons in our brain, an entire cosmos of imagined existences that blink out of existence when we breathe our last. The invocation of Whitman—and, later, Carl Sagan's famous cosmic calendar, the one that informs us all of human existence takes place a few ticks before midnight in a universe condensed to a year—suggests an effort to create a sort of secular cosmology, a sense of a universe greater than the self. But the effect is precisely the opposite. It'd be one thing if Chuck's life of the mind represented important moments and people in his actual life, if we learned that the characters we were following were key figures in Chuck's own world, if we discovered that he helped them find something deeper, something more meaningful, if he saved their lives or redirected the stream of their existence. But we . . . don't. They're just kind of random, stray thoughts. A couple of teachers, a funeral director, a little girl he saw skating on a promenade one time. And when he dies, they disappear into nothingness. This simply does not work as a metaphor for a life well lived or a person who matters to the community; it is fundamentally solipsistic, an expression of a nearly unimaginable form of self-centeredness, almost a hope that the world ends when we die, that people cannot go on without us. So yes, The Life of Chuck works, kinda, if what we mean by 'work' is 'it'll make you tear up.' But it's a work of nearly distressing emptiness. Zip this into a friend's inbox or zap it on to social media: Share
San Francisco Chronicle
3 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Why ‘Materialists' director Celine Song thinks love is a marketplace
In Celine Song's latest movie 'Materialists,' a New York City matchmaker navigates the politics of love. 'You're not ugly — you just don't have money,' says Lucy, portrayed by Dakota Johnson, exhaling cigarette smoke into the New York City air from a fire escape. More Information 'Materialists' (R) is in theaters Friday, June 13. Song's debut film, 2023's 'Past Lives,' rocked audiences with its soft yet devastating spotlight on what it's like to love your husband and your childhood sweetheart the way you love adjoining parts of your own soul. But her follow-up feature takes on a whole new love triangle, one plagued by questions of vanity, class and self-worth. Now for the second time in a row, the writer-director delivers on the wounding nuances of modern love. Like Johnson's Lucy, Song worked for a matchmaking agency in New York. Her clientele was more honest with her about what they wanted in a partner than with their own friends and therapists, she said. And their priorities — height, money and a low body mass index — are the ugly truths central to 'Materialists.' The Chronicle met with Song at the Langham hotel in Manhattan the day after the 'Materialists' premiere to discuss love, commodification and where the two meet. The following interview has been edited for length and clarity. Q: A big theme in this movie is value. Where does the idea derive from in your own life? A: If somebody says, 'I really need to date somebody who's above 6 feet tall,' it all comes down to, 'Because that makes me feel valuable — that makes me feel like I am worthy of love from somebody who everybody considers valuable.' It comes down to that: 'I don't want to walk into a party with somebody who is 5-foot-6.' So I think that's why the conversation about value really showed up. I worked as a matchmaker for six months, and I learned so much about how people describe the person they want to be partnered with for the rest of their life. It's amazing, because it's all numbers: height, weight, income. Q: How would you describe the characters' relationship with self-love, self-worth? A: I think that all three of them are struggling with self-worth, which is common in modern life and modern dating. Another part of the problem is this objectification and commodification of the self and of each other. In 'Pride and Prejudice' or in Victorian romance, this marriage market used to happen in salons or garden parties, where people talk about everybody's value: their worth in silver, their property. That kind of marketplace has existed forever. But now, this objectification and commodification has become so accessible and global. (Song gestures to her phone screen.) Q: I recently saw photos of Kris Jenner's new face — not sure if you saw too. I'm curious what you think about the access to plastic surgery and how it bears weight on dating and love. A: It's terrifying. I feel like there is a really insidious language around taking care of yourself or 'self-improvement.' But this language is really about increasing your value in the marketplace. To me, what's really scary is how cheap Botox is getting. And what's insidious is that it's like, well, everybody is doing it. Those are your competitors in the dating market, and they're doing it. So aren't you doing it? Q: Two characters in 'Materialists' have had plastic surgery and struggle with self-worth, but they're also trying to find love. Do you think you have to have self-love before you find a partner, or are you someone who believes 'We can figure this out together'? A: I met my husband when I was 24, so we were too young to really get to this world of value. I don't know if anybody is that secure when you're in your 20s. But what's amazing is that when you ask somebody who loves you why they love you, their answer will never have anything to do with your market value. It's never going to have anything to do with height or weight. It will always be like, 'I just do.' It's just simple. So in that way, I already know that the marketplace is not real. But now you have access to the global dating market on Instagram, so the problem is that now you're going to start evaluating and objectifying yourself in relation to everybody else, which is really common. Q: So much of this movie is about the math of dating and the failure of that math. What do you think ultimately brings people together? A: It's completely mysterious to me why one person feels something for another person. All you can hope for is that you do, and part of that is being open to that person. It's much easier to be cynical, isn't it? But the truth is that it's a very brave thing to say, 'No, I want love. I believe in it. It might be right around the corner.' And the truth is that it might be right around the corner. That's actually true. Q: Both of your movies, 'Materialists' and 'Past Lives,' explore love triangles that can't last, so you set up a portion of your audience for disappointment. Do you like doing that? A: I want it to be a revelation for the audience members themselves. It usually speaks more about who you are as a person watching it than it does about the characters. Many people might walk away from the film being like, 'I would have made that decision differently.' But the truth is, Lucy is not you. You're you. Q: What hope is there for single people? A: Well, there's advice in the film. … When love happens and is offered to you, you just need the bravery to be able to say yes. I think that's the only thing we can hope for.
Newsweek
4 days ago
- Newsweek
Homeowner Rips Up Carpet During Renovation—What She Finds Stuns Viewers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A video of a homeowner making a "jackpot" discovery beneath a carpet during renovation works has gone viral on TikTok. The clip was shared by Seren and Rhys (@our_edwardian_reno) and has garnered 513,000 views since it was posted on June 9. The short clip shows a woman peeling a carpet off the floor to reveal what appears to be Victorian tiles underneath it, according to a hashtag shared in the caption. Each tile features a blue star shape against a white backdrop, overlaid with a patterned centerpiece. "Oh my god," the caption simply says. According to another video, the tiles were found on the day the poster was adding a new doorway to their hallway. The discovery in the viral post comes amid a broader trend of Americans investing in home renovations. According to a recent survey by Houzz, a home design website, the median renovation spending in the U.S. surged by 60 percent between 2020 and 2023, rising from $15,000 to $24,000. Seven out of 10 renovating homeowners were reported to have invested in interior room remodeling in 2023, according to the report. The viral video also comes as the global flooring market was estimated to be valued at $360.7 billion in 2024 and projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 6.8 percent from 2025 to 2030, according to a report by Grandview Research, a market research firm headquartered in San Francisco. "Increasing demand for aesthetic, superior, and durable floor covering solutions and changing consumer trends in floor design have aided the growth of the flooring industry over the past few years," the report said. 'Dream Find' Viewers on TikTok were amazed by the incredible surprise finding beneath the carpet in the viral video. Claud said: "Holy shiz. dream find right there!" and MGW wrote: "Absolute perfection." Landstack noted: "You just hit the jackpot," and Eymer Creates said: "I would lose my life if i discovered that!" Bh_London 🇬🇧 noted: "I'd be beyond happy, just stunning." User samspam29 said: "Omg why would somebody cover that beauty up!" User Caravandays said: "What a find will look fabulous." User O'Neil noted: "ohhh so perfect, so many memories stepped over those tiles xx." Matthew Cobb called it an "amazing find," and silvia said it's an "unexpected it." Annette Whitehead wrote: "That's beautiful lucky you," and @nadine_x_13 said: "I'm so jealous." Newsweek has contacted the original poster for comment via TikTok. This video has not been independently verified. Stock image of a woman removing tape from the edge of a floor during a renovation. Stock image of a woman removing tape from the edge of a floor during a renovation. Getty Do you have a home renovation-related video or story to share? Let us know via life@ and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
