logo
Tennessee victim-serving agencies warn cuts will be ‘catastrophic' if Gov. Bill Lee fails to act

Tennessee victim-serving agencies warn cuts will be ‘catastrophic' if Gov. Bill Lee fails to act

Yahoo03-03-2025

An attendee looks at a series of banners for National Crime Victims' Rights Week Candlelight Vigil on the National Mall on April 24, 2024, in Washington, D.C. The Justice Department's Office for Victims of Crime held the event to pay tribute to victims and survivors of crime and individuals who provide service and support. (Photo by)
As federal funding for crime victims dwindled in recent years, 35 states across the nation took action to keep domestic violence shelters open, sexual assault centers operating and child abuse counselors available to serve the youngest of victims.
Tennessee was not one of these states.
Now a looming budget crisis threatens the future viability of scores of Tennessee nonprofits that operate hotlines, protect seniors from elder abuse and work with prosecutors to secure evidence against perpetrators of human trafficking.
Collectively these organizations serve more than 95,000 victims in Tennessee each year, according to the state's Office of Criminal Justice Programs.
'Many states have dedicated victim service funding in their budgets. Tennessee doesn't,' said Jennifer Escue, executive director of the Tennessee Coalition to End Domestic & Sexual Violence.
'We're really worried that programs across the state might have to close their doors open. We know they would have to drastically reduce their services,' Escue said. Rural organizations that rely most heavily on the federal funding have fewer private-sector resources to tap, and victims who depend on them will suffer the most, she said.
Escue said victims are facing a 'double whammy' in funding losses.
The Victims of Crime Act, or VOCA funding, which relies on the fees and fines collected in federal court, has seen a drastic drop in collections as prosecutors have made a concerted shift to accept more plea deals — a trend that preceded the current Trump Administration.
A short-term infusion of COVID-era funding helped bridge the gap, but those funds have now ended.
In 2018, the federal government distributed more than $67 million to Tennessee's Office of Criminal Justice Programs, which in turn, gave grants to 128 agencies across the state to serve crime victims.
By 2024, that number had dropped to $16 million.
Advocates are expecting to see up to 40% more in cuts come July from the already slashed federal crime victims fund, a steep loss that could spell the closure of small nonprofits in rural areas that rely on the funding for up to 80% of their budgets.
Last fall, victim-serving agency leaders met with Gov. Bill Lee's staff to make their case for $25 million in recurring state funding needed to keep organizations' doors open.
'We received an indication from leadership of the General Assembly and the governor's office that it was being considered,' said Stephen Woerner, executive director of Tennessee Children's Advocacy Centers.
But that hope was short-lived. The governor's budget, unveiled earlier this month, includes no funding for victim organizations.
'We were disappointed,' said Woerner.
Woerner's organization operates 46 centers across the state that employ specialized counselors who work with children who have been abused, neglected or sexually assaulted.
The counselors conduct forensic interviews designed to prevent further trauma while eliciting information used in prosecuting perpetrators. The counseling continues for the victims and non-offending family members after the abuse has ended. The services are provided free of charge.
Ultimately what we're going to see happen is victims of crime don't get the care they need and an increase in cycles of generational crime, and it's going to make law enforcement's jobs much more difficult.
– Rachel Freeman, president and CEO, Sexual Assault Center
The organization received $5.5 million annually from the federal crime victims fund at its peak; this year, it received $2.1 million.
'Child advocacy centers will close their doors if we can't shore this up,' he said. 'If a child advocacy center closes, it means that a child is going to have to drive anywhere between an hour and two hours away. That's step one.'
'It means we have fewer interviews, because families are not able to do that, especially in rural Tennessee. The Department of Children's Services is going to have a harder time (protecting children). And for district attorneys, fewer interviews means fewer prosecutions.'
Woerner's organization has joined more than 120 others in issuing dire warnings to Lee and members of the General Assembly that saud without an infusion of $25 million in state funding, 'the consequences will be catastrophic.'
'Our shelters, crisis hotlines, and outreach programs are often the only lifelines available. Without stable funding, we face service cuts and closures,' read a letter to lawmakers from the Tennessee Victim Service Providers Alliance, an umbrella group of victim serving organizations hastily formed to advocate for state funding.
The letter noted that many of the services they provide, including sexual assault exams and forensic interviews of children suspected of being abused, were mandated by the General Assembly but included no state funding to carry them out.
Lee this week declined to say whether he will reconsider including funding for victim services in a supplemental budget to be introduced this spring.
'The Tennessee Victim Service Providers Alliance represents key organizations that serve Tennesseans well, and we appreciate their partnership,' a statement from Lee's office said. 'Gov. Lee continues to work with the General Assembly on budget priorities, and the administration's budget amendment will be finalized in the coming months.'
!function(){'use strict';window.addEventListener('message',(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data['datawrapper-height']){var e=document.querySelectorAll('iframe');for(var t in a.data['datawrapper-height'])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();
Rachel Freeman, president and CEO of the Sexual Assault Center in Nashville said her organization is better positioned to raise private sector funds than smaller nonprofits in rural areas lacking resources to make up for funding cuts.
Nevertheless, she said, the ongoing cuts have proved challenging.
About half of the nonprofit organization's $5 million budget comes from the federal VOCA funding. Freeman is preparing for cuts of between 10% and 40% this year.
Without state dollars, the funding loss will be 'disastrous for our state,' she said.
'Ultimately what we're going to see happen is victims of crime don't get the care they need and an increase in cycles of generational crime, and it's going to make law enforcement's jobs much more difficult,' she said. 'That's a vicious cycle that's going to be more disastrous for our state.'
The federal funding cuts will also be felt in local government, police departments and district attorney's offices that provide victim counseling and advocacy.
The Metro Nashville Office of Family Safety lost two of its 12 counselor positions last year as federal funds contracted and expects to lose two more if no state funding is provided, said Diane Lance, director.
The Nashville governmental agency helps victims of interpersonal violence obtain orders of protection, create safety plans for themselves and their children and provides crisis counseling.
'These therapies are for 'I have been raped,' 'my mother was shot and killed by my dad.' We're trying to get them through the immediate emergency,' Lance said.
Without state funding, 'they're not going to get the help they need. Already with domestic violence shelters, 40 percent of the time they can't take you in. And now there's so many funding cuts you won't have a crisis advocate. So good luck trying to stay safe for you and your children.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Dakota is on track to spend $2 billion on prisons in the next decade
South Dakota is on track to spend $2 billion on prisons in the next decade

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

South Dakota is on track to spend $2 billion on prisons in the next decade

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — Two years after approving a tough-on-crime sentencing law, South Dakota is scrambling to deal with the price tag for that legislation: Housing thousands of additional inmates could require up to $2 billion to build new prisons in the next decade. That's a lot of money for a state with one of the lowest populations in the U.S., but a consultant said it's needed to keep pace with an anticipated 34% surge of new inmates in the next decade as a result of South Dakota's tough criminal justice laws. And while officials are grumbling about the cost, they don't seem concerned with the laws that are driving the need even as national crime rates are dropping. 'Crime has been falling everywhere in the country, with historic drops in crime in the last year or two,' said Bob Libal, senior campaign strategist at the criminal justice nonprofit the Sentencing Project. 'It's a particularly unusual time to be investing $2 billion in prisons.' Some Democratic-led states have worked to close prisons and enact changes to lower inmate populations, but that's a tough sell in Republican-majority states such as South Dakota that believe in a tough-on-crime approach, even if that leads to more inmates. For now, state lawmakers have set aside a $600-million fund to replace the overcrowded 144-year-old South Dakota State Penitentiary in Sioux Falls, making it one of the most expensive taxpayer-funded projects in South Dakota history. But South Dakota will likely need more prisons. Phoenix-based Arrington Watkins Architects, which the state hired as a consultant, has said South Dakota will need 3,300 additional beds in coming years, bringing the cost to $2 billion. Driving up costs is the need for facilities with different security levels to accommodate the inmate population. Concerns about South Dakota's prisons first arose four years ago, when the state was flush with COVID-19 relief funds. Lawmakers wanted to replace the penitentiary, but they couldn't agree on where to put the prison and how big it should be. A task force of state lawmakers assembled by Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden is expected to decide that in a plan for prison facilities this July. Many lawmakers have questioned the proposed cost, but few have called for criminal justice changes that would make such a large prison unnecessary. 'One thing I'm trying to do as the chairman of this task force is keep us very focused on our mission,' said Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen. 'There are people who want to talk about policies in the prisons or the administration or the criminal justice system more broadly, and that would be a much larger project than the fairly narrow scope that we have.' South Dakota's incarceration rate of 370 per 100,000 people is an outlier in the Upper Midwest. Neighbors Minnesota and North Dakota have rates of under 250 per 100,000 people, according to the Sentencing Project, a criminal justice advocacy nonprofit. Nearly half of South Dakota's projected inmate population growth can be attributed to a law approved in 2023 that requires some violent offenders to serve the full-length of their sentences before parole, according to a report by Arrington Watkins. When South Dakota inmates are paroled, about 40% are ordered to return to prison, the majority of those due to technical violations such as failing a drug test or missing a meeting with a parole officer. Those returning inmates made up nearly half of prison admissions in 2024. Sioux Falls criminal justice attorney Ryan Kolbeck blamed the high number of parolees returning in part on the lack of services in prison for people with drug addictions. 'People are being sent to the penitentiary but there's no programs there for them. There's no way it's going to help them become better people,' he said. 'Essentially we're going to put them out there and house them for a little bit, leave them on parole and expect them to do well.' South Dakota also has the second-greatest disparity of Native Americans in its prisons. While Native Americans make up one-tenth of South Dakota's population, they make up 35% of those in state prisons, according to Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit public policy group. Though legislators in the state capital, Pierre, have been talking about prison overcrowding for years, they're reluctant to dial back on tough-on-crime laws. For example, it took repeated efforts over six years before South Dakota reduced a controlled substance ingestion law to a misdemeanor from a felony for the first offense, aligning with all other states. 'It was a huge, Herculean task to get ingestion to be a misdemeanor,' Kolbeck said. Former penitentiary warden Darin Young said the state needs to upgrade its prisons, but he also thinks it should spend up to $300 million on addiction and mental illness treatment. 'Until we fix the reasons why people come to prison and address that issue, the numbers are not going to stop,' he said. Without policy changes, the new prisons are sure to fill up, criminal justice experts agreed. 'We might be good for a few years, now that we've got more capacity, but in a couple years it'll be full again,' Kolbeck said. 'Under our policies, you're going to reach capacity again soon.' Raza writes for the Associated Press.

Ukraine the indomitable
Ukraine the indomitable

Boston Globe

time7 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Ukraine the indomitable

This was not just another maneuver in a long and grueling war. It was a masterstroke of ingenuity, courage, and asymmetrical warfare — and it should erase any remaining doubt about three critical truths. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up First , Ukraine's tenacity is not merely impressive. It is inspirational. From the earliest days of the full-scale Russian invasion, when Kyiv refused to fall and 'Victory,' Advertisement Second , no army on earth today is more experienced in fighting a modern war against a nuclear-armed dictatorship than Ukraine's. After years of trial by fire, its military is arguably the most battle-hardened and tactically innovative in the Western sphere. The Ukrainian armed forces have combined Cold War-era equipment with When Russian invaders Third , it is long past time for Ukraine to be admitted to NATO. Yes, even while the war is ongoing. Especially while the war is ongoing. In the more than three decades since the Cold War ended, no country has shown more loyalty to the West, or more bravery in its defense, than Ukraine. NATO membership wasn't designed to be a reward for good behavior; it is a security pact for mutual protection. Who better to bolster that pact than the Ukrainians, who have been fighting and dying on the front lines of freedom for more than three years, yet have not asked any other nation to risk the life of a single soldier in Ukraine's defense? On the contrary: So advanced is Ukraine's frontline expertise in resisting Russia that its army is now being enlisted by NATO members to instruct their troops. It was announced in April, for example, that teams of Danish soldiers are to be sent to Ukraine for training in drone combat techniques. Advertisement President Trump has treated Ukraine with shocking callousness and Trump has In the weeks since then, as National Review's Jim Geraghty Advertisement Analysts have been But Ukraine has already achieved far greater success in the face of overwhelming odds than anyone believed possible. Again and again it has not just survived to fight another day but has discovered new ways to shift the military balance against a deceitful, murderous enemy. Each time Ukraine beats the odds, it is the entire free world that stands taller. After Operation Spiderweb, it should be clearer than ever that there is no legitimate justification to withhold from Ukraine all the tools and diplomatic support we can provide. Because there is no future in which America and the West are better off if Ukraine loses. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at

Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed
Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

Los Angeles Times

time7 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

FERRIDAY, La. — Even at a glance, the differences are obvious. The walls of Ferriday High School are old and worn, surrounded by barbed wire. Just a few miles away, Vidalia High School is clean and bright, with a new library and a crisp blue 'V' painted on orange brick. Ferriday High is 90% Black. Vidalia High is 62% white. For Black families, the contrast between the schools suggests 'we're not supposed to have the finer things,' said Brian Davis, a father in Ferriday. 'It's almost like our kids don't deserve it,' he said. The schools are part of Concordia Parish, which was ordered to desegregate 60 years ago and remains under a court-ordered plan to this day. Yet there's growing momentum to release the district — and dozens of others — from decades-old orders that some call obsolete. In a remarkable reversal, the Justice Department said it plans to start unwinding court-ordered desegregation plans dating to the Civil Rights Movement. Officials started in April, when they lifted a 1960s order in Louisiana's Plaquemines Parish. Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the department's civil rights division, has said others will 'bite the dust.' It comes amid pressure from Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and his attorney general, who have called for all the state's remaining orders to be lifted. They describe the orders as burdens on districts and relics of a time when Black students were still forbidden from some schools. The orders were always meant to be temporary — school systems can be released if they demonstrate they fully eradicated segregation. Decades later, that goal remains elusive, with stark racial imbalances persisting in many districts. Civil rights groups say the orders are important to keep as tools to address the legacy of forced segregation — including disparities in student discipline, academic programs and teacher hiring. They point to cases like Concordia, where the decades-old order was used to stop a charter school from favoring white students in admissions. 'Concordia is one where it's old, but a lot is happening there,' said Deuel Ross, deputy director of litigation for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. 'That's true for a lot of these cases. They're not just sitting silently.' Last year, before President Trump took office, Concordia Parish rejected a Justice Department plan that would have ended its case if the district combined several majority white and majority Black elementary and middle schools. At a town hall meeting, Vidalia residents vigorously opposed the plan, saying it would disrupt students' lives and expose their children to drugs and violence. An official from the Louisiana attorney general's office spoke against the proposal and said the Trump administration likely would change course on older orders. Accepting the plan would have been a 'death sentence' for the district, said Paul Nelson, a former Concordia superintendent. White families would have fled to private schools or other districts, said Nelson, who wants the court order removed. 'It's time to move on,' said Nelson, who left the district in 2016. 'Let's start looking to build for the future, not looking back to what our grandparents may have gone through.' At Ferriday High, athletic coach Derrick Davis supported combining schools in Ferriday and Vidalia. He said the district's disparities come into focus whenever his teams visit schools with newer sports facilities. 'It seems to me, if we'd all combine, we can all get what we need,' he said. Others oppose merging schools if it's done solely for the sake of achieving racial balance. 'Redistricting and going to different places they're not used to ... it would be a culture shock to some people,' said Ferriday's school resource officer, Marcus Martin, who, like Derrick Davis, is Black. The district's current superintendent and school board did not respond to requests for comment. Concordia is among more than 120 districts across the South that remain under desegregation orders from the 1960s and '70s, including about a dozen in Louisiana. Calling the orders historical relics is 'unequivocally false,' said Shaheena Simons, who until April led the Justice Department section that oversees school desegregation cases. 'Segregation and inequality persist in our schools, and they persist in districts that are still under desegregation orders,' she said. With court orders in place, families facing discrimination can reach out directly to the Justice Department or seek relief from the court. Otherwise, the only recourse is a lawsuit, which many families can't afford, Simons said. In Concordia, the order played into a battle over a charter school that opened in 2013 on the former campus of an all-white private school. To protect the area's progress on racial integration, a judge ordered Delta Charter School to build a student body that reflected the district's racial demographics. But in its first year, the school was just 15% Black. After a court challenge, Delta was ordered to give priority to Black students. Today, about 40% of its students are Black. Desegregation orders have been invoked recently in other cases around the state. One led to an order to address disproportionately high rates of discipline for Black students, and in another a predominantly Black elementary school was relocated from a site close to a chemical plant. The Trump administration was able to close the Plaquemines case with little resistance because the original plaintiffs were no longer involved — the Justice Department was litigating the case alone. Concordia and an unknown number of other districts are in the same situation, making them vulnerable to quick dismissals. Concordia's case dates to 1965, when the area was strictly segregated and home to a violent offshoot of the Ku Klux Klan. When Black families in Ferriday sued for access to all-white schools, the federal government intervened. As the district integrated its schools, white families fled Ferriday. The district's schools came to reflect the demographics of their surrounding areas. Ferriday is mostly Black and low-income, while Vidalia is mostly white and takes in tax revenue from a hydroelectric plant. A third town in the district, Monterey, has a high school that's 95% white. At the December town hall, Vidalia resident Ronnie Blackwell said the area 'feels like a Mayberry, which is great,' referring to the fictional Southern town from 'The Andy Griffith Show.' The federal government, he said, has 'probably destroyed more communities and school systems than it ever helped.' Under its court order, Concordia must allow students in majority Black schools to transfer to majority white schools. It also files reports on teacher demographics and student discipline. After failing to negotiate a resolution with the Justice Department, Concordia is scheduled to make its case that the judge should dismiss the order, according to court documents. Meanwhile, amid a wave of resignations in the federal government, all but two of the Justice Department lawyers assigned to the case have left. Without court supervision, Brian Davis sees little hope for improvement. 'A lot of parents over here in Ferriday, they're stuck here because here they don't have the resources to move their kids from A to B,' he said. 'You'll find schools like Ferriday — the term is, to me, slipping into darkness.' Binkley and Lurye write for the Associated Press. T

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store