logo
The invisible threat that risks devastating air travel

The invisible threat that risks devastating air travel

Yahoo5 hours ago

The escalating conflict in the Middle East poses an unseen but potentially deadly threat to planes crossing the region's airspace.
Electronic warfare technology used by Iran, Israel and other players in the region is increasingly drowning out the satellite signals modern jets use to determine their positions.
In turn, the risk of aircraft colliding or being shot down as they lose their GPS connections and stray off course has become heightened, aviation safety experts warn.
Airlines are faced with a choice of trusting pilots to fly through affected areas or making costly diversions that could add a thousand miles and two hours to each flight.
Tragedy has so far been largely averted, though the crash of an Azerbaijan Airlines plane in Kazakhstan has been linked to jamming.
However, Benoit Figuet, co-founder of SkAI, which maps GPS jamming, warns the increasing prevalence of the technique is presenting fresh challenges for airlines.
'The aim of jamming is to stop the missile reaching its target, but civil aircraft use the same GPS system to navigate,' he says. 'Pilots are very concerned about the increasing risk.'
Instances of disruption to navigational systems have surged since Benjamin Netanyahu's government launched its attacks on Iran 10 days ago.
FlightRadar24 reported a 'dramatic increase' in interference since the US attacked Iran's underground facilities over the weekend, while SkAI said that more than 160 flights were impacted in the Persian Gulf area on June 21 alone, together with close to 90 in the skies around Israel.
Civil aircraft can be sent off course in two distinct ways.
Jamming at its most basic involves broadcasting a signal strong enough to drown out the weaker signatures of satellites. Since this deprives the receiver of data, the flight's pilots would generally become quickly aware of the situation.
GPS spoofing is a more modern technique and involves indicating a false position for the missile or plane, leading the former to miss its target but sending the latter off course.
In a recent survey of 2,000 flight crew by Ops Group, an organisation for pilots, air traffic controllers and flight dispatchers, 70pc rated their level of concern about spoofing's impact on flight safety as very high or extreme.
Their biggest worries were going off course, being unable to use GPS-based landing aids, being unable to restore GPS and having to fly across the ocean without it, and receiving false ground proximity warnings, which could result in an emergency ascent and a collision.
While the 'hot war' in the Middle East presents a clear threat to overflying aircraft, with the danger of a passenger plane being accidentally or deliberately targeted, the risk from the invisible conflict is likely to linger long after military exchanges cease.
With Russia erecting electronic warfare systems along the length of its western border since the invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago, jamming is active along a 3,500-mile arc stretching from the Arctic Ocean to Oman.
Although narrow gaps of still-open airspace have allowed airlines to carry on flying from Europe and eastern US to the Middle East, Asia and and Australia, while avoiding conflict zones, those areas have not been immune to jamming.
Incidents of interference with satellite signals have been commonplace over Iraq, which provided the most popular route for flights between Europe and the Gulf until it too became a no-fly zone when Israel began its barrage against Iran on June 13.
Though aircraft are continuing to fly over Turkey, the Caucasus and across central Asia to reach the Far East, SkAI's map shows that those flights are potentially exposed to intense Russian jamming activity in the southern Black Sea.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash last December involved suspected Russian jamming aimed at countering drone attacks. Having lost GPS contact, the plane was hit by shrapnel from a missile and diverted to Kazakhstan, where it came down, killing 38 of the 67 people on board.
Airlines bound for the Gulf and India had been flying a much more southerly route since the start of the Israeli offensive, with flights from Europe heading south over the Mediterranean and into Egypt before turning east over Saudi Arabia, giving the war zone a wide berth.
Despite that, numerous airlines abandoned services to the Gulf on Sunday following the US bombardment, with British Airways suspending flights to both Dubai and Doha, in Qatar, having already put Bahrain and Amman, in Jordan, on hold.
British Airways cancelled Qatar-bound services again Monday following Tehran's attack on a US base there, but said two overnight trips to Dubai, the world's busiest international airport, would go ahead following an assessment of the security situation.
Virgin Atlantic's winter-only flights to Dubai do not resume until October, while services to Riyadh, in Saudi Arabia, are continuing as normal. India flights have been diverted away from the Gulf and Iraq.
The International Air Transport Association (Iata), which represents 350 airlines, highlighted the threat from jamming and spoofing at its annual meeting earlier this month, saying that instances of GPS signal loss had increased threefold between 2021 and 2024.
Nick Careen, Iata's safety chief, said the typical response to spoofing right now is to reboot the system so that the plane can re-acquire its correct coordinates, though this is not possible with all models of aircraft.
He also urged governments to stop airports and air traffic controllers removing ground-based navigational aids that could help guide planes in the event of satellite guidance being lost.
He said: 'It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where we're heading. To stay ahead of the threat, aviation must act together and without delay.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump bombs Iranian nuclear facilities in major escalation. What happens next?
Trump bombs Iranian nuclear facilities in major escalation. What happens next?

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump bombs Iranian nuclear facilities in major escalation. What happens next?

President Donald Trump has claimed to have 'completely, totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear program in a series of missile strikes and bombings, marking explicit U.S. intervention into Israel's war that risks a wider international crisis. The true extent of the damage is unclear. Retaliatory strikes are expected, as are efforts to revive already-fractured negotiations and diplomatic efforts to lower temperatures. But the United States is now embroiled in a war between two well-armed nations that could spill out far beyond their borders with untold casualties, experts have warned. 'Remember, there are many targets left,' Trump said in a brief address to the nation on June 21, roughly two hours after announcing a 'very successful' series of strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.' The world is watching to see what will happen, as experts and analysts consider how current conditions, history and a volatile political environment could inform what's next. A 'dangerous escalation' Trump had campaigned on a promise to end all wars, including Israel's war in Gaza and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, yet the president has so far failed to negotiate an end to either. Israel sought American military support for its campaign against Iran after receiving virtual permission for its devastating war in Gaza in the wake of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks — 'undermining Trump's claim to be a peacemaker and his assertion that wars would never have started under his leadership,' according to Brookings Institution senior fellow Sharan Grewal at the Center for Middle East Policy. He now risks exploding a wider crisis across the Middle East that could endanger U.S. installations abroad and embolden Iran's allies to retaliate, following a legacy of U.S. intervention and destabilization in the Middle East dovetailing with U.S. support for Israel's ongoing devastation in Gaza and in occupied territories. United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres said late Saturday that he was 'gravely alarmed' by Trump's decision to bomb Iran, calling it 'a dangerous escalation' and 'a direct threat to international peace and security.' 'There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control — with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world,' he said. Iran could also retaliate by blocking the strategically important Strait of Hormuz or attacking the energy infrastructure of the Arab Gulf — dramatically driving up global oil prices. Within hours after Saturday's attacks, roughly 50 oil tankers were seen scrambling to leave the Strait of Hormuz. Iran-backed Houthis have warned that Trump 'must bear the consequences,' Houthi political bureau member Hizam al-Assad posted on X. The Houthi-controlled Yemeni Armed Forces also said the group was prepared to target U.S. Navy warships in the Red Sea 'in the event that the American enemy launches an aggression in support' of Israel. Houthi rebels had previously attacked ships linked to Israel's war in Gaza, and the United States retaliated with a series of airstrikes in Yemen earlier this year. Hardening Iran's resolve — or doing enough damage to force negotiations? Saturday's attack marks an 'unprecedented event that may prove to be transformational for Iran, the Middle East, U.S. foreign policy, global non-proliferation, and potentially even the global order,' according to Karim Sadjadpour, an Iranian-American policy analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.' 'Its impact will be measured for decades to come,' he wrote. 'It could entrench the regime — or hasten its demise. It could prevent a nuclear Iran — or accelerate one. ' Iranian officials have stressed for years that its nuclear programs are for civilian and peaceful purposes only, but Israel has claimed that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, a claim central to the long and now accelerating conflict between the two nations. Following Saturday's bombings, Iran's atomic agency vowed 'never' to stop its nuclear program, according to Iranian media. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said the three targeted nuclear sites came under 'savage assault,' seen as 'blatant violation of international law, particularly the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.' The agency also accused the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog of 'complicity' in the effort as it urged the international community to condemn the strikes and 'never allow the progress of this national industry … to be halted.' Aerial bombardment alone would not be enough to conclusively stop any nuclear ambitions because 'neither Israel nor the U.S. can kill all the nuclear scientists,' former U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker told Politico. Targeted strikes that significantly damage operations could convince Iran to negotiate, according to former U.S. special envoy Dennis Ross. But a wider assault — fueled by demands from Israeli officials and Iran hawks in the United States — could be seen by Iran as seeing that 'they have little to lose and their best bet is to show they can make us pay a heavy price,' he told Politico. When Israel struck nuclear programs in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007, 'the long-term results were diametrically different,' according to Mara Karlin, former assistant secretary of defense for strategy, plans, and capabilities under Joe Biden. 'Tehran could conceivably choose either path,' she said. 'And, as long as the uranium enrichment complex at Fordow remains largely intact, it does not need to decide.' Blowback in Washington — and across America Trump's attacks risk deepening a growing divide between his allies and anti-interventionist Republicans now tenuously aligned with a wider anti-war movement and the majority of Americans who do not want the United States involved with Israel's campaign at all. Several members of Congress have questioned whether the president's actions are even legal, amounting to an unconstitutional attempt to escape congressional authorization. At least two congressional Republicans — Rep. Warren Davidson and Thomas Massie — joined Democrats to immediately condemn the bombings as unconstitutional. 'The only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress,' Sen. Bernie Sanders said in remarks in Oklahoma as the crowd learned about the bombings in real time. 'The president does not have the right.' 'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers,' said Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. 'He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations.' The New York congresswoman said the attack is 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' Top Democrats on congressional intelligence committees were also not briefed in advance of the attacks. 'The American public is overwhelmingly opposed to the U.S. waging war on Iran,' said Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, who has urged Congress to pass legislation that would require Trump to go to Congress before attacking Iran. He noted that Israeli officials said its bombs have already set Iran's nuclear capability back by two to three years. 'So what made Trump recklessly decide to rush and bomb today?' he said. 'Horrible judgment. I will push for all Senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war.' While Trump touts what he claims are unequivocal military successes, he has also spent his first few months in office developing plans to crush dissent domestically. The deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles to respond to protests against his anti-immigration agenda could be seen as a 'dress rehearsal' for far more expansive emergency powers to impose federal control of America's cities, according to The Atlantic's David Frum. More demonstrations against further military action in Iran are expected, adding to a steady rhythm of protests and unrest against the Trump administration that exploded across American streets in recent weeks.

Four Signs Iran and Israel Could Soon Return to War
Four Signs Iran and Israel Could Soon Return to War

Newsweek

time37 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Four Signs Iran and Israel Could Soon Return to War

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A ceasefire brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump this week has put on hold Israel and Iran's fiercest confrontation, but the truce is already showing cracks. Two weeks ago, Israel launched strikes targeting Iran's nuclear and military sites, killing key scientists and generals. Iran responded with long-range missile attacks on Israeli cities. Eventually, the United States struck Iranian nuclear sites too before the ceasefire was agreed. Why It Matters The Iran-Israel conflict shapes the security landscape of the entire Middle East, with the potential to ignite a broader regional war and draw in global powers. A new conflict could disrupt vital energy supplies passing through the Persian Gulf, further destabilize neighboring countries such as Lebanon and Syria, and bring the United States and its allies into a deeper military role. Fire and smoke rise into the sky after an Israeli attack on the Shahran oil depot on June 15, 2025 in Tehran, Iran. Iran's foreign minister said the country would respond decisively and proportionally to... Fire and smoke rise into the sky after an Israeli attack on the Shahran oil depot on June 15, 2025 in Tehran, Iran. Iran's foreign minister said the country would respond decisively and proportionally to a wave of attacks that Israel launched beginning in the early hours of June 13. The attacks targeted multiple military, scientific and residential locations, as well as senior government officials. More Getty Images Here are four signs that Iran and Israel could soon return to war: 1. Iran's Nuclear Infrastructure Israeli airstrikes and American bunker-busting raids targeted Iran's enrichment sites, but despite the damage, a U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency assessment states the attacks only delayed Iran's nuclear progress by months—not destroyed it—as underground centrifuges and key infrastructure remain operational. Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recently reported that Iran has further limited inspector access and increased uranium stockpiles beyond agreed limits, raising international alarms. For Israel, the ongoing nuclear threat—and Iran's reduced cooperation with the IAEA—could require further strikes, making another round of conflict highly likely if enrichment accelerates. 2. Ceasefire Under Strain Both sides accused each other of violating the truce. Israel launched retaliatory airstrikes on Iranian missile facilities, sparking Trump's frustration and calls for restraint. Iran's missile strike on a Beersheba apartment building at around the time of the ceasefire killed at least four civilians. Iran said its missiles had been fired before the ceasefire began. Meanwhile, several drones were detected and shot down over northern Iran by air defenses, according to state media. 3. Escalating Covert Operations Iran says it has arrested over 700 individuals accused of working with Israeli intelligence, dismantling what authorities describe as a major Mossad-linked espionage network. The arrests follow a surge in covert attacks blamed on Israel, including drone strikes, car bombs, and high-profile assassinations of Iranian military and nuclear personnel. Tehran has already executed several alleged spies and vowed harsh retaliation. The scale and intensity of these operations have increased tensions. Emergency responders work at a building where four people were killed by an Iranian missile strike on June 24, 2025 in Beersheba, Israel. According to Israeli authorities, Iran launched a barrage of missiles in the... Emergency responders work at a building where four people were killed by an Iranian missile strike on June 24, 2025 in Beersheba, Israel. According to Israeli authorities, Iran launched a barrage of missiles in the early hours this morning, before the start of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between the two countries. The Iranian foreign minister said that, if Israel stopped its attacks as of this morning, Iran would also end its strikes More4. Rhetoric Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the recent military campaign as a "historic victory" and warned, "If someone in Iran tries to restore [the nuclear] program, we will act with the same determination, the same power." His message underscored Israel's readiness to strike again. In turn, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian declared the outcome a "great victory" and said Iran would "continue to stand firm against Zionist aggression." This entrenched rhetoric on both sides leaves little room for de-escalation and heightens the risk of renewed conflict. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, center, gets into his car after attending a protest following the U.S. attacks on nuclear sites in Iran, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 22, 2025. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, center, gets into his car after attending a protest following the U.S. attacks on nuclear sites in Iran, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 22, 2025. Vahid Salemi/AP Photo What Happens Next The ceasefire may offer only a temporary respite. With Iran saying its nuclear program is still intact, potential covert Israeli operations inside Iran, and hardline leaders on both sides, the risk of renewed war remains high. Unless the U.S. can broker enforceable agreements addressing nuclear limits and de-escalate hostile actions, this fragile peace could soon unravel.

Did Donald Trump just become the most powerful president in modern history?
Did Donald Trump just become the most powerful president in modern history?

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Did Donald Trump just become the most powerful president in modern history?

Donald Trump made it clear over the weekend: he wants to be the most powerful president in modern history. He may already be. Saturday evening's announcement of U.S. strikes on three Iranian targets tied to the country's nuclear program triggered angry statements from Democrats who accused the president of drawing the country into another Middle East war with potentially no end in sight. Now directly involved, U.S. participation in the Iran-Israel conflict quickly became an opportunity for Trump to both push the boundaries of the Executive Branch's power and continue a trend he began in January: the centralization of the Executive Branch's policy and power within the Oval Office. Driving that effort is the president's willingness to contradict his own deputies and top advisors, sometimes within just hours of their own public assessments. On Iran, Trump accelerated this dynamic to the point where the buildup to three American strikes against Iranian targets Saturday resembled a cartoonish version of the Bush administration's justification of war with Iraq in 2002. But where Republican officials with George W. Bush's administration presented what they claimed at the time was evidence of Iraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction an analysis that largely proved to be false — Trump used the the opposite tactic: the public denial of his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, that Iran was working on nuclear weapons. 'My intelligence community is wrong," Trump told reporters in a gaggle on Friday, asked about Gabbard's previous public assessment. "Who in the intelligence community said that?" "Your director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard," a reporter replied. "She's wrong," Trump repeated. That echoed comments he made earlier in the week, on his way back from a G7 summit in Canada. "I don't care what she said," the president told reporters aboard Air Force One. "I think they were very close to having one." His belief versus the DNI's intel. Guess which won. The latest example of that dynamic occurred on Sunday, when Vice President J.D. Vance assured Kristen Welker of NBC's Meet the Press in a sit-down interview presumably planned out by the White House in the wake of Saturday's attacks that the U.S. was not seeking 'regime change' in Iran. 'Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change. We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out. We want to end their nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here,' said Vance. That rationale seemed to broadly justify the forceful-but-limited action taken against specific targets in Iran Saturday night while aiming to appease the MAGA isolationists wary of a deeper U.S. involvement that regime change almost always necessitates. But within hours, Trump wholly undermined his running mate in a Truth Social posting: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' It's hard to believe Trump's statement wasn't an intentional snub. But intent aside, the message is the same: only the president's whims and gut instinct matters now, and in the case of both Iran and his tariff agenda (another power snatched from the Legislative Branch), Trump has shown that he can change his mind on a dime. As Tuesday dawned on Washington, there were still no signs of any Republicans joining the lonely Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) on his bipartisan resolution aimed at reining in the president's war powers. Overnight, an uneasy ceasefire between Iran and Israel was rammed into place by the U.S. president, who by late Tuesday morning was already haranguing both sides over violations. Shaky as it may be, it likely will kill any momentum the resolution (and a concurrent measure in the Senate) had. Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress is the only body with the power to declare war, but presidents typically get around that by using their executive authority and by asking Congress to authorize the use of military force after the fact. By Tuesday afternoon 128 Democrats had joined all House Republicans to roundly defeat a push by progressives — introduced by constant Trump combatant Rep. Al Green and championed by his regular punching bag Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — to have Trump impeached over his actions against Iran without congressional consent. Massie, meanwhile, is the latest example of Trump's eagerness to make an example of any GOP official who dares counter him. The president over the weekend announced the creation of a political action committee aimed at trashing the congressman in his home state of Kentucky. The message that Trump is sending to elected members of his party is clear: stay in line, or you'll be next. On Monday, MAGA Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (who maintains a shaky but generally positive relationship with Trump) released her own lengthy statement condemning the possibility of U.S.-backed regime change efforts in Iran, which would likely involve full-scale war. 'It feels like a complete bait and switch to please the neocons, warmongers, military industrial complex contracts, and neocon tv personalities that MAGA hates and who were NEVER TRUMPERS!' the Georgia Republican unleashed in a Twitter rant. 'Trump is not a king, MAGA is not a cult, and I can and DO have my own opinion,' Greene proclaimed. Democrats and even some supporters of the Iraq War found themselves cautioning against or outright condemning the idea of America sustaining the kind of military footprint it did throughout the 2000s and 2010s. 'President Trump must provide the American people and Congress clear answers on the actions taken tonight and their implications for the safety of Americans. No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. At The Bulwark, the center-right publication helmed by former Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol, podcaster and author J.V. Last wrote this week that American supporters of regime change were ignoring an uncomfortable truth about the fall of the Iranian government; namely, that it would require sustained U.S. intervention to ensure that a similarly beligerent state did not come to power in the resulting vacuum. 'H]ere's a hard truth: If Iran was teetering on the brink of failure, then somebody from the outside would have to go in and secure a bunch of stuff to make sure it doesn't fall into the hands of rogue, non-state actors,' Last wrote on Monday. 'And that somebody would almost certainly have to be the United States.' The view is shared by the farthest-right members of the House, who are coincidentally also the strongest critics of foreign military engagement. But despite Greene and numerous other allies of the president coming out against war ahead of Saturday's conflict, there's almost zero chance that this issue will create a real divide among Republicans in Congress, who are near-unanimously opposed to any defiance of the president. Greene herself lacks clout in this department, as evidenced by her and Massie's failed bid to unseat House Speaker Mike Johnson last year. As the president asserts his will over a meek Republican Congress, the president is taking other steps to shift policy decisions typically made at the agency or Cabinet level to his desk. And that's been bolstered by the efforts of DOGE, which leashed many federal agencies to the White House as it sought to make wide-ranging cuts and personnel reductions at a slew of federal offices. Those moves left them with no leadership able or willing to counter the White House on any given matter. But Trump himself has also driven this centralization with that clear willingness to publicly contradict his closest advisors and deputies, sometimes within a matter of hours — making it clear that there's one voice that matters in the end. What truly sets the president apart from his predecessors is not a willingness to grab power from Congress, which many presidents have done dating back decades, or even his frequent humiliation of his closest allies. Trump's truly unique characteristic — even setting his second presidency apart from his first term — is the fervor with which his White House has challenged both the Judicial Branch and state leaders around the country. For months, the Justice Department and DHS fought with courts who ordered the U.S. facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an El Salvadoran man illegally deported back to his home country in violation of a judge's order. The two branches deadlocked over whether judges were allowed to affect what the Trump administration insisted was a matter of foreign policy for weeks. Abrego Garcia is now back in the U.S., but Homeland Security officials indicated Monday that they are still determined to deport him — which could still happen if another country besides El Salvador accepts him. The president's show of force in California, against the wishes of the governor and mayor of Los Angeles, is his administration's first (but likely not final) push into seizing authority from state-level officials. There's no question that this is a matter of policy, not merely a response to factors on the ground in L.A.; Rolling Stone reports that Trump was looking for opportunities to 'send in the troops' just days and weeks after taking office. With Abrego Garcia's return, the administration has backed off of its direct confrontation with one branch of government — for now. The second is unlikely to push back in any meaningful way until Democrats retake one or both chambers of Congress, which could happen in 2027, though it's uncertain. For Trump, the question is no longer whether his administration is willing to cross lines; it's how far they're willing to push them. And how much will the Democrats claw back, if and when they ever get the chance?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store