logo
The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains

The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains

Recently. I've been pondering another big question, namely what can you buy for £144 million?
A couple of decent midfielders for an English Premier League team would be one and I suppose you could conceivably get quite a large swathe of Perthshire too and still have a bit of change left over.
However, it transpires that what you cannot guarantee with that sort of money is a better rail service.
This week will see the re-opening of the line between Glasgow and East Kilbride reopen after being shut for since January.
The electrification of the line is part of the Scottish Government's plans to decarbonise Scotland's rail passenger services by 2035.
Since January, the route has been transformed with full electrification of the route, new stations at Hairmyres and East Kilbride.
The work has also improved access at Giffnock, with a new accessible footbridge and a new station entrance at Clarkston.
The existing track has also been lowered near Busby, Clarkston and Giffnock stations so that overhead line equipment can be accommodated under some bridges.
As a result of work on the track there have been no trains on the line since January 25.
So this week, commuters, and there are a considerable number along the route, could realistically expect to see an increased service.
Alan Simpson: Giving CalMac contract is right - now give them better ships
Alan Simpson: Forcing landowners to sell to locals is not the best solution
Alan Simpson: Any port in a storm as ministers look to buy Ardrossan
One of the promises made at the start of the work was that a double track would allow services to be increased from two every hour to four.
In the evenings, after 7pm, the service is reduced to just one an hour which is unacceptable for a line that serves one of Scotland's largest towns with a population of around 75,000.
It also passes through the densely populated suburbs of Glasgow on the way so the service was not really fit for purpose given the numbers of potential passengers.
So, I'm sure there would be an air of anticipation from regulars who have been forced to get the bus since January when the new timetables were issued.
Unfortunately they would have been in for a nasty surprise as the timetable appears to be exactly the same as it was before the line was closed.
Which does rather beg the question - what was the point?
After spending £144milllion on an upgrade then passengers have a right to feel a little short-changed by having to suffer the same poor service, in the same old trains than before.
At least you would hope the trains will have all been hoovered in the interim.
Last week it was revealed that cost has risen to almost £144 million.
The new figure was presented in a letter to Richard Leonard, convener of Holyrood's public audit committee by Alyson Stafford, director general of the Scottish Exchequer, the civil servant responsible for the Scottish Budget including tax, spending and measuring performance.
The original estimate for the work said it would cost between £100m and £120m.
The figure was later revised to £139.8m.
Ms Stafford said: 'The Original Business Case (OBC) outlined that total project cost was estimated to be £100m to £120m and that it was estimated to be operational in December 2024.
'The Full Business Case (FBC) outlined that total project cost was estimated to be £139.8m and that it was estimated to be operational in December 2025....The Anticipated Final Cost is now £143.7 million which is an increase to that at FBC and as previously reported.'
She went on to say the additional cost was mostly due to Transport Scotland having to contribute towards the delivery of a car park at a new relocated station in Hairmyres in East Kilbride.
The re-opening of the line will be welcome to the tens of thousands of people who have faced gridlock on the roads at various spells during the work.
A series of road improvements took place simultaneously while the track was electrified.
The result was apparently total chaos which has a serious side as ambulances were struggling to access Hairmyres hospital at one point because of the traffic.
But the fact that there is no change to the timetable will be scant consolation to the passengers.
Electric trains are not due to be operational until December while the works are completely finished.
Hopefully then a new timetable will be introduced and the whole point of the works will become clear.
However, no new electric trains have been ordered by Scotrail so, presumably, the service will be run by rolling stock that is currently being used on other parts of the network.
This will inevitably see capacity being reduced elsewhere so that services can run on the East Kilbride line.
Scotrail has already admitted it cannot guarantee that all services will be electric when the new timetable is introduced in December, which kind of begs the question what is the point?
Why spend millions electrifying railway lines and then not buying new trains?
But this, perhaps, sums up the current sticking plaster approach to Scotland's transport system that has been allowed to happen in recent years.
Transport Scotland, of course, has form for this in the ferry network with new vessels being ordered for ports that cannot accommodate them and are not yet upgraded.
Elsewhere, ferries are taken off routes to fill holes elsewhere which leaves disruption pretty much everywhere in the islands.
Now, two major Glasgow commuter lines will have been electrified in recent years - to East Kilbride and also to Barrhead - but no rolling stock appears to have been ordered to run on them.
Scotrail has the oldest fleet in the UK and last took delivery of 70 electric trains in 2018 when the network was in private hands, operated by Abellio.
Plans were announced to purchase new suburban trains in 2022 followed by replacements for rural lines and high speed trains.
Unfortunately, these have not yet materialised which shows the expensive folly that nationalisation could well become.
Private firms were obliged to introduce new fleets as part of their franchise agreements but this doesn't seem to be the case in public hands.
As has been shown with the ferry network, Transport Scotland and ministers have form for complacency when it comes to providing a fleet that's fit for purpose.
Sadly, the rail network seems to be going that way too.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Achieving child poverty target could cost £920m a year in benefits, report warns
Achieving child poverty target could cost £920m a year in benefits, report warns

STV News

time28 minutes ago

  • STV News

Achieving child poverty target could cost £920m a year in benefits, report warns

Scotland could meet its 2030 child poverty target—but a report has warned that this could cost £920m a year in benefits, with 'significant additional' spending also required to increase the number of parents in work. Chris Birt, associate director at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) in Scotland, said its research shows: 'Holyrood has the chance to prove that it's up to the task of not just setting lofty ambitions, but straining every sinew to deliver on them.' PA Media The Joseph Rowntree Foundation examined the costs and impacts of different measures that could be introduced to tackle child poverty (Jane Barlow/PA). The think tank said there would be financial benefits from getting more parents into employment, and from helping those with jobs to work more hours. Doing this could increase tax revenues to the Scottish Government by £410m, it said, while cutting spending on universal credit by around £500 million a year. With 240,000 children living in poverty in Scotland, the JRF produced what it described as a 'toolkit' for parties running in the 2026 Holyrood election, setting out the impact different policies could have towards meeting the target of having less than 10% of youngsters in relative poverty by 2030–31. The think tank said it had 'deliberately not prescribed an exact course of action' but had instead 'shown the required scale of action needed'. To meet the target, the report said the next Parliament would need to 'lift around 100,000 children out of poverty' – adding this would 'require a laser-focused prioritisation'. The Meeting the Moment paper stresses that none of the measures it considered would achieve the target on their own. 'Even a near quadrupling of the SCP (Scottish child payment) to £100 a week per child at an annual cost of £1.14 billion would see a child poverty rate three percentage points above the targets,' it said. However it found increasing the SCP – which is given to low-income families for every child they have under the age of 16 – to £40 a week would have 'the best poverty reduction impact per pound'. This would cost an extra £190m a year – but on its own would only bring the child poverty rate down to 18%. However the research found that by supplementing the benefit for families with babies and for single parents, and by boosting take-up to 100% of those eligible, when combined with other measures – such as boosting employment among parents in poverty – 90,000 youngsters could be lifted out of poverty, meeting the 10% target. The report said: 'This would cost an additional £920m in targeted child benefits in Scotland (as well as other costs associated with increasing employment). 'It would also increase tax revenues by £410m because of increased parental employment. 'Universal credit expenditure could also fall by £500m as demand for it falls due to higher incomes through work.' Mr Birt said: 'Whoever forms the next Scottish Government has the chance to change what it means to grow up in Scotland. 'To do so, they must meet the Parliament's child poverty targets. Not only for Scotland's children and their futures, but to show those who often feel overlooked and ignored by politics that trust can be rebuilt through actions. 'This analysis gives each political party a detailed map to help them reach a Scotland free from child poverty. They may choose to take different routes to get there. But whichever route they take will require every ounce of determination and demand action at scale. 'The actions of Westminster governments may help, or hinder, but Holyrood has the chance to prove that it's up to the task of not just setting lofty ambitions, but straining every sinew to deliver on them.' Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'I welcome this report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 'We are absolutely committed to meeting the 2030 child poverty targets and thanks to the actions we are already taking, families in the poorest 10% of households are estimated to be £2,600 a year better off in 2025-26 and this value is projected to grow to an average of £3,700 a year by 2029-30. 'However our policies are having to work harder in the current economic context and as a result of decisions taken by the UK Government, such as keeping the two-child limit on Universal Credit which are holding back Scotland's progress. 'While the Joseph Rowntree Foundation predict child poverty will rise in other parts of the UK by 2029, they highlight that policies such as our Scottish Child Payment, and our commitment to mitigate the two-child limit, are behind Scotland 'bucking the trend'. 'We will publish our third child poverty delivery plan by the end of March 2026, setting out the actions to be taken between 2026-2031 to meet the 2030 targets. We will continue working closely with stakeholders, including the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, to shape that plan.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Keir Starmer to put UK on war footing amid 'new threats' in 'dangerous world'
Keir Starmer to put UK on war footing amid 'new threats' in 'dangerous world'

Daily Mirror

time35 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Keir Starmer to put UK on war footing amid 'new threats' in 'dangerous world'

Keir Starmer will this morning announce a huge expansion of the UK's submarine fleet as he warns the country needs to be on a war footing. A long-awaited strategic defence review will be published today, with the Government commiting to build 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines and invest £15billion in its warhead programme. Defence minister Luke Pollard told BBC Breakfast the world is now "more dangerous" and ominously stated: "We're certainly not at war at the moment, but it's also true that we're certainly not at peace." Mr Starmer will give a speech in Scotland at around 10am to outline the plans, which will be released this afternoon. Defence Secretary John Healey said last night that Britain "must act decisively to face down Russian aggression". Defence minister Luke Pollard has said the UK is "certainly not at war at the moment, but it's also true that we're certainly not at peace". He said action was needed to prevent conflict, telling BBC Breakfast: I think all your viewers will have seen the appalling scenes from Ukraine over recent years. They'll be aware that the world is more dangerous. They'll be aware that to secure our freedom and our economic prosperity, we have to invest in our national security. "It's the first duty of any government to keep our country safe, but it's also the first mission of this Labour Government to grow our economy by investing in defence. We're creating jobs in every single part of United Kingdom." He went on: "I don't want us to go to war. I want us to deter aggression. That is precisely what the defence review sets out to do today." In response to the Strategic Defence Review, the Government's commitments will include: Getting the armed forces to a stage where it would be ready to fight a war Boosting weapons and equipment stockpiles and making sure there is capacity to scale up production if needed in a crisis or war £1.5billion to set up at least six munitions factories Buying up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons in a move due to support 800 defence jobs Setting up a new cyber command and investing £1billion in digital capabilities More than £1.5billion of additional funding to repair and renew armed forces housing Boosting recruitment for Britain's armed forces - with the number of cadets increasing by 30% A minister has again refused to guarantee that the Government will spend 3% of the UK's economic output on defence in the next Parliament. Labour frontbencher Luke Pollard said the commitment would be dependent on the state of the ecomomy. It comes after Defence Secretary John Healey yesterday could not confirm that the Treasury would fund the plan to bring spending up to 3% of GDP by 2034. Asked on Monday morning whether the 3% commitment remained a guarantee, defence minister Luke Pollard told Times Radio: "Well, we've set out that we are spending 2.5% by April 2027, with the ambition to spend 3% in the next parliament, when economic conditions allow." Pressed about the commitment, Mr Pollard added: "Well I've got no doubt that we will get to 3% in the next parliament, as I've said a number of times." The defence minister said the strategic defence review, a wide-ranging investigation into the UK's defence being published on Monday, is the "biggest transformation of our armed forces in 100 years".He said: "It seeks to learn the lessons from the war in Ukraine, refresh our capabilities, invest in our people, and underscore that increased defence spending up to 2.5% of our GDP by April 2027 is an engine for growth." Keir Starmer will today announce major plans to almost double the UK's nuclear-powered submarine fleet. The Prime Minister will set out the building of 12 new attack submarines as part of the AUKUS programme, a security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US. He will also announce a major £15billion investment in the UK's nuclear warhead programme. The PM will make the announcements as he unveils the Government's new Strategic Defence Review (SDR). The externally-led review is expected to recommend the Armed Forces move to warfighting readiness to deter the growing threats faced by the UK. The UK currently has five Astute class attack submarines, which are on track to become a fleet of seven warships in the near future. These will be replaced one by one with the new SSN-AUKUS attack submarines from the late 2030s. A further five new submarines will take the total to 12. A major expansion of the industrial capabilities at Barrow and Raynesway, Derby, will see a new submarine built every 18 months in the future. These will all be built by the UK and operated by the Royal Navy. Click here for the full story

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store