logo
European leaders at G7 trying to bring Iran back to negotiating table

European leaders at G7 trying to bring Iran back to negotiating table

The Guardian7 hours ago

European leaders at the G7 summit in Canada are trying to engineer an Iranian return to the negotiating table using Gulf leaders as intermediaries.
But Iran is demanding a joint ceasefire with Israel, while Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, is resisting the move, and Donald Trump has yet to show his hand.
The US is seen by Iran as critical to putting pressure on Israel, but Trump wants indications that Iran will back down on its insistence that it will continue to have the right to enrich uranium inside Iran. He is willing to continue to use the Israeli assault as a bargaining chip if necessary.
Trump said on Monday that Iran was not winning its conflict with Israel and should re-enter negotiations 'before it's too late'.
'They have to make a deal, and it's painful for both parties, but I'd say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it's too late,' the US president told reporters at a G7 summit in Canada.
Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, appealed to Trump to break with Netanyahu, telling the US president he was being played by an Israeli leader who was determined to scuttle a deal Iran and the US were on the verge of sealing.
He said: 'By all indications, the purpose of Netanyahu's criminal attack on Iran – killing hundreds of innocent civilians, including women and children – is to scuttle a deal between Iran and the US, which we were on the right path to achieve. He is playing yet another American president, and ever more American taxpayers, for absolute fools.
'If President Trump is genuine about diplomacy and interested in stopping this war, next steps are consequential. Israel must halt its aggression, and absent a total cessation of military aggression against us, our responses will continue. It takes one phone call from Washington to muzzle someone like Netanyahu. That may pave the way for a return to diplomacy.'
The United Arab Emirates, the country that sent Trump's first negotiating offer to Iran, has been one of the intermediaries along with Oman, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
Oman's foreign minister, Badr Albusaidi, the previous broker in the US-Iran talks, has been urging Tehran to return to the negotiating table, pointing to the heavily laden military odds against Iran.
Iranian news agencies reported the president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, had warned the Sultan of Oman that, 'if the United States does not restrain Israel, Iran will be forced to continue its response in a more severe and painful manner'.
Keir Starmer, the UK prime minister; and the French president, Emmanuel Macron, have both been in touch with the UAE leadership, and Starmer claimed there was a consensus for de-escalation.
'It is really important that we focus on de-escalation, because the risks of the conflict escalating are obvious across the region and beyond the region, the impact that this could and probably will have on Gaza, which is a tinderbox, and, of course, the impact on the economy. That is why the G7 has such a focus on de-escalation. That will be an intense discussion for our talks today
'We're just arriving for the beginning of these talks. We haven't started the sessions yet, so there's going to be a whole day of discussions about all manner of things, including the economy, the global economy, and a number of other matters. But this will be a central issue.'
European leaders at the G7 are warning Iran both directly and via Gulf leaders that Iranian concessions will have to be made at the negotiating table, or Israel is likely to press home its military advantage to the point of securing an end to the Iranian government formed after the revolution in 1979.
With the vast majority of its military and intelligence leadership wiped out by Israel in assassinations, Iran's decision-making structure is in flux. Even parts of the Iranian foreign ministry in Tehran have been bombed.
European leaders are deeply concerned both by doubts over the nature of any successor regime, the prospect of Iran's break-up and a prolonged conflict that could hit world trade and send oil prices up if Iran blocked the strait of Hormuz in a desperate attempt to cling to power.
Iran has insisted it is not interested in building a nuclear bomb, but is not saying it is willing to abandon its right to enrich uranium, the red line that the Iranian foreign minister insisted on throughout the talks with the US.
The coincidence of the G7 meeting with the escalation in the Iran crisis has provided European leaders with an opportunity to try to reimpose themselves in the Iran negotiations from which they have been largely excluded by American ever since Trump returned to the White House
Between 2013 and 2025 the three European powers of UK France and Germany had been ever-present in the negotiations with Iran.
The G7 leaders are also preparing a joint statement on the Iran-Israel crisis
At issue has been whether any joint statement calling for a return to diplomacy and ruling out Iran ever possessing nuclear weapons goes further by calling for a ceasefire. Some states wanted to hint at criticism of Israel for upending the US and Iranian negotiations that were due to have continued on Sunday.
But G7 member states are divided, with Japan's prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, on Friday sharply criticising Israel's recent military assaults on Iran, labelling the attacks 'totally intolerable' and 'extremely regrettable' amid rising tensions in the region.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two more countries added to list Brits shouldn't travel to in new warnings
Two more countries added to list Brits shouldn't travel to in new warnings

Daily Mirror

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Two more countries added to list Brits shouldn't travel to in new warnings

The Foreign & Commonwealth Office has issued fresh travel guidance following hostilities between Israel and Iran, and it says visiting certain nations could invalidate your travel insurance Two more countries have been added to the list of place Brits should avoid, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCDO) says. Brits are warned not to travel to Jordan and Israel amid the latter's conflict with Iran, which saw Iran fight back on the weekend. Brits already in these countries should follow local authorities' advice, the FCDO stressed. ‌ With reference to Jordan, it added: "Ongoing hostilities in the region and between Israel and Iran could escalate quickly and pose security risks for the wider region. There are reports of military debris falling in various locations. ‌ "Travel disruption, including flight cancellations and airspace closures may occur. Demonstrations and protest activity may take place. Jordanian airspace is open but airports and airspace may close at short notice." Donald Trump said he believes Iran would be "foolish" not to sign the deal he will be offering them in an attempt to ease tensions. If it is rejected, it is feared Iran could begin producing nuclear weapons. Due to this, the FCDO says Brits should not travel to Israel too. Airspace there has been closed since the violence ramped up on Friday morning. The FCDO continued: "Following Israeli strikes against targets in Iran, Iran has launched multiple rounds of missile and drone attacks against Israel. On 13 June, a nationwide state of emergency was declared in Israel. Israeli airspace remains closed and Ben Gurion Airport is currently closed. No travel can be guaranteed safe." Ignoring any advice from the FCDO may invalidate your travel insurance, the agency added. Those planning trips to Jordan or Israel should monitor local and international media for the latest information, and be vigilant and follow the instructions of local authorities. The FCDO's new advice comes amid the fast-moving situation which poses significant risks as it could deteriorate further, quickly and without warning. Mr Trump acknowledged this late on Monday UK time (6.30pm in Washington). The US President posted on Truth Social: "Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign. What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran." The Israeli Air Force yesterday sent fighter jets over central Iran on the fourth day of its military operation to strip away Iran's capacity to produce nuclear weapons. Among the targets hit by Israel was a building used by Iran's state TV - and the attack was caught live on air. Israeli officials put the death toll from Iran's overnight strikes at eight people after the Islamic Republic punctured Israel's Iron Dome defence system, hitting targets in Tel Aviv and Haifa. In total, 24 Israeli civilians have died as a result of Iranian strikes. Meanwhile, in Iran, the country's health ministry reported that the death toll has climbed to 224 people in the 72 hours since the war began.

US and UK announce a trade deal, but steel imports are still being negotiated
US and UK announce a trade deal, but steel imports are still being negotiated

The Independent

time33 minutes ago

  • The Independent

US and UK announce a trade deal, but steel imports are still being negotiated

U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday that they had signed a trade deal that will slash tariffs on U.K. auto and aerospace industry imports, but they are still discussing how to handle steel production. The pair spoke to reporters at the Group of Seven summit in the Canadian Rockies, with Trump brandishing the pages of what he said was a long-awaited agreement. The rollout was anything but smooth, however, as Trump dropped the papers and at first said his administration had reached an agreement with the European Union when he meant the United Kingdom. The president nonetheless insisted the pact is 'a fair deal for both' and would 'produce a lot of jobs, a lot of income.' 'We just signed it,' Trump said, 'and it's done.' Starmer said it meant 'a very good day for both our countries, a real sign of strength.' Reaching an agreement is significant as Trump has threatened much of the world with steep import tariffs that have unsettled markets and raised the possibility of a global trade war. He has since backed off on many of his proposed levies but also continued to suggest that administration officials were furiously negotiating new trade pacts with dozens of countries — even as few have actually materialized. Trump said 'the U.K. is very well protected,' from tariffs. 'You know why? Because I like them.' The signing of the deal at the G7 followed Trump and Starmer's announcement in May that they'd reached a framework for a trade pact that would slash U.S. import taxes on British cars, steel and aluminum in return for greater access to the British market for U.S. products, including beef and ethanol. But Monday's agreement fully covers only British cars and aerospace materials, with more work to come on steel. Trump said more details on that would be available soon. After the two leaders spoke, the White House released a statement seeking to clarify matters, saying that with respect to steel and aluminum, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will 'determine a quota of products that can enter the United States without being subject' to previous tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The British government said the new agreement removes U.S. tariffs on U.K. aerospace products, exempting Britain from a 10% levy the Trump White House has sought to impose on all other countries — a boost to British firms, including engine-maker Rolls-Royce. It also sets the tax on British autos at 10% from the end of the month, down from the current 27.5%. U.K. Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the deal protects 'jobs and livelihoods in some of our most vital sectors.' But there was no final agreement to cut the tax on British steel to zero as originally foreseen. Britain has been spared the 50% tariff imposed on global steel, instead getting a 25% rate. It will stay at that level while talks continue on lowering it. There also was no final deal on pharmaceuticals, where 'work will continue,' the U.K. said. The deal signed Monday also confirms that American farmers can export 13,000 metric tons (29 million pounds) of beef to the U.K. each year, and vice versa — though a British ban on hormone-treated beef remains in place. That's more detail than both countries offered in May when they announced a framework deal. That framework didn't immediately take effect, leaving British businesses uncertain about whether the U.K. could be exposed to any surprise hikes from Trump. British businesses, and the U.K. government, were then blindsided earlier this month when Trump doubled metals tariffs on countries around the world to 50%. He later clarified the level would remain at 25% for the U.K. The British government said Monday that the plan was still for '0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed.'

What are Trump's options for dealing with Iran?
What are Trump's options for dealing with Iran?

BBC News

time33 minutes ago

  • BBC News

What are Trump's options for dealing with Iran?

President Trump's comments on the Israel-Iran conflict have veered from full throated support for Israel's strikes to strongly distancing himself from them, and back ambiguity has added to the sense of uncertainty as the fighting itself the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the attacks were "fully coordinated" with the what factors are weighing on Trump and, crucially, what are his options now? 1. Bowing to Netanyahu pressure and escalating As Israeli missiles hit Tehran on Thursday, Trump threatened Iran's leaders with "even more brutal" attacks from his Israeli ally armed with American know Trump's ultimate objective. He says, like Netanyahu, that Iran can't have a nuclear he has said his preferred option (unlike Netanyahu) is via a deal between the US and Iran (this route also reflects his self-described image as a world-class dealmaker and his oft-repeated desire to win the Nobel peace prize).But he has equivocated over how to get there, sometimes leaning into the threat of force, other times pushing the diplomacy. Last week he even said in the same breath that an Israeli attack on Iran would help a deal or it would "blow it".Follow live updates on Israel-Iran conflictWhere is Israel's operation heading? His unpredictability is sometimes portrayed by his supporters after the fact as strategic - the so-called "madman" theory of foreign relations. This theory is one that has previously been used to describe Trump's negotiating tactics and suggests that deliberate uncertainty or unpredictability about escalation works to coerce adversaries (or even allies in Trump's case) into complying. It was famously attributed to some of the Cold War practices of President Richard of Trump's advisers and supporters back the "maximum pressure" side of the madman theory when it comes to his approach to Iran. They think the threats will in the end prevail because, they argue, Iran is not serious about negotiating (even though in 2015 the country signed an Obama-led nuclear deal that Trump later pulled out of). Netanyahu has applied constant pressure on Trump to go down the military not diplomatic path, and the US president may in the end see a need to deliver on his more belligerent threats to Tehran's may also push harder behind the scenes for American involvement as it sees it to finish the job. The US has bunker buster bombs Israel believes can destroy Iran's underground uranium enrichment site at the fighting escalates, so does the pressure on Trump from the hawkish camp of Republicans in Congress who have long called for regime change in will also see the argument that it could force the Iranians into negotiating with him with a now weaker hand. But the fact remains that the Iranians already were at that table, as a sixth round of talks due with Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff had been planned in Oman on talks are now abandoned. 2. The middle ground - holding the course So far, Trump has reiterated that the US is not involved in Israel's comes with significant and potentially legacy-defining risks for Trump. American naval destroyers and ground based missile batteries are already helping in Israel's defence against the Iranian of Trump's advisers at the National Security Council are likely to be cautioning against him doing anything that could add to the intensity of Israel's attacks on Iran in the immediate days, especially with some Iranian missiles breaching Israeli-US defences to deadly effect.'Don't let beautiful Tehran become Gaza'Israelis in neighbourhood struck by missile back warNetanyahu is now arguing that targeting Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei would end, not escalate, the an anonymous US official briefed to some news outlets at the weekend that Trump made clear he was against such a move. 3. Listening to the Maga voices and pulling back One of the big political factors playing on Trump's mind is his domestic Republicans in Congress still staunchly back Israel, including continued American arms supplies to the country. Many have vocally backed Israel's attacks on there are key voices within Trump's Make America Great Again (Maga) movement who now outright reject this traditional "ironclad" support for the last few days they've asked why the US is risking being drawn into a Middle East war given Trump's "America First" foreign policy pro-Trump journalist Tucker Carlson wrote a stinging criticism on Friday saying the administration's claims not to be involved weren't true, and that the US should "drop Israel". He suggested Mr Netanyahu "and his war-hungry government" were acting in a way that would drag in US troops to fight on his wrote: "Engaging in it would be a middle finger in the faces of the millions of voters who cast their ballots in hopes of creating a government that would finally put the United States first."Similarly, the staunch Trump loyalist US representative Marjorie Taylor Greene posted on X that: "Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA". This represents a considerable vulnerability for adds pressure on him to put distance between the US and Israel's offensive and there are signs, in public at least, that he has Maga debate over the weekend coincided with him posting on social media that he joined Russia's president Putin in calling for an end to the war. By Sunday he said Iran and Israel should make a deal, adding: "The US had nothing to do with the attack on Iran".Satellite images show damage to Iran missile sitesIsrael's smaller, sophisticated military opposes larger IranIran has already threatened to attack US bases in the region if, as is now happening, Washington assists Israel's risk of any American casualties would likely see the Maga isolationist argument grow exponentially, in turn potentially adding pressure on Trump to pull back and urge Mr Netanyahu to bring the offensive to a swifter end.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store