
Joe and Jill Biden fire back on 'The View' against accusations of health cover-up, call stories 'wrong'
Former President Joe Biden and former First Lady Jill Biden fired back on "The View" Thursday against stories about his mental decline behind the scenes at the White House, with Jill Biden cutting in at one point as the ex-president trailed off while defending his record.
Asked by co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin about Democratic sources in new books who said there was a "dramatic decline" in the president's cognitive abilities toward the end of his term, Joe Biden flatly said they were incorrect before segueing into criticism of the prior Trump administration.
"They are wrong," he said. "There's nothing to sustain that, number one. Number two, you know, think of what we left with. We left with a circumstance where we had an insurrection when I started, not since the Civil War. We had a circumstance where we were in a position that we – well, the pandemic, because of the incompetence of the last outfit, end up over a million people dying, a million people dying. And we're also in a situation where we found ourselves unable to deal with a lot of just basic issues, which I won't go into in the interest of time. And so we went to work, and we got it done and, you know, one of the things that – well, I'm –"
That's when his wife jumped in.
"Alyssa, one of the things I think is that the people who wrote those books were not in the White House with us," Jill Biden said. "And they didn't see how hard Joe worked every single day. I mean, he'd get up. He'd put in a full day, and then at night he would – I'd be in bed, you know, reading my book, and he was still on the phone, reading his briefings. Working with staff. I mean, it was nonstop."
She praised her husband for working hard and said, based on the state of things now under President Donald Trump, "give me Joe Biden any time," leading to loud applause from the audience.
Griffin also pressed Biden about his dramatic departure from the 2024 race under pressure from fellow Democrats like Nancy Pelosi. Biden said he exited because he didn't want a divided Democratic Party, while again insisting during the show he could have beaten Trump.
"I thought it was better to put the country ahead of my interests, my personal interests. I'm not being facetious. I'm being deadly earnest about that," he said. "And I think that we still – let me put it this way. I had six more months. Did a pretty good job in six months."
He acknowledged concerns about his age – he would have been 86 at the end of a second term and was already the oldest American president in history – but said he got plenty done when "I supposedly lost my cognitive capability."
Co-host Whoopi Goldberg, a fervent Biden supporter, suggested that his poor showing at the debate last year started the whole concern over his fitness for office.
"Why do you think people bought into it, especially the Democrats?" Goldberg asked.
Biden said he hadn't lost many debates but acknowledged he had a "bad night" while also saying he was sick that evening. His wife said he admitted it to her afterward – and he used a colorful term for "screwed up" – but she didn't want those 90 minutes to define his presidency.
"We all saw it, it was terrible," she said of her husband's debate performance.
In actuality, Republicans and some Democrats had been raising concerns before the debate for years and especially throughout 2024 about his mental fitness, through such moments as the Robert Hur report that mentioned his failing memory, a bombshell Wall Street Journal story about behind-the-scenes concerns, and various viral videos of Biden appearing to freeze up or seem confused that the White House dismissed as "cheap fakes."
However, the debate's fallout was unmistakable. Although Biden held on at first, he succumbed to party pressure and exited the contest on July 21, endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris, who went on to lose the general election to Trump.
Co-host Sara Haines put heat on Jill Biden over concerns she may have been too close to the situation to impartially gauge whether her husband could handle a second term.
"I was with Joe day and night," she said. "I saw him more than any other person … I did not create a cocoon around him. I mean, you saw him in the Oval Office. You saw him making speeches. He wasn't hiding somewhere. I didn't have him, you know, sequestered in some place."
Asked about the idea she was a "Lady MacBeth," a reference to the scheming Shakespeare character who wields nefarious influence behind the scenes, she responded that such rhetoric was "very hurtful, especially from some of our so-called friends."
Jill Biden has previously said she was disappointed in Pelosi's role in pushing her husband out of the race.
"We were friends for 50 years," she told the Washington Post. "It was disappointing."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hall declares victory over Davis for Fort Worth City Council District 6 seat
Dr. Mia Hall declared victory over opponent Daryl R. Davis II to the applause and cheers of friends, mentors and family Saturday night at her election watch party at Bowlounge. Unofficial polling data shows Hall leading with 57.12% over Davis's 42.88% in the race for the Fort Worth City Council District 6 seat. Allof the 19 polling locations are reporting. Hall will fill out-going Council Member Jared Williams's shoes to represent Southwest Fort Worth and Como. In the crowd during Hall's speech of thanks were Council Members Chris Nettles, Michael Crain and Elizabeth Beck and Crowley School Board Members Dr. Nedra Robinson and Chakina Watkins. Because none of the four candidates — Davis, Hall, Marshall Hobbs and Adrian Smith — received more than 50% of the votes on May 3, the top two vote-getters went to a runoff election. On May 3, Hall had 46.8% of the votes, followed by Davis with 28.49%, Hobbs with 21.57% and Smith with 3.14%. Now with early voting results, she leads by nearly 400 votes. There was a 4.47% voter turnout. Hall said she was overwhelmed by the outpouring of support from the voters. She was formerly a Crowley ISD Board Trustee and a member of the Fort Worth Zoning Commission. 'It's been my pleasure to to have served this community in the capacity of a trustee for the last 10 years,' Hall said, 'and just to see the voter turnout, and the fact that they are going to bestow or that I may have the opportunity to represent them as the District 6 councilwoman, is just very humbling.' Hall has promised safe neighborhoods, improved roads and infrastructure, enhanced city services and the fostering of economic development. 'I made promises to our neighbors, and I plan to honor those promises,' Hall said. 'Among those were to be responsive and to be accessible, and that's something that I want to be day one. The other part will be just getting my bearings meeting the other council men and women and me and my colleagues, and just getting my footing underneath me so that we can take the priorities that our District 6 neighbors have made and put them to work quickly, without delay.' Her opponent in the runoff, Davis, promised well-planned neighborhoods that are safe and affordable to live in.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ben Crump Says Donald Trump's Spending Bill is Terrible Amid Elon Musk Feud
Ben Crump's picked his side in the Elon Musk and Donald Trump beef ... but, he's not backing a personality, he says he's backing the better idea -- and, he doesn't want the "One Big Beautiful Bill" to pass through the Senate. We caught up with the civil rights activist and attorney and asked him about the fight between POTUS and his former advisor ... and, he doesn't directly say he's on Elon's side -- but, he does think this spending bill is terrible. Crump rips the bill for making cuts to Medicaid -- the medical assistance program for people with lower incomes. BC says the world needs more humanity for all people ... instead of making the life of individuals struggling financially more difficult. As you know ... Elon lost his cool about this spending bill earlier this week -- firing off shots at the president and claiming Trump only won reelection because of his efforts. President Trump called BS on that idea ... but, Elon pushed on and claimed the real reason the administration hasn't released the so-called Epstein files is because the president's name is all over them. He's since deleted the post where he wrote that ... but, today Trump warned of serious consequences if Elon decides to support Dems who are running against Republicans who vote for the bill. BTW ... we also asked Crump about Trump potentially pardoning Diddy -- and, it sounds like Crump's staying out of that one, too. Bottom line ... back the idea, not the man -- that's the Ben Crump way!


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
University of California researchers face uncertain future over possible federal funding cuts
Thousands of University of California and California State University system workers are unsure about their jobs and the future of their research after reports that President Donald Trump is going after the federal funding for California. In response, Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to stop paying the state's federal taxes. Tanzil Chowdhury is a graduate student researcher at UC Berkeley with the Materials Science and Engineering Department. He works on semiconductors and is researching how to create more efficient batteries and better solar panels. His academic future, however, is in limbo. "I really want to make a difference with the work that I do, I want to help transition off of fossil fuels and create greener and more efficient energy grid for everyone. With these cuts, I don't know if I'll be able to continue doing that," Chowdhury told CBS News Bay Area. That's because Mr. Trump is considering pulling funding for both the UC and Cal State University systems. "This would just be catastrophic to my work, the work of all my coworkers and the amazing research that happens here in the state of California at the UC and CSU," he said. "We can't access the materials that we need, we can't get the lab space that we need, we can't run our experiments if there's no money coming in." A recent report shows the UC system received more than $4 billion for academic research during the 2024 fiscal year. Schools, including UC San Francisco, rely on those grants. "This is one of the biggest recipients of National Institute of Health's funds, which are some of the funds that the Trump administration is reportedly going to cut," Chowdhury said. He helps lead UAW Local 4811, a union of 48,000 academic workers in the UC system. Chowdhury said about 15,000 of those academic workers are from UC San Francisco and UC Berkeley. "It is one of the nation's leaders in biomedical and biological research. So, groundbreaking treatments in cancer, heart disease, diabetes, all that stuff happens right here," he said. "The patient who needs that sort of groundbreaking research to get better, get healthier, that work stops." One infectious disease doctor and UC San Francisco professor agrees. "We receive 30% of all NIH funding in this country. And that's not because just that we are a more populous state, but because we have fantastic universities here, really high-level academics," Dr. Monica Gandhi told CBS News Bay Area. She added that funding cuts will have a dire impact on the patient level. "It would mean the complete slowing of any progress in biomedical research that is actually fueling American lives, health," she added. "People who are living in California, their health will absolutely be affected. We won't get novel medications, we won't get therapeutics for cancer, for diabetes, for HIV, for infectious diseases." Dr. Gandhi said that a recent analysis showed that three out of 365 medications that had been approved from 2010 to 2019 were from NIH-funded research. "It would be disastrous for California to not be able to continue the lifesaving, NIH-funded research that it does," she added. Meanwhile, Chowdhury hopes that Governor Gavin Newsom can help by rescinding academic budget cuts on the state level. "He should work with the California legislature to ensure that we have job security, and we're able to continue doing the research that we need to do, and fill in the gaps left behind by the federal government," Chowdhury said. While the future remains uncertain, the battle for academia continues. "The administration needs to not do this, because we don't want to mess with American lives and American health," Dr. Gandhi said. "Maybe we need to re-evaluate how much money we give to the federal government from California taxpayer dollars, because I know what my California taxpayer dollars to go to. I want them to go to life-saving medical research to extend human life," she added.