logo
Rules for portable batteries on planes are changing. Here's what to know.

Rules for portable batteries on planes are changing. Here's what to know.

The Star5 days ago

The rules around flying with portable batteries are becoming more confusing as some airlines and governments change their policies, citing the risk of fires.
Southwest Airlines is the first of the four biggest US carriers to tighten its rules, citing incidents involving batteries on flights across airlines. Starting Wednesday, it will require passengers to keep portable chargers visible while using them.
Airlines in Malaysia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Singapore, and Hong Kong have also either changed their rules in a similar way or banned the use of portable chargers in flight since a fire destroyed an Air Busan plane on the tarmac in South Korea in January. It was one of several recent aviation episodes that made travelers anxious.
There is no definitive link between portable batteries and the Air Busan fire, and an investigation is underway.
Because rules vary across airlines, you might find yourself having to repack or turn off batteries when boarding a plane. Here's what you need to know.
Which airlines have changed their rules and why?
Southwest passengers will not be allowed to charge devices while they are stowed in overhead bins. The rule will help flight attendants act more quickly if a battery overheats or catches fire, Southwest said in a statement.
The US Federal Aviation Agency requires only that devices containing lithium-ion batteries are kept in carry-on baggage, and the European Union's aviation regulator has similar rules.
Rules vary among Europe's biggest carriers. Ryanair, a low-cost Irish airline, tells passengers to remove lithium batteries before storing bags overhead. Britain's EasyJet and Germany's Lufthansa do not.
The South Korean government now requires that passengers keep portable chargers within arm's reach and out of overhead bins, saying that the rule was implemented to ease anxiety about the risk of battery fires.
Malaysia Airlines, the country's flag carrier, has banned using and charging power banks, and storing them in overhead bins. Hong Kong's aviation regulator has put a similar regulation into effect for all of the territory's airlines, including Cathay Pacific.
Major Taiwanese airlines implemented similar changes after the Air Busan episode. EVA Air and China Airlines announced a ban on using or charging power banks on their planes, although the batteries can still be stored in overhead compartments.
Thai Airways, Thailand's flagship airline, said it would implement a similar ban on using and charging power banks, citing 'incidents of in-flight fires on international airlines, suspected to be linked to power bank usage'. Singapore Airlines and its budget subsidiary, Scoot, also announced new rules.
Since 2016, the International Civil Aviation Organization, which is the United Nations agency that coordinates global aviation regulations, has banned lithium-ion batteries, which are the kind commonly found in power banks, from the cargo holds of passenger planes.
But there is no industry standard on how airlines regulate power banks, said Mitchell Fox, director of the Asia Pacific Center for Aviation Safety.
They have become a part of everyday life only in recent years, and some consumers may be unaware of the risks, he said.
What risks do these batteries pose?
Lithium-ion batteries have been used for decades to power smartphones and laptops, and are commonly used in portable power banks.
Each battery has a cell that can heat up quickly in a chain reaction that causes it to catch fire or explode. The FAA warns that this reaction can happen if the battery is damaged, overcharged, overheated or exposed to water. Manufacturing defects are another potential cause.
Some products that use lithium-ion batteries, including smartphones, laptops and electric vehicles, have strict regulations and quality control standards, said Neeraj Sharma, a professor of chemistry at the University of New South Wales in Sydney who studies batteries. Others, such as power banks, e-cigarettes, e-bikes and scooters, are less regulated, he said, raising the risk of malfunction.
'Make sure you get your devices from reputable manufacturers,' Sharma said.
How often do batteries catch fire on planes?
The frequency of incidents involving lithium-ion batteries on US airlines has been increasing. There were 84 last year, up from 32 in 2016. These included cases – in the cabins of both passenger and cargo planes – where batteries caught fire, emitted smoke or overheated. Portable chargers were the biggest culprit, followed by e-cigarettes, according to the FAA.
For years, airlines around the world have required passengers to pack spare lithium-ion batteries in their carry-on luggage instead of in their checked bags so that any smoke or fire from the batteries can be noticed quickly. In the cargo hold, a fire might not be detected by a plane's automatic fire-extinguishing system until it has become a critical problem.
What do flight crews do when there is a fire?
Fires in plane cabins that are caused by lithium-ion batteries are rarely deadly, and flight crews are generally well prepared to deal with them, said Keith Tonkin, managing director of Aviation Projects, an aviation consulting company in Brisbane, Australia.
In many cases, passengers will notice that their electronics are overheating and inform crew members, who put the device in a thermal containment bag or water, with little disruption to the flight, according to the FAA. – ©2025 The New York Times Company
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ireland's Dalata Hotel rejects US$1.5bil buyout proposal from Pandox, Eiendomsspar
Ireland's Dalata Hotel rejects US$1.5bil buyout proposal from Pandox, Eiendomsspar

New Straits Times

time39 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Ireland's Dalata Hotel rejects US$1.5bil buyout proposal from Pandox, Eiendomsspar

KUALA LUMPUR: Ireland's largest hotel group Dalata on Tuesday rejected a 1.3 billion euro (US$1.48 billion) buyout proposal from Scandinavian property companies Pandox AB and Eiendomsspar AS for "materially" undervaluing it. Dalata, which launched a strategic review in March, said Pandox was not participating in its ongoing sale process, which has drawn interest from other potential bidders. The Irish group operates 55 hotels under the Maldron Hotel and Clayton Hotel brands, mostly in Ireland and Britain, and aims to expand its portfolio to 21,000 rooms across Ireland, the UK and continental Europe under its "2030 Vision" strategy. The proposal from the groups had comprised a cash offer of 6.05 euros per ordinary share of Dalata, representing a premium of about 5 per cent to Dalata's closing price on Monday. Shares of Dalata closed up 5.2 per cent at 6.06 euros on Tuesday, their highest since May 2019. It said it continues to engage in "constructive discussions" with other parties who have submitted initial non-binding proposals, without naming who they were. The Pandox-led consortium did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the rebuff by Dalata. Under Irish takeover rules, Pandox and Eiendomsspar had until July 15 to make a formal offer for Dalata or walk away. Norway-based Eiendomsspar is the second largest shareholder in the Irish group with a stake of around 8.8 per cent and in Pandox, in which it has a stake of around 8.5 per cent. Sweden-based Pandox AB specialises in the ownership, development and leasing of large hotel assets in major cities across Sweden and northern Europe. It has been expanding its portfolio through acquisitions and leases in key European cities including Stockholm, Berlin and Brussels. Dalata's adjusted core profit rose 5.1 per cent last year to 234.5 million euros as revenue grew 7.3 per cent to 652.2 million euros, driven by additions to its portfolio over the past two years.

TSMC says tariffs have some impact but AI demand robust
TSMC says tariffs have some impact but AI demand robust

New Straits Times

timea day ago

  • New Straits Times

TSMC says tariffs have some impact but AI demand robust

HSINCHU: US tariffs are having some impact but demand for artificial intelligence (AI) remains strong and continues to outpace supply, the chief executive of Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC said on Tuesday. US President Donald Trump's trade policies have created much uncertainty for the global chip industry and TSMC, the top producer of the world's most advanced semiconductors whose customers include Apple and Nvidia. CC Wei, speaking at the company's annual shareholders meeting in the northern Taiwanese city of Hsinchu, said they have not seen any changes in customer behaviour due to tariff uncertainty and the situation may become clearer in coming months. "Tariffs do have some impact on TSMC, but not directly. That's because tariffs are imposed on importers, not exporters. TSMC is an exporter. However, tariffs can lead to slightly higher prices, and when prices go up, demand may go down," he said. "If demand drops, TSMC's business could be affected. But I can assure you that AI demand has always been very strong and it's consistently outpacing supply." In April, the company, the world's largest contract chipmaker, gave a bullish outlook for the year on robust demand for AI applications. In a sign of the strength of demand, Wei said TSMC's job is to provide its customers "with enough chips, and we're working hard on that. 'Working hard' means it's still not enough." Wei also commented on media reports that the company has been evaluating building chip factories in the United Arab Emirates, saying they have no plans for any such plants in the Middle East.

TSMC says tariffs have some impact but AI demand robust
TSMC says tariffs have some impact but AI demand robust

The Star

timea day ago

  • The Star

TSMC says tariffs have some impact but AI demand robust

FILE PHOTO: The TSMC logo is displayed on a building in Hsinchu, Taiwan April 15, 2025. REUTERS/Ann Wang/File Photo HSINCHU, Taiwan (Reuters) - U.S. tariffs are having some impact but demand for artificial intelligence (AI) remains strong and continues to outpace supply, the chief executive of Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC said on Tuesday. U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policies have created much uncertainty for the global chip industry and TSMC, the top producer of the world's most advanced semiconductors whose customers include Apple and Nvidia. C.C. Wei, speaking at the company's annual shareholders meeting in the northern Taiwanese city of Hsinchu, said they have not seen any changes in customer behaviour due to tariff uncertainty and the situation may become clearer in coming months. "Tariffs do have some impact on TSMC, but not directly. That's because tariffs are imposed on importers, not exporters. TSMC is an exporter. However, tariffs can lead to slightly higher prices, and when prices go up, demand may go down," he said. "If demand drops, TSMC's business could be affected. But I can assure you that AI demand has always been very strong and it's consistently outpacing supply." In April, the company, the world's largest contract chipmaker, gave a bullish outlook for the year on robust demand for AI applications. (Reporting by Wen-Yee Lee; Writing by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Christian Schmollinger and Edwina Gibbs)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store