logo
China seizes disputed reef near key Philippine military outpost: report

China seizes disputed reef near key Philippine military outpost: report

The Hindu27-04-2025

The Chinese Coast Guard has seized control of a disputed reef near a major Philippine military outpost in the South China Sea, according to Beijing's state media, adding to longstanding territorial tensions with Manila.
Beijing claims sovereignty over almost all of the South China Sea and has waved away competing assertions from other regional countries as well as an international ruling that its position has no legal basis.
China and the Philippines have engaged in months of confrontations in the contested waters, and Manila is currently taking part in sweeping joint military drills with the United States that Beijing has slammed as destabilising.
The Chinese Coast Guard 'implemented maritime control' over the Tiexian Reef, also known as Sandy Cay, during the middle of April, state broadcaster CCTV reported on Saturday (April 26, 2025).
The tiny sandbank, part of the Spratly Islands, lies near Thitu Island, also called Pag-asa and the site of a Philippine military facility.
CCTV said the Coast Guard landed on Sandy Cay to 'exercise sovereignty and jurisdiction' over the reef, carry out an 'inspection' and 'collect video evidence regarding the illegal activities of the Philippine side'.
The broadcaster published a photograph of five black-clad people standing on the uninhabited reef as a dark inflatable boat bobbed in the nearby water.
Another shot showed four Coast Guard officials posing with a national flag on the reef's white surface, in what CCTV described as a 'vow of sovereignty'.
The group also 'cleaned up leftover plastic bottles, wooden sticks and other debris and garbage on the reef', the broadcaster said.
The Financial Times reported an unnamed Philippine maritime official as saying that the Chinese Coast Guard had left after unfurling the flag.
There do not appear to be any signs that China has permanently occupied the reef or has built a structure on it.
In recent months, Beijing and Manila have blamed each other for causing what they describe as the ecological degradation of several disputed landforms in the South China Sea.
China's state news agency Xinhua on Friday (April 25, 2025) cited a report from the natural resources ministry that it said 'debunked' Manila's allegations that Beijing's land reclamation projects had harmed the local environment.
Philippine forces are present on Thitu Island and Manila inaugurated a Coast Guard monitoring base there in 2023 in an effort to counter what it describes as Chinese aggression.
On Monday (April 21, 2025), the Philippine and U.S. militaries launched three weeks of annual joint exercises called 'Balikatan', or 'shoulder to shoulder', which will include an integrated air and missile defence simulation for the first time.
U.S. Marine Corps Lieutenant General James Glynn said at the opening ceremony in Manila that the two side would 'demonstrate not just our will to uphold our mutual defence treaty in existence since 1951 but our matchless capability to do so'.
'Nothing builds bonds more quickly than shared adversity,' he said, without specifying a common threat.
Beijing said the manoeuvres 'undermine regional strategic stability' and accused Manila of 'collusion with countries outside the region'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

J-10 Jet Maker AVIC Chengdu Slips 17% In A Month After 64% Surge Post Pahalgam Attack
J-10 Jet Maker AVIC Chengdu Slips 17% In A Month After 64% Surge Post Pahalgam Attack

News18

time34 minutes ago

  • News18

J-10 Jet Maker AVIC Chengdu Slips 17% In A Month After 64% Surge Post Pahalgam Attack

Last Updated: In the two weeks between April 30 and May 12, the price of Avic Chengdu Aircraft stock shot up to 95.86 CNY from 58.75 CNY, registering a jump of 64 per cent in the duration. AVIC Chengdu Aircraft Stock: Shares of Avic Chengdu Aircraft Co Ltd, a Chinese defence manufacturing and the maker of J-10 fighter jets, have seen a weak momentum by falling over 17 per cent with the ease of tensions between India and Pakistan. J-10 jet fighters were used by the Pakistan army during the border tensions. Stocks of Avic Chengdu Aircraft experienced a sharp spike after the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. In the two weeks between April 30 and May 12, the price of Avic Chengdu Aircraft stock shot up to 95.86 CNY from 58.75 CNY, registering a jump of 64 per cent in the duration. Other Chinese defence stocks also saw surged in the expectations of a full-fledged war and the surging demand of weapons like fighter jets, missiles and other equipment. Since then, the stock has been in the consolidation phase with a slide to below 80 CNY. The Chinese defence stock has declined after Prime Minister Narendra Modi challenged Pakistan's claims that Chinese-made fighter jets were responsible for destroying the Indian Air Force's Adampur airbase. First Published:

Tariffs not going to move the needle much for Chinese or Indian markets: Mark Matthews
Tariffs not going to move the needle much for Chinese or Indian markets: Mark Matthews

Economic Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Tariffs not going to move the needle much for Chinese or Indian markets: Mark Matthews

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads , MD,, suggests that while the tariff landscape between the US, China, and India is evolving, markets appear unfazed. He notes that exports are no longer critical for either the Chinese or Indian economies. Despite trade tensions, the Chinese market is performing strongly, with Hong Kong experiencing significant the Indian market, the biggest thing will be the earnings and anything less than high single digits growth will disappoint the market as it is not particularly the tariff news is moving from escalation to de-escalation. Most importantly, the US-China relationship is improving. But with India, there were hopes that a deal would be struck by the end of this month and I do not know how much the market has priced that in. I have not heard any news about it happening. There is obviously this big sticking point about access to the Indian market for US agriculture companies and I understand why that is sensitive for India because there are a lot of jobs that could be lost in the rural areas if you open that market to the outside world. So, I do not know.I do not think tariffs are going to move the needle that much. The biggest thing will be the earnings which you mentioned and typically in India, the earnings accelerate in the second half of the year. I am not expecting double-digit earnings for the April to June quarter, but I think that if it is anything less than high single digits, the market will be disappointed because it is not particularly cheap. You probably know it is at around 21 times price to earnings. So, we need some earnings to bring that price to earnings ratio possibly. The tariffs that the US has on Chinese imported goods were 30% until a couple of days ago. Now, they have gone up to 55%, and that is a very high number where companies can substitute from other sources, I am sure they will try. The Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent, said that this is a preliminary deal and both sides are willing to continue to negotiate to get a permanent deal where the numbers are lower. I do not think 55% is the final number with China. But I do think that when all is said and done, when the dust is settled, the tariff on Indian imports into the US will be lower than Chinese I just bring that back to markets, I do not think the markets are that fussed about this because exports are not really that important for the Chinese economy anymore. As you know, they are not for India either. So, this creates a lot of noise, but I do not know at the end of the day, how much it really hurts or helps either country's GDP. The Chinese market is one of the best markets in the world so far this year. The Hong Kong market is up about 20%. Last year, it was also up about 25%.China is really back on the map and Bank of America hosted a conference last month in Shanghai where many investors from around the world went to Shanghai and many of them had not visited China since before Covid. The fact they were willing to get on an airplane and go all the way to the other side of the world shows that many people are willing to be constructive on China and view it as investable again.

Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein
Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads "You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China , so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade agreement," says Shaun Rein, China Market Research is a great and big question. Trump is saying the deal has been signed and he has been talking about that the Chinese are going to send rare earths and magnets in advance to whatever the United States needs because what you have seen in the last month is the lack of rare earths that were exported to the United States has really crippled the American economy You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade has said the rumour is that they will give maybe export licenses to rare earths on a six-month trial basis to American companies. So, basically Trump is exaggerating the win in his mind and China is being a lot more honest probably saying well we do not have all the details ironed out, we want to come to an agreement but quite frankly China has the upper hand in the trade war with the United States right that the United States makes except for semiconductors, the Chinese can buy elsewhere. So, instead of buying American beef, they are buying Australian beef; instead of buying American oil, they are buying Canadian oil; instead of buying American soybeans, they are buying Brazilian soybeans. So, what you have seen is that there is a total shift in trade patterns and a total shift in power and China is at the top of the triangle, the top of the pyramid right now in terms of buying goods and trading goods from other countries. We are seeing a shift in world order right I mean that that is not true. I mean, Chinese equity markets are up 15-16% since the start of the year while the S&P 500 is only up about 2%. So, it is quite clear that the Chinese Hong Kong equity markets are outperforming the United States right the equity markets also do not necessarily reflect the economy. So, what you are seeing right now is Abigail Johnson, who is the head of Fidelity , the rumour is today that her private investment house is going to be selling 40 Chinese tech companies that they have long held because they are worried about the regulatory and I have been talking with a lot of mutual funds, I have been talking with a lot of LPs like pension funds and endowments and they are getting huge pressure from not just Trump, but previously under the Biden regime to derisk by not investing in Chinese equities, so that does not mean the economy is bad, that just means more oppression and bullying from the United States because they are trying to really contain China's economic might have happened eight years ago and that might have worked eight years ago. But the big problem is the United States has gone after Europe. The United States has gone after Canada. You even hear Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce , criticised India last week and said, why is India buying Russian weapons, they should be buying American the reality is the United States under Trump and Biden has been bullying people all around the world. And I think at some point the global south or I prefer to call it the global majority is saying you know what, let us not deal with all the drama, let us not deal with weaponization of the US dollar, weaponization of technology and let us move closer towards China where we have a lot more stable relations with Australia for instance, Australian dollar has strengthened in the last couple weeks because basically Australia is a proxy for China. Australia's economy does well when China's economy does well, whether it be buying iron ore, whether it be buying tourists going to Australia to buy products, so that is why the Aussie has strengthened and the US dollar is weakened. Now when it comes to liquidity and volume going back towards China, we are still at a very initial of the global funds only have about 25% of their holdings exposed to China. I recommend retail investors to have 15% to 20% because of the volatility and the regulatory we are seeing in my conversations with institutional investors like hedge funds that they want to come back into China, but they have not come back yet. Now, that gives a great opportunity for speculators and people who have a high-risk appetite to trade in front of the institutional personally, I am getting more exposure to Hong Kong equities the last six months because I am trying to front run what the hedge funds are doing because they still have not quite gotten into the markets yet and they will in the next three to six months because they have to make the business case, China is outperforming the S&P the United States needs a deal. Frankly, China controls about 30-35% of global manufacturing. So, America might have the money, they might have the capital, but they need to buy the products from China. At the end of the day, China makes not just rare earths, about 90% of refined rare earths, but they also make most of the ibuprofen, most of the of the antibiotics in the world comes from China. So, at the end of the day, that is real leverage. So, for instance in 2017, 18% of Chinese exports went to the US, that number is down to 14%. China on the other hand has shifted and exports to Asean, has gone up to 16%.So, basically, it is a game of chicken right now. China's economy is hurting, do not get me wrong. There are about 15 million people who are involved in the export sector. You have seen that the CPI index has dropped about 0.1%. So, we are dealing with the D-word, the economy in China is not booming, but China is not going to blink. They have the resolve to push hard back against Trump and Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick because at the end of the day, the Americans need to buy from China. They cannot buy antibiotics from any other country in the world except for a little bit from India.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store