Gordon signs Religious Freedom Restoration Act bill into law
CHEYENNE — Wyoming joined 28 other states in passing its own state-level Religious Freedom Restoration Act after Gov. Mark Gordon signed House Bill 207 on Thursday.
After Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 1993, a U.S. Supreme Court decision later found it violated the Constitution as it extended to the state and local levels. In City of Boerne v. Flores, the high court decided Congress could not create a religious exemption that would be generally applicable to state and local laws.
Since this decision, 28 states have passed RFRA laws, and nine other states have effectively done so through their court systems.
House Bill 207, primarily sponsored by Rep. Art Washut, R-Casper, protects religious exercise and observance by people, including corporations, from state government interference. The bill prevents state action from 'burdening' a person's ability to exercise their freedom of religion, including state laws with general applicability.
An exemption is made for a state law where there is proven 'compelling governmental interest' that is pursued in the least-restrictive way possible.
Washut previously told House Judiciary Committee members the purpose of the bill is to change the standard a judge uses to evaluate cases regarding religious freedom.
The Senate added two amendments to the bill after it crossed over unamended from the House of Representatives. A standing committee amendment passed during the first floor reading in the Senate aligns definitions in the bill with the federal RFRA and other, similar state acts.
Sen. Barry Crago, R-Buffalo (2025)
Sen. Barry Crago, R-Buffalo
'This bill is really about process, and process only,' said Sen. Barry Crago, R-Buffalo. 'It ensures every Wyomingite, regardless of their belief system or political power or understanding, receives a fair hearing when the government seeks to force that person to violate his or her religious beliefs.'
Sen. Cale Case, R-Lander (2025)
Sen. Cale Case, R-Lander
Sen. Cale Case, R-Lander, who voted against the bill, asked how far a person could go in claiming religious interference, such as being required to take a vaccine. Crago referred to the test provision in the bill, where the state must prove it has compelling interest and is furthering that interest in the least-restrictive way possible.
'That's up to the courts to decide,' Crago said.
Sen. Jared Olsen, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Sen. Jared Olsen, R-Cheyenne
Sen. Jared Olsen, R-Cheyenne, also noted in the bill that the belief must be a 'sincerely held religious belief.' The point of the bill, Crago concluded, is to give people a better standing in court when they feel their religious exercise or belief has been violated by the state government.
'We're not picking winners and losers,' Crago said. 'We're just giving folks their fair day in court.'
The heart of the bill, he said, provides declaratory and injunctive relief to those who feel their religious rights have been violated. Crago successfully added an amendment that removed language regarding civil actions and unlimited damages.
Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne
Majority Floor Leader Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne, who strongly supported Crago's amendment, said she counted 19 bills at that time that eliminated governmental immunity and authorized 'unlimited financial damages to government entities related to non-negligent actions of the government.'
'If you are concerned about any other funding of government, you should be concerned about that trend,' Nethercott said.
The bill is effective July 1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said the Trump administration has excluded him and his family from a picnic at the White House in what he believes to be an act of retribution, politicizing an annual celebration of bipartisanship over Paul's refusal to support the president's signature legislation. 'We just tried to get our tickets today, and they said, 'You were not invited,' ' Paul told reporters outside the Capitol on Wednesday. While he said he did now know exactly who left him out, he added, 'I think that it's somebody acting in a very petty way.'
Epoch Times
25 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
House Strips Reconciliation-Ineligible Provisions From ‘Big Beautiful Bill' in Procedural Vote
The House of Representatives on June 11 approved a procedural resolution to make changes to the House-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, stripping provisions that would make the bill ineligible for a filibuster-proof vote in the Senate. The resolution passed in a 213–207 vote along party lines. This changes the bill without the need for another vote on the full package.
San Francisco Chronicle
27 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Colombia's president bypasses lawmakers and issues decree to let voters decide on labor reform
BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Colombian President Gustavo Petro on Wednesday bypassed legislative opposition and signed a decree summoning voters to the polls in August to decide changes to the country's labor laws, including whether workdays should be limited to eight hours. The decree fulfilled Petro's threat to Congress to put his labor system overhaul before voters should senators not approve the 12-question referendum themselves. He issued the measure in a tense political climate following the Saturday shooting of opposition senator and presidential candidate Miguel Uribe Turbay during a public event. The referendum has become the crux of long-running tensions between the executive and legislative branches. After Congress rejected Petro's labor reform twice, most recently in March, he sent lawmakers a 12-question referendum proposal on May 1 as Colombian law requires that the Senate rule on the advisability of referendums. The legislative body two weeks later voted 49-47 against the measure, prompting Petro to accuse lawmakers of fraud. Petro, Colombia's first leftist president, has accused Congress of working against the interest of workers and has asked them to demonstrate across the country. The referendum's questions include whether workers should receive double pay if they work during holidays; whether daytime workdays should end at 6 p.m.; and whether open-ended contracts should be offered to workers to prioritize job stability. The disagreements between Petro and Congress date back to the start of his term in 2022, but they have heightened as he seeks to consolidate his legacy ahead of next year's legislative and presidential elections. Uribe remained in critical condition Wednesday following his shooting in broad daylight Saturday during a political rally in the capital, Bogota. Authorities investigating the motive have not ruled out the possibility that it was a targeted attack on the opposition. They are also considering whether it was an attempt to destabilize the current government, or retaliation by illegal armed groups. In anticipation of court challenges, Petro on Wednesday said his government will send the decree to Colombia's Constitutional Court for review. At the same time, the Council of State is considering a lawsuit seeking to annul the Senate's vote.
