
Teachers' forum: Rationalisation to promote privatisation & corruption
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh Sarva Shiksha Sanjha Manch, a joint forum of teacher organisations, on Saturday demanded an immediate rollback of the ongoing teacher rationalisation process in the state and including teachers' perspectives.
The Manch termed the exercise 'inconsistent' and detrimental to the education system, announcing a series of protests, including district-level 'pol-khol' (expose) rallies on 10 June, divisional rallies on the 13th, and a boycott of the 'Shala Praveshotsav' (school admission festival) from 16 June.
Speaking at a press conference at the Raipur Press Club, Virendra Dubey and other representatives asserted that the current rationalisation drive would promote privatisation of education and foster corruption.
They clarified that their opposition was not to ensuring teacher availability in single-teacher or teacher-less schools. The forum also mentioned that a teachers' body had approached HC and they were also exploring legal options in case their protests are not responded to.
'Process Halted Last Yr But Resumed Without Inccluding Improvements'
The representatives highlighted that similar rationalisation directives issued in Aug-Sept 2024 faced widespread criticism and protest.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
NYC Hotel Smartphone Booking | Bookmark Now! | New York City Hotel Booking |
Mill Canyon Road
Click Here
Undo
Although that process was halted last year, the department restarted it on 1 May 2025, without incorporating any improvements.
The Manch alleged widespread nepotism and corruption, citing the replacement of a former education minister and suspension of four divisional joint directors and several other officials. They claimed that several points in the current directive violate the departmental set-up of 2008 and the recruitment and promotion rules of 2019.
They also opposed the merging of schools based on low enrolment, short distance, or same campus.
'On Ground Changes That Will Affect Teachers & Students Not Being Addressed'
A key concern raised is the reduction of the minimum set-up for primary schools from three posts, including the headmaster, to two. This, they argued, makes proper functioning of primary schools unfeasible, especially with the attachment of 'Balwadis', raising concerns about education quality and child safety.
The reduction will lead to a large number of assistant teachers becoming surplus, causing significant disorder and discontent, they said.
The Manch criticised the exemption of new recruits on probation from being declared surplus, while existing teachers are being removed, terming it an 'injustice' and a protection of arbitrary actions by departmental officials. Furthermore, they highlighted the the uncertain future of hundreds of Pota Cabin schools in Bastar division that lack departmental set-up approval.
The rationalisation process in high and higher secondary schools, which identifies surplus teachers based on the number of periods, was deemed inappropriate, with the Manch arguing for more posts based on sections. The Manch put forward several key demands: immediate review and improvement of the rationalisation directives issued on 2 Aug 2024; a meeting of all teacher organisations for a consensual solution; no immediate changes to the departmental set-up of 2008; exclusion of headmaster posts from teacher count in primary and middle schools; and a minimum subject-free set-up for primary (01+02) and middle (01+04) schools.
Finally, the Manch urged the department to establish departmental advisory committees at all levels.
Dept Speaks On Process
Meanwhile, education department secretary Siddhartha Komal Singh Pardeshi clarified that the rationalisation is being done as per the RTE Act 2009 and NEP 2020, assuring that no teacher will lose their job.
He stated the aim is to provide quality education to children. Pardeshi explained that the rationalisation of 10,372 schools (98.6%) is being carried out on the same campus, encompassing primary, middle, high school, and higher secondary sections.
He asserted that this 'one school, one campus' approach aligns with national and international criteria for better performance and results. He added that a teacher will monitor children from class 1 to 12 and that the rationalisation will make the method flexible, allowing a teacher of higher or higher secondary school to teach students of middle or high school in case of absence of any teacher.
Pardeshi reiterated that no schools will be closed.
He stated that out of approximately 48,000 schools, 10,538 are undergoing rationalisation, with 10,372 (98.6%) on the same campus. Adding that only 166 schools are being rationalised based on distance or student-teacher ratio.
The secretary further explained that as per the RTE Act, a headmaster is required for every 150 students in primary schools, but if there are 60 students, two teachers will be present. He noted that present headmasters are handling both teaching and administrative work.
Regarding Atmanand schools, he clarified that those on deputation are not under the purview of rationalisation, but those working as part of mergers and regular employees will be affected.
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh Sarva Shiksha Sanjha Manch, a joint forum of teacher organisations, on Saturday demanded an immediate rollback of the ongoing teacher rationalisation process in the state and including teachers' perspectives.
The Manch termed the exercise 'inconsistent' and detrimental to the education system, announcing a series of protests, including district-level 'pol-khol' (expose) rallies on 10 June, divisional rallies on the 13th, and a boycott of the 'Shala Praveshotsav' (school admission festival) from 16 June.
Speaking at a press conference at the Raipur Press Club, Virendra Dubey and other representatives asserted that the current rationalisation drive would promote privatisation of education and foster corruption.
They clarified that their opposition was not to ensuring teacher availability in single-teacher or teacher-less schools. The forum also mentioned that a teachers' body had approached HC and they were also exploring legal options in case their protests are not responded to.
'Process Halted Last Yr But Resumed Without Inccluding Improvements'
The representatives highlighted that similar rationalisation directives issued in Aug-Sept 2024 faced widespread criticism and protest.
Although that process was halted last year, the department restarted it on 1 May 2025, without incorporating any improvements.
The Manch alleged widespread nepotism and corruption, citing the replacement of a former education minister and suspension of four divisional joint directors and several other officials. They claimed that several points in the current directive violate the departmental set-up of 2008 and the recruitment and promotion rules of 2019.
They also opposed the merging of schools based on low enrolment, short distance, or same campus.
'On Ground Changes That Will Affect Teachers & Students Not Being Addressed'
A key concern raised is the reduction of the minimum set-up for primary schools from three posts, including the headmaster, to two. This, they argued, makes proper functioning of primary schools unfeasible, especially with the attachment of 'Balwadis', raising concerns about education quality and child safety.
The reduction will lead to a large number of assistant teachers becoming surplus, causing significant disorder and discontent, they said.
The Manch criticised the exemption of new recruits on probation from being declared surplus, while existing teachers are being removed, terming it an 'injustice' and a protection of arbitrary actions by departmental officials. Furthermore, they highlighted the the uncertain future of hundreds of Pota Cabin schools in Bastar division that lack departmental set-up approval.
The rationalisation process in high and higher secondary schools, which identifies surplus teachers based on the number of periods, was deemed inappropriate, with the Manch arguing for more posts based on sections. The Manch put forward several key demands: immediate review and improvement of the rationalisation directives issued on 2 Aug 2024; a meeting of all teacher organisations for a consensual solution; no immediate changes to the departmental set-up of 2008; exclusion of headmaster posts from teacher count in primary and middle schools; and a minimum subject-free set-up for primary (01+02) and middle (01+04) schools.
Finally, the Manch urged the department to establish departmental advisory committees at all levels.
Dept Speaks On Process
Meanwhile, education department secretary Siddhartha Komal Singh Pardeshi clarified that the rationalisation is being done as per the RTE Act 2009 and NEP 2020, assuring that no teacher will lose their job.
He stated the aim is to provide quality education to children. Pardeshi explained that the rationalisation of 10,372 schools (98.6%) is being carried out on the same campus, encompassing primary, middle, high school, and higher secondary sections.
He asserted that this 'one school, one campus' approach aligns with national and international criteria for better performance and results. He added that a teacher will monitor children from class 1 to 12 and that the rationalisation will make the method flexible, allowing a teacher of higher or higher secondary school to teach students of middle or high school in case of absence of any teacher.
Pardeshi reiterated that no schools will be closed.
He stated that out of approximately 48,000 schools, 10,538 are undergoing rationalisation, with 10,372 (98.6%) on the same campus. Adding that only 166 schools are being rationalised based on distance or student-teacher ratio.
The secretary further explained that as per the RTE Act, a headmaster is required for every 150 students in primary schools, but if there are 60 students, two teachers will be present. He noted that present headmasters are handling both teaching and administrative work.
Regarding Atmanand schools, he clarified that those on deputation are not under the purview of rationalisation, but those working as part of mergers and regular employees will be affected.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
S. Korea halts loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts against North
AP image South Korea on Wednesday halted loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts into the nuclear-armed North, the defence ministry said, adding it was a bid to "restore trust" under Seoul's new administration. The decision to suspend the broadcasts was "to make good on a promise to restore trust in South-North Korea relations and seek peace on the Korean peninsula", the defence ministry said in a brief statement. A ministry spokesperson told AFP the broadcasts were halted Wednesday afternoon. Ties between the two Koreas deteriorated under the hardline administration of hawkish ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol. But Yoon was impeached and stripped of office earlier this year over an abortive martial law declaration. After winning last week's snap poll, Seoul's new President Lee Jae-myung pledged to improve ties with Pyongyang. The loudspeakers were turned on in the demilitarised zone that divides the two Koreas in June last year in response to a barrage of trash-filled balloons flown southward by Pyongyang. The North claimed the balloons were a response to activists floating similar missives filled with anti-Kim Jong Un propaganda and US dollar bills northwards. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo The two Koreas technically remain at war because the 1950-53 conflict ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty. The anti-North Korea broadcasts infuriate Pyongyang, which has previously threatened artillery strikes against Seoul's loudspeaker units. South Korea's resumption of its broadcasts last year was the first time the tactic had been used in six years. They typically consist of blaring K-pop songs and news reports into the North. - North Korea response? - In response, North Korea turned on its own propaganda broadcasts, sending strange and unsettling noises into the South at all hours, prompting complaints from border residents. On Ganghwa island, which is very close to the North, villager Ahn Hyo-cheol told AFP that the North Korean noises had "not subsided at all" by Wednesday afternoon. "While I don't have high hopes for how North Korea might change, I think the government's decision to halt loudspeaker broadcasts toward the North is the right move," he said. Ganghwa county councillor Park Heung-yeol told AFP the move by Seoul was "long overdue". "Halting the loudspeaker broadcasts should not be the end -- we must also work to restore inter-Korean communication channels and initiate dialogue to stop the North's broadcasts targeting the South," Park added. Lee, who took office the day after last week's election, has vowed to improve ties with the North through dialogue. "No matter how costly, peace is better than war," he said after he was elected. North Korea has not commented on Lee's election except for a brief news report informing its public of his win. Lee comes to power with his party already holding a parliamentary majority -- secure for the next three years -- meaning he is likely to be able to get his legislative agenda done. The halt to loudspeaker broadcasts "is a clear signal from Lee that he intends to deliver on his campaign promise to improve ties with the North and that he has no hostile intent toward it," said Hong Min, a senior analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification. "We can expect Lee to take further steps to further this stance, such as attempting to revive a military agreement with the North that was scrapped last year," Hong said. "The North could reciprocate by halting its own noise campaign targeting South Koreans living on border-area islands."


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Is the US abandoning Ukraine? Aid cuts loom in 2026 budget, Europe pressed to counter Russia
The United States has confirmed that it will reduce military aid to Ukraine in the proposed 2026 defense budget. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated before a congressional subcommittee that the decision is a strategic reorientation, with the Trump administration trying to de-escalate the Ukraine conflict through diplomatic efforts rather than prolonged military engagement. Hegseth also said that Washington's NATO allies should take primary responsibility for Europe's conventional defense and deterrence of Russia. This comes when growing concerns within Washington over the sustainability of the multi-billion-dollar aid packages sent to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Invest today with in Shriram's ULIP Shriram Life Insurance Undo Over the past two years, the US has committed more than $66 billion to Ukraine, supplying it with advanced weaponry, ammunition, air defense systems, and logistical support. However, with global tensions rising elsewhere, from the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East, and domestic calls for fiscal restraint growing louder, the administration is trying to push its NATO allies to spend more in supporting Ukraine. Live Events Why is the US cutting aid to Ukraine? Testifying at a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on June 10, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that funding for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) will be scaled back. 'It is a reduction in this budget,' he told lawmakers, pointing out a viewpoint different from the Biden administration. 'This administration takes a very different view of that conflict. We believe that a negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests, especially with all the competing interests around the globe.' The USAI is a key mechanism for delivering US military aid to Ukraine. While Hegseth did not disclose precise figures, he noted that the Pentagon is reassessing specific systems used in the war, saying they are 'not survivable on the modern battlefield,' hinting at a deeper review of weapons strategy beyond Ukraine. Another view is that the US doesn't want to only focus on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but a much larger potential economic threat, China. Hegseth hinted that American defense resources must be strategically distributed to counter global threats, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. At the same time, he called on NATO allies to step up, asserting, 'Europe should take primary responsibility for conventional defense and deterrence of Russia.' This messaging mirrors previous calls from Washington for the European Union and NATO to bear a greater share of the financial and logistical burden in supporting Kyiv. On the ground in Ukraine Meanwhile, Ukraine continues to face relentless Russian aerial assaults. Missile and drone strikes recently targeted Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, intensifying pressure on Ukrainian forces and infrastructure. Kyiv urgently requests additional air defense systems, including US-supplied Patriot batteries, to shield its cities and energy grid. However, the US has now reallocated some of these resources, reportedly including 20,000 anti-drone missiles originally designated for Ukraine, to American military operations in the Middle East. Ukrainian officials have not yet formally commented on the proposed aid cuts. Still, analysts warn that any significant drop in Western support could devastate the Ukrainian army and put pressure on Western European NATO countries. Is the US deserting the Ukrainians? Although the US administration's stance is complex to untangle, the US is not deserting Ukraine either. On multiple occasions, President Trump has remained committed to Ukraine's sovereignty. This aid cut may signal a growing prioritization of diplomatic pathways over sustained military funding. The Pentagon is expected to submit its full 2026 budget proposal in the coming weeks. The move will likely spark debate in Congress, where bipartisan support for Ukraine has shown signs of fracturing. The Social Security Fairness Act, passed in January, is another example of budgetary recalibration: it offers domestic spending increases while potentially diverting resources from overseas commitments. Experts believe that the United States is no longer prepared to underwrite an open-ended war in Eastern Europe without a clear endgame and that future support for Ukraine may be shaped more by diplomacy than defence.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Big Beautiful patchup?' Elon Musk expresses regret over linking Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein; social media reacts
In a dramatic turn after days of heated online clashes, billionaire Elon Musk has said he regrets posting critical comments about US President Donald Trump , signalling what social media users are calling a "big beautiful patch-up" between the two powerful figures. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk posted on Wednesday, days after he deleted a series of posts accusing Trump of being mentioned in Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The tech billionaire's remarks had fuelled speculation that he was implying a deeper connection between the MAGA supremo and the convicted sex offender. Netizens were both surprised and taken aback by the unlikely feud, expressing funny, emotional, and predictable reactions to the "patch-up". The fallout came just a week after Trump and Musk appeared at a joint press conference where the president praised Musk's contributions as he stepped down as head of the Department of Government Efficiency. "Elon gave an incredible service. There's nobody like him," Trump had said. But tensions exploded after Musk posted fierce criticism of Trump's spending bill on X, labelling it the "Big Ugly Bill". He wrote, "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." Trump responded from the White House with visible disappointment. "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," he said. The president later used his Truth Social platform to accuse Musk of going "crazy" after he removed government subsidies for electric vehicles. The argument intensified as Musk continued to post critiques and floated the idea of forming a new political party. He even suggested that he would outlast Trump politically, noting, "Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years." At one point, Musk claimed, "Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public." The post was later deleted, but it ignited a storm online. In retaliation, Trump defended his policies and claimed Musk's business empire benefited from government support that could now be at risk. Musk sarcastically responded by saying SpaceX would start decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft, though he reversed the statement hours later. Musk also reshared posts suggesting Trump should be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance, further deepening the divide. The tech mogul also shared a 1992 video of Trump and Musk together. By Wednesday, though, the mood had shifted. Musk's expression of regret hinted at a desire to de-escalate the feud, with observers wondering if a full reconciliation might be on the horizon. Many online have dubbed the development the "big beautiful patch-up", referencing Trump's often-used phrase.