
Restore Kanjur dump to mangrove forest within 3 months: HC to BMC
MUMBAI: In a major setback for the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), the Bombay high court on Friday ordered the civic body to return the dumping ground at Kanjurmarg to its original condition – a mangrove forest – within three months. The division bench of justices GS Kulkarni and Somasekhar Sundaresan struck down as illegal the 2009 de-notification of the 120-hectare plot as forest land and its conversion into a landfill for violating procedures laid down under the Forest Conservation Act (FCA), 1980.
The court was hearing a plea filed by the nonprofit Vanashakti in 2013, which challenged the grant of environment clearance (EC) for a landfill on the plot adjacent to the Thane creek.
Though the plot was originally categorised as a protected forest, in April 2006, the high court had allowed the BMC to use it as a dumping ground following an assurance from the civic body that no mangroves would be destroyed in the process. However, on December 29, 2009, the entire plot was de-notified as forest land in contravention of due process stipulated under the Forest Conservation Act, the petition said.
In response, the state government and the BMC told the court that the notification dated December 29, 2009 merely corrected an error in the forest notification, using powers statutorily granted under the General Clauses Act, 1897. Such correction did not require compliance with the process stipulated under the FCA, the government and BMC told the court.
Senior counsel Gayatri Singh, representing Vanashakti, submitted that the Forest Conservation rules issued in 2003 stipulated a detailed and finely balanced procedure pertaining to de-reservation and de-notification of forest land.
'Environmental clearance was granted (for the dumping ground) without processing forest clearance and was therefore is illegal,' she asserted.
Advocate general Birendra Saraf, representing the state, contended that originally, the land was only marginally covered by mangroves and nothing in the area constituted a forest, much less a 'protected forest'. The Supreme Court had in November 2003 already approved usage of the land for a dumping ground, subject to strict observance of laws relating to pollution, he told the court.
The division bench of justices Kulkarni and Sundaresan said that since the plot was originally covered by mangroves, it automatically fell within the coastal regulatory zone I, within the category of protected forest. The Supreme Court had no occasion to consider the implications of the FCA in the November 2003 order as there was no notification of the land as a protected forest at the time, the judged clarified.
The division bench ruled that the de-notification of plot as forest land was erroneous, unsustainable and in conflict with provisions of the FCA.
'The absence of compliance with this requirement has led to the failure of due process stipulated in the FCA rules,' the court observed, directing the BMC to restore the 119.91 hectares to its original condition within three months.
Any further proposal to de-notify the plot would need to be compliant with provisions of the FCA, the court said and granted three months to the BMC to comply with the order.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rijiju launches portal for registration, monitoring of waqf properties
Union minority affairs minister Kiren Rijiju on Friday launched a portal for the registration and monitoring of waqf properties, calling it a symbol of dedication to transparency and good governance. The Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development (UMEED) portal seeks to bring all stakeholders onto a single digital platform and streamline the management of waqf properties by ensuring real-time data collection and open access to verified information. 'We are taking a firm step toward ensuring that waqf properties are used for the benefit of the intended communities,' said Rijiju at the portal launch in the presence of minister of state for minority affairs George Kurian. Waqf properties are required to be registered on the portal within six months of the launch date. Rijiju asked representatives of state waqf boards, who were present at the launch virtually, to ensure adherence to the six-month limit. Respective state boards will have to carry out the registrations. Properties not registered within six months may get up to a two-month extension in exceptional cases such as technical delays. Those that remain unregistered beyond the extended deadline will be classified as disputed and referred to the Waqf Tribunal. Minority affairs secretary Chandra Shekhar Kumar said the portal will allow submission of documents for registering a property to prevent the inclusion of illegal or encroached land. He added the custodians of properties without documentation will be required to approach the tribunal for verification. 'Since land is a state subject, it will ultimately be up to the state governments to confirm or deny whether the land in question is indeed waqf,' Kumar said. Kumar said that women, children, and economically weaker sections will be among the primary beneficiaries of Waqf assets. The portal, which includes a field asking whether a property is on government land, was launched weeks after the passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Act. Petitions challenging the law's constitutional validity are pending in the Supreme Court. On April 17, the court declined to stay the law after the government submitted that certain provisions would not be enforced for now. Rijiju refused to comment on the challenges to the law, saying the matter is sub judice. 'I hope the court recognises that this is a landmark law... The opposition must accept this and cooperate with the government to ensure smooth implementation. As for the waqf rules, it is a natural process. We are actively working on it.' The waf properties have to be registered with details such as dimensions and geotagged locations. Properties recorded in the names of women will be ineligible to be declared as waqf. The portal will generate a 17-digit unique identification number for each property based on the state and district codes, property type, etc. The portal features dropdown-based structured data input and an online grievance redressal mechanism. The public will have access to the property information. A three-tier user verification process has been instituted for the portal. The mutawalli or an authorised person of a waqf board will initiate data entry. The checker will be a district-level officer or a designated official to verify the data, and the approver will be the CEO or an officer to grant final approval. Data protection and privacy regulations will cover the portal. A toll-free helpline has been made available for technical assistance and support.


India.com
39 minutes ago
- India.com
Big blow to Turkey by this small Indian civic body cancels plan to…, made in…
The Mumbai civic body has canceled its plan to procure Turkey-manufactured robotic lifebuoys for deployment on six beaches, officials said. The decision comes after growing backlash against Turkey in India over its support for Pakistan after Operation Sindoor. The remotely-operated rescue machines, designed to assist lifeguards in saving people from drowning, were to be deployed at Girgaum Chowpatty, Shivaji Park Dadar, Juhu, Versova, Aksa and Gorai beaches, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) said on Monday. Each unit of the machine was equipped with dual water jets, a 10,000 mAh rechargeable battery, and had the capacity to carry up to 200 kg. It could travel 800 metres into the sea at speeds up to 18 km/h and operate for about an hour, as per officials. The civic body faced strong criticism from political parties for the deal after Turkey extended diplomatic and military support to Islamabad during the last month's military confrontation between India and Pakistan. Political leaders, including of the ruling BJP and its ally Shiv Sena, had questioned the procurement of the equipment from foreign supplier instead of promoting indigenous alternatives. Turkey's open support to Pakistan in the wake of Operation Sindoor, India's military response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, triggered broader domestic calls for a boycott of goods made in the Eurasian country. (With Inputs From PTI)


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Governor Sanjay Malhotra reveals why RBI is concerned about cryptocurrencies: ‘Can hamper…'
RBI MPC: Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra on Friday said that the central bank is 'concerned' about cryptocurrencies as they can 'hamper' financial stability of the country. Speaking to reporters during an interaction after announcing the RBI MPC decisions, Sanjay Malhotra touched upon the topic of cryptocurrencies. He was asked about them in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's observation on crypto currency last month. Malhotra said that there has been no new development on cryptocurrencies. 'There is no new development as far as crypto is concerned. A committee of the government is looking after this.' 'Of course, as you are aware, we are concerned about crypto because that can hamper financial stability and monetary policy,' Malhotra said. The Supreme Court in an observation on May 19 asked the Centre why it is not making a clear cut policy on cryptocurrency. 'Why does Centre not come out with a clear cut policy on regulating cryptocurrency,' a bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh asked. The remarks from the Supreme Court came when it was hearing a bail plea of an accused who was held for illegal Bitcoin trade in Gujarat. The accused, Shailesh Babulal Bhatt, had moved top court for bail. The SC termed Bitcoin trade as an illicit trade more or less like "hawala" business. On May 5, the top court said trading in Bitcoin in India was like "dealing with a refined way of Hawala business" as it lamented the Centre's inability to come up with a clear regime on regulating virtual currency so far. India is currently working on a discussion paper for cryptocurrencies and an inter-ministerial group (IMG), comprising officials from RBI, Sebi and finance ministry, is looking into global norms. In absence of any regulation, cryptocurrency is not yet illegal in India. The discussion paper will give the stakeholders an opportunity to give their views before India decides on its policy stance on cryptocurrencies. In 2022, the government announced a flat 30 per cent tax on gains arising from cryptocurrencies. Taxing income from cryptocurrencies does not necessarily and explicitly legalise cryptocurrencies. Currently, crypto assets are unregulated in India.