logo
Tuskegee Airmen, WASP History Will Stay in Air Force Boot Camp Curriculum Following Outcry

Tuskegee Airmen, WASP History Will Stay in Air Force Boot Camp Curriculum Following Outcry

Yahoo28-01-2025

The Air Force is resuming its boot camp lessons about trailblazing Black and female World War II pilots after the material was flagged for review following President Donald Trump's order to cancel all diversity efforts in the military and federal government.
Material related to the Tuskegee Airmen, the historic Black aviators, and the Women's Airforce Service Pilots, or WASPs, who helped pilot planes stateside during the war, was initially pulled into efforts to scrub diversity-related education for Basic Military Training, the Air Force told Military.com in a statement Sunday. The move caused outcry and public backlash.
The effort was "ensuring we implement all directives outlined in the executive orders issued by the president," the service said Friday. But, following fierce public and military condemnation, the content about the WASPs and Tuskegee Airmen was said to have been reinstated by Sunday.
Read Next: Inside the Military's Scramble to Move Troops to the Mexico Border
"No curriculum or content highlighting the honor and valor of the Tuskegee Airmen or Women Airforce Service Pilots has been removed from Basic Military Training," Lt. Gen. Brian Robinson, head of Air Education and Training Command, said in a statement Sunday. "The block in which these lessons were taught included [diversity, equity and inclusion] material which was directed to be removed."
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was confirmed by the Senate late Friday in an unusually close and partisan vote, took to social media Sunday evening to say "this has been immediately reversed."
The weekend outcry over the Tuskegee and WASP material review is an example of the hurry and confusion as the military attempts to comply with Trump's executive actions.
The policy review delayed instruction for one group of boot camp trainees, and a revised training that included the accomplishments of the Tuskegee Airmen and WASPs was continued on Monday, Robinson said.
The Tuskegee Airmen were Black fighter and bomber pilots, as well as support crews, with the 332nd and 477th groups who fought in World War II, numbering more than 16,000 men and women, according to Tuskegee Airmen Inc. -- a nonprofit that advocates for and educates the public on the legacy of the aviators.
Notably, Trump promoted retired Col. Charles E. McGee, a Tuskegee Airman, to brigadier general in 2020. McGee died in 2022.
The WASP training program graduated upward of 1,000 graduates who "ferried over 50% of the combat aircraft within the United States during the war years" from 126 bases across the country, according to the Air Force Historical Support Division.
Tuskegee Airmen Inc. condemned the policy review in a news release Saturday.
"The service and sacrifice of the Tuskegee Airmen and the WASPs, who were also removed from the Air Force's training courses, are an essential part of American history and carried significant weight in the World War II veteran community," the nonprofit said. "We believe the content of these courses does not promote one category of service member or citizen over another. They are simply a part of American military history that all service members should be made aware of."
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin was still walking back confusion about the curriculum review on Monday.
"Allow me to clearly dispel a rumor -- while we are currently reviewing all training courses to ensure compliance with the executive orders, no curriculum or content highlighting the honor and valor of the Tuskegee Airmen or Women Airforce Service Pilots has been removed from Basic Military Training," Allvin said in a statement. "When policies change, it is everyone's responsibility to be diligent and ensure all remnants of the outdated policies are appropriately removed, and the new ones are clearly put in place."
The Air Force moved quickly to adhere to Trump's executive orders last week and gutted groups that were dedicated to making quality-of-life improvements for minority, female and LGBTQ+ airmen a priority. Those improvements included creating lactation rooms for nursing service members, pushing for beard policy modifications for Black airmen, and advocating for better-fitting body armor for women.
Related: Air Force Groups that Advocated for Beard Policies, Better Body Armor Are Gutted by Trump Directive

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Says Musk Will Face ‘Very Serious Consequences' If He Backs Democrats
Trump Says Musk Will Face ‘Very Serious Consequences' If He Backs Democrats

Epoch Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

Trump Says Musk Will Face ‘Very Serious Consequences' If He Backs Democrats

President Donald Trump on June 7 warned that Elon Musk could face 'serious consequences' if he decides to back Democratic political candidates in upcoming elections. While Musk campaigned for Trump's 2024 presidential run and was a key member in the Trump administration's fight against fraud and waste, the two were involved in a public spat this week, apparently fueled by their disagreements over Trump's budget priorities in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington
What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington

President Trump's signature 'Big Beautiful Bill' has precipitated an epic fallout between the US president and one of his closest allies, billionaire Elon Musk. The blowup played out publicly on social media, with both men using their respective platforms, X and Truth Social, to exchange criticisms. Related: Eyes on Senate Republicans as Trump and Musk feud over tax and spend bill Here is a summary of how the rift unfolded, and what we know so far: Donald Trump kicked off the fight during an Oval Office meeting with German chancellor Friedrich Merz. Asked about Elon Musk's criticism of his 'Big, Beautiful Bill', the US president told reporters: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed in Elon', telling them: 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left. … He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next, but I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Soon after Musk posted on X denying Trump's statement, beginning a flurry of posts that stepped up his feud with the president. Musk wrote: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' He went on to claim that without him Trump would have 'lost the election' before bemoaning what he called 'such ingratitude'. The president followed up by , prompting a return threat from the SpaceX boss to decommission the Dragon spacecraft (which brought home astronauts stuck on the ISS for months), potentially throwing US space programmes into turmoil. Hours later Musk rescinded the threat. Musk also suggested Trump should be impeached and that JD Vance should replace Trump, warning that Trump's global tariffs would 'cause a recession in the second half of this year'. Musk went on to say on X the reason the had not released the files into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was because they implicated the president. The White House called the assertions an 'unfortunate episode'. Meanwhile, Steve Bannon, a longtime ally and Elon Musk critic, suggested there were grounds to deport the tech billionaire, who has US citizenship. Bannon told the New York Times: 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately.' The spectacular blowout between Trump and Musk sent Tesla shares into free fall. They The decline in Tesla's share price on Thursday knocked about $8.73bn off Musk's total net worth, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The reported $152bn drop also decreased the value of the company to roughly $900bn.

Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick

The White House has withdrawn as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Related: Drugs, marital advice and that black eye: key takeaways from Trump's Oval Office send-off for Elon Musk Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. Related: Universe's mysteries may never be solved because of Trump's Nasa cuts, experts say 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store