
Burying my 14-year-old was my worst nightmare. This is the question I wish I'd asked.
Burying my 14-year-old was my worst nightmare. This is the question I wish I'd asked. | Opinion Gun injuries are the leading cause of death in the U.S. for children and teens. The rate of them dying from firearms has gone up 106% since 2013. We can save children from that tragedy.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
New Mexico deputies disarm two boys in coordinated response
Newly released drone footage captured two boys passing a loaded weapon before being surrounded by sheriff's deputies. The sheriff's office blurred their faces.
When I bought my 14-year-old son a crisp, navy suit with a yellow bowtie for his upcoming spring formal, I never imagined that I'd have to bury him in it just days later.
My radiant, joyful boy went over to a family member's house, where he and his cousin found an unsecured gun in a drawer, hidden beneath a T-shirt. They started playing with it, not realizing it was loaded. Minutes later, JaJuan was gone.
The phone call we received that afternoon, informing us what happened, was every parent's worst nightmare. And it was entirely preventable.
My husband and I had always been protective of JaJuan. We had taught him as a child to look both ways before crossing the street and not to accept rides from strangers. And we had always ask other parents the usual questions – about screen time, video games and curfews – before letting JaJuan go to a friend's house.
But we never asked: "Is there a gun in the house? If so, is it stored securely?"
It never occurred to us that the thing that posed the greatest risk to JaJuan's life would be a firearm, but gun injuries are the leading cause of death for children and teens in the United States. And since 2013, the firearm death rate among children and teens has increased by 106%.
Opinion: Gun violence stole our children from us. Mother's Day carries loss – and hope.
We can agree that children shouldn't die from guns
One of the things I've realized since my son passed away is that addressing gun violence and its impact – especially on children – doesn't have to be a partisan issue. With our children and teens at the center of this crisis, it can't be. A recent study from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health showed that gun injuries claimed over 2,500 children's lives in 2022 – more than car crashes, overdoses or cancers.
For older teens, 1 out of every 3 ages 15-17 who died in 2022 died as a result of a firearm injury.
Whether you're a lifelong gun owner or someone who has never touched one, we all want our children to be safe. And there are plenty of solutions that the majority of Americans support – if we'd simply start a conversation about gun violence prevention, one rooted in the common ground we share. In fact, 8 in 10 Americans agree that productive conversations can help reduce gun injury and death among children and teens.
Everyone shares the goal of reducing suicides and unintentional shootings – which in 2022 accounted for nearly 60% of all gun deaths. These tragedies often receive less media attention than intentional shootings, but they devastate families and communities all the same.
To save lives, we need a cultural shift. That starts in our homes and communities, with conversations that help people understand how asking simple questions, practicing secure storage and understanding the signs of a mental health crisis can prevent irreversible loss.
Opinion: I survived the FSU shooting. Your thoughts and prayers are killing us.
Talk to kids, other parents about gun safety. Here's how.
For starters, ask other parents, friends and relatives if they keep firearms and how they're stored. It might feel awkward at first. But just like you'd ask about peanuts if your child has an allergy, asking about guns could save a life.
Similarly, parents – even the ones who don't personally own guns – need to talk to their kids about firearm safety. Make sure kids understand that guns aren't toys, and as a precaution, what to do – and not do – if they see one. Ultimately, it's the adults' responsibility to keep them safe.
We also need to normalize open conversations around mental health. This is especially important when it comes to putting necessary time and space between a teen in a moment of crisis and a firearm, so that they don't make a tragically irreversible decision.
Parents of teens who show signs of emotional distress – like becoming suddenly withdrawn or having decreased interest in school and other activities – should consider alternative storage options for their firearms until the crisis passes.
I don't enjoy talking about this topic, but I've become so passionate about this issue because JaJuan's story could help save another family from going through what we did. Talking about secure storage and crisis intervention doesn't have to be controversial. It just has to be done to protect our children.
I encourage – in fact, I beg – other parents to start those lifesaving conversations today. And for those who don't know where to begin, information and resources to help start the conversation are available.
We don't have to – and might not – always agree on everything, but we can all agree that we can all play a role in creating a safer America where gun violence is no longer the leading cause of death for children and teens.
Julvonnia McDowell is the mother of a son who died from an unintentional shooting and is an advocate for secure gun storage.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Bodies of two U.S. hostages recovered in Israeli military operation in Gaza
Israeli special forces recovered the bodies of two American hostages who were held in Gaza, the Israel Defense Forces and the Shin Bet intelligence service announced Thursday. Why it matters: Judi Weinstein-Haggai and Gad Haggai from Kibbutz Nir Oz were murdered during the Oct. 7 attack while they were on their morning walk. Their bodies were held by a Hamas 0ff-shoot called "The Mujahideen Brigades" for more than 600 days. The remains of 36 additional hostages are still believed to be held in Gaza, including Americans Itay Chen and Omer Neutra. Driving the news: The IDF and Shin Bet said the operation to recover their bodies was conducted on Wednesday night by special forces acting on precise intelligence. State of play: The Trump administration is still negotiating with Israel and Hamas over a new Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal, but talks are deadlocked.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
FIRST READING: How some Canadian cities are becoming more lawless than the U.S.
First Reading is a Canadian politics newsletter curated by the National Post's own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here. Despite Canada's reputation as a safer version of the U.S., newly compiled data is showing that crime has worsened to the point where, on some metrics, Canadian cities are becoming more lawless than the U.S. Americans are still getting shot and murdered at higher rates than Canadians, but when it comes to theft, carjackings and break-ins, figures show that some Canadian cities are doing worse than their American counterparts. In fact, two Canadian jurisdictions — Kelowna, B.C., and Lethbridge, Alta. — now rank worse than any other urban area south of the border. In 2022, Lethbridge recorded 5,521 property crimes per 100,000 people, an average of one crime each year for every 18 residents. The worst-ranked U.S. city for property crime, Pueblo, Colo., saw property crimes hit 4,911 per 100,000. This is all according to an 85-page 'snapshot' of U.S. and Canadian crime rates compiled by the Fraser Institute. Researcher Livio Di Matteo took city-specific crime data from Statistics Canada and the FBI and compared it across the 18 years from 2004 to 2022. When Di Matteo compared rates of 'average annual property crimes' across metropolitan areas, he found that Canada was now in the lead after years of trailing the U.S. An introduction framed the figures as a check on the notion that Canada is 'a peaceable kingdom marked by less crime.' An infographic accompanying the report highlights that of the 86 U.S. and Canadian cities surrounding the Great Lakes, it's Canada's that have the worst rates of property crime. Thunder Bay and London, Ont. were the two worst-ranked cities of the 86. And the property crime stats for Windsor, Ont., were higher than for Detroit, located just across the river. In a news release, the Fraser Institute wrote that the average Torontonian is now more likely to be a victim of property crime than the average New Yorker. The report warns that comparing U.S. and Canadian crime rates is an imperfect science, in part because of the two countries' differing views of what constitutes a crime. As one example, Canadian law adopts a broad definition of sexual assault that creates a single category for 'any unwanted sexual act.' In the U.S., meanwhile, sex crimes are still stratified into specific categories such as rape. The two countries also can't be compared in terms of 'crime severity.' Since 2009, Canada's leading crime metric has been the Crime Severity Index, a tool that not only measures the quantity of crimes committed in a given year, but also tries to weight them in terms of relative damage or societal impact. The U.S., though, has no such metric. As such, the Fraser Institute report had to work with raw figures of police-reported crime, differentiated only by whether a crime was violent or non-violent. The 'comparability' of the two countries' crime figures could be skewed by something as simple as police being more diligent in counting petty crime as compared to more serious offences. But Di Matteo wrote that it was still an acceptable way 'to indicate overall crime patterns.' And for most of the 2004-2022 period, the average Canadian city did indeed post lower rates of property crime than the average American city. These averages then became tied in 2020 and 2021, with Canada pulling ahead in 2022. The year 2022 happens to be when Canada was seized by a number of unprecedented crime waves, including a wave of arsons against churches, and a massive spike in car thefts that would eventually cause Canada to be dubbed by the BBC as an 'auto theft capital of the world.' But while the average Canadian city-dweller might be more likely to get their car broken into, they still trail the United States in terms of being hurt or killed by crime. On the measure of 'violent crimes per 100,000 population,' the Fraser Institute report found that while Canada has seen violent crime increase in recent years, the U.S. remains well in the lead. This remains most dramatic in terms of homicide rate. Canada has a relatively consistent murder rate of two homicides for every 100,000 people. In recent years, the U.S. homicide rate has come close to nearly tripling that amount. The Fraser Institute report was published on March 18, and was largely overlooked amid Mark Carney's swearing-in as prime minister and the start of the 45th general election on March 23. Last week, it was highlighted in a widely circulated social media post by Dubai-based influencer Mario Nawfal. 'Canada's biggest cities are now clocking higher property crime rates than the American metros most people think of first when they hear the word 'crime,'' wrote Nawfal. The NDP's interim leader Don Davies has announced that his party will vote 'no' on accepting the terms of the Carney government's throne speech (Davies said it wasn't 'worker-centred' enough). Since the Liberals are governing as a minority, this means that either the Conservatives or the Bloc Québécois will have to vote 'yes' on the speech, lest the government fall on a confidence vote and Canada be plunged into another federal election. The opposition could always weasel out of a decision by simply abstaining on the vote, given that polls are showing that any election would probably just deliver the same result as last time. But the whole exercise has illustrated that Prime Minister Mark Carney's grip on power may not be as strong as he's indicated. It was only two weeks ago that he was speaking of having a 'mandate of change.' And in the unlikely instance that the 45th parliament ends up dissolving almost immediately due to a procedural vote on the speech from the throne, this will technically mean that we dragged King Charles III here for all of these insights and more into your inbox by signing up for the First Reading newsletter. Carney hints retaliation is coming after Trump's latest steel and aluminum tariffs After former Leafs and Blue Jays players, CRA now goes after ex-Raptors star Norman Powell
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
We've finally slowed the surge in overdose deaths. The Trump admin may undo all of it
On May 14, 2025, the Division of Overdose Prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced that the number of overdose deaths in 2024 had dropped 27%. This was an extraordinary, even historic announcement, given overdoses had risen relentlessly for more than 33 years, resulting in the deaths of more than a million Americans, with another 1 million projected to die before this decade is over. Now, for more than a year, overdose deaths have decreased every single month, most dramatically for deaths caused by illicit fentanyl — considered the toughest problem, given the opioid's high potency, simplicity of manufacture, and ease of smuggling. That very same day, the new Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in testimony before Congress, made no reference to overdoses, the number one killer of Americans 18 to 44 years of age, nor to the recent success. A week later, in his agency's 72-page 'Making America Healthy Again' manifesto, the word 'opioid' was never mentioned. Instead, he went on to propose that CDC should be disassembled, along with the other principal agencies responsible for addressing the overdose crisis. Those proposals, as part of the administration's 2026 fiscal year budget, passed the House and await action by the Senate. For nearly thirty years I was a CDC scientist. I have been outspokenly critical of how CDC and those other agencies have handled the opioid crisis, but the solution is not to take a wrecking ball to the institutions that protect us, particularly when we seem to be making progress. What will be the consequences? A health secretary who systematically ignores mention of the major killer of adult Americans is clearly not interested in research on what could account for a decrease in deaths. But among recent national initiatives, the push to increase availability of the opioid overdose antidote, naloxone (brand name Narcan), has clearly played a role. Between 2021 and 2023, the number of naloxone doses dispensed from retail pharmacies doubled, and millions of additional doses were distributed by harm reduction organizations. Then in March 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved over-the-counter distribution of a nasal spray version. By the end of the year, 20 million doses had been dispensed. The decline in overdose death rates started the month after the nasal spray became widely available. Temporal sequence is not causation, but in a public health crisis, a plausible step is mass distribution of an antidote easily administered by lay persons. Few interventions in medicine are more cost-effective than saving a life in ten seconds for $25. Shortly after being put in charge of the U.S. health care system in February 2025, Kennedy, called for immediate decreased funding for naloxone. And he didn't stop there. Slated for abolition is the National Institute for Drug Abuse, the research group at the National Institutes of Health that helped develop the nasal version of naloxone. NIDA is currently researching opioid analgesics with lower addiction risk and developing wastewater detection systems to provide early warning of new illicit drugs. What is left of NIDA will be absorbed, with other decimated institutes, into a single entity focused on 'behavioral health.'Also on the chopping block is the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, which provides the major funding for state and local naloxone distribution and drug treatment programs. CDC's Division of Overdose Prevention, which is responsible for monitoring the drug epidemic, is marked for demolition too, despite having just reported the unprecedented reduction in overdose deaths. Adding to the threat of a renewed overdose explosion, the CDC issued the stark warning of a seven-fold rise in overdoses from illicit carfentanil, an opioid 100 times more potent than fentanyl — so potent that the drug is used to sedate elephants and minuscule amounts can easily kill a person. Remnants of SAMHSA and the CDC's Division of Overdose Prevention will be folded into the new 'Agency for Healthy America." Even if we assume that every cent of the budgets of the three cancelled drug control groups is eliminated, the total reduction in the federal budget would be one-tenth of one percent, or considerably less than the cost of one aircraft carrier. According to the new director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, these transformations should be done in a way to assure that the federal workforce will 'be traumatically affected,' and 'viewed as the villains.' What should the few remaining traumatically affected villains do about the drug crisis? Kennedy, who attributes his heroin recovery to 12-step abstinence, made that clear in his 2024 documentary: 'We're going to build hundreds of healing farms' — places where people with addiction 'learn the discipline of hard work' and 'get re-parented,' all the while bringing 'a new industry to these forgotten corners of America.' Antidotes, treatment, prevention? These are at best irrelevant — more likely, a moral hazard. The first thing you learn in public health is that all victories are temporary. Back in 2000, the CDC group where I worked demonstrated that ongoing transmission of measles — the most infectious pathogen known to humankind — had been eliminated from the U.S., thanks to nationwide hard work to raise immunization levels. A quarter-century later, because of lowered immunization levels consequent to a torrent of vaccine misinformation by Kennedy and others, there have been more than 1,000 measles cases in 30 states over the first five months of this year. The question is now before Congress: If the agencies battling the drug epidemic are disabled, will a renewed explosion of deaths result? The last time the current president was in office, overdose rates rose more than 44% over the course of his tenure — the largest overdose increase in American history, with more than 300,000 lives lost. This time, we may never know if history is repeating itself since the systems that monitor overdose deaths are themselves subject to elimination. However, families of future overdose victims may still wonder if 2025 was the year we helped make Americans die again.