ICE arrests California father and leaves his children behind in car: witness
Immigration advocates on California's Central Coast are reeling after Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations reportedly conducted operations across the region this week, including a May 4 arrest in Oxnard that reportedly left two young people alone at a gas station after agents detained their father.
'They arrested someone,' gas station attendant Juan Conches said in Spanish in a video shared by 805 UndocuFund, an immigrant advocacy group. 'They left the children inside the truck.'
The station attendant said he saw about six vehicles surround the truck before the arrest.
The advocacy group identified one of the man's children as a 19-year-old 'old enough to be alone but unable to drive, stranded, and powerless to leave.' The age of the other is unknown.
The Independent has contacted the regional ICE field office for comment.
Over the last week, ICE has conducted three confirmed raids resulting in seven total arrests, with activity centered around Oxnard's La Colonia neighborhood, home to a large population of migrant farm workers from Mexico's Mixtec community, an 805 UndocuFund organizer told SFGate.
'They have overwhelmed our community,' Beatriz Basurto said.
Other arrests included May 4 and May 5 apprehensions in Santa Maria, The Santa Barbara Independent reports.
ICE's Los Angeles field office announced further Los Angeles-area arrests in Riverside and North Hills on May 5.
As The Independent has reported, farming communities across the state are filled with anxiety as the Trump administration has pursued a wide-ranging deportation campaign, detaining undocumented people, legal permanent residents, and U.S. citizens alike.
The Border Patrol kicked off 2025 with a mass sweep in Southern California farm towns, where critics said targets were stopped largely because of their appearance. The ACLU sued over the operation, and a federal judge in April issued a preliminary injunction barring the agency from making immigration arrests without reasonable suspicion.
'You just can't walk up to people with brown skin and say, 'Give me your papers,'' U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Thurston said during a hearing in the case, Cal Matters reports.
Immigration officials have been accused of boundary-pushing actions in support of President Trump's campaign promise of rapidly deporting millions of immigrants, including arresting migrants at appointments with immigration officials and a Massachusetts case in which agents smashed a car window to apprehend a Guatemalan man, in a case later dropped for failure to prosecute.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rachel Reeves vows to end use of 'costly' hotels to house asylum seekers - but not for up to four years
has vowed to end the 'costly' use of hotels to house asylum-seekers – but not for up to four years. In her Spending Review speech, the Chancellor said migrants would be moved out of hotels by the end of the current Parliament, with the next general election not due until 2029. She also promised £1billion of savings by speeding up the asylum system, along with £280million more investment in future years for the new Border Security Command. 'The party opposite left behind a broken system: billions of pounds of taxpayers' money spent on housing asylum seekers in hotels, leaving people in limbo and shunting the cost of failure onto local communities. We won't let that stand,' Ms Reeves told the Commons. 'So I can confirm today that, led by the work of the Home Secretary, we will be ending the costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament.' But the Tories said taking asylum-seekers out of hotels would simply move them into rented accommodation across the country, while speeding up asylum decisions would mean more people granted leave to remain. Julia Lopez wrote on Twitter/X: 'The Home Office just wants people off their books as fast as possible - straight onto the books of local councils. 'That means more positive asylum decisions - only making it more attractive to cross. And so it will go on.' Shadow Home Office minister Matt Vickers added: 'Rachel Reeves claims Labour will ' end the use of asylum hotels '. 'But if they won't commit to deport all illegal immigrants, where will they go? Coming to a house on your street?' Latest figures show £3.1billion was spent on housing asylum-seekers in hotels in 2023-24, out of a total asylum support bill of £4.7bn. More than 30,000 asylum-seekers are currently housed in about 200 hotels across Britain, and ministers are currently looking at moving them into derelict tower blocks and student digs instead. The Spending Review document published by HM Treasury shows the Home Office's budget will fall by 2.2 per cent in real terms over the next few years, from £22billion in the current financial year to just £22.3bn in 2028-29. Earlier this week Downing Street was forced to deny claims that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was on 'resignation watch' after heated discussions with the Chancellor over her department's budget.
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Inside the LA cop private chatroom
Los Angeles cops have a private chatroom — and California's Democratic leaders won't like what they're saying. The Instagram group 'Defend the LAPD' allows officers and commanders to talk freely about what's really going on in the streets of America's second-biggest city, where cops clash daily with anti-government rioters. The Daily Mail gained exclusive access to the 8,500-member club and spoke to its organizers — and the views they presented were a stark rebuke to Gov Gavin Newsom (pictured) and other leaders of the Democrat-run state. Despite what their bosses say, LAPD officers broadly support the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard to protect federal buildings amid a wave of sometimes violent protests against immigration raids, says the group. Members also expressed alarm at LA Mayor Karen Bass (pictured), a Democrat, for allegedly taking command of their control room, delaying the deployment of officers, and putting federal agents and the public in danger. They also accused media outlets of one-sided coverage of the protests, by focussing on heavy-handed policing while overlooking the threat that some violent activists posed to cops and the public. More broadly, they say the city has 'quietly defunded' the LAPD since the George Floyd protests of 2020, and that today's force is understaffed, underresourced, and cannot handle the crisis exploding on the streets. The revelations come as US Marines head to Los Angeles, as part of a federal strategy to quell the protests against immigration raids, which are a signature effort of President Donald Trump's second term. Clashes across LA have further polarized America's two main political parties, with Trump threatening to arrest Newsom, who slams the deployment of guardsmen as an abuse of power and an unnecessary provocation. The LAPD, the official police union, and Mayor Bass's office did not immediately respond to our requests for comment. A spokesperson for Defend the LAPD, which presents itself as a grassroots club for thousands of LA cops and their supporters, told the Daily Mail that officers of all ranks appreciate the backup of Trump's National Guard deployment. 'Everyone supports all the help they can get,' said the spokesperson. 'We need the help from other agencies, because we can't handle it. Our asses are being handed to us on a platter.' While Gov Newsom says the National Guard are not needed and part of Trump's 'manufactured' crisis, the spokesperson said this was 'not true,' and that extra boots helped keep the streets safe. 'They're here because we don't have enough personnel, after all the back door defunding they have done for years,' said the spokesperson. In the channel, officers, commanders and other members are able to post their concerns about events in a city of nearly 4 million people that's become the epicenter of Trump's controversial immigration crackdown. In the posts, which we could not independently verify, members slammed Mayor Bass for 'unprecedented political interference' this week by assuming direct control of LAPD forces and preventing cops from bailing out federal immigration agents. 'This breach of the chain of command prevented the Incident Commander from making crucial operations decisions, put Department of Homeland Security officers, FBI agents, and community members at risk, and delayed immediate LAPD support,' says the post. Another post takes aim at Ysabel Jurado, the LA City Council member at the center of a firestorm after one of her aide's was arrested on suspicion of assaulting a cop with a deadly weapon at an anti-ICE protest. According to the post, Jurado, a progressive tenants' rights lawyer, said '[expletive] the police' when she was campaigning. We could not verify the claim, and Jurado did not immediately answer our request for comment. In another post, a group member takes aim at how the riots are presented by local media — showcasing the police as heavy-handed while downplaying the threats they face from violent leftist agitators. The post focuses on KTLA's coverage of a police horse 'trampling a rioter' in a clip that omitted the 'footage right before that with the rioter throwing a Molotov cocktail at horses!' 'The media is not reporting honestly,' adds the post. The chaos on LA's streets erupted just days after Defend the LAPD released a report about underfunding and 'dysfunction' in the city's police force, which it says is short by thousands of officers at any one time. The 38-pager, which was produced with the input of more than 300 officers, says cops have had their hands tied and left unable to tackle crime by progressive politicians and the 'activist groups' they bow to. 'The Department was not prepared for large-scale unrest,' said the spokesman. The spokesperson attributed this to 'poor planning, inexperience at the top, and inefficient deployment of sworn resources.' 'That dysfunction is no longer theoretical. It's playing out live on our streets,' said the spokesperson. 'To make matters worse, officers are being told to stand down even as they're being assaulted with glass bottles, concrete, fireworks, and other dangerous projectiles. It's clear the current leadership is prioritizing optics over officer safety, and that is unacceptable.' Street demonstrations in Southern California have been underway since Friday, when activists clashed with sheriff's deputies during federal anti-immigration raids in areas with big foreign-born and Latino populations. Demonstrators in Los Angeles have assembled, among other places, at a government immigration lockup. President Trump has ordered active-duty US Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops into LA, vowing that those protesting immigration enforcement raids would be 'hit harder' than ever. Newsom slammed the move, posting on X that US Marines 'shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President. This is un-American.' Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people who are in the country illegally and to lock down the US-Mexico border, setting the ICE border enforcement agency a daily goal of arresting at least 3,000 migrants.
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Democrats introduce bill that aims to protect reproductive health data
Three Democratic members of Congress are introducing a bill to limit companies' ability to hoover up data about people's reproductive health – a measure, they say, that is necessary to protect women from persecution in the post-Roe v Wade era. Representative of California, Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon on Wednesday will file the My Body, My Data Act in both the US House and Senate. The bill aims to block companies from collecting, using, retaining or disclosing information about someone's reproductive health unless that data is essential to providing a requested service. This provision would apply to information about pregnancy, menstruation, abortion, contraception and other matters relating to reproductive health. 'Young people live our lives online, right? That includes tracking our periods, but it also includes our phones tracking our location and using Google to think about your medical care or how to obtain an abortion for yourself or a friend, or ordering abortion pills online, or using an Uber to travel to an abortion clinic,' Jacobs said. 'All of those things are tracked online, and none of those are protected right now.' Law enforcement officials have already attempted to use people's data trails to identify abortion seekers. In 2022, the year that the US supreme court overturned Roe, Nebraska levied a series of felony and misdemeanor charges against a teenager and her mother in connection to the teen's abortion. The charges relied on Facebook chats, which the social media giant had turned over. (Both the teenager and her mother pleaded guilty and were sentenced to time behind bars .) In 2023, anti-abortion activists used cellphone location information to send anti-abortion messages to people who had visited some Planned Parenthood clinics. And in May, a Texas police officer searched tens of automatic license plate reader cameras, including in states that permit abortion, for a woman who officials suspected of self-managing an abortion. The post-Roe landscape is also creating more opportunities for online surveillance. In recent years, orders for abortion pills online have spiked, as tens of thousands more Americans have used online services to obtain pills to 'self-manage' their own abortions. A number of women have also faced criminal charges over miscarriages, leading abortion rights advocates to worry that women who Google phrases like 'how to get an abortion' and then miscarry could find themselves in law enforcement's crosshairs. 'It doesn't deal with everything in terms of data brokers, but it does put women in a much stronger position to protect their rights,' Wyden said of the My Body, My Data Act. 'Reproductive rights are the ultimate privacy priority, because the fundamental right of a woman to control her own body and her own healthcare is as private as it gets.' An earlier version of the bill was introduced in 2023. Given that Republicans control Congress, the bill is not likely to pass. 'I have many Republican colleagues who say they care about data privacy. We work together on data privacy in every other area, but when it comes to anything abortion-related, they refuse to do it,' Jacobs said. 'This is also the third oldest Congress in history, and I'll be honest, many of my colleagues don't understand how period tracking apps or website searches or location data even work.' Jacobs says she uses a period tracker run by a company based in Europe that is subject to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, a set of strict regulations that governs how businesses obtain and handle people's online data. While the US has no similar regulations on the federal level, Washington state in 2023 became the first in the country to create a state version of the My Health, My Data Act. That law covers health data that is not otherwise protected by the US Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (Hipaa) – including information about reproductive healthcare services – and requires companies to give their customers more privacy disclosures and seek their authorization before selling their data. It also gives Washington residents the ability to demand those companies delete their personal information. Jacobs advises people to use apps based in states with some degree of protection for reproductive health data. She added: 'If you live in a state that is really criminalizing abortion and going after people, you should be careful about what you put online.'
