logo
Federal judge blocks Alabama from prosecuting those aiding out-of-state abortion travel

Federal judge blocks Alabama from prosecuting those aiding out-of-state abortion travel

Yahoo01-04-2025

A shot of cards on a table at West Alabama Women's Center in Tuscaloosa, Ala., on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023. U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson ruled Alabama's AG cannot punish residents for aiding out-of-state abortion care. (Vasha Hunt for Alabama Reflector)
A federal judge Monday ruled that Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall cannot prosecute people who assist individuals seeking to leave the state to obtain abortion care.
U.S. District Judge Myron H. Thompson Monday ruled in a 131-page opinion that the AG's threatened enforcement of the state's criminal laws to prosecute those who assist individuals seeking to leave the state for abortion care violates both the First Amendment and the right to travel.
'At its core, this case is simply about whether a state may prevent people within its borders from going to another state, and from assisting others in going to another state, to engage in lawful conduct there,' Thompson repeated from his ruling in May denying the AG's motion to dismiss and added, 'The court now answers no, a state cannot.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The lawsuit was filed by Yellowhammer Fund; WAWC, formerly the West Alabama Women's Center; Alabama Women's Center (AWC) in Huntsville and Dr. Yashica Robinson, after Marshall in 2022 publicly threatened to criminally prosecute those who assist women seeking to travel out-of-state to get an abortion under Alabama's near-total abortion ban. Marshall's office later defended his power to do so in a court filing in August 2023.
'An elective abortion performed in Alabama would be a criminal offense; thus, a conspiracy formed in the State to have that same act performed outside the State is illegal,' the filing stated.
Amanda Priest, a spokesperson for the Attorney General's office, wrote in an email that 'the office is reviewing the decision to determine the state's options.'
Alabama has had an effective ban on abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down federal abortion rights protections in 2022.
Thompson ruled that the attorney general's threats violated the plaintiffs' clients' right to travel. He said in the ruling that the right to travel includes the right both to move physically between states and to do what is lawful in those states, and prosecuting those who facilitate lawful out-of-state abortions would violate that right.
The court also found that the attorney general's threatened enforcement of Alabama's criminal laws imposes a content- and viewpoint-based restriction on speech, which violates the First Amendment.
'The attorney general has presented no other reason to deny the plaintiffs' First Amendment claim besides his attempt to invoke the Giboney exception, which, as stated, does not extend to speech in furtherance of lawful out-of-state conduct,' Thompson wrote.
The Giboney exception would restrict speech that is directly part of or essential to committing a crime.
'Since the attorney general's threatened enforcement cannot meet strict scrutiny, the court will enter summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for this freedom-of-speech claim,' Thompson concluded.
Thompson, in his conclusion, cautioned against the implications of the attorney general's threats, writing that it is 'one thing for Alabama to outlaw by statute what happens in its own backyard. It is another thing for the state to enforce its values and laws, as chosen by the attorney general, outside its boundaries by punishing its citizens and others who help.'
'If Alabama held the power its Attorney General asserts here, it is hard to envision a limiting principle besides what the Attorney General personally sees as permissible and impermissible,' he wrote.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Seattle mayor urges peaceful protests, warns against fueling Trump narrative
Seattle mayor urges peaceful protests, warns against fueling Trump narrative

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Seattle mayor urges peaceful protests, warns against fueling Trump narrative

The Brief Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell is urging peaceful protests in Seattle, saying violence is what Trump wants to "spin his false narrative" about the city. An anti-ICE rally is set to take place on Wednesday at 7 p.m. at Cal Anderson Park. A national "NO KINGS" demonstration is planned for Saturday, President Trump's birthday. SEATTLE - Mayor Bruce Harrell is urging Seattle protesters to remain peaceful, warning that violence and property damage would reinforce a narrative President Donald Trump could use to misrepresent the city. As the nation witnesses violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement in Los Angeles, people in other cities, like Seattle, are holding similar rallies in solidarity. This week alone, Seattle has already seen anti-ICE demonstrations at the Federal Building and pro-Palestine rallies at the U-District light rail station urging the University of Washington to cut ties with Boeing due to the company's military contracts with Israel. More protests are expected in the coming days. "The Trump administration's actions in Los Angeles are an extreme and egregious overreach of federal authority meant to escalate tensions and distract from his failures to live up to the promises he hasn't delivered on," the Mayor wrote in part. "We disagree with Trump's ICE policy of mass deportations that has already been on full display in American communities with arrests, detentions, and deportations often occurring in violation of due process." An anti-ICE rally is set for 7 p.m. Wednesday at Seattle's Cal Anderson Park, calling on the federal government to stop the deportations conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). What they're saying "The people of Los Angeles and surrounding areas have taken a courageous stand against Trump's reign of terror targeting immigrant families," wrote Party of Socialism and Liberation (PSL) wrote in an Instagram post. "In response, the administration has falsely labeled those taking to the streets in protest of the brutal war on immigrants as "rioters" and called in thousands of National Guard soldiers for a crackdown." The PSL called on protesters not to "let this repression intimidate" the community and encouraged Antifa to "invade Seattle" on Wednesday. Amid recent violence in Los Angeles, Harrell reiterated that violent actions would only serve to justify Trump's policies. "Seattle strongly supports the First Amendment rights of our residents, and we encourage residents to stand up for their values peacefully," Mayor Harrell wrote. "There is no room for violence. Violence and property damage are exactly what Trump wants to spin his false narrative of our city." Major anti-Trump demonstrations are scheduled across the U.S. on Saturday, June 14, including several in Washington state. The "NO KINGS" campaign is promoting a national day of action to protest what it calls the "increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption" of the Trump administration. The event coincides with President Trump's birthday and is intended to counter a planned military parade in Washington, D.C. What they're saying "In America, we don't put up with would-be kings. NO KINGS is a national day of action and mass mobilization in response to increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption from Trump and his allies," read a statement from NO KINGS organizers. "We've watched as they've cracked down on free speech, detained people for their political views, threatened to deport American citizens, and defied the courts. They've done this all while continuing to serve and enrich their billionaire allies." In addition to the protest at Cal Anderson Park in Seattle, demonstrations are planned in: Everett Tacoma Olympia Vancouver Spokane Other cities across the state The Source Information in this story comes from an official statement from Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell, SUPER UW, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, "NO KINGS" demonstration organizers and original reporting by FOX 13 Seattle. Travis Decker manhunt: 'Remote' areas of 5 WA counties told to lock doors Former Army squadmate shares insight into Travis Decker's military past Miles Hudson found guilty on 2 counts of reckless driving in Seattle Key figures from Bryan Kohberger's youth summoned to Idaho for student murders trial Rochester dog training facility owner accused of killing employee during video shoot To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter. Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

Detroit anti-ICE protests: Demonstrators take to the streets amid LA protests
Detroit anti-ICE protests: Demonstrators take to the streets amid LA protests

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Detroit anti-ICE protests: Demonstrators take to the streets amid LA protests

The Brief Anti-ICE protests in LA have spread to Detroit. The protesting comes as thousands of troops and hundreds of Marines have been deployed to L.A. by the Trump administration. Activists say immigrants trying to get citizenship are being detained. DETROIT (FOX 2) - All eyes were on Los Angeles as anti-ICE protests continued into day 6, and now demonstrators in Detroit are lending their voices to the fight. This as ICE says they are keeping up their targeted immigration enforcement across the region, arresting two dozen undocumented immigrants in a recent span. Local perspective They hit the streets multiple times Wednesday with a single clear message, stop the raids. Demonstrators joined the fight as they protested outside the ICE office in Detroit. The protesting comes as thousands of troops and hundreds of Marines have been deployed to L.A. by the Trump administration. Attorneys like Julie Hurwitz are monitoring demonstrations taking place on Wednesday to ensure First Amendment rights are not violated. "I think we can expect to happen in cities all over the country. It's a direct violation of the Constitution," Hurwitz said. "The over-assertion of power by our government is a direct assault on the rule of law, the Constitution, and democracy." What they're saying Activists say immigrants trying to get citizenship are being detained. Meanwhile, ICE says it's carrying out orders designed to keep the streets safe. They say locally they arrested a convicted murderer and convicted arsonist on the same day. A newly posted video by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement showing its Detroit officers and special agents arresting 24 undocumented immigrants in what ICE calls "ongoing targeted immigration enforcement operations," one of many local and national scenes prompting responses like this. Meanwhile, protesters say due process is not at play during court hearings. "Today, I know that three of my community members who came in this morning did not come out, and their phones are not responding," said Sarr. A Detroit City Council member is urging the federal government to provide better pathways to citizenship. "The federal government needs to have an actual process for people to become citizens," said one protester. "We do not have a process and myself I am an immigrant. I was born in Mexico. And when it was easier, it still took us ten years, and we still paid thousands of dollars to become citizens." The Source FOX 2 spoke with protesters and ICE officials for information on this report.

Supreme Court expected to rule on Texas porn age verification law
Supreme Court expected to rule on Texas porn age verification law

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court expected to rule on Texas porn age verification law

WASHINGTON (KXAN) – The Supreme Court is expected to rule in the coming days on whether Texas can require pornographic websites to verify users' ages, a case that could reshape online speech protections and affect similar laws in more than 20 states. The justices heard arguments in January over Texas House Bill 1181, which requires websites with content 'harmful to minors' to check government-issued IDs before allowing access. The law carries fines up to $10,000 per violation, rising to $250,000 if minors are involved. At the heart of Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton is a fundamental constitutional question: What legal standard should courts use when evaluating laws that restrict adults' access to protected speech in the name of protecting children? The adult entertainment industry argues the law violates the First Amendment by burdening adults' access to legal content and eliminating their anonymity online. Texas counters that age verification is a reasonable way to protect minors, similar to laws preventing alcohol sales to children. The case has already had real-world impact. Pornhub, one of the world's most popular adult sites, blocked Texas users rather than comply with the identification requirements. A federal judge initially blocked the law, but the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals allowed the age verification portion to take effect. The appeals court applied 'rational basis review,' the most lenient constitutional standard, reasoning that laws protecting children need only be reasonable. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton defended the law as protecting children. 'We are not going to lose,' Paxton told reporters in January. 'We are going to have the right to enforce this.' The Free Speech Coalition, a trade association for the adult industry, appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that courts should apply 'strict scrutiny' — the most demanding standard — because the law restricts content-based speech. The group points to the court's 2004 decision in Ashcroft v. ACLU, where justices struck down a federal law requiring age verification for websites with content 'harmful to children.' The decision will affect similar age verification laws enacted in states including Louisiana, Utah, Virginia and Arkansas. By one count, 23 states passed such measures in 2023 and 2024. Civil liberties groups warn the laws expose adults to privacy risks and could set precedent for broader internet restrictions. Child safety advocates support the measures as necessary protections in the digital age. The Court will be issuing opinions throughout the month of June, before their summer recess. The next term for the Supreme Court starts in October. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store