logo
RIF uncertainty reigns

RIF uncertainty reigns

Politico17-03-2025

Presented by
With help from Chris Marquette and Oriana Pawlyk
Quick Fix
— The beleaguered federal workforce, including at DOT, is bracing for wide-scale layoffs — and what will happen next with probationary workers a court ordered be rehired is unclear.
— The Justice Department got another four weeks to continue talks with Boeing over a plea agreement tied to the 737 MAX 8 crashes in 2018 and 2019.
— The FAA offered (some) clarity on how it is using artificial intelligence to identify aviation risks in the wake of January's regional jet-Black Hawk disaster.
IT'S MONDAY: You're reading Morning Transportation, your Washington policy guide to everything that moves. We're glad you're here. Send tips, feedback and song lyrics to Sam at sogozalek@politico.com, Chris at cmarquette@politico.com and Oriana at opawlyk@politico.com and follow us at @SamOgozalek, @ChrisMarquette_ and @Oriana0214.
'A subway train thunders through the Bronx/ A taxi horn on the corner honks/ But I adore every roar/ And what more do I need?'
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
Driving the day
WHAT'S NEXT?: There's a growing sense of whiplash and uncertainty across the federal workforce — with DOT being no exception — as employees hunker down for the Trump administration's boldest attempt yet to slash its head count: massive reduction-in-force orders, which will be reviewed at the White House.
— To recap, after an initial wave of firings of probationary workers, who have fewer job protections, agencies are now planning wide-scale layoffs, known as RIFs. Your MT team has documented how employees at DOT who helped make sure travelers are safe got swept up in the earlier mid-February purge — and this raises questions about exactly what similar functions may be the next target?
— Asked for the agency's RIF plan, or whether it had been finalized, a DOT spokesperson last week gave a statement to your MT host that didn't really answer the questions. They instead noted that DOT is working with Elon Musk and his cost-cutters to ax 'waste, fraud, and abuse' while also 'investing in our core mission of safety, finding new efficiencies, and unleashing a wave of innovation.'
AND THEN THERE'S THE COURTS: Adding to the confusion is the rapid-fire decisions last week from two federal judges who reversed the administration's culling of scores of probationary workers. One of them, Judge James Bredar of Maryland, ordered DOT and over a dozen other agencies to reinstate the fired employees before 1 p.m. today. Bredar also directed officials to file court papers showing how they've complied with his decision — such as the number of workers brought back 'to the greatest degree of granularity practicable.' (His order expires on March 27, but the Democratic state attorneys general who brought the case can argue for an extension.)
— Your MT team on Friday had yet to hear of any fired workers returning to DOT. The Justice Department quickly appealed both rulings, only further muddying the situation.
— The looming RIFs, meanwhile, raise the prospect of employees being rehired only to be quickly laid off.
Aviation
KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD: The DOJ on Friday again asked for more time to decide what to do with the Boeing plea agreement related to the 737 MAX 8 crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia. In a joint filing, the agency and the planemaker sought an additional four weeks so they could keep hashing out the issue. (They want to file another status report by April 11.)
— 'The parties have not reached agreement but continue to work in good faith toward that end, to include the briefing of new Department leadership,' the court papers read.
— Judge Reed O'Connor, presiding over the case in the Northern District of Texas, swiftly granted the extension Friday.
A BIT MORE CLARITY: Duffy last week touted how the FAA is deploying artificial intelligence to identify any 'hot spots' at U.S. airports where helicopters and planes fly close to one another, like at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. The agency on Friday drilled down into (some) of the specifics:
— The FAA said it is 'using machine learning and language modeling to scan incident reports and mine multiple data sources to find themes and areas of risk.' The agency added that it is assessing eight cities with charted helicopter routes: Boston, New York, the Baltimore-D.C. area, Detroit, Chicago, Dallas, Houston and Los Angeles, as well as the Gulf Coast, including offshore operations. Regulators said they will issue corrective action plans if they identify any issues.
YES, WE'RE DOING IT: The FAA confirmed Friday that it's permanently restricting certain helicopter traffic around Reagan National after the NTSB issued an urgent recommendation to do so while it continues to probe January's air disaster.
— One new nugget: The FAA said it will limit the use of visual separation to certain Coast Guard, Marine and Park Police helicopter operations outside of the restricted airspace.
— The FAA added that if helicopters must fly through what's known as the Route 4 area for an urgent reason, like medical treatment or presidential transport, the agency will 'keep them specific distances away from airplanes.'
WHAT TRUMP WANTS: During a Fox News interview aired Friday, Duffy said DOT and the FAA are not yet ready to allow Boeing to increase its production cap of 38 737 MAX per month, which regulators imposed after last year's door plug blowout. But he added that, when it comes to Trump, who is miffed at Boeing's Air Force One delays, the president 'wants us to not be too restrictive. He wants us to be smart and loosen up' the limitations on Boeing's production 'when it's appropriate.'
SLIGHT UPTICK: DOT said Friday that airlines logged a cancellation rate of 1.4 percent last year — a small increase from 1.3 percent in 2023.
— They also reported 437 tarmac delays lasting more than three hours on domestic flights in 2024, a roughly 51 percent increase compared to the year prior.
APPROPRIATIONS
A REPUBLICAN VICTORY: The Senate passed a House-GOP written spending bill, 54-46, almost entirely along party lines Friday after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer decided it wasn't worth risking a shutdown, enraging his party's progressive flank, Katherine Tully-McManus reports. The nearly seven-month stopgap, which Trump signed Saturday and runs through Sept. 30, includes:
— A provision that extends existing DOJ and DHS counter-drone authorities until the end of the fiscal year.
— A roughly $15.8 million rescission for operations and support at the Transportation Security Administration.
Automobiles
EYEING ABUSE POTENTIAL: Reps. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) and Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) are introducing a bill today that would set up a process in which domestic violence and sexual assault survivors can request that internet-connected vehicle manufacturers disable an abuser's access to such technology. Automakers would have to publish information on their websites about how survivors can ask them to take action. The legislation would direct the FCC, in consultation with NHTSA, to conduct a rulemaking.
— As MT readers will know, during the fight over Massachusetts' 2020 right-to-repair ballot measure, the Coalition for Safe and Secure Data, a group funded by automaker trade groups, warned that bad actors could hack into wireless vehicle data and expose sensitive geolocation markers that could reveal where people go and when.
The Autobahn
— 'Major air carriers challenge ruling on Biden airline fee rules.' Reuters.
— 'Tesla warns it could face retaliatory tariffs.' Reuters.
— 'Astronaut crew docks with space station to replace 'Butch and Suni.'' Reuters.
— 'Conservatives' Tesla Rescue Mission Has Its Work Cut Out.' New York Times.
— 'China Condemns Panama Canal Deal, Asserting a Right to Influence the Region.' New York Times.
— 'BMW Expects $1.1 Billion Earnings Hit From Tariffs This Year.' Wall Street Journal.
— 'Tesla Develops Cheaper Model Y in China to Battle Growing Competition.' Wall Street Journal.
— 'Don't click on those road toll texts. Officials issue warnings about the smishing scam.' AP.
— 'FAA proposes inspections for 'excessive gaps' in Boeing's 787.' Seattle Times.
— 'Elon Reportedly Orders Government to Stop Feeding the Bomb-Sniffing Dogs.' Futurism.
— 'FAA Has Taken Steps To Prevent and Mitigate Runway Incursions, but Work Remains To Improve Data Analytics and Implement Key Initiatives.' DOT Office of Inspector General.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Musk's ‘soap opera' with Trump could dent his businesses — and upend federal policy
How Musk's ‘soap opera' with Trump could dent his businesses — and upend federal policy

Politico

time20 hours ago

  • Politico

How Musk's ‘soap opera' with Trump could dent his businesses — and upend federal policy

Elon Musk's rift with President Donald Trump is exposing his companies to all the perilous downsides of going to war with his former First Buddy. From SpaceX's role as a defense and space contractor to Starlink's hopes for billions in federal broadband subsidies and air traffic control contracts, Musk's businesses stood to reap potentially limitless gains from his 130 days as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief. Even after the world's richest man left the White House a week ago, acolytes from his Department of Government Efficiency remained in key positions at agencies that make decisions about his companies — including weighing how to handle safety problems at Tesla, alleged security violations involving X, Musk's potential ventures in cryptocurrency, or air pollution generated by his artificial intelligence agent Grok. Now those same arms of government — the vast, powerful federal bureaucracy that Trump has openly portrayed as a weapon to be wielded against his enemies — are potential threats to Musk's business empire. Already, fallout from the Musk-Trump feud has wiped billions of dollars off Tesla's stock, although it recovered somewhat Friday after the White House sent signals of a possible rapprochement. The drama could reshape myriad policy outcomes, including the futures of brain-chip technology or America's hopes of reaching Mars. 'This is quite the soap opera,' said Steve Sosnick, a Wall Street veteran who works as chief strategist for Interactive Brokers. 'A lot of people saw this as a potentially combustible relationship, but the speed and ferocity at which it combusted is really astounding.' Here are some of the potential implications for Musk's businesses as a once-mighty alliance between the two men at the peaks of wealth and political power devolves into an ugly divorce: Tesla is arguably the cornerstone of Musk's business interests, the company that helped electric cars go mainstream in the U.S. and has visions of dominating the future of self-driving taxis. But much of its fate is in the hands of regulators at the Transportation, Treasury and Commerce departments. Before Trump's second term started, DOT's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had opened probes targeting significant concerns with Tesla's design, mostly involving its suite of auto-throttle and lane-keeping technologies that the company erroneously names 'Autopilot' or 'Full Self Driving.' The agency investigates safety issues with automakers and can issue recalls for cars that suffer defects — and while Tesla had been poised for a potentially easier ride with Musk in Trump's good graces, that dynamic could now flip. Musk is also keenly interested in autonomous vehicle technology and has a significant stake in seeing it more widely adopted. Early moves by DOT had appeared aligned with Musk's interests, including requiring less self-reporting for some crashes involving driverless cars. He also wants national standards for autonomous vehicles, rather than the state-by-state patchwork that exists now — a wish that Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has supported. But Congress has failed in the past to enact legislation to create a national standard, and Musk's barrage of attacks on GOP congressional leaders could make that already heavy legislative lift even harder to reach. Tesla also benefits from a suite of federal clean energy policies left over from the Biden era, including a $7,500 tax break for electric vehicle purchases, that Republicans are now pushing to abolish in the 'big beautiful bill' that triggered the flameout between Musk and Trump. (Musk has denied that his attacks on the bill are an attempt to salvage the tax credits — saying his complaint is the trillions of dollars that the bill would add to the national debt.) Tesla faces an additional threat from a Commerce Department proposal earlier this year to impose tariffs of up to 721 percent on battery ingredients from China. The GOP megabill also threatens to deliver a quick death to tax incentives that are crucial for Tesla's solar energy generation and storage division, whose annual revenues recently jumped 67 percent year-over-year to $10 billion. Tesla Energy has instead urged the Senate to support a 'sensible wind down' of those tax credits, arguing that ending them abruptly 'would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid.' — Chris Marquette and Kelsey Tamborrino Trump's most direct threat to punish Musk came in a Truth Social post Thursday, in which he mused about cutting billions of dollars in the megabillionaire's companies' U.S. government contracts. Calling it 'the easiest way to save money in our Budget,' Trump added that he 'was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' That threat could cut both ways. SpaceX alone has received at least $20.9 billion in government contracts over the past 18 years, largely from NASA and the Defense Department, according to public federal spending records. The majority of that funding was awarded within the last five years. But the government depends on Musk's companies as well, with the Pentagon relying on his rocket company, SpaceX, for rapid and low-cost launches. It is unlikely that its biggest competitors, including the joint Boeing and Lockheed Martin-backed venture ULA or the Jeff Bezos-led BlueOrigin, could make up the difference. NASA relies on SpaceX as the only American company able to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station, at least until Boeing works out problems with its Starliner. Musk, aware of that fact, greeted Trump's announcement with a counterpunch — tweeting that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft 'immediately.' Musk later walked back that comment upon the advice of an account on X named 'Alaska.' If SpaceX did decommission Dragon, the U.S. would have to go back to hitching rides aboard Russian spacecraft — a potentially awkward arrangement as Trump pushes Russian President Vladimir Putin to resolve his war in Ukraine. The move would also imperil plans to launch commercial space stations under a NASA-funded program. In addition, SpaceX is key to NASA plans to return to the moon, with the company slated to provide a landing system for astronauts for a planned 2027 mission. SpaceX was also seen as a top contender to win contracts for Trump's proposed 'Golden Dome' defense system, which would rely on a constellation of satellites to track missile threats against the U.S. homeland. Musk's SpaceX has already landed federal contracts for seven upcoming space launches worth $845.8 million out of nine that the U.S. is set to conduct. Payload, a media outlet covering the space industry, estimated that SpaceX's revenue shot up by more than 50 percent to over $13 billion in 2024, with U.S. government launches and Starlink purchases helping to drive the increase. DOT could also create significant headaches for SpaceX, whose launches are licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration. SpaceX can't launch without an FAA permit, and under the Biden administration several of its launches were delayed or prohibited until the company fixed problems or passed environmental reviews. The FAA also slapped SpaceX with a $633,009 fine last year for separate launch violations, triggering Musk to call for its then-administrator Mike Whitaker to resign. Whitaker subsequently stepped down, effective the day Trump took office — years ahead of the end of his five-year term. — Jack Detsch, Joe Gould, Sam Skove, Oriana Pawlyk and Jessie Blaeser Starlink, SpaceX's satellite subsidiary, has been angling for a role in the FAA's promise to upgrade its beleaguered air traffic control system — one of the most criticized potential conflicts of interest between Musk's businesses and his former leading role in the Trump administration. And it's seeking billions of dollars in Biden-era broadband subsidies, a decision in the hands of the Commerce Department. Now all that is at risk. Musk has publicly promoted Starlink's satellite communications terminals as a solution for the FAA's communications technology problems, while criticizing Verizon's work on a $2.4 billion contract meant to upgrade the agency's telecom infrastructure from copper wires to fiber optics. (He later conceded that he had meant to criticize a different contractor.) Duffy more recently urged Congress to approve a massive improvement plan for the FAA that could, among other fixes, allow either fiber or satellite technology to replace the agency's telecommunications equipment. He said he was 'agnostic' about whether Musk's companies should be involved. Duffy also allowed SpaceX employees to visit an FAA air traffic control center in Virginia in February, and some SpaceX engineers took temporary jobs at the agency under an ethics arrangement that allowed them to take part in matters that could affect the company's financial interests. To date, however, the FAA has not disclosed any information about whether it intends to modify the Verizon contract or award any business to Starlink, beyond a handful of test sites that have been in progress since before Trump took office. At the same time, Starlink could reap enormous taxpayer subsidies from the federal buildout of fast internet access across the country as the Commerce Department overhauls its funding rules to allow a larger role for satellite companies. The changes in the $42.45 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program were expected to hand a bigger role — and much more money — to new technologies like satellite broadband. Musk's Starlink would likely be the big winner from that overhaul. Musk was also looking to Trump-appointed officials in Commerce and the Federal Communications Commission to make smaller rule changes that could have helped expand Starlink's business, such as freeing up wireless bandwidth for satellite service providers. — Oriana Pawlyk and John Hendel The Federal Trade Commission is in charge of enforcing a consent decree stemming from a 2011 settlement with Musk's social media company — then called Twitter and under different ownership — over data security violations. The order was updated in 2022 when the company had to pay a $150 million fine for violating the original deal, and it's set to keep X under FTC scrutiny until 2042. The order requires periodic audits of X's privacy and security practices, and violations could result in extending the consent decree order, as well as additional fines. It's been a thorn in Musk's side since he acquired the company. The FTC is also investigating whether advertising groups violated antitrust laws through coordinating boycotts against X — an investigation that could help Musk, if it turns up illegal collusion. Or regulators could drop or stall the probe amid the Musk-Trump feud. Meanwhile, the clash between Musk and Trump blew up just as the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday was granting Musk, a longtime critic of the agency, another six weeks to respond to a January lawsuit over his purchases of Twitter stock in 2022. The agency has alleged that Musk was 11 days late to publicly disclose he had acquired a major stake in the company — a gap that allowed him to buy up shares cheaply while investors lost out on more than $150 million. How Trump's SEC handles the case has already been a question mark to many former Wall Street regulators. — Alfred Ng and Declan Harty Musk's brain-implant company Neuralink has won some key federal approvals allowing it to test its technology, but it will ultimately need Food and Drug Administration clearance for its chip to reach the market. Neuralink said in May that the company had received a breakthrough designation from the FDA for its device, which aims to restore the ability to communicate in people with severe speech impediments caused by a variety of neurological conditions or paralysis. The designation gives the company quicker access to agency feedback while trying to expedite the review process. While FDA commissioners have historically shied away from interfering in product reviews, the agency head could call for conditions to be placed on any Neuralink clearance, such as postmarketing study requirements. Commissioner Marty Makary recently unveiled a framework for approving updated Covid vaccines that sets study expectations for manufacturers who want to get their shots approved for young, healthy people. The agency green-lit the company's first clinical trial in humans in 2023. — Lauren Gardner The Trump-Musk breakup comes as Congress is considering legislation that would regulate cryptocurrencies. Musk — a longtime fan of the industry and particularly the token Dogecoin — isn't explicitly in the crypto business. But his social media company's plan to launch an 'X money' platform with Visa has sparked concerns among some lawmakers that he or another big technology firm could seek to issue a digital currency known as a stablecoin that is pegged to the value of the dollar. Lawmakers could include language in crypto legislation that would limit tech firms' ability to use stablecoins to get into financial services. That would allay fears from Democrats about digital currencies breaking down historic barriers between banking and commerce firms — but it would deliver a blow to Musk. What's more, X's payments company is poised to operate as a money transmitter business that is regulated by the Treasury Department. The company has already obtained licenses in several dozen states and has registered with Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. — Jasper Goodman and Michael Stratford Trump's environmental regulators also have the power to obstruct one of Musk's highest-profile initiatives — his artificial intelligence company, xAI. The Memphis, Tennessee-based supercomputer behind Musk's chatbot, Grok, has a voracious appetite for electricity, and has been powered in part by natural gas turbines operating without Clean Air Act permits since June 2024. The Environmental Protection Agency has so far declined to take any action against the sprawling supercomputer facility for the huge amounts of smog-forming air pollution it's releasing. Theoretically, though, it could order xAI to shut the unpermitted turbines down. If that happens, Grok would be forced to operate on just 150 megawatts of power that xAI receives from the local electric grid — a fraction of what it needs. Musk has underscored the importance of the turbines to his operations, saying at the launch of Grok3 in February that the bot was powered by 'trailer after trailer of generators.' xAI was valued at $80 billion in March when it bought Musk's social media site X. xAI is now seeking a Clean Air Act permit for 15 of the turbines. The decision technically lies with the Shelby County Health Department, but the department has requested assistance from EPA, which is reviewing the issue. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin met with xAI representatives at the end of May. — Ariel Wittenberg

How We Obtained and Vetted a Russian Intelligence Document
How We Obtained and Vetted a Russian Intelligence Document

New York Times

timea day ago

  • New York Times

How We Obtained and Vetted a Russian Intelligence Document

On the popular messaging app Telegram, cybercriminals advertise stolen government documents from around the world. Intelligence briefings from Indonesia for $5,000. Diplomatic cables from Taiwan for $10,000. The identities of Iranian spies for $3,000. Anybody is welcome to browse these channels. They are entirely anonymous. In November, a crime group known as Ares Leaks announced on Telegram that it was selling classified Russian intelligence documents. The group claimed that the records originated from inside the Federal Security Service, or F.S.B. The New York Times does not pay its sources or buy stolen documents. But we do accept documents that are provided without cost or strings attached. And it is common practice for sellers like Ares Leaks to share free samples. In this case, Ares Leaks provided snapshots of Russian intelligence documents and, most important, a complete F.S.B. counterintelligence document about China. More documents were available, the group said, for a negotiable price paid in the cryptocurrency Monero. The sample document on China appeared to come from the security agency's Department for Counterintelligence Operations, known as the D.K.R.O. And it offered tantalizing insight into Russia's relationship with China, one of the most important — and least understood — alliances in modern geopolitics. It described deep concerns in Moscow about Chinese espionage, and it revealed that Russia operates a secretive program to organize and analyze data from the popular Chinese messaging app WeChat. The document looked consistent with F.S.B. records that have previously been made public. Times reporters who have studied Russian espionage for years analyzed the material and saw nothing immediately suspicious. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store