logo
Proposed commission would regulate tribal members' hunting, fishing rights

Proposed commission would regulate tribal members' hunting, fishing rights

Yahoo26-03-2025

Southeastern Connecticut's federally recognized Indian tribes — the Mashantucket Pequots and the Mohegans — expressed support this week for a bill calling for a 20-member commission that would regulate tribal members' hunting, fishing and gathering on nontribal lands and water in the state.
The tribes testified on the bill during a public hearing Monday conducted by the legislature's Environment Committee.
Introduced by Rep. Aundré Bumgardner, D-Groton, the measure would exempt members of Connecticut's five state-recognized tribes from paying hunting and fishing license fees. The tribes are the Mashantuckets, the Mohegans, the Eastern Pequots of North Stonington, the Golden Hill Paugussetts of Colchester and Trumbull, and the Schaghticokes of Kent.
'This legislation is a step forward in recognizing and respecting the sovereignty of Native American tribes in Connecticut,' Chuck Bunnell, the Mohegans' chief of staff, wrote in testimony submitted to the committee. 'By establishing the Connecticut Tribal Wildlife and Fisheries Commission, the act ensures that tribes ... have a direct role in developing and administering hunting and fishing regulations for their members.'
Hunting and fishing, including shellfishing, sustained the Mashantuckets for centuries, providing the tribe with a critical source of food and economic activity, 'inextricably binding us to the lands and waters of this region,' the Mashantuckets said in their testimony.
'In short, hunting and fishing have been and remain fundamental to the survival of our tribal traditions and lifeways,' they said.
Both tribes suggested a change in the bill's language to clarify the bill would apply to their tribal members' activities on state land outside their reservations, which are located on land held in trust by the federal government. The tribes already regulate hunting and fishing on trust land.
Bumgardner said Tuesday the bill's final language would include the change sought by the tribes and would make it clear that the exemption from license fees would apply to members of all five state-recognized tribes. He said it has yet to be determined whether the bill would call for issuing tribal members free lifetime licenses or eliminating the licensing process altogether for tribal members.
The Connecticut Fisheries Advisory Council opposed the bill as written while supporting the establishment of a wildlife and fisheries commission. The nonprofit Friends of Connecticut Sportsmen opposed the bill on the grounds it would grant a group of citizens 'special privileges to hunt, fish and trap, etc. while excluding others.'
Bumgardner said courts have consistently upheld the constitutionality of laws pertaining to tribes' hunting and fishing rights. He said a number of states, including Vermont, have enacted laws granting tribal members hunting and fishing rights and exempting them from license fees.
'It's time for Connecticut to fully recognize the sovereignty of tribes, not just through words but through policy,' he said. 'This bill ensures they will have a seat at the table when it comes to regulating (hunting and fishing). It's about justice and partnership.'
The 20 members of the proposed commission would include one member from each of the five state-recognized tribes; the commissioner of the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection or the commissioner's designee; one member from each of DEEP's Fisheries, Wildlife and Forestry divisions; one member from the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station; one member for the state Department of Agriculture; one member from the Department of Agriculture's Bureau of Aquaculture; one member from Connecticut Sea Grant; one member from UConn's Native American and Indigenous Studies Department; two Indigenous people chosen by the tribes; and the co-chairmen and ranking members of the legislature's Environment Committee.
Bumgardner said the Environment Committee could act on the measure Friday.
b.hallenbeck@theday.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India and US advance toward interim trade deal after four-day talks, say sources
India and US advance toward interim trade deal after four-day talks, say sources

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

India and US advance toward interim trade deal after four-day talks, say sources

By Manoj Kumar NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Indian and U.S. negotiators made progress in their latest round of talks in New Delhi on Tuesday on a bilateral trade deal, having focused on market access for industrial and some agricultural goods, tariff cuts and non-tariff barriers, Indian government sources said. "The negotiations held with the U.S. side were productive and helped in making progress towards crafting a mutually beneficial and balanced agreement including through achievement of early wins," one of the sources said. The U.S. delegation, led by senior officials from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, held closed-door negotiations with Indian trade ministry officials headed by chief negotiator Rajesh Agrawal. Both sides discussed increasing bilateral digital trade, by improving customs and trade facilitation measures, the sources said, adding that "negotiations will continue" for early conclusion of the initial tranche of the trade pact. U.S. President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had agreed in February to conclude a bilateral trade agreement by fall 2025 and to more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. The two sides are expected to sign an interim agreement by the end of the month, before the expiry of Trump's 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs on major trading partners, including a 26% tariff on India. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, currently in Switzerland for talks with European trade partners, said India is prepared to proceed with the deal by first addressing simpler issues. The next phase of negotiations could tackle more complex matters, with the goal of signing the first tranche of the bilateral trade pact by September or October, the officials added. India resisted U.S. demands to open its markets to wheat, dairy and corn imports, while offering lower tariffs on high-value U.S. products such as almonds, pistachios and walnuts, one of the sources said. India also asked the U.S to revoke its 10% baseline tariff. However, the U.S. side opposed this, noting that even Britain was subject to this under its recent bilateral trade agreement. Additionally, India sought an exemption for its steel exports from a 50% tariff. A potential 26% tariff on India would be devastating to Indian goods - including rice, shrimp, textiles and footwear, which together comprise nearly one-fifth of India's merchandise exports - and could severely hit exports and dampen foreign investment inflows. India has pledged to increase purchases of American goods, including energy products like liquefied natural gas, crude oil, coal and defence equipment. India's exports to the U.S. rose 28% to $37.7 billion in the first four months of 2025, while imports increased to $14.4 billion, widening India's trade surplus, according to U.S. government data. (Additional reporting by Sarita Chaganti Singh and Khushi Malhotra; Editing by Andrea Ricci) Sign in to access your portfolio

Pakistan hikes defense budget 20% following conflict with India, but overall spending is cut
Pakistan hikes defense budget 20% following conflict with India, but overall spending is cut

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pakistan hikes defense budget 20% following conflict with India, but overall spending is cut

ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan Tuesday hiked defense spending by 20% following last month's deadly conflict with India. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the increase as part of the budget for the fiscal year 2025-26, in which overall spending will be cut by 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion). Pakistan and India were pushed to the brink of war earlier this year after a gun massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir, marking the biggest breakdown in relations between them since 2019. Weeks of tension followed, culminating in missile and drone strikes that resulted in dozens of fatalities on both sides of the border. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the government was allocating 2.55 trillion rupees ($9 billion) for defense compared with 2.12 trillion rupees in the previous budget. India in February increased its defense spending by 9.5%. Sharif told the Cabinet: 'All economic indicators are satisfactory. After defeating India in a conventional war, now we have to go beyond it in the economic field as well.' Opposition members of the National Assembly verbally abused Aurangzeb, chanting slogans, throwing scrunched-up copies of the budget at him, whistling, and banging their desks as he gave his address. The coming year's defense allocation is considerably more than the government's expenditure on higher education, agricultural development, and mitigating climate-related risks, to which Pakistan is especially prone. The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DoJ urged to investigate US group accused of working as Modi-backed ‘foreign agent'
DoJ urged to investigate US group accused of working as Modi-backed ‘foreign agent'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

DoJ urged to investigate US group accused of working as Modi-backed ‘foreign agent'

One of the largest Sikh houses of worship in the US is calling on the Trump administration to investigate a non-profit it has alleged is working as a 'foreign agent' on behalf of the the Indian government and prime minister Narendra Modi. The Fremont Gurdwara Sahib, which said it draws 5,000 Sikh worshippers every week and is a 'fulcrum' of the Sikh community in the US and around the world, has asked the Department of Justice to launch a national security investigation into the Hindu American Foundation (HAF), to determine whether the Pennsylvania-based non-profit should be required to file as an Indian foreign agent. Under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, any such determination by the DoJ would require the HAF to publicly disclose details of its activities, including meetings with lawmakers, and any contracts and financial arrangements it has with the Indian government. 'The HAF has facilitated meetings between foreign principals and US lawmakers, platformed foreign principals at their own events, and consistently and unequivocally advocated for the interests of the BJP on both domestic and foreign policy matters,' a representative for the Gurdwara wrote in a letter last week to Pam Bondi, the US attorney general. The HAF denied the claims. In a statement the group said it was a non-partisan tax-exempt charity that is wholly independent and American and has 'absolutely no affiliation or ties to any organization or political parties in the US or abroad'. It also hit out against what it called 'coordinated campaigns' against the HAF by the Khalistan separatist movement, which is seeking to establish an independent Sikh state. 'To discuss these dangerous and false accusations against us from activists supporting transnational violent separatist movements focused on India, [the] HAF welcomes the opportunity to meet with attorney general Pam Bondi, FBI director Kash Patel, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, as well as all homeland security officials,' the HAF said. The allegations and counter-claims come at a tense time between Sikhs who support an independent state and the Indian government. Individuals connected to the Indian government have been accused in both Canada and the US of waging a campaign of transnational repression against Sikhs outside of India after the 2023 assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian advocate for Khalistan. The Canadian government has said there were 'credible allegations' that 'agents of the Indian government' were behind Nijjar's death. In the US, prosecutors have alleged that at agent of the Indian government directed the attempted assassination of an American citizen who is also a Sikh activist. A recent investigation by Al Jazeera, the news outlet, reported that when the HAF emerged two decades ago it was a voice for the Hindu community in the US, and not a 'champion' of the Indian government. That, Al Jazeera reported, changed since Modi became prime minister in 2014, when HAF is alleged to have 'ramped up its political activities in favour of the Indian government'. The HAF has not faced accusations that it is involved in violent campaigns against Sikhs. In its letter to Bondi, the Gurdwara said the HAF 'has facilitated meetings between foreign principals and US lawmakers, platformed foreign principals at their own events, and consistently and unequivocally advocated for the interests of the Bharatiya Janata party on both domestic and foreign policy matters'. Any determination by the DoJ that the HAF was in fact working on behalf of the Indian government would require the HAF to publicly disclose details of its activities, including meetings with lawmakers, and any contracts with the Indian government. The Indian embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store