Aurora City Council approves giving $500,000 to VNA Health Care in support of new clinic
The city of Aurora is moving forward with giving VNA Health Care $500,000 in support of its newly-opened clinic at the Bloomhaven campus on Aurora's near East Side.
The Aurora City Council on Tuesday evening approved the move, despite concerns from some aldermen.
The money will go toward supporting the opening of VNA's new Primary Care Center, which offers services in both English and Spanish, at 323 Weston Ave. VNA, a nonprofit, accepts patients with Medicaid, Medicare, private insurance or no insurance, with potential discounts for those without insurance.
The nonprofit invested around $8 million in its new center, according to past reporting, with $500,000 pledged by city administration last July and recognized through a letter signed by former Mayor Richard Irvin and VNA CEO Linnea Windel. But the agreement never went before the City Council for approval, nor was it included in the 2025 budget.
The item most likely should have gone before the City Council when the agreement was made, Aurora Chief of Staff Shannon Cameron previously said, and it appears to have been simply an oversight of the previous administration.
The item was set to go to the City Council Finance Committee on May 15 but was held so more research could be done, according to past reporting. It went to the May 29 Finance Committee meeting, then came back to its meeting on June 12 with a change by Aurora Chief Financial Officer Chris Minick, who suggested the city pay the $500,000 in two installments. VNA tentatively agreed to the plan, according to past reporting.
The payment is now being split in half, distributing $250,000 this year and $250,000 next year, according to past reporting. This year's payment is set to be paid using city interest earnings, and the funding source for next year's payment will be decided during the 2026 budgeting process, Minick previously said.
The item was reviewed by the Committee of the Whole, and then ultimately discussed and voted on Tuesday by the City Council.
Ald. Edward Bugg, 9th Ward, who had previously expressed concern about the way the agreement was approved, said on Tuesday that he had 'serious doubts' about the matter going forward. He — along with Ald. Ted Mesiacos, 3rd Ward, and Ald. Keith Larson, at-large — voted against approving the payments to VNA.
But the majority of the City Council, acknowledging the potential error in the approval process, said they felt it was a worthy cause regardless.
Ald. Carl Franco, 5th Ward, said it was 'unproductive' to 'keep bringing it up and throwing people under the bus' and said the council should focus on whether it's appropriate to provide the funds.
'Is it worthwhile?' Franco said. 'I don't even think it's a question.'
Several council members echoed similar sentiments about the value VNA provides to the community, in spite of any possible mistakes made on the city's end.
But, looking to future votes, Ald. Daniel Barreiro, 1st Ward, who noted that he was voting for the proposal 'on a non-precedent setting basis,' said the city needs to ensure a similar situation doesn't happen again.
Now, with final approval secured, VNA is set to get the first installment of the payment this year for the new clinic, which opened in April, and the second half of the payment next year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
Dallas delays West Oak Cliff rezoning vote after residents express fears
The Dallas City Council on Wednesday postponed a long-anticipated vote that would have rezoned parts of the West Oak Cliff neighborhood, following strong opposition from residents concerned about displacement and gentrification. Dozens of residents packed the council chambers late Wednesday afternoon, many holding a press conference beforehand to voice their opposition to the proposed changes along the Hampton and Clarendon corridor. Residents fear gentrification impact "Sidelined," "redlined," and "forgotten" were among the words used by residents to describe the city's proposed rezoning plan. Jerry Figueroa, owner of J&E Express Auto Service on Clarendon Drive, said the plan would disproportionately affect Latino-owned businesses and longtime residents. "Now that we speak up, the city chooses to ignore us," Figueroa said. "There's no protection from the city to help businesses, landowners, or residents from price hikes or development speculation. We've seen what happened in Bishop Arts and West Dallas." City cites error, seeks feedback The proposed zoning changes are part of the West Oak Cliff Area Plan, adopted in 2020, and aim to bring new residential development and improve walkability and traffic flow. However, a city representative said the vote was delayed due to an error on community reply forms and a desire to ensure the process is done correctly. District 1 Council Member Chad West noted that the upcoming state law SB840, which takes effect Sept. 1, could accelerate residential displacement. He said the delay would allow time to address community concerns and find common ground. Call for anti-displacement measures Jennifer Rangel, a local resident and co-founder of RAYO Planning, said the community supports more housing but wants safeguards in place. "We're not saying we don't need more housing — we absolutely do," Rangel said. "But we need to do it with fair housing in mind. With SB840 coming, it's time to put protections in place." Supporters say growth is needed Supporters of the rezoning argue the plan is necessary to accommodate future growth in West Oak Cliff. Temple Anderson, a local resident, said the proposal has backing from three neighborhood associations and has been formally opposed by fewer than 11% of notified property owners. "No plan is perfect, but what has been brought to you today is a good, balanced plan for this corridor," Anderson said. The council is now scheduled to vote on the rezoning proposal on Aug. 13.
Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey has blunt words on spending money to keep a dog alive
Few decisions carry as much weight as those involving conflicting stresses on how money should be spent in times of emotional crisis. Whether it's downsizing a family home, pausing a child's education fund, or walking away from a dream business, financial choices often intertwine with deeply personal values and identity. The pain of these moments isn't always about numbers - it's about what those numbers represent: security, love, legacy, and hope. In times of financial stress, people confront questions that challenge not only their budgets, but their sense of compassion and well-being. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter One major example of this for many Americans is the heartrending dilemma involved with how much money one should spend on medical bills to keep a beloved family pet alive. Personal finance author and popular radio host Dave Ramsey recently confronted this difficult circumstance when an advice-seeker presented him with a painful question. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare "My wife and I … have a household income of $127,000 a year. We have an older dog who has had some very expensive vet bills recently," wrote a man identifying himself as Jeff in an email sent by Ramsey Solutions to TheStreet. "It has us both wondering how far, financially speaking, we should be willing to go to keep him alive," he continued. "We both really love our dog, so we would appreciate your thoughts in the event we have to make a really hard decision somewhere down the road." Ramsey offered a thoughtful response. Ramsey began by expressing his own personal feelings. "Wow … You're really trying to get me into trouble, aren't you?" he wrote. "First of all, let me say this: I. Love. Dogs. I really do. I've had several during my life, and right now, I have one I like more than most people I know." The radio host then provided some emotionally poignant context. "That being said, this little animal that I love like crazy is still … a dog," Ramsey wrote. "It's not one of my grandchildren, and it's not one of my kids." "If you were to ask me how much money I'd spend to keep one of my kids or grandkids alive, the answer is simple - all the money I've got," he added. "Everything. I've started over from nothing before, and I could do it again. But there's your answer." More on personal finance: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Ramsey acknowledged the difficulty of facing a decision such as this. "Now, here's something that's going to be hard for a few folks to hear," he wrote. "With some people who love their animals as much as I do, what I've observed is that the whole relationship can become more about the human than the animal." "I've seen people spend tens of thousands of dollars to keep their pets alive, even though the animals were still suffering," he continued. "At that point, it's not fair to the animal. And unfortunately, that's what often ends up happening with this kind of situation." Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security Ramsey revealed his emotions when handling similar circumstances in his own life. "Listen, I understand this. I'm not bad-mouthing anyone, because I've experienced these kinds of feelings, too," Ramsey wrote. "I've had to have animals put to sleep, and I'll be 100% honest with you: I've sat there and cried - I mean flat-out sobbed - while it happened." "And in my mind, that's a better path to take sometimes, rather than selfishly letting the animal spend its last weeks or months in pain just because you don't want to go through something difficult," he advised. Ramsey also suggested that, in some situations, a happier result is possible. "Now, if you can fix the animal - if you can give it a more-or-less normal, pain-free life by spending some money and actually correcting the problem - then, sure. Do it," he wrote. "There's no rule of thumb or percentage on something like this. If you actually have the money, let's get them fixed up." "But if it takes going deep into debt, wrecking your finances or leaving your family scrambling to make ends meet as a result - then, no," Ramsey continued. "I'm sorry. You should honor and love that wonderful little animal well enough that you don't make them suffer for you." "I hope you understand this, Jeff, and that it makes sense to you. God bless you all, and God bless that old pup. I hope you'll have many more happy days together." Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Axios
39 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Schumer-linked group hits Ernst on "we all are going to die"
A group linked to Senate Democrats' top super PAC is launching an online ad campaign this week featuring Sen. Joni Ernst's (R-Iowa) viral " we all are going to die" quote during a May town hall. Why it matters: Iowa has been a solidly red state for years, but Democrats see an opportunity to weaken Ernst ahead of her 2026 re-election campaign. Zoom in: In response to questions about Medicaid cuts expected to be part of the sweeping GOP budget bill making its way through Congress, Ernst argued the program would protect the most vulnerable, but also told voters "well, we all are going to die." Democrats are featuring the footage in a new ad campaign launching Wednesday that will run for the next couple weeks on streaming services, YouTube and social media. Majority Forward, a nonprofit affiliated with Senate Majority PAC —and linked to Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) — is spending $200,000 on the effort. Democrats have made Medicaid a focus of their counterattacks against GOP's congressional control, accusing vulnerable Republicans of working to strip health care coverage from potentially millions of Americans. What they're saying: "Ernst was already a remarkably weak candidate," SMP spokesperson Lauren French said in a statement. She continued, "and we're going to ensure she has to answer for not just her asinine and callous comments but for her continued support of policies that do nothing to lower costs for Iowans." Ernst spokesperson Palmer Brigham told Axios in a statement: "While Democrats fearmonger against strengthening the integrity of Medicaid, Senator Ernst is focused on improving the lives of all Iowans." "There's only two certainties in life: death and taxes, and she's working to ease the burden of both by fighting to keep more of Iowans' hard-earned tax dollars in their own pockets and ensuring their benefits are protected from waste, fraud, and abuse."
