Tolling an option for $91m Mill Road project planned for south Auckland
Transport Minister Chris Bishop
Photo:
RNZ/Calvin Samuel
Transport Minister Chris Bishop is welcoming the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) Board's endorsement and approval of a $91.1 million investment case for Mill Road.
The funding will complete the design work and securing consents on stage one.
Bishop said Mill Road was a crucial Road of National Significance, one of 17 for the government.
"South Auckland is the fastest growing area in the Auckland region, with 120,000 more people expected to make it their home over the next 30 years. We need to get on and deliver crucial transport infrastructure that supports that kind of growth, reduces congestion, improves safety, and helps unlock housing," Bishop said.
"Delivering Mill Road Stage 1 has substantial benefits, including a 30 percent reduction in congestion on the corridor, over 60 percent reduction in deaths and serious injuries, and by 2031, 25 percent faster journey times."
However, Bishop didn't rule out the inclusion of tolling for the new piece of roading.
He said the government policy statement on land transport 2024 required Waka Kotahi
to consider tolling for all new Roads of National Significance
.
"The investment case confirms tolling is possible and the revenue will support the construction and maintenance of the road."
The benefit cost ratio would be 2.2 if tolled, and un-tolled the ratio would be 3.1.
"The government will consider this recommendation and announce next steps of the process in due course," he said.
The Transport Minister said it was anticipated construction could begin as early as the middle of next year.
"Technical work to secure the route protection and other approvals for future Stages 2 and 3 is scheduled to begin from mid-2026," he said.
"In order to deliver benefits for the people, communities and businesses of South Auckland as soon as possible, NZTA are planning on dividing the construction of Stage 1 in different construction packages so they can start work sooner in places where there is more certainty around the existing environment.
"The plan is to focus on Stage 1b from Hollyford Drive to Hilltop Road, along with a piece of work to the south (Stage 1d), which includes roundabout improvements around the Mill Road Alfriston area. Stage 1a between State Highway 1 (SH1) and Hollyford Drive and Stage 1c from Hilltop Road to north of Alfriston will be delivered later."
The Minister said NZTA was working "at pace to build on earlier designs". It focus included improving the efficiency and resilience of the corridor, and increasing capacity to deliver faster, more reliable journey times.
"The project will also seek to obtain statutory approvals, likely via the Fast Track Approvals Act, and this will be confirmed in coming months."
The investment case for Mill Road Stage 1 (Manukau to Alfriston) includes:
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
KiwiSaver Providers Hope Public Support For Contribution Increases Will See Default Rates Move Higher
KiwiSaver providers are unsurprised by the public support, and hope it will see default contribution rates increase further. Susan Edmunds, Money Correspondent KiwiSaver providers are hoping public support for increased contribution rates could provide the incentive to push them still higher. The latest RNZ-Reid Research poll included questions about the changes to the KiwiSaver scheme announced in the Budget. From 1 April next year, the default contribution rate for employers and employees will rise to 3.5 percent. The following April, it will be 4 percent. But the government will halve the credit it offers to people who contribute at least $1042 a year to their KiwiSaver, to a maximum $260.72. It will not be available to people earning more than $180,000. The poll showed a total of 61.2 percent of respondents supported the contribution change, 21.4 percent opposed it and 17.4 percent were not sure. Among National voters, almost 80 percent supported the change. But only 23.7 percent of total voters supported the government's move to halve the contribution rate, and fewer than half of National supporters. Fisher Funds chief investment officer Ashley Gardyne said he was not surprised by the findings. He said we should not stop at 4 percent plus 4 percent, and should push towards higher contribution rates. 'I think it's really positive we've seen the contribution rates increase, and ultimately if we want people to get to the right amount of savings in retirement those rates do need to move up through time.' He said the Australian model, where contribution rates slowly lifted over a number of years, could be one to follow. 'They took a really long-term, 10-year approach of increasing contributions by a little bit every year. The reality is it's tough to find extra money in your pay cheque to put into KiwiSaver but it is really important long-term as well to make sure you end up in the right position for retirement. 'Having a long-term vision like that is really important.' Kirk Hope, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, which represents KiwiSaver providers, agreed the results were expected. 'We've known for some time that in terms of contributions those will be relatively well received. Obviously it's a bit tougher if the government contribution is being halved or in some cases removed that's not going to be particularly popular, the key thing is the government continues to contribute something.' He said there should be a bipartisan agreement about a long-term strategy for retirement income. He said it was also worth discussing other steps the government could take, such as adjusting the tax settings. 'Other changes the government might be able to make to the tax system in the future to continue to incentivise particularly savings and even up the playing field between savings and investment and housing. That's some fundamental shifts in the tax system.' More incentives needed Ana-Marie Lockyer, chief executive at Pie Funds, said it was good to see that most people supported the contribution increase. 'In terms of the halving of the government contributions we need to acknowledge the government faced some hard choices as a result of the tight fiscal environment. But I believe we should be offering more incentives for Kiwis to save for their retirement, not fewer. 'Reducing the government contribution is more likely to impact the retirement balances of lower income earners – a group who deserve the same opportunities as everyone else.' She said even a reduced contribution of $261 a year could grow to more than $40,000 over a person's working life. 'I think what's more important than the dollar amount of the government contribution is the number of Kiwis who don't receive it, either because they're not eligible or they're not contributing enough. 'While it's a good thing that the government contributions are now available for 16- and 17-year-olds, I think the government missed a trick by not extending it to the increasing number of over-65s who are still working, whether by choice or necessity. 'What's probably more concerning is the thousands of KiwiSavers missing out on the MTC government contribution each year because they're not contributing enough to qualify, leaving millions of dollars on the table. 'So the poll is actually a timely reminder for people to ensure they've contributed at least $1043 by 30 June in order to receive the full government contribution of $521 – before it reduces to $261 next year.' A spokesperson for Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the changes to KiwiSaver were designed to help Kiwis to save more and make the scheme more fiscally sustainable. 'For example, an 18-year-old earning the minimum wage of just under $49,000 a year who invests in a balanced fund can expect to have almost $910,000 in KiwiSaver at age 65. Under the old settings it would have been about $732,000. 'The results are similar for most other people. The Retirement Commissioner estimates the changes will increase retirement savings for about 80 percent of KiwiSaver members.'
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
KiwiSaver Providers Hope Public Support For Contribution Increases Will See Default Rates Move Higher
KiwiSaver providers are unsurprised by the public support, and hope it will see default contribution rates increase further. Susan Edmunds, Money Correspondent KiwiSaver providers are hoping public support for increased contribution rates could provide the incentive to push them still higher. The latest RNZ-Reid Research poll included questions about the changes to the KiwiSaver scheme announced in the Budget. From 1 April next year, the default contribution rate for employers and employees will rise to 3.5 percent. The following April, it will be 4 percent. But the government will halve the credit it offers to people who contribute at least $1042 a year to their KiwiSaver, to a maximum $260.72. It will not be available to people earning more than $180,000. The poll showed a total of 61.2 percent of respondents supported the contribution change, 21.4 percent opposed it and 17.4 percent were not sure. Among National voters, almost 80 percent supported the change. But only 23.7 percent of total voters supported the government's move to halve the contribution rate, and fewer than half of National supporters. Fisher Funds chief investment officer Ashley Gardyne said he was not surprised by the findings. He said we should not stop at 4 percent plus 4 percent, and should push towards higher contribution rates. 'I think it's really positive we've seen the contribution rates increase, and ultimately if we want people to get to the right amount of savings in retirement those rates do need to move up through time.' He said the Australian model, where contribution rates slowly lifted over a number of years, could be one to follow. 'They took a really long-term, 10-year approach of increasing contributions by a little bit every year. The reality is it's tough to find extra money in your pay cheque to put into KiwiSaver but it is really important long-term as well to make sure you end up in the right position for retirement. 'Having a long-term vision like that is really important.' Kirk Hope, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, which represents KiwiSaver providers, agreed the results were expected. 'We've known for some time that in terms of contributions those will be relatively well received. Obviously it's a bit tougher if the government contribution is being halved or in some cases removed that's not going to be particularly popular, the key thing is the government continues to contribute something.' He said there should be a bipartisan agreement about a long-term strategy for retirement income. He said it was also worth discussing other steps the government could take, such as adjusting the tax settings. 'Other changes the government might be able to make to the tax system in the future to continue to incentivise particularly savings and even up the playing field between savings and investment and housing. That's some fundamental shifts in the tax system.' More incentives needed Ana-Marie Lockyer, chief executive at Pie Funds, said it was good to see that most people supported the contribution increase. 'In terms of the halving of the government contributions we need to acknowledge the government faced some hard choices as a result of the tight fiscal environment. But I believe we should be offering more incentives for Kiwis to save for their retirement, not fewer. 'Reducing the government contribution is more likely to impact the retirement balances of lower income earners – a group who deserve the same opportunities as everyone else.' She said even a reduced contribution of $261 a year could grow to more than $40,000 over a person's working life. 'I think what's more important than the dollar amount of the government contribution is the number of Kiwis who don't receive it, either because they're not eligible or they're not contributing enough. 'While it's a good thing that the government contributions are now available for 16- and 17-year-olds, I think the government missed a trick by not extending it to the increasing number of over-65s who are still working, whether by choice or necessity. 'What's probably more concerning is the thousands of KiwiSavers missing out on the MTC government contribution each year because they're not contributing enough to qualify, leaving millions of dollars on the table. 'So the poll is actually a timely reminder for people to ensure they've contributed at least $1043 by 30 June in order to receive the full government contribution of $521 – before it reduces to $261 next year.' A spokesperson for Finance Minister Nicola Willis said the changes to KiwiSaver were designed to help Kiwis to save more and make the scheme more fiscally sustainable. 'For example, an 18-year-old earning the minimum wage of just under $49,000 a year who invests in a balanced fund can expect to have almost $910,000 in KiwiSaver at age 65. Under the old settings it would have been about $732,000. 'The results are similar for most other people. The Retirement Commissioner estimates the changes will increase retirement savings for about 80 percent of KiwiSaver members.'
RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
What will the changes to Sport New Zealand actually mean?
Photo: Explainer: The news landed with a thud within, and outside, the walls of Sport New Zealand. When the then-minister for sport and recreation, Chris Bishop, ordered an independent rapid review of the crown agency in November last year , the nervous rumblings were felt immediately across the sector. The purpose of the review, according to a statement from the minister's office, was to "provide assurance and visibility… that the use of public funding by the Sport NZ Group is efficient and effective". One sports official with knowledge of the review told RNZ there were concerns that Sport NZ's funding strategy had become a "cash free-for-all". The move was interpreted by many as a signal from the government that fundamental changes were coming for the way Sport NZ operates and funds both elite and community level sport. Last week, the long-awaited findings of the review landed with barely a whimper. Mark Mitchell, who took over as minister for sport and recreation in the cabinet reshuffle at the beginning of the year, said the findings of the independent review highlighted the "effectiveness and efficiency" of Sport NZ . Far from the brutal overhaul many had feared, the report's recommendations focused on potential changes to the institutional and governance arrangements of the agency. The review, led by senior public sector leader Brendan Boyle, gave Sport NZ a tick of approval when it comes to the agency's operations and performance. The findings also dispelled concerns over Sport NZ's financial performance. Boyle found Sport NZ's corporate and operating costs were in line with public sector benchmarks. Sport NZ chief executive Raelene Castle said the findings of the review reinforced the work her agency does. "The biggest thing is that all of the measures of how we're performing as an agency - the headcount we have versus our revenue profile, the number of contractors we have - all of those things that are really big for a government organisation came out very positively and at the lower end of the guidelines," Castle said. "So, the sector and our partners can be assured that we are always wanting to make sure we have the right headcount to support the sector. But also we're always thinking about what we can do to cost save, so we can invest as much as we can into the people that are doing the work on the ground." Minister for Sport and Recreation Mark Mitchell. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi The key action Mitchell is taking following the review is to move the strategic policy function to the Ministry of Culture and Heritage (MCH). The review highlighted an anomaly with Sport NZ's set-up in that the agency serves as both the policy advisor to the government and a decision-maker on funding. Boyle pointed out there were potential conflicts of interest in this arrangement. "As a Crown entity, the operations of Sport NZ are at arm's length from the minister. However, Sport NZ is unusual in that it also includes the policy function that is typically included in the monitoring agency, providing independent policy advice and line of sight to the minister," the report reads. "The current arrangements create a potential conflict of interest for Sport NZ in being both policy advisor as well as the decision-maker for funding." The report also noted that this arrangement means that Sport NZ is not as well-integrated into the wider government policy network and agenda as it should be. The minister is also advancing "minor amendments" to the appointments process for the High Performance Sport NZ and Taumata Māori boards. Sport New Zealand chief executive Raelene Castle was pleased with the findings of the review. Photo: Photosport Castle said Sport NZ's partners and wider stakeholders won't see much of a difference in how the organisation operates. "There won't be a significant difference. It's more back house operational policy and relationships between government departments is where that change in responsibility will sit, but actually the implementation on the ground won't change," she says. "It means that going forward, the big pieces of strategic policy that get developed will be led by the Ministry of Culture and Heritage. They will hold the pen, if you like, but they will work with [Sport NZ] to seek our input to understand the impacts for the sector. So, we'll still support and contribute to those processes, we just won't be the lead agency. "Then, once the high level policy stuff is determined, that then comes to deliver that piece of policy and put in place the operational things around it." A working group of Sport NZ, MCH, Treasury and Public Service Commission officials has been established to work through how the final structure will look. Castle says it is likely some staff from Sport NZ will move over to MCH. The strategic policy function is intended to move to MCH by 1 October this year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
