logo
Columbia Journalism Review Faces the Kind of Crisis It Usually Covers

Columbia Journalism Review Faces the Kind of Crisis It Usually Covers

New York Times23-04-2025

For more than a half-century, Columbia Journalism Review has critiqued the news media from its perch at America's most prestigious journalism school. Now, the magazine finds itself at the center of its own story.
Last week, the Columbia Journalism School fired the publication's editor, Sewell Chan, after many people working under him raised complaints of unprofessional or abusive behavior. Mr. Chan was replaced on an interim basis by Betsy Morais, one of his deputies.
The leadership change leaves the magazine, a product of the Columbia Journalism School known as CJR, reeling just as it — like many of the publications it covers — is looking for a sustainable business model.
Much of Mr. Chan's job, which he began about seven months ago after holding editing positions at The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times and The Texas Tribune, was to help chart that new course. CJR is in the early stages of a major fund-raising campaign, with Mr. Chan as its public face until last week.
Jelani Cobb, the dean of the Columbia Journalism School and the publisher of CJR, said the school was committed to keeping the magazine alive. It hasn't published a print edition for years, but frequently updates its website with news coverage, investigations and features.
'CJR is a crucial outlet, particularly at a time when journalism is being attacked from multiple directions,' Mr. Cobb said in a statement. 'Like many media organizations, we're navigating real challenges, but we've developed a thoughtful, forward-looking strategy for CJR's long-term viability.'
CJR is synonymous with two pillars of American culture under great pressure: journalism and higher education. The magazine, founded in 1961, has historically relied on donations and university funding to survive. Both have lately come under strain, with a cash reserve drying up and Columbia's funding situation complicated by its clash with President Trump.
In recent years, CJR relied on a $2 million cushion created during a fund-raising campaign nearly a decade ago. That reserve, which has been exhausted, was a linchpin of the magazine's annual budget of nearly $2 million, along with supplemental funding from the university and a small amount of subscription revenue.
As that funding ran out, Columbia increased its support of CJR on a short-term basis. But that increase was supposed to be temporary, with a fund-raising campaign from the publication intended to fill the gap.
Mr. Chan was hired last year by Mr. Cobb to serve as an emissary to the wider news media industry in addition to his role as editor, making him a fund-raiser for the magazine.
Mr. Chan had begun to work with members of CJR's supervisory board on a new fund-raising campaign, including identifying potential donors, when he was fired last week, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak publicly.
The fund-raising campaign has been put on hold while the magazine figures out what to do next. The board, which was shocked by Mr. Chan's sudden exit, the two people said, is scheduled to meet this week to discuss next steps.
Mr. Chan's tenure atop CJR ended after an hourlong meeting Thursday between Mr. Cobb and the magazine's editorial staff. During the meeting, roughly 10 people aired concerns about Mr. Chan's behavior, describing insults, threats to ruin their reputations, and an atmosphere of fear and hostility, according to two people with knowledge of the discussion who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Several participants cried.
Mr. Cobb announced Mr. Chan's departure in an email to CJR staff members the next day, and thanked them for their 'resilience and dedication.'
In a statement posted to LinkedIn, Mr. Chan called his dismissal 'hasty, ill-considered and quite frankly baffling,' and described three 'pointed conversations' with staff members at the publication. He called them 'normal workplace interactions' and said his leadership approach at CJR had been similar to his approach at previous jobs. He declined to be interviewed for this article.
Despite his short tenure, Mr. Chan had already made changes at the magazine. He resurrected and renamed CJR's most recognizable feature — a roundup of news media missteps and plaudits now known as 'Laurels and Darts.' He also outlined an editorial plan focusing on emerging topics like artificial intelligence, modern business models and the global crackdown on independent journalism.
In 2021, years before Mr. Chan was named editor of CJR, he wrote a column for the publication that in many ways foreshadowed the financial challenges he would grapple with as its editor. After combing through the CJR archives, Mr. Chan said he had concluded that journalism had 'always been a tough business,' despite 'nostalgic memories of 'the good old days.''
'The days when a top editor could focus only on stories — not digital audience, workplace culture, buyouts and layoffs, or assertive unions — are gone for good,' Mr. Chan wrote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US
Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US

Despite mass firings within the government, threats of tariffs and struggles to get the 'big, beautiful bill' passed, President Donald Trump's approval ratings have held steady early in his second term. DOGE leader Elon Musk is leaving the White House and Trump is threatening to tariff two high profile American companies — Apple and Mattel — despite questions by the US Court of International Trade about his authority to unilaterally impose tariffs without action by congress. Here's what the recent polls show about Trump's presidential job approval ratings as of the first week of June. According to Rasmussen Reports polling, Trump's approval has improved to a 53% approval rating and 46% that disapprove. The TrafalGarGroup poll from this weekend found that 53.7% of Americans approve of how Trump is handling his job as president, while 45.6% disapprove. The Morning Consult tracker poll taken this weekend reported a drop to 46% approval rating and a 51% that disapprove. The Economist/YouGov poll taken this week, shows Trump improving with a 45% favorability versus 53% unfavorable. Americans expressed the most important issue was overwhelmingly focused on inflation/prices, followed by jobs and the economy, health care, immigration and civil rights. In this weekend's Quantus Insights poll, Trump's job approval improved with 48.3% approval versus 47.8% that disapprove and 3.9% that had no opinion. RealClear Polling which encompasses the average of different 15 different pollsters, including all those mentioned above, shows Trump's overall favorability at 47.5% and 49.7% that disapprove. These numbers have improved since his lows at the end of April, when it reached a 52.4% disapproval rating and 45.1% favorable approval rating. According to Civiqs polls, last updated June 2, Trump's approval ratings have dropped about three points in The Keystone State compared to what Pennsylvanians thought of his performance in January. About 53% of Pennsylvanians polled currently disapprove of the president's performance, up from 50% on Jan. 20. Only 43% of the commonwealth gave Trump a thumbs up as of early June, down from 46% six months ago. These polling numbers were also broken down by age, education, gender, race and party. Age: Those between 18-34 were most unfavorable of Trump (60%), while those 50 to 64 were the most favorable (55%). Education: Postgraduate students were most unfavorable toward Trump (68%). Non-college graduates were most favorable (49%). Gender: Men and women are split on Trump, more than half of females (58%) holding an unfavorable view and more than half of males (52%) having a favorable view of the president. Party: Members of the Republican party were 87% favorable of Trump, compared to the Democratic party, who felt just 3% favorable of the president's performance. Independent voters leaned unfavorable (48%). Race: Black voters had the highest unfavorable opinion of Trump (89%), followed by other races at 59%, Hispanic/Latino at 57% and white at 46%. Note: Polls are constantly changing and different pollsters ask different varieties of the population. These numbers were reflected as of Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 10 a.m. This article originally appeared on Donald Trump presidential approval rating today in PA vs. nationally

Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.
Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.

In the few months since Donald Trump returned to the presidency, he has issued so many executive orders and pronouncements on domestic and foreign policy that he may have overwhelmed our intellectual and emotional energy to fully appreciate their impact. Whether or not you approve of the direction he wants to take the country, he took office after being duly elected. Many of his initiatives are within his authority. Generally speaking, Trump has the right to indulge his ideological obsessions and advance policies that benefit the economic class that 'brung him to the dance.' But, what of those executive orders that exceed the limited authority proscribed for the presidency — powers meant to be shared with other branches of government, or those that defy Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitution? Say goodbye to democracy — and our freedoms — if we ignore James Madison's warning in the Federalist Papers No. 47 that "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." On Jan. 20, 2025, Trump took the Presidential Oath of Office to 'faithfully execute the Office of President' and 'preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Yet just three months later, when asked if he agreed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement that every person in the United States is entitled to due process, Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker that he's not so sure. 'I don't know. I'm not a lawyer.' The Constitution states that 'no person' shall be 'deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.' It says 'person,' not 'citizen.' Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court has held that everyone in this country have certain basic rights. When Welker reminded the president of this constitutionally guaranteed right, Trump complained that this only slows him down: 'I was elected to get them the hell out of here, and the courts are holding me from doing it.' This helps explain why democracy requires an independent judiciary — to check the actions of the executive (from local police to presidents) to ensure that government allegations of wrongdoing are accurate and mistakes are not made. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the recent high-profile example, is Salvadoran, married to an American citizen with three American-born children who has lived in U.S. since 2011. He was granted protected status by an immigration judge in 2019. Nevertheless he was detained by ICE in March and deported to El Salvador without a hearing. The Trump administration originally acknowledged that he was mistakenly deported, and a federal judge ordered that he be returned to the U.S. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld this directive. As of this writing the Trump administration has done nothing to facilitate his return. The President even quipped that he could do so, but he will not. The government now asserts that Abrego Garcia's deportation wasn't a mistake, claiming he is a member of the Salvadoran gang MS-13, but declines to provide evidence supporting the claim. As if to emphasize contempt for constitutional rights, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller recently said that the Trump administration was considering suspending Habeas Corpus to block an immigrant's right to challenge their detention before being deported. There are other examples of presidential defiance of the law, such as the illegal impoundment of congressionally authorized appropriations and constitutional freedoms. So, it is time to insert the 'I' word (impeachment) into civic conversations. I am not naïve: impeachment is neither imminent nor likely — for now. The disgrace of this period, as future historians will note, is that whether the President has intimidated Congress into silence or they applaud his overly expansive use of power, the legislative branch has abandoned its oversight responsibility. For now, Congress is content to look the other way. Nevertheless, we must begin to insert 'impeachable offenses' into civic conversations. If we don't, we will be complicit in accepting that the aberrant behavior of this President is the new normal for the evaluation of future presidents. Howard L. Simon served as executive director of the ACLU of Florida from 1997-2018. He resides in Gainesville and is president of Clean Okeechobee Waters Foundation, Inc. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Talk of impeachment hasn't come up. How long can that last? | Opinion

Ted Cruz leads senators in plan to designate June Pro-Life Month during Pride Month
Ted Cruz leads senators in plan to designate June Pro-Life Month during Pride Month

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ted Cruz leads senators in plan to designate June Pro-Life Month during Pride Month

While last week marked the start of Pride Month, Ted Cruz is leading more than two dozen senators in an effort to designate June as 'Life Month.' The Texas lawmaker introduced the joint ''Life Month Resolution' to the upper chamber Tuesday to 'recognize that every human life is a sacred gift from God,' it states. 'Every human life is worthy of protection, and it is especially incumbent upon Americans and lawmakers to protect the most vulnerable among us,' Cruz said in a statement. 'Designating June as Life Month is a recommitment to the American principle that every life has dignity. I call on my colleagues in the Senate to swiftly pass this resolution.' Cruz's office stated that the resolution was intended to commemorate the third anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which occurred on June 24, 2022. President Donald Trump has repeatedly bragged about being able to 'kill Roe v. Wade' by installing three conservative Supreme Court justices to reverse the decision. While Cruz did not explicitly express the aim to replace any other awareness month, social media users were quick to argue that the resolution contradicts June's recognition as Pride Month, which celebrates LGBTQ+ individuals and communities worldwide. 'June is pride month, ted cruz,' one person responded to Cruz on X. 'The month was already called for; find another one,' another added, this time directed at Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville, who co-sponsored the resolution. A total of 26 GOP senators have also co-sponsored the resolution, including conservative firebrands Tuberville, John Cornyn of Texas, and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. 'If we are going to dedicate entire months to recognizing every group under the sun, the least we can do is dedicate June to protecting unborn babies,' Tuberville tweeted Wednesday. The resolution is also supported by 22 anti-abortion organizations, including Christian legal advocacy group Alliance Defending Freedom and Heritage Action, a subsidiary of the far-right think tank the Heritage Foundation. A companion resolution was introduced to the House by New Jersey Representative Chris Smith, who said it calls for Americans to put a stop to the 'dismembering [of] helpless babies with sharp knife-like curettes or poisoning babies with pills that literally starve them to death and often result in their bodies being flushed down a toilet.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store