logo
Chemical in cosmetic goods behind 350,000 heart disease deaths per YEAR

Chemical in cosmetic goods behind 350,000 heart disease deaths per YEAR

Business Mayor29-04-2025

A 'forever chemical' in thousands of cosmetic products could be responsible for over 350,000 heart disease deaths each year, a government-funded study suggests.
Researchers in New York City combed through health and environmental data from 200 countries to measure exposure to di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP).
DEHP is a type of phthalate, toxic chemicals used to help scents last longer and in food containers to make them more durable.
Studies have shown they imitate the body's hormones and interfere with the production of – and response to – natural hormones like estrogen and testosterone.
But previous research has also shown that phthalates can cause an immune response that triggers inflammation in the heart's major arteries.
Over time, this inflammation may cause the heart to work harder and increases the risk of heart attack and stroke.
Based on these findings, the researchers estimated exposure to DEHP contributed to over 350,000 deaths worldwide from heart disease every year.
And in the US alone, DEHP was directly linked to one in eight – 10,000 – deaths from cardiovascular disease, America's number one killer that takes more lives than cancer and dementia combined.
A new study from New York University found toxic chemicals called phthalates, found in cosmetic products like perfume, could be responsible for 350,000 deaths worldwide (stock image)
The researchers said the study is likely the first to date to calculate the burden of cardiovascular disease directly caused by toxic chemicals.
Sara Hyman, an associate research scientist at NYU Grossman School of Medicine in New York City, said: 'By highlighting the connection between phthalates and a leading cause of death across the world, our findings add to the vast body of evidence that these chemicals present a tremendous danger to human health.'
Your browser does not support iframes.
There are nearly 1million deaths from cardiovascular disease – a group of disorders including coronary artery disease, heart attack and stroke – every year in the US.
The study, published Tuesday in the journal Lancet eBiomedicine, analyzed health data from 200 countries, including the US and UK.
This data included urine samples showing traces of phthalates and mortality data from the US Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.
They then used a mathematic model to estimate the likelihood the chemicals played a role.
They found in 2018, the latest data available, 12 percent of all cardiovascular deaths in the US were related to DEHP exposure. This added up to 10,237 deaths.
Additionally, these chemicals were responsible for 316,916 years of 'lost human life' from cardiovascular disease.
Worldwide, India had the highest amount of deaths from DEHP exposure at 103,587. China and Indonesia followed closely behind with 60,937 and 19,761, respectively.
In the UK, DEHP was linked to 947 cardiovascular-related deaths, or just under one in 10.
The researchers believe long-term exposure to phthalates triggers inflammation in arteries in the heart.
Over time, this leads to conditions like atherosclerosis, where plaque builds up in the arteries and restricts blood flow. Eventually, the heart needs to worker harder, leaving it prone to heart attacks and strokes.
Dr Leonardo Trasande, senior study author and professor in the Department of Population Health at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, said: 'Our results underscore the urgent need for global regulations to reduce exposure to these toxins, especially in areas most affected by rapid industrialization and plastic consumption.'
The above graph shows the percentage of cardiovascular-related deaths that can be attributed to DEHP exposure in eight different areas around the world, including the US
The above map shows the percentage of cardiovascular-related deaths that can be attributed to DEHP exposure by country. Darker colors represent higher percentages
Phthalates are most common in plastics, as they make them pliable and soft and are used in thousands of products, from plastic food wrap to vinyl flooring, garden hoses and shower curtains.
They are also estimated to be in around three-quarters of scented personal care products like deodorants, nail polish, hair gels, shampoos, soaps and lotions.
The fact they are so abundant in beauty goods may partly explain why women consistently have higher levels in their bodies than men.
The chemicals have been associated with fertility issues in both men and women.
One study in the journal Toxicological Sciences, for example, found that female mice exposed in the womb to the same phthalate mixtures detected in pregnant women were born with fertility issues, which they then passed on to their female offspring.
And researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that exposure to the fragrance musk ambrette – which contains phthalates – could increase the risk of early puberty in girls, as children and teens have started wearing makeup and perfume at earlier ages.
Earlier puberty in girls has been linked to a complications like increased risk for obesity, heart disease, breast cancer, and psychological problems.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What makes a food ultraprocessed? The FDA is about to weigh in.
What makes a food ultraprocessed? The FDA is about to weigh in.

Boston Globe

time14 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

What makes a food ultraprocessed? The FDA is about to weigh in.

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Dr. Marty Makary, the commissioner of the FDA, said he expected the definition would encourage companies to label foods as 'non-ultraprocessed' to entice customers, similar to how food manufacturers market their products as being free from added sugars. Advertisement 'We do not see ultraprocessed foods as foods to be banned,' he said. 'We see them as foods to be defined so that markets can compete based on health.' The idea that consumers may go out of their way to avoid these items reflects growing concerns about the potential harms of ultraprocessed foods, which include many breakfast cereals, instant noodles, protein bars, meal-replacement shakes, flavored yogurts, hot dogs and more. Scientists have increasingly linked ultraprocessed foods to poor health outcomes, such as Type 2 diabetes, some types of cancers, and heart and gastrointestinal issues. Advertisement Kyle Diamantas, the deputy commissioner of the FDA's food division, said that there were some 'obvious areas' the agency would consider when crafting its definition, including synthetic dyes, emulsifiers and preservatives. 'We don't have in our home kitchens these new novel ingredients that help a Twinkie stay on the shelf for six years or whatever it might be,' Diamantas said. He also suggested that a standard definition of ultraprocessed foods could be used for regulating the meals served to members of the military and at prisons and Veterans Affairs hospitals. The government will almost certainly face pushback from some corners of the food industry, which has relied on preservatives and artificial ingredients to produce cheap, convenient foods at a large scale. Related : Any definition the government comes up with would be 'hotly contested' by the food industry, said Marion Nestle, an emerita professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University. By defining ultraprocessed foods, the government will also weigh in on issues that have divided nutrition experts and confused consumers: Do plant-based meats and milks belong in the same category as sodas and candy bars? And are all ultraprocessed foods inherently unhealthy? Some, like various yogurts and whole-grain breads and cereals, contain valuable nutrients and have been associated with positive health outcomes. The broad term can 'demonize' foods that aren't necessarily harming consumers, said Maya Vadiveloo, an associate professor of nutrition at the University of Rhode Island. Advertisement The federal push follows recent efforts in a handful of states to restrict ultraprocessed foods sold and served in schools. In Arizona, lawmakers defined ultraprocessed foods only as those with certain food additives, like artificial dyes. But additives may only be one part of what makes certain ultraprocessed foods unhealthy, said Brenda Davy, a professor of nutrition at Virginia Tech — and if the federal definition follows Arizona's example, it would likely miss a great number of ultraprocessed foods, she said, like a sugar-loaded cereal that does not use certain food colorings. 'If their focus is too narrow, it may be limited in how much that might improve health,' she said. Still, a federal definition would be a 'big step forward,' Nestle said. It could pave the way for new types of warning labels, or for the government to regulate whether food makers could continue marketing ultraprocessed foods to children, she said. 'All of those are up for grabs if there's a definition,' she said. She added: 'It matters a lot.' This article originally appeared in .

41. Rad AI
41. Rad AI

CNBC

time2 days ago

  • CNBC

41. Rad AI

Founders: Doktor Gurson (CEO), Jeff ChangLaunched: 2018Headquarters: San FranciscoFunding: $143 millionValuation: $528 millionKey Technologies: Artificial intelligence, cloud computing, deep neural networks/deep learning, generative AI, machine learningIndustry: Health carePrevious appearances on Disruptor 50 list: 0 Radiologist burnout is a condition that Rad AI co-founder Jeff Chang has long experience with — arguably, longer than any other radiology specialist has ever witnessed. The youngest radiologist and second youngest doctor in U.S. history, Chang started medical school at 16 at New York University and worked long night shifts as an emergency room radiologist for a decade. The stress hasn't changed within his profession. With the vast majority of radiologists feeling overworked or at their limit, Rad AI is focused on using generative artificial intelligence to save time and enhance productivity. Rad AI offers products designed to streamline workflow for radiologists, Rad AI Reporting and Rad AI Impressions. Rad AI Reporting generates imaging reports based on radiologists stating their findings from scans into a microphone or software system. By combining speech recognition with machine learning algorithms, it can also create templates that match individual radiologists' language and style preferences. Rad AI Impressions provides a summary of what a patient's image shows, saving radiologists over an hour per shift, according to the company, time that can be put back into patient care and burnout prevention. Its AI models also identify follow-up recommendations from patient reports, and can automatically send communication to patients, which Rad AI says can increase needed follow-up appointments by as much as 40%. A decade ago, experts were predicting radiology would be one of the first professions entirely replaced by AI. AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton of the University of Toronto, and formerly Google, was among those quoted as saying radiologists should no longer be trained. Hinton recently told the New York Times that he was wrong, and while AI is great at interpreting imagery, it is a profession where it looks like AI and human doctors will be working together for much longer. Rad AI's core reporting and imagery tools are designed to be reviewed and signed off by the radiologist. In the case of any system errors, the radiologist will have the final look at the patient's report and impression. The future for Rad AI is looking bright, as the company is currently working with half of all health systems and radiology practices in the United States, including recent deals with the Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Yale New Haven and Cincinnati Children's Hospital. It also has recent partnerships with tech and health-care giants Google and Bayer.

SF SoMA sex shop sued for allegedly selling ‘toxic' mouth gags
SF SoMA sex shop sued for allegedly selling ‘toxic' mouth gags

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

SF SoMA sex shop sued for allegedly selling ‘toxic' mouth gags

SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) — A decades-old sex shop in San Francisco's SoMa (South of Market) neighborhood is being sued for allegedly selling mouth gags laced with toxic chemicals without a clear warning label. A civil case filed on Friday, June 6 by Seven Hills LLP on behalf of Blue Sky Forever says that Mr. S. Leather Co., Incorporated violated a health and safety code for not letting customers know about the dangers of a product called 'The Jaw Master Gag' and the 'harms caused by exposures to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ('DEHP'), a toxic chemical found in and on gags manufactured, imported, distributed, sold, and offered for sale.' See court document hereDownload Mr. S Leather is located at 385 8th St. and has been in business since 1979. 'Detectable levels of DEHP are found in and on the gags Defendants manufacture, import, sell and distribute for sale in California,' the suit adds, saying that exposures to DEHP can cause birth defects and other reproductive issues. On its website, Mr. S. Leather states, 'We've been designing and producing exceptional bondage gear as well as leather, neoprene & sports clothing for kinky guys since 1979…When you're ready for the good stuff – Mr. S Leather is a place you'll want to check out.' The court document says the case is actionable, thanks to Proposition 65, and that Mr. S. Leather could face civil penalties of up to $2,500 per day for each violation. 'On October 24, 2003, pursuant to Proposition 65 implementing regulations, the State of California listed DEHP as a chemical known to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm,' says the suit. 'DEHP became subject to the 'clear and reasonable warning' requirements one year later, on October 24, 2004.' KRON4 reached out to Mr. S. Leather before the publication of this article and will update this story with a provided statement. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store