What are blue books that are returning to US colleges to prevent AI cheating?
In an unexpected twist, the humble blue book -- a staple of traditional college exams -- is making a strong comeback in US universities. As AI tools like ChatGPT become increasingly prevalent, educators are turning to these paper booklets to uphold academic integrity and prevent cheating.With the rise of generative AI tools, students have found new ways to complete assignments and exams. A study highlighted by WIRED revealed that 86% of students globally use AI regularly, blurring the lines between assistance and cheating. Educators are grappling with this shift, seeking methods to ensure genuine student engagement and understanding.advertisementWHY BLUE BOOKS ARE A TRUSTED SOLUTIONBlue books, simple stapled booklets with lined pages, have long been used for handwritten exams. Their resurgence is driven by the need for in-person, supervised assessments that minimise the risk of AI interference.
Roaring Spring Paper Products, the main maker of blue books in the US, says demand has soared in the past two years. Sales have jumped by over 30% at Texas A&M, nearly 50% at the University of Florida, and a massive 80% at UC Berkeley.TEACHERS USING DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT METHODSProfessors across disciplines are revising their assessment strategies. Many have shifted from take-home essays to in-class writing assignments, oral discussions, and pre-assigned prompts answered by hand during exams.These methods aim to evaluate students' genuine understanding and reduce reliance on AI-generated content.BALANCING TECH AND INTEGRITYWhile the return to blue books addresses immediate concerns, educators acknowledge the importance of integrating AI responsibly into the curriculum.advertisementTeaching students how to use AI ethically and effectively is becoming a priority, ensuring they are prepared for a future where technology plays a significant role.FUTURE OF EXAMSThe resurgence of blue books is part of a broader conversation about assessment in the digital age.As institutions navigate the challenges posed by AI, a hybrid approach that combines traditional methods with modern technology may emerge as the optimal path forward.Trending Reel
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
9 hours ago
- News18
Google DeepMind CEO Predicts AI Will Help Humans Colonise The Galaxy Starting 2030
Last Updated: Google DeepMind CEO and Nobel laureate Demis Hassabis said that starting 2030 humans will be able to colonise the galaxy and artificial intelligence will power this revolution. 2024 Nobel Prize winner and Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis told a news outlet recently that humans will be able to 'colonise the galaxy" starting 2030 and the revolution will be powered by artificial intelligence (AI). The Nobel chemistry laureate told WIRED that AI will lead humanity to far into the universe while turbocharging human productivity. Hassabis, who was jointly awarded the Nobel Prize with David Baker 'for computational protein design", said the 'golden era' was only five years away and that AI models set to bring about a renaissance in human existence. 'If everything goes well, then we should be in an era of radical abundance, a kind of golden era. AGI can solve what I call root-node problems in the world, curing terrible diseases, much healthier and longer lifespans, finding new energy sources," Hassabis was quoted as saying in an interview with WIRED. AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, refers to an AI system with human-like cognitive abilities, capable of understanding, learning, and applying knowledge across a wide range of tasks. 'If that all happens, then it should be an era of maximum human flourishing, where we travel to the stars and colonise the galaxy. I think that will begin to happen in 2030," he said. When asked whether abundance through AI would still result in unequal distribution, Demis Hassabis said the technology could make the world feel 'like a non-zero-sum game." Although AGI has the potential to open vast new frontiers for humanity, Hassabis has previously expressed concern that society may not be prepared for its impact and admitted that the risks and consequences of such powerful technology often keep him up at night. 'It's a sort of like probability distribution. But it's coming, either way it's coming very soon and I'm not sure society's quite ready for that yet. And we need to think that through and also think about these issues that I talked about earlier, to do with the controllability of these systems and also the access to these systems and ensuring that all goes well," he said. He has also advocated for creating a UN-style global body to oversee the development and governance of AGI. 'I would advocate for a kind of CERN for AGI, and by that, I mean a kind of international research-focused high-end collaboration on the frontiers of AGI development to try and make that as safe as possible," he further added.
Hindustan Times
12 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Why ChatGPT essays still fail to fool experts despite good structure, although they are clear and well structured
The advent of AI has marked the rise of many tools, and ChatGPT is one of the most popular ones. Often used for research and writing, this tool has often been the centre of discussion for its ability to fetch interesting content. However, A new study from the University of East Anglia (UEA) in the UK shows that essays written by real students are still better than those produced by ChatGPT, a popular AI writing tool. Researchers compared 145 essays written by university students with 145 essays generated by ChatGPT to see how well the AI can mimic human writing. The study found that although ChatGPT's essays are clear, well structured, and grammatically correct, they lack something important. The AI essays do not show personal insight or deep critical thinking, which are common in student writing. These missing elements make the AI-generated essays feel less engaging and less convincing. However, the researchers do not see AI only as a threat. They believe tools like ChatGPT can be helpful in education if used properly. Instead of shortcuts to finish assignments, AI should be a tool that supports learning and improves writing skills. After all, education is about teaching students how to think clearly and express ideas. These are things no AI can truly replace. One key difference the researchers looked at was how the writers engage readers. Real student essays often include questions, personal comments, and direct appeals to the reader. These techniques help make the writing feel more interactive and persuasive. On the other hand, ChatGPT's essays tend to avoid questions and personal opinions. They follow academic rules but do not show a clear viewpoint or emotional connection. Professor Ken Hyland from UEA explained that the AI focuses on creating text that is logical and smooth but misses conversational details that humans use to connect with readers. This shows that AI writing still struggles with capturing the personal style and strong arguments that real people naturally use.
Hindustan Times
13 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
You can now schedule tasks with Gemini as Google's powerful new AI feature rivals ChatGPT's capabilities
Google is steadily evolving Gemini into a smarter, more proactive AI assistant that now competes directly with OpenAI's ChatGPT. The tech giant has started rolling out a feature called Scheduled Actions, which lets users automate recurring or timed tasks without repeating commands. Originally previewed during Google I/O, Scheduled Actions is now arriving on both Android and iOS devices. The feature is currently available to subscribers of Google One AI Premium and select Google Workspace business and education plans. With this rollout, Google is pushing Gemini closer to becoming a fully integrated productivity companion. Scheduled Actions let users instruct Gemini to perform specific tasks at set times or intervals. This includes sending daily calendar summaries, weekly content prompts, or even one time reminders. Once scheduled, Gemini handles them automatically in the background with no follow up required. For example, a user might say, 'Send me a summary of today's meetings every morning at 8 AM' or 'Generate weekly blog ideas every Friday at 10 AM.' These tasks run quietly behind the scenes, transforming Gemini from a reactive chatbot into a daily-use productivity tool. The setup process is built to be intuitive, making automation easy for both everyday users and professionals. Within the Gemini app, users can define a task, set the time, and choose the frequency through a clean and accessible interface. Scheduled Actions puts Google in direct competition with the kind of automation ChatGPT users create through Zapier or custom workflows. What gives Gemini a clear edge is its deep integration with Google's suite of apps. Functioning across Gmail, Calendar, Docs, and Tasks, Gemini offers a smooth setup and efficient task execution experience. Since it is built into tools people already use, Gemini can interact directly with information across Google's ecosystem. There is no need for third party services or custom scripts. For users already invested in Google's platform, the experience is more seamless than ChatGPT's dependence on external integrations. Scheduled Actions signals a shift in expectations for how AI assistants should function. Instead of waiting for commands, Gemini can now anticipate and handle repetitive tasks, offering a more personal and assistant like experience. While this may be just the beginning, it is a clear step toward positioning Gemini as a truly productivity first AI assistant. And as Gemini continues to evolve, it may not just catch up to ChatGPT but define the next generation of digital assistance.
