logo
I work at Holyrood – how the new toilets policy affects me

I work at Holyrood – how the new toilets policy affects me

The National12-05-2025

I enjoy my job. It allows me to help ordinary people experiencing the failures of our system, whether that be in healthcare, education or something else.
I've been doing it for three years now. Even though I often find myself surrounded by people who actively work to make my life worse – and also life for disabled people and working-class people – I know that my part is useful.
Dylan Hamilton I spend all day every day reading emails from some of the most vulnerable people in society who are overlooked or swept to the side.
It's depressing but arguably one of the most rewarding jobs in the building. I get to directly help the people who elect our politicians, the people who they all ultimately work for and are accountable to.
Those people working against my rights, the Conservatives in particular, but now also members from Labour, the SNP, and the Alba Party, have succeeded. At 5pm last Thursday, my last day of work for the week, an email came in. It said I'm no longer allowed to use the men's toilets at work.
READ MORE: Activists surround police van as man 'detained' at pro-Palestine protest
This will affect any trans person who comes to the Scottish Parliament. Any trans person who wishes to participate in our democracy must now face a humiliating, degrading experience simply to use the toilet.
Has anybody ever raised an issue with this before? No. Have I ever bothered anyone while using the toilets? No, of course not. Am I aware of any issue, ever, with anybody in the toilets at the Scottish Parliament? No.
But now those who organise the operational matters of the building have decided to follow guidance they are not legally obligated to that will strip me and others of our dignity – for the crime of wanting to pee.
I've been open in my identity as a trans man for seven years, more than a third of my life. I've never regretted it for a moment. I began using the men's facilities at age 14, when I'd already taken some steps to appear more boyish and could sense the girls were confused by my presence in the women's.
I've never had a single issue in a toilet. For the vast majority who are not constantly imagining the genitals of people around them, they couldn't care less who is in the bathroom with them. The only thing I miss about women's facilities is that they are cleaner.
I now have facial hair and, while being annoyingly short, a rather muscular frame. I can't remember the last time someone was confused by which pronouns to use for me, which I'm very grateful for as transition is a long and painful road.
This is what some call the 'trans man gotcha': that now big, burly men will be in the women's toilets. This is not the case, with the reality being far worse.
The Supreme Court judgment that is responsible for this situation, having used the law in all its flexibility to interpret whatever they wanted from it, explicitly states that trans men who appear masculine should not use women's facilities. Instead, we should use a secret, third thing. We mustn't worry though, it'll be just as pleasant, just as clean, just as equal … but separate. I'm sure nothing of this sort has ever happened before.
Now, trans men are expected to use neither the women's nor the men's facilities. Instead, we've to use separate gender-neutral facilities, outing ourselves to everyone at any occasion.
Transgender people already face incredibly high levels of assault and discrimination, with 79% experiencing discrimination or bullying in the workplace, resulting in many choosing not to disclose their gender identity there. While I'm fortunate that my colleagues are accepting, this is not the case for a huge number of trans people.
READ MORE: Pro-Palestine activists protest against Israel at Eurovision opening ceremony
This is simply a matter of dignity and respect. As far as I know, I am the only transgender person in the entire MSP staff block. It feels personal because it is. I've always seen myself as being independent and determined, I can't stand to be seen as weak or to be pitied, which is now how I feel being so exposed.
Of course, I'm grateful that my colleagues are supportive and angry on my behalf, but it forces me into the centre of attention for the sole reason of having different genitals than other people. Who wouldn't feel uncomfortable in that situation?
As an activist, I'm no stranger to being flexible with rules and the law in order to achieve justice. I'm no stranger to being criticised by those who are against my cause or my tactics. This feels different: this is a personal attack on my dignity that I will have to experience every day.
Do I flout the rules by using the toilet as normal? Do I use the women's facilities, potentially making women uncomfortable and confused by my presence, resulting in being banned from those as well?
Do I use the disabled toilets when there are several wheelchair users in my workplace who could be held up?
All I want to do at work is continue assisting constituents who need help. Now, instead of devoting all my energy to that, I will be worrying about how long I can avoid using the toilet for. Which option should I choose?
Can I handle the adrenaline right now of refusing to comply with bigoted guidance? Can I handle the humiliation of being so visibly in the wrong place?
One thing is for sure, I will not simply stay at home to avoid the situation altogether. The bigots who have brought these archaic bathroom restrictions into existence don't care about women's safety, with masculine-presenting women already experiencing harassment and fear using women's facilities.
They care about stepping on an oppressed minority and ultimately pushing us out of public life altogether. That will never happen. Transgender people have existed for centuries before this wave of bigotry and culture wars, and we will exist for long after.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drip-fed aid, a starving population and the most air strikes since October 7: Gaza's growing crisis in numbers
Drip-fed aid, a starving population and the most air strikes since October 7: Gaza's growing crisis in numbers

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Drip-fed aid, a starving population and the most air strikes since October 7: Gaza's growing crisis in numbers

It has been around 80 days since Israel launched 'pre-emptive' strikes on Gaza in March, effectively ending a fragile ceasefire with Hamas and resuming the conflict. Two months later, Benjamin Netanyahu's government launched Operation Gideon's Chariots, an intensification of military action in Gaza with the aim of taking control of the entire strip. It has seen mass evacuation orders and restricted flows of aid with widespread reports of food shortages. The latest figures from the Hamas-run health ministry say that 54,607 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza and a further 125,341 people injured, since around 1,200 people were killed in the Hamas attacks on 7 October, 2023. Since the ceasefire broke in mid-March, Israel's attacks on Gaza have ramped up significantly, with around 1,500 strikes recorded. May has been the most intensive month since 7 October, according to conflict specialist non-profit ACLED (Armed Conflict Location and Event Data). At the same time, Gaza has faced looming famine and an ongoing aid crisis. Aid was blocked for over two months from early March, with no food allowed to cross into Gaza; forcing bakeries and organizations like the World Food Kitchen to shutter their operations. On May 19, Israel announced that aid would finally enter Gaza, but only through the newly-established, US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The first aid trucks entered Gaza on May 25, but only lasted a week before GHF paused operations on Tuesday after 58 Palestinians were killed near distribution centers in Southern Gaza. Aid distribution in Gaza was halted on Friday after the US and the GHF said overcrowding had made it unsafe to continue operations. It was again paused on Saturday after the GHF claimed it was facing threats from Hamas. 'In addition to escalating military operations throughout Gaza, the humanitarian situation has deteriorated even further with the opening of the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF),' conflict analyst Salma Eissa told the Independent. 'ACLED records at least three fatal incidents connected to GHF aid distribution centers in the final week of May alone, underscoring the rising level of insecurity surrounding aid delivery." The GHF has said it is working with other organisations to try and prevent further incidents. In an interview with ABC News, the new chief executive Reverend Johnnie Moore said: "I fundamentally disagree with the premise that our operation is somehow disproportionately imperiling people. I'm not doing this for anybody to die.' 4,335 deaths How much aid is entering Gaza? Israel blocked all aid from entering Gaza for nearly three months, between March 2 and May 20. Over this period, the entire 2.1 million population of Gaza faced food shortages, with 500,000 people at risk of starvation, according to a report from UN-backed food security experts. The prices for basic essentials spiked, with a 25kg bag of flour costing between $235 and $520 according to the UN. In late May, the UN Secretary General António Guterres said that some 160,000 pallets of aid supplies (around 9,000 trucks) were ready and waiting to enter Gaza. +3000% Even after the blockade ended, r eports on how much aid has been entering Gaza is not entirely clear. An average of 116 aid trucks entered Gaza every day before the blockade, according to BBC reports. The GHF oversees all distribution of aid since the end of the blockade, meaning that the UN and other humanitarian organisations are not able to track how much is being given out. The GHF has said that it delivered approximately 5.8 million meals in the week since it began operations on distributing aid on 27 May. The lack of transparency and tight control over aid distribution means that these figures cannot be verified by third parties. 2-3 meals a week If these figures are correct, they are meant to feed Gaza's entire 2.1 million population – meaning an average of less than three meals per person over a seven day period. The GHF's food packages are reported to contain rice, flour, canned beans, pasta and more; most of which require cooking equipment and access to clean water and fuel. UN officials have also said that the limited amounts of aid they have been allowed to distribute is limited to flour, with no ready-to-eat meals. After aid distribution resumed briefly on Thursday following a two-day pause, the GHF said it had distributed around 25,000 boxes of food amounting to roughly 1.5 million meals. But there were further pauses on Friday and into the weekend. On Saturday, the GHF said it was unable to distribute any humanitarian aid because Hamas had issued "direct threats" against the organisation's operations. "These threats made it impossible to proceed today without putting innocent lives at risk," the organization said in a statement. "GHF will not be deterred. We remain committed to safe, secure and independent aid delivery. We are actively adapting our operations to overcome these threats and fully intend to resume distributions without delay." A Hamas official told Reuters he had no knowledge of the alleged threats. Israel Hamas of stealing aid, hence its restrictions. The UN denies there is any systematic diversion away from civilians. Intense conflict since the ceasefire Last month marked a shift in Israel's conflict strategy. Launched in May, Gideon's Chariots aims to capture all of Gaza and establish a 'sustained presence' in the enclave. It also involves the mass displacement of the Gaza population to tightly controlled areas, concentrated in the south. Since March 18, when the ceasefire ended, 4,335 Palestinians have been killed in the Gaza strip, says the Hamas-run health ministry. In this period, Israel has launched over 2,100 remote and explosive attacks (including air and drone strikes, shelling, missiles and landmines) on Gaza, according to ACLED's databases; 77 per cent of which were air and drone strikes. 6 in 10 attacks This brings the total number to 15,500 remote attacks in the 20 months since 7 October, with over 9,700 strikes. Over 60 per cent of these attacks have targeted civilians, according to ACLED records. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied that the military targeted civilians, in an address at the end of May, while the military itself has repeatedly said it is only targeting Hamas. 'The first lie that is put against us is that we are deliberately killing civilians,' he said. 'We are texting civilians by the millions. Millions of text messages, millions of phone calls, cell phone calls, millions of pamphlets. Please get out because we are going to come in. And that's why the ratio of non-combatants to combatants killed in the most dense urban warfare area in modern history is the lowest in the Gaza war. 'We are going after Hamas, we are not going after the civilian population, both in allowing it to leave the theaters of combat but by also supplying them with essential requirements. Food, water, medicine. We supplied them with 1.8m tons of food and aid.' Hamas and Palestinian armed groups have launched seven rocket attacks on Israel since the end of the ceasefire, according to the same ACLED records. The data is collected from news sources and official reports, and not independently verified. Figures should be taken as approximate, as more attacks may not have been recorded. May saw 690 air and drone strikes, even more than the first month of Israel's retaliation in October 2023 when 673 strikes were recorded, ACLED says. 'The post-ceasefire period brought on a significant escalation in hostilities, characterized by intensified airstrikes and expanded ground operations as well as a notable shift in Israel's military strategy in Gaza,' Ms Eissa, Middle East research manager at ACLED, told the Independent. 'This escalation has been marked with a surge in air/drone strikes, with a level of intensity not recorded by ACLED since the early days of the war in 2023,' 'The announcement of Operation Gideon's Chariots in May brought on a further sustained and intensifying pattern of violence in Gaza, as Israel launched a comprehensive military campaign and resumed ground operations in addition to their aerial bombardment campaign.' These increased strikes were seen across Gaza but with high concentrations in Khan Younis. The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) attributed many of the strikes in Khan Younis (37% of all strikes last month) to targeting Hamas terrorist hubs in the area; where senior Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar was reportedly killed last week. The Israeli military says it seeks to exert 'tremendous pressure' on Hamas and expand 'operational control'. In a statement last month, Mr Netanyahu said: "We are engaged in massive fighting - intense and substantial - and there is progress. We are going to take control of all areas of the Strip, that's what we're going to do.' The Israeli military has also been carrying out controlled demolitions and bulldozing of infrastructure in Gaza, separate from the air strikes. This includes destroying Hamas tunnels and command centers, but also hundreds of targeted explosions at residential buildings, hospitals, government buildings, shops, and more. The actions echo statements made by Israeli officials, including finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, who vowed that 'Gaza will be entirely destroyed'; while US President Donald Trump called Gaza a 'demolition site' earlier this year, encouraging Palestinians to leave. This destruction has increased significantly since the ceasefire ended, ACLED data reveals; with 191 instances of IDF-controlled property destruction recorded in Gaza since March alone. Most of these properties are residential homes, primarily in Gaza City, Khan Younis and Rafah. The exact scale of the damage is unknown, but the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) estimates that 92 percent of all residential homes in the Gaza Strip have been destroyed. Meanwhile, satellite imagery analysis from the UN (UNOSAT) suggests that over 70,000 buildings have been entirely destroyed in the Strip; with a further 18,000 severely damaged, and 52,000 seeing moderate damage. A further 81 percent of Gaza's cropland has also been damaged by the conflict, according to UNOSAT's latest report in April; significantly hindering the homegrown food supply amid widespread shortages. And as the crisis continues to deepen, Israel faces ongoing international pressure. On Wednesday, the UK joined 13 other countries in backing a UN Security Council resolution that called for an immediate ceasefire and for Israel to lift restrictions on aid. But the move was vetoed by the US, on the basis that the resolution was not linked to the release of the remaining hostages taken on 7 October, did not condemn Hamas and did not insist the militant group disarm and withdraw from Gaza.

Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist
Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist

Leader Live

time44 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist

The First Minister was asked on the BBC Scotland's Sunday Show if those who backed Reform were 'gullible' or 'racist' – a term the SNP leader has previously used to describe the party. Mr Swinney said the 7,088 people who backed Reform – more than a quarter of the vote – in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse ballot were 'neither', but were instead 'angry at the cost-of-living crisis'. He added: 'I think that's what motivates the Reform vote. People have got poorer because of one central thing – Brexit, and the author of that is (Reform UK leader Nigel) Farage. 'I'm standing up to Farage. I'm going to make no apology for it.' He said the SNP is 'in the process of recovery' and he had come into office as First Minister a year ago 'inheriting some significant difficulties' within the party, and that it needs to get stronger before the Holyrood election in 2026. He said voters are 'having to work hard for less' and are concerned about public services, particularly the NHS. Mr Swinney was asked about comments he made prior to the vote saying 'Labour were not at the races' and claiming it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. Labour's Davy Russell gained the seat from the SNP with 8,559 votes, while SNP candidate Katy Loudon came second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie. The First Minister said that since the general election campaign last year, people he has met have pledged never to vote Labour due to the winter fuel allowance being cut, while Reform's support increased. Mr Swinney said: 'People were telling us on the doorsteps, they were giving us reasons why they weren't supporting Labour. We could also see that Farage's support was rising dramatically and that's happening across the United Kingdom, it's not unique to Hamilton. 'I positioned the SNP to be strong enough to stop Farage, and that's what we were determined to do.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has branded the SNP's campaign 'dishonest and disgraceful' and said it had put the spotlight on Reform. Those comments were put to the First Minister, who said he had previously been allies with Mr Sarwar in a campaign to 'stand up to far-right thinking'. Mr Swinney said: 'That was months ago and then we found ourselves in the aftermath of the UK local authority elections, the English local authority elections where Farage surged to a leading position and won a by-election south of the border. 'So the dynamic of our politics change in front of us. 'I've been standing up to Farage for months, I've been warning about the dangers of Farage for months, and they crystallised in the rise of Farage during the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall by-election.'

Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist
Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist

Mr Swinney said the 7,088 people who backed Reform – more than a quarter of the vote – in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse ballot were 'neither', but were instead 'angry at the cost-of-living crisis'. He added: 'I think that's what motivates the Reform vote. People have got poorer because of one central thing – Brexit, and the author of that is (Reform UK leader Nigel) Farage. 'I'm standing up to Farage. I'm going to make no apology for it.' John Swinney said those who voted Reform in Hamilton were 'angry' (PA) He said the SNP is 'in the process of recovery' and he had come into office as First Minister a year ago 'inheriting some significant difficulties' within the party, and that it needs to get stronger before the Holyrood election in 2026. He said voters are 'having to work hard for less' and are concerned about public services, particularly the NHS. Mr Swinney was asked about comments he made prior to the vote saying 'Labour were not at the races' and claiming it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. Labour's Davy Russell gained the seat from the SNP with 8,559 votes, while SNP candidate Katy Loudon came second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie. The First Minister said that since the general election campaign last year, people he has met have pledged never to vote Labour due to the winter fuel allowance being cut, while Reform's support increased. Reform UK came third in the by-election (Jane Barlow/PA) Mr Swinney said: 'People were telling us on the doorsteps, they were giving us reasons why they weren't supporting Labour. We could also see that Farage's support was rising dramatically and that's happening across the United Kingdom, it's not unique to Hamilton. 'I positioned the SNP to be strong enough to stop Farage, and that's what we were determined to do.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has branded the SNP's campaign 'dishonest and disgraceful' and said it had put the spotlight on Reform. Those comments were put to the First Minister, who said he had previously been allies with Mr Sarwar in a campaign to 'stand up to far-right thinking'. Mr Swinney said: 'That was months ago and then we found ourselves in the aftermath of the UK local authority elections, the English local authority elections where Farage surged to a leading position and won a by-election south of the border. 'So the dynamic of our politics change in front of us. 'I've been standing up to Farage for months, I've been warning about the dangers of Farage for months, and they crystallised in the rise of Farage during the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall by-election.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store