Victims' concern over ‘need to promote narrative of peace' before Omagh bomb
The Omagh Bombing Inquiry also heard concerns that the policing of terrorism in Northern Ireland at the time was not as effective as that in England.
The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland.
Michael Gallagher, the father of Omagh bomb victim Aiden Gallagher, arrives at the Silverbirch Hotel in Omagh for the Omagh Bombing Inquiry (Liam McBurney/PA)
The bomb exploded months after the Good Friday Agreement was signed, largely bringing an end to decades of political violence in the region.
The inquiry heard a statement from Hugh Southey on behalf of victims represented by solicitor John Fox.
They included the families of Aiden Gallagher, Ann McCombe, Fred and Bryan White, Avril and Maura Monaghan, Oran Doherty, Shaun McLaughlin, Jolene Marlow, James Barker, Brian McCrory, Rocio Abad Ramos, Sean McGrath, Geraldine Breslin, Mary Grimes and Esther Gibson, who were all killed in the massacre, as well as several other people who were injured.
Mr Southey told the inquiry it was 'possible that politics had an influence on security activities' in 1998.
He said: 'In simple terms there is a concern that the need to promote a narrative of peace may have resulted in a light touch being adopted to terrorist activity.'
The barrister continued: 'A key issue is whether there was a decision to relax security that was inappropriate and contributed to the bomb.
'There is a linked issue as to whether any flawed decision was political.'
Mr Southey said there was a clear desire from his clients for the public inquiry to 'conduct a thorough and comprehensive review of the circumstances surrounding the Omagh bomb'.
He said: 'In a real sense this may be the last opportunity for a cathartic, healing process.'
Mr Southey said there was a need for the inquiry to investigate 'differential policing'.
He said: 'What I mean by that is was the policing of terrorism in Northern Ireland as effective as that in England?
'Preparedness for warning calls is an aspect of this. Did England have more effective procedures to respond to bomb threats?
'The Army had regularly been called upon during bomb alerts, as it possessed a range of expertise, including bomb disposal expertise.
'However on August 15 1998 they were not deployed into Omagh following warnings being issued.'
He added: 'This raises the question of why the Army were not deployed on the day of the bomb and what was the protocol governing their attendance.
'Victims and survivors submit that an aspect of preventability was whether a decision not to deploy the Army was or should have been influenced by intelligence and other material suggesting a threat.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Albert Einstein's letter shows life in Norfolk as Nazis wanted him dead
A letter has emerged showing Albert Einstein's life in England as he fled Nazi death threats - he was protected by a 24-hour police guard and local men armed with shotguns An enthralling letter penned by Albert Einstein 92 years ago has been uncovered, revealing how he cherished the "enviable solitude" of Norfolk while evading the Nazi regime. The celebrated physicist escaped to Belgium following Hitler's ascent but continued to be under threat. Inadequate police protection necessitated his journey across to Dover, after which he was chauffeured to a modest 9m2 hut on Roughton Heath, near Cromer, generously provided by Conservative MP Oliver Locker-Lampson. Einstein expressed to his son Eduard in a letter that despite the austere living situation, he was savouring the quietness of his retreat, dedicating most of his time to mathematics and running outdoors to keep warm. Commencing the correspondence dated September 23, 1933, from Cromer, he candidly shared: "Times have been rather turbulent... It was actually reported... plans for my assassination... My little house... consists of a single room... Outside the door you have immediate access to Mother Nature." He described the Nazi domination of his native Germany as "a revolution of the stupid against the rational" and even welcomed guests like sculptor Jacob Epstein, who sculpted a bust in his likeness, reports the Express. Einstein departed England for the United States in October 1933 and never revisited Europe before his demise in 1955. This two-page document, which remained within the Einstein family circles until 2001, is set to go under the hammer at Christie's London, with an expected valuation between £20,000 and £25,000. Thomas Venning, a specialist in books at Christie's, commented: "It shows Einstein's humour amid stress. Despite threats, he joked about getting peace and quiet when dead but not enjoying it. His line about Nazism as a 'revolution of the stupid against the rational' was a powerful critique. His love of solitude and nature shines through." Venning further noted the irony of the globally renowned genius taking refuge in a Norfolk hut, protected by locals armed with shotguns, describing it as "Dad's Army-like". He also pointed out that the coverage by the British press diminished the secrecy of his hideaway. The auction is set for 9 July.
The Independent
15 hours ago
- The Independent
Government has ‘plain duty' to assist Omagh inquiry with swift disclosure
The UK Government has a 'plain duty' to ensure that full disclosure of documents is swiftly made to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry, its chair has said. Lord Turnbull said his experience to date over the cooperation of some state agencies with the inquiry had caused him to have 'some concerns'. The inquiry chair was speaking at the end of two days of hearings in which the legal representatives of core participants delivered opening statements. The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous secretary of state Chris Heaton-Harris to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. Lord Turnbull said he understood the challenges of providing disclosure of relevant documents to the inquiry were 'significant'. But he added: 'The fact remains that two years have already passed since the secretary of state announced that there was to be an enquiry. 'At many times since that point the progress towards setting up the inquiry and then of trying to move towards evidential hearings, has appeared to be frustratingly slow. 'Difficulties over providing disclosure of course impact on the ability to schedule evidential hearings.' The inquiry chair said some of those watching may have observed that if successive governments had 'not so staunchly set their face against a public inquiry the problems now being grappled with would not be so acute'. He added: 'Having opposed the setting up of an inquiry so long, there is a plain duty on the Secretary of State (Hilary Benn) and others in government to remedy that now by making available whatever resources are necessary to ensure that full disclosure can be swiftly made available. 'I say that not just because of the passage of time. 'My experience to date has caused me to have some concerns. 'I have not been convinced that some of those with whom the inquiry has to depend upon to provide it with the material it seeks have always been in a position properly to engage with the inquiry or to dedicate the necessary resources to those tasks. 'I therefore trust after all that has been said over today and yesterday, that my remarks and concerns will be passed on to the relevant ministers and others who manage the responses to the inquiry's requests.' Lord Turnbull also said that the inquiry would not 'simply accept statements' that documents had been lost or destroyed. He said: 'Where claims are made that documents of importance have been destroyed or cannot be located, material providers can expect such assertions to be subjected to the most rigorous scrutiny. 'Accordingly the inquiry will expect to hear detailed evidence as to the nature of the efforts made to locate any such documents and the processes around their storage and retention. 'And having done so, the inquiry will draw such inferences as seem appropriate in light of the nature and importance of the documents concerned, alongside the quality of any evidence given by way of explanation for their absence.'
Leader Live
16 hours ago
- Leader Live
Government has ‘plain duty' to assist Omagh inquiry with swift disclosure
Lord Turnbull said his experience to date over the cooperation of some state agencies with the inquiry had caused him to have 'some concerns'. The inquiry chair was speaking at the end of two days of hearings in which the legal representatives of core participants delivered opening statements. The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous secretary of state Chris Heaton-Harris to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. Lord Turnbull said he understood the challenges of providing disclosure of relevant documents to the inquiry were 'significant'. But he added: 'The fact remains that two years have already passed since the secretary of state announced that there was to be an enquiry. 'At many times since that point the progress towards setting up the inquiry and then of trying to move towards evidential hearings, has appeared to be frustratingly slow. 'Difficulties over providing disclosure of course impact on the ability to schedule evidential hearings.' The inquiry chair said some of those watching may have observed that if successive governments had 'not so staunchly set their face against a public inquiry the problems now being grappled with would not be so acute'. He added: 'Having opposed the setting up of an inquiry so long, there is a plain duty on the Secretary of State (Hilary Benn) and others in government to remedy that now by making available whatever resources are necessary to ensure that full disclosure can be swiftly made available. 'I say that not just because of the passage of time. 'My experience to date has caused me to have some concerns. 'I have not been convinced that some of those with whom the inquiry has to depend upon to provide it with the material it seeks have always been in a position properly to engage with the inquiry or to dedicate the necessary resources to those tasks. 'I therefore trust after all that has been said over today and yesterday, that my remarks and concerns will be passed on to the relevant ministers and others who manage the responses to the inquiry's requests.' Lord Turnbull also said that the inquiry would not 'simply accept statements' that documents had been lost or destroyed. He said: 'Where claims are made that documents of importance have been destroyed or cannot be located, material providers can expect such assertions to be subjected to the most rigorous scrutiny. 'Accordingly the inquiry will expect to hear detailed evidence as to the nature of the efforts made to locate any such documents and the processes around their storage and retention. 'And having done so, the inquiry will draw such inferences as seem appropriate in light of the nature and importance of the documents concerned, alongside the quality of any evidence given by way of explanation for their absence.'
