logo
No, Trump can't legally send Americans to prison in El Salvador

No, Trump can't legally send Americans to prison in El Salvador

Washington Post24-04-2025

John D. Bessler is a law professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, an adjunct professor at the Georgetown University Law Center and a visiting scholar at the University of Minnesota Law School's Human Rights Center.
President Donald Trump has suggested sending U.S. citizens convicted of crimes to prison in El Salvador, outside the reach of the U.S. legal system. 'The homegrowns are next,' Trump said during a meeting with El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, adding he'd 'have to build five more places' to hold the prospective inmates.
The Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment prohibits this course of action. White House lawyers should read the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Trop v. Dulles. The court barred the government from rendering U.S. citizens stateless, which is similar to what Trump is threatening to do if Americans are imprisoned abroad.
During World War II, Albert Trop, an American citizen, was serving as a U.S. Army private in Morocco. He escaped a stockade and was taken into custody the next day and court-martialed. Convicted of desertion, he was sentenced to three years of hard labor, forfeiture of pay and a dishonorable discharge. When Trop applied in 1952 for a passport, his application was denied on the ground that, under the Nationality Act of 1940, he had lost his U.S. citizenship by virtue of his conviction.
In Trop, the Supreme Court held that denationalization as a punishment is a violation of the cruel and unusual punishments clause of the Eighth Amendment. 'It is a form of punishment more primitive than torture, for it destroys for the individual the political existence that was centuries in the development,' the court concluded. 'In short, the expatriate has lost the right to have rights.'
The Trop case makes clear that any effort to incarcerate U.S. citizens abroad would be an Eighth Amendment violation. Were that to happen, people would — as a practical matter — be deprived of their fundamental constitutional rights. They would be at the mercy of a foreign legal system or, worse yet, a dictator's arbitrary whims. Bukele called himself 'the world's coolest dictator,' and El Salvador operates the notorious Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT. Any American held abroad — as Chief Justice Earl Warren pointed out in Trop — would be 'at the sufferance of the country in which he happens to find himself.'
'Banishment,' Warren concluded, is 'a fate universally decried by civilized people.'
As just one example, the Eighth Amendment protects against horrendous conditions of confinement. But how would someone in a foreign prison meaningfully assert an Eighth Amendment violation from a cell controlled by another sovereign country?
The case of Kilmar Abrego García, an immigrant and longtime Maryland resident who the Trump administration admitted in court was sent in error to El Salvador, illustrates the threat. The Supreme Court ordered the administration to facilitate García's return, but it has resisted taking action. Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III — a Reagan appointee — warned in his Fourth Circuit order on April 17 that 'the government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order.'
The government's claim that nothing can be done for García now that he's out of U.S. custody, Wilkinson observed, 'should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear.'
'If today the Executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders,' Wilkinson wrote, 'what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home?'
Trump has said he'll only send Americans convicted of crimes abroad if it is legal. The Supreme Court has made clear it is not. We should hope Wilkinson is right, 'that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says
Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says

President Trump's ex-personal attorney Michael Cohen on Saturday said that Trump isn't done with tech billionaire Elon Musk yet, after tensions between the two men became incredibly heated in a public social media spat last week. 'They're going to really go after Elon Musk like nobody has seen, ever, in this country, because they can,' Cohen told MSNBC's Ali Velshi. 'And one thing Elon doesn't understand is this political guerilla warfare that they're going to conduct against him,' he added. On Thursday, a fight between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big, beautiful bill' earlier in the week escalated rapidly on Musk's X platform and Trump's Truth Social platform. The president said the tech billionaire 'just went CRAZY!' and threatened Musk's government contracts. Musk alleged that Trump had ties to convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein on X. The public spat followed the end of Musk's recent service in the Trump administration and an alliance with the president that appeared to start off strong. Musk endorsed Trump in July 2024 in the wake of Trump surviving an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Musk's administration service was marked by intense backlash from those on the left and Democrats over actions taken by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on the federal government. 'He doesn't care about Elon Musk,' Cohen said in his MSNBC appearance, talking about Trump. 'He used Elon Musk for what he needed. Initially it was the money, so that he didn't have to lay out any of his own, and also, more importantly, for his access with X.' The Hill has reached out to the White House and X for comment.

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'
Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

San Francisco Chronicle​

time15 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

President Donald Trump on Monday endorsed the idea of arresting California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the state's resistance to federal immigration enforcement efforts in Los Angeles, intensifying a clash that has already drawn legal challenges and fierce rebukes from Democratic leaders. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to Tom Homan, his border czar, who over the weekend suggested that state and local officials, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, could face arrest if they interfered with immigration raids. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. Trump's remarks signal a sharp escalation in the administration's crackdown on sanctuary jurisdictions and a willingness to target political opponents in unprecedented ways. Newsom responded swiftly, calling Trump's words a chilling attack on American democratic norms. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor,' Newsom wrote on X. 'This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' Tensions escalated sharply after Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles following days of civil unrest related to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. The deployment marked the first time a president has federalized a state's National Guard without the governor's consent since 1965. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced plans to sue Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, alleging the deployment was unlawful. 'Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President's authority under the law,' Bonta said at a press conference. 'There is no invasion. There is no rebellion.' Meanwhile, David Huerta, president of SEIU California, was charged with felony conspiracy to impede an officer after his arrest during the L.A. protests. Despite the furor, legal experts note that Homan lacks the authority to arrest elected officials, and his role remains advisory. Still, Trump's rhetoric has raised alarms among critics who view his comments as part of a broader pattern of undermining democratic institutions. 'This is a preview of things to come,' Newsom warned in an interview with Brian Taylor Cohen that he shared on social media. 'This isn't about L.A., per se,' the Democratic governor added. 'It's about us today, it's about you, everyone watching tomorrow. This guy is unhinged. Trump is unhinged right now, and this is just another proof point of that.' At a news conference held by lawmakers in Sacramento to discuss the protests in Los Angeles, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Hollister, said Trump's threat to arrest Newsom is a 'direct assault on democracy and an insult to every Californian.'

Musk's feud with Trump reveals one ugly truth about Tesla stock
Musk's feud with Trump reveals one ugly truth about Tesla stock

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk's feud with Trump reveals one ugly truth about Tesla stock

You can catch Opening Bid on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. The very public spat that has erupted between Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk and president Donald Trump has sent shares of the EV maker on a wild, wild ride. Shares are off by 15% over the last five sessions as investors fear Trump will take aim at Musk's various lines of business. Musk also being out of Trump's inner circle also runs counter to the bull thesis that circled Tesla's stock post election. But the dustup between the two powerbrokers brings to light a major problem for Tesla's stock as Musk tries to jumpstart a sagging EV business. There is a big disconnect between Tesla's valuation and what's happening underneath the surface. For example, Tesla's stock is up 12% since October 2022 – yet, consensus EPS estimates for 2025, 2026 and 2027 have plunged 77%, 70% and 71% since then according to new research from JP Morgan auto analyst Ryan Brinkman. Further, the stock is valued at a significant premium to the broader market despite Trump likely doing away with EV tax credits soon. The tax credit has been a driver of Tesla's sales and profits. EV subsidies represent about 52% of Tesla's current profits, Brinkman estimates. For full episodes of Opening Bid, listen on your favorite podcast platform or watch on our website. Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid is produced by Langston Sessoms All right. Welcome to a new episode of The Opening Bid Podcast. I'm Yahoo! Finance executive editor, Brian Sozzi. And this is our stock of the day. Let's get a minute on that clock. Uh, of course, we're going to start with the Elon Musk feud with President Trump, continuing to unfold, has quieted down a little bit, but nonetheless, it's something to be following because it has impacted Tesla stock. Uh, shares are down by 15% over the last five sessions. Uh, of course, when the president, uh, won the presidency, there was this thought that Elon would help, uh, you know, his closeness or proximity to the president would help get auto taxis approved, and everybody would be using robots. Now that thesis has unwound, as Musk is clearly not in the Trump inner circle. But this is highlighted, uh, this feud has highlighted really two problems with Tesla stock. First, uh, the valuation of the stock versus reality. Uh, have to give a shout out to Ryan Brinkman at JP Morgan. Uh, he notes that, uh, Tesla stock is up 12% since October 22. Yet, consensus EPS estimates, I mean, these are shocking to clients, for 2025, next year and 2027 have plunged by 77%, 70%, and 71%, respectively. These are huge declines at a time where Tesla stock is still high. And the problem number two, as I mentioned, is in fact the valuation. Tesla stock valued about 140 times forward estimated earnings. Uh, the S&P 500 is about 22 times. And if President Trump rolls back those EV tax credits, like, uh, it is expected because of his big beautiful bill, um, Tesla could lose a lot of profits. Brinkman estimates EV subsidies represent about 52% of Tesla's core profits, uh, and theoretically, all those profits would go up in smoke. That's our stock of the day on The Opening Bid Podcast.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store