Israel says it strikes Iran amid nuclear tensions
Flames lit up Tehran's skyline after Israeli strikes targeted Iranian military and nuclear sites, with damages to residential buildings. (X pic)
TEHRAN : Israel carried out strikes against Iran on Friday, targeting its nuclear and military sites, after US President Donald Trump warned of a possible 'massive conflict' in the region.
Israel's operation struck at the 'heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme', taking aim at the atomic facility in Natanz and nuclear scientists, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.
The operation against Iran will 'continue as many days as it takes,' Netanyahu said.
Iran's chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri was 'likely eliminated', said an Israeli security official.
Iranian state media said residential buildings in Tehran were also hit, killing a number of civilians including women and children.
Fire and smoke were seen at a key site for Iran's Revolutionary Guards, state TV reported, while explosions were also heard in Natanz city in Iran's central province.
The Guards' leader Hossein Salami was killed in the strikes, Iranian media said.
Air traffic was halted at Tehran's main international airport Imam Khomeini, while neighbouring Iraq has also closed its airspace and suspended all flights at all airports, state media reported.
Israel declared a state of emergency, likewise closing its airspace, with defence minister Israel Katz saying retaliatory action from Tehran was possible following the operation.
'Following the State of Israel's preemptive strike against Iran, a missile and drone attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate future,' Katz said.
An Israeli military official added that the Israeli army believed that Iran had the ability to strike Israel 'any minute'.
Oil prices surged as much as 8% while stocks sank on the Israeli strikes, which came after Trump's warning. The US president has also said the US was drawing down staff in the region.
'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' Trump told reporters at the White House Thursday when asked if an Israeli attack loomed.
Trump said he believed a 'pretty good' deal on Iran's nuclear programme was 'fairly close', but said that an Israeli attack on its arch foe could wreck the chances of an agreement.
The US leader did not disclose the details of a conversation on Monday with Netanyahu, but said: 'I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it.'
Trump quickly added: 'Might help it actually, but it also could blow it.'
Secretary of state Marco Rubio warned Iran not respond to Israeli strikes by hitting US bases, saying Washington was not involved.
'Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel,' Rubio said in a statement.
'Extremist'
The US on Wednesday said it was reducing embassy staff in Iraq – long a zone of proxy conflict with Iran.
Israel, which counts on US military and diplomatic support, sees the cleric-run state in Tehran as an existential threat and hit Iranian air defences last year.
Netanyahu has vowed less restraint since the unprecedented Oct 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Tehran-backed Hamas, which triggered the massive Israeli offensive in Gaza.
The US and other Western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has repeatedly denied.
Israel again called for global action after the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency accused Iran on Wednesday of non-compliance with its obligations.
The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a 'snapback' mechanism, which expires in October, that would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then US president Barack Obama.
Trump pulled out of the deal in his first term and slapped Iran with sweeping sanctions.
Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, slammed the resolution as 'extremist' and blamed Israeli influence.
In response to the resolution, Iran said it would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location.
Iran would also replace 'all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines' at the Fordo uranium enrichment plant, said Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.
Iran currently enriches uranium to 60%, far above the 3.67% limit set in the 2015 deal and close, though still short, of the 90% needed for a nuclear warhead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Baghdad asks Iran to avoid strikes on US targets in Iraq: Official
BAGHDAD: Baghdad has asked Tehran not to target US interests on Iraqi soil, a senior security official said Saturday, as Washington's ally Israel and Iran traded blows, heightening tensions across the region. The government in Baghdad is a close ally of Tehran but also a strategic partner of Iran's arch-foe the US, which has some 2,500 troops in Iraq as part of an anti-jihadist coalition. Fearing being caught up in a regional escalation, the Iraqi government asked Tehran not to strike in its territory, a senior Iraqi security official told AFP. "The request was made. They promised us positive things," said the official, requesting anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. The official added that Tehran has shown understanding with regards to Baghdad's request. Before the current escalation, which began early Friday, June 13, 2025, with a series of Israeli attacks on military and nuclear sites in Iran, Tehran had threatened to strike military bases hosting US forces in the region in the event of a conflict triggered by the possible failure of nuclear talks with Washington. Throughout the Gaza war, which began in October 2023 and has pitted Israel against Iran-backed Palestinian group Hamas, Tehran-aligned armed factions have launched dozens of rocket and drone attacks targeting US forces in Iraq and in neighbouring Syria. Before the wave of attacks began, the US on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, announced it was reducing staffing at its Baghdad embassy, citing security reasons. Several pro-Iran groups in Iraq called on Friday, June 13, 2025, to accelerate the departure of US forces from the country, with the powerful Kataeb Hezbollah warning of "additional wars in the region." — AFP
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Israel's Iran strikes hint at bigger goal: Regime change
JERUSALEM, June 14 — Israel's surprise attack on Iran had an obvious goal of sharply disrupting Tehran's nuclear programme and lengthening the time it would need to develop an atomic weapon. But the scale of the attacks, Israel's choice of targets, and its politicians' own words suggest another, longer-term objective: toppling the regime itself. The strikes early on Friday hit not just Iran's nuclear facilities and missile factories but also key figures in the country's military chain of command and its nuclear scientists, blows that appear aimed at diminishing Iran's credibility both at home and among its allies in the region — factors that could destabilise the Iranian leadership, experts said. 'One assumes that one of the reasons that Israel is doing that is that they're hoping to see regime change,' said Michael Singh of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former senior official under President George W. Bush. 'It would like to see the people of Iran rise up,' he said, adding that the limited civilian casualties in the initial round of attacks also spoke to a broader aim. In a video address shortly after Israeli fighter jets began striking Iranian nuclear facilities and air defence systems, Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, appealed to the Iranian people directly. Israel's actions against Iran's ally Hezbollah had led to a new government in Lebanon and the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, he said. The Iranian people had an opportunity too: 'I believe that the day of your liberation is near. And when that happens, the great friendship between our two ancient peoples will flourish once again,' said Netanyahu. But despite the damage inflicted by the unprecedented Israeli attack, decades of enmity toward Israel — not only among Iran's rulers but its majority-Shi'ite population — raises questions about the prospect for fomenting enough public support to oust an entrenched theocratic leadership in Tehran backed by loyal security forces. Singh cautioned that no one knows what conditions would be required for an opposition to coalesce in Iran. Friday's assault was the first phase of what Israel said would be a prolonged operation. Experts said they expected Israel would continue to go after key Iranian nuclear infrastructure to delay Tehran's march to a nuclear bomb — even if Israel on its own does not have the capability to eliminate Iran's nuclear programme. Iran says its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only. The UN nuclear watchdog concluded this week that it was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty. Israel's first salvoes targeted senior figures in Iran's military and scientific establishment, took out much of the country's air defence system and destroyed the above-ground enrichment plant at Iran's nuclear site. 'As a democratic country, the State of Israel believes that it is up to the people of a country to shape their national politics, and choose their government,' the Israeli embassy in Washington told Reuters. 'The future of Iran can only be determined by the Iranian people.' Netanyahu has called for a change in Iran's government, including in September. US President Donald Trump's administration, while acquiescing to Israel's strikes and helping its close ally fend off Iran's retaliatory missile barrage, has given no indication that it seeks regime change in Tehran. The White House and Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York also did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the matter. Ending nuclear programme beyond reach, for now Israel has much further to go if it is to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, and military analysts have always said it might be impossible to totally disable the well-fortified sites dotted around Iran. The Israeli government has also cautioned that Iran's nuclear programme could not be entirely destroyed by means of a military campaign. 'There's no way to destroy a nuclear programme by military means,' Israel's National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi told Israel's Channel 13 TV. The military campaign could, however, create conditions for a deal with the United States that would thwart the nuclear programme. Analysts also remain sceptical that Israel will have the munitions needed to obliterate Iran's nuclear project on its own. 'Israel probably cannot take out completely the nuclear project on its own without the American participation,' Sima Shine, a former chief Mossad analyst and now a researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, told reporters on Friday. While setting back Tehran's nuclear programme would have value for Israel, the hope for regime change could explain why Israel went after so many senior military figures, potentially throwing the Iranian security establishment into confusion and chaos. 'These people were very vital, very knowledgeable, many years in their jobs, and they were a very important component of the stability of the regime, specifically the security stability of the regime,' said Shine. 'In the ideal world, Israel would prefer to see a change of regime, no question about that,' she said. But such a change would come with risk, said Jonathan Panikoff, a former US deputy national intelligence officer for the Middle East who is now at the Atlantic Council. If Israel succeeds in removing Iran's leadership, there is no guarantee the successor that emerges would not be even more hardline in pursuit of conflict with Israel. 'For years, many in Israel have insisted that regime change in Iran would prompt a new and better day - that nothing could be worse than the current theocratic regime,' Panikoff said. 'But history tells us it can always be worse.' — Reuters
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
The Madman Theory, reloaded: Bibi's big bet and the ghosts of Armageddon — Che Ran
JUNE 14 — There's something about men who cling to power for too long. They start to believe their own warnings. They confuse nightmares for policy, ghosts for threats. For three decades, Binyamin 'Bibi' Netanyahu has been warning that Iran is the gravest threat to Israel's survival. He's raised the alarm in parliaments, on CNN, in closed-door meetings with US presidents, and — most infamously — with cartoon bombs at the United Nations. And now, with the world distracted, with American politics gridlocked and the Arab street roiling in the aftermath of Gaza, Bibi has done what many feared he might: he made the nightmare real. Friday's flames On Friday night, the Israeli Air Force launched wave after wave of airstrikes deep into Iranian territory. The targets weren't symbolic. These were no dusty outposts or token retaliatory strikes. Bibi's jets went for the jugular — uranium enrichment facilities, IRGC command centres, and senior officials with unpronounceable names and frightening portfolios. The kind of targets that, if hit hard enough, can provoke a response that turns the sky black. Netanyahu wasn't acting out of character. This is a man who's defined his political career around the Iranian threat. For Bibi, it's not just personal — it's biblical. He sees himself as a modern-day David slinging stones at the nuclear Goliath in Tehran. But here's the catch: what if this isn't David vs. Goliath? What if this is Sarajevo, 1914, and no one's steering the bus? The spectre of escalation Let's be clear. Iran is a nasty piece of work. The regime is brutal, repressive, and cynical. It funds Hezbollah and backs Syrian war criminals. Give them a nuclear bomb, and you've got a whole new level of hell in the region. Israel is absolutely entitled to defend itself, even preemptively. No sane person wants the Ayatollahs to get their hands on nukes. But the question isn't whether Israel can strike. It's whether it should — and what happens next. Iran has already vowed vengeance. The Supreme Leader is not known for his sense of restraint. Hezbollah, now sitting on more missiles than most European countries, has itchy fingers and a permanent grudge. The Houthis in Yemen — yes, they matter now — have already lobbed missiles at commercial shipping lanes and threatened the Gulf. And Iraq? Already teetering on the edge. This isn't just sabre-rattling. It's a fuse that's been lit. And the powder keg? It stretches from Tel Aviv to Tehran to Tampa. Washington's dilemma And what of America? The world's reluctant hall monitor. The Biden administration was not consulted in advance. And while the White House issued a predictably lukewarm statement of support for Israel's 'right to self-defence,' insiders are reportedly livid. The US has 30,000 troops across the Middle East, from Al Udeid to Bahrain. Every one of them just got a bigger target on their back. Washington now faces an impossible choice: back Israel and risk being dragged into another catastrophic war, or distance itself and watch its most important ally in the region spiral alone. There's no winning hand here — just varying degrees of bloodshed and blowback. A demonstrator carrying the Israeli flag walks past a portrait of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during an anti-government protest in front of the Defence Ministry in Tel Aviv June 7, 2025. — AFP pic A war nobody wants, but everyone expects Let's talk worst-case scenarios. Iran retaliates, and the spiral begins. Saudi Arabia, once cautiously thawing ties with Israel, panics and arms up. The UAE gets jittery. Oil prices skyrocket. The Strait of Hormuz — a narrow artery through which a fifth of the world's oil flows — gets blockaded. Cue a global recession. Meanwhile, Israeli cities face nightly missile barrages. Civilians die. Western capitals face protests, cyberattacks, and worse. And for what? To delay a nuclear programme that's been scattered, hardened, and made redundant by decades of preparation? To send a message? To flex? Bibi may have bought a few months of security, but at what cost? The domestic distraction And let's not forget the man behind the curtain. Netanyahu is not just fighting Iran. He's fighting for his political life. Besieged by corruption charges, hated by large swaths of his own people, and held in power by a Frankenstein coalition of extremists and zealots, Bibi needed a distraction. What better than a good old-fashioned existential threat? This is the Madman Theory redux: convince your enemies you're crazy enough to do anything, and maybe they'll back down. But that only works if they don't call your bluff. If Iran strikes back hard—and let's not pretend they don't have the capability—it won't be a clever ploy. It'll be a firestorm. Asia watches closely Meanwhile, in the East, Beijing smiles behind its Great Wall of poker faces. The Middle East burns, and China moves quietly into the vacuum — offering 'peace' deals, energy partnerships, and soft-power plays while America gets dragged back into the quicksand it spent two decades trying to crawl out of. South-east Asia, caught in the geopolitical vice grip of the US-China rivalry, watches this with growing dread. Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand — they're already feeling the heat from supply chain disruptions and oil market volatility. In Singapore's boardrooms and Jakarta's mosques, the question is the same: if the Iran-Israel war spreads, what happens to the fragile economic recovery we're clinging to? The final course This isn't a war with tidy endings. There's no Mission Accomplished banner waiting to be unfurled. No grand parade. Just a pile of bodies and the sickening taste of regret. Israel has the right to defend itself. Iran is a threat. But Bibi's bombing run wasn't strategy. It was desperation masquerading as courage. We live in a world where the adults are exhausted and the lunatics run the show. Where headlines outrun diplomacy. Where every drone strike feels like the last word — until the next one drops. So here we are. Staring down another Middle Eastern war, one airstrike away from a regional apocalypse. And all because one man believed his prophecy — and decided to make it come true. Come hungry. Leave humbled. Even war has its tragic poetry. *This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
