Exclusive-Democrats want new leaders, focus on pocketbook issues, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
By James Oliphant and Jason Lange
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Democrats want new leaders for their party, which many feel isn't focusing enough on economic issues and is over-emphasizing issues like transgender rights and electric vehicles, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found.
The poll identified a deep disconnect between what Democrats say their priorities are and the issues they believe party leaders care about most ahead of next year's midterm elections, when they hope to crack Republican control of Congress. They see their elected officials as not focused on helping families make ends meet and reducing corporate influence.
Democrat Kamala Harris' November loss to Republican Donald Trump has left the party rudderless and sparked a round of soul-searching about the path forward. The poll shows that party leaders have work to do in recruiting candidates for Congress in 2026 -- and for the White House in 2028.
Some 62% of self-identified Democrats in the poll agreed with a statement that "the leadership of the Democratic Party should be replaced with new people." Only 24% disagreed and the rest said they weren't sure or didn't answer.
Just 30% of Republicans polled said they thought their party leadership should be replaced.
Democrats' dissatisfaction is also playing out in leadership changes, including this week's resignation of Randi Weingarten, the influential president of the American Federation of Teachers, from the Democratic National Committee -- which followed the ouster of progressive activist David Hogg.
The Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 4,258 people nationwide and online June 11 through 16, including 1,293 Democrats. It had a margin of error of about 3 percentage points for Democrats. It found that Democrats want the party to focus on their day-to-day needs and want wealthier Americans to pay more in taxes.
California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is viewed as a potential Democratic presidential candidate in 2028, agrees.
"People don't trust us, they don't think we have their backs on issues that are core to them, which are these kitchen table issues," Newsom said on his podcast in April.
DEMOCRATS 'IMPATIENT'
Democratic strategists who reviewed the poll's findings said they send a clear message.
"Voters are very impatient right now," said Mark Riddle, who heads Future Majority, a Democratic research firm. "They want elected officials at all levels to address the cost of living, kitchen-table issues and affordability."
The poll found a gap between what voters say they care about and what they think the party's leaders prioritize. It was particularly wide on the issue of reducing corporate spending in political campaigns, where 73% of Democrats said they viewed putting limits on contributions to political groups like Super PACs a priority, but only 58% believed party leaders prioritize that.
That issue matters to Sam Boland, 29, a Democrat in Minneapolis, who views Super PAC money as a way to 'legally bribe' candidates.
'Politicians want to keep their jobs and are afraid of the impact that publicly funded elections might have,' Boland said.
Along that line, 86% of Democrats said changing the federal tax code so wealthy Americans and large corporations pay more in taxes should be a priority, more than the 72% of those surveyed think party leaders make it a top concern.
The Republican-controlled Congress is currently pushing forward with Trump's sweeping tax-cut bill that would provide greater benefits to the wealthy than working-class Americans.
Anthony Rentsch, 29, of Baltimore, said he believes Democratic leaders are afraid to embrace more progressive policies such as higher taxes on the wealthy.
'A lot of Trump's success has been with populist messages, and I think there's similar populist message Democrats can have,' Rentsch said.
Democrats' own priorities appeared more in line with party leaders on abortion rights - which 77% cited as a priority.
NEW BLOOD
Dissatisfaction over the party's priorities on several economic policies was stronger among younger Democrats like Boland and Rentsch.
For example, only 55% of Democrats aged 18-39 thought the party prioritized paid family leave that would allow workers to care for sick family members and bond with a new baby, but 73% said it was a priority for them. Among older Democrats, the same share - 68% - that said the issue was a priority for them said it was a priority for party leaders.
Rentsch said that criticizing Trump over his conduct won't be enough to win over skeptical voters.
'That can't be it,' Rentsch said. 'It has to be owning those issues that have an impact on their economic well-being and their physical and mental well-being.'
Democratic respondents said the party should be doing more to promote affordable childcare, reduce the price of prescription drugs, make health insurance more readily available and support mass transit. They view party leaders as less passionate about those issues than they are, the poll found.
Even so, some Democrats argue the party also needs to stand toe-to-toe with Trump. 'They gotta get mean,' said Dave Silvester, 37, of Phoenix.
Other Democrats said the party sometimes over-emphasizes issues that they view as less critical such as transgender rights. Just 17% of Democrats said allowing transgender people to compete in women and girls' sports should be a priority, but 28% of Democrats think party leaders see it as such.
Benjamin Villagomez, 33, of Austin, Texas said that while trans rights are important, the issue too easily lends itself to Republican attacks.
'There are more important things to be moving the needle on,' said Villagomez, who is trans. 'There are more pressing issues, things that actually matter to people's livelihoods.'
Democratic strategists say that if Trump's trade and tax policies lead to higher prices and an increased budget deficit, the party needs to be ready to take full advantage in next year's elections, which will decide control of Congress.
'This recent polling data indicates Democrats have room for improvement on criticizing Trump on the economy and making it clear to voters that Democrats are the ones standing up for working people,' said Ben Tulchin, who served as U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders' pollster for his two presidential campaigns.
The party needs to get beyond portraying itself 'as the lesser of two evils," Boland, the Minneapolis Democrat, said.
'It needs to transform itself into a party that everyday people can get excited about,' he said. 'That requires a changing of the guard.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Second War Breaks Out in Trump's Dysfunctional Administration
The Trump-appointed director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency has ignited an intragovernmental civil war with a series of tweets calling for the resignation of the Federal Reserve chair. Businessman Bill Pulte launched his campaign against Jerome Powell on Wednesday with a tirade calling on Powell to lower interest rates, shortly before it was announced that the Federal Reserve would not be changing interest rates this month. He wrote, 'Because President Trump has crushed inflation, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell needs to lower interest rates today, and if not Chairman Powell needs to resign, immediately. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can help so many more Americans if Chair Powell will just do his job and lower rates.' Over the course of the next day, Pulte posted an additional eight tweets calling on Powell to resign. In one, he used his position as chairman of government-backed mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to point the finger at Powell's failure to lower interest rates that is hurting the housing market. In another, he claimed that Powell had no clue what he could do for the housing market and was 'not listening to the people who help lead' it. As a result, needed to resign. In response to an article from The Hill about his crusade, Pulte explained his repeated calls for Powell to resign. 'He is hurting Americans and hurting the mortgage market, which I am responsible for regulating.' The latest conflict comes as Republicans find themselves embroiled in another civil war over the Trump administration's handling of the Israel-Iran conflict, with figures like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon urging Trump to avoid involving the U.S. in another war in the Middle East. Pulte was eventually joined by President Donald Trump, who posted on TruthSocial, 'Too Late—Powell is the WORST. A real dummy, who's costing America $Billions!' Trump followed with a longer missive, writing on Thursday morning, ''Too Late' Jerome Powell is costing our Country Hundreds of Billions of Dollars. He is truly one of the dumbest, and most destructive, people in Government, and the Fed Board is complicit. Europe has had 10 cuts, we have had none. We should be 2.5 Points lower, and save $BILLIONS on all of Biden's Short Term Debt. We have LOW inflation! TOO LATE's an American Disgrace!' Trump nominated Powell for the position of chairman in 2017, breaking from tradition by naming a new appointee rather than reappointing the previous chair, Janet Yellen. Powell was then nominated to a second term by President Joe Biden in 2022. Pulte, meanwhile, was nominated to the role of director for FHFA in January, and was confirmed in March. Soon after being sworn in, he ousted several board members and named himself chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He also appointed a SpaceX employee to the board of Fannie Mae and placed 35 workers on administrative leave without advance notice. Powell had responded negatively to Trump's proposed tariff scheme earlier this year, cautioning that it could lead to higher inflation and slower growth. This prompted Trump to post on TruthSocial, 'Powell's termination cannot come fast enough!' while also telling reporters in the Oval Office, 'If I want him out, he'll be out of there real fast, believe me.' Despite these threats, according to The New York Times, the president is aware that attempting to remove Powell from his position could further damage an already volatile market. While Federal Reserve chairs are nominated by the president, as Powell was by Trump in 2017, the question of whether they can then be removed by the president is a legally complex and politically fraught one; Trump firing Powell could be seen as compromising the political independence of the Federal Reserve. Of the Federal Reserve's decision, Powell said on Wednesday that he and his colleagues preferred to keep interest rates unchanged as they wait to see the economic impact of Trump's tariffs. At a press conference, Powell said, 'It takes some time for tariffs to work their way through the chain of distribution to the end consumer.' He continued, 'We're beginning to see some effects, and we do expect to see more of them over coming months.'
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Aren't We Electing Skiers as Politicians?
Looking to the outdoors–out the proverbial window–Hornsby long ago told us to watch out for the back room boys that say the smoke is going to blow away. Look out for the men who say it's okay, sitting in a building far prescient, his words are as pressing as ever for anyone concerned with the preservation of our world outside of golf cart paths and boys club boardrooms. Miles from any BLM office, and at a remarkably troubling clip, a paradigm shift in environmental government policy is in not hard to wonder if those spearheading this movement–namely President Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again friend Elon Musk–spend any time outside, let alone in the wilderness. How else can you explain their approach to government? Marooned and protected in the urban ballast of Mar-a-Lago and Starbase, they take their DOGE axe to the federal budget, ostensibly cutting waste. To what end? Amidst an historic drought, federal firefighting crews have seen their ranks decimated by DOGE cuts, then, in the confusion, departments have asked some of those employees to return. Thousands of forest service workers have been furloughed, while the wanton use of tariffs has caused massive uncertainty in the outdoor industry. All of this theorized by some to be just the beginning in a long strategy to diminish our public lands to the point of fallowness that they will be unmissed as they come under the scythe of industry. While that ultimate end remains conjecture, the last few months have been a shocking counterpoint to what had become a comfortable status quo for the outdoorsperson–that stewardship of public lands and the conservation of wilderness for posterity was not only a given, but permanent. That feels as fraught as ever in a new administration that eschews not only decorum, but anything resembling an ethos of Trump is not alone. While the Republican-backed behemoth funding measure–the hyperbolically titled One Big Beautiful Bill that is in front of Congress now–at first had some of its teeth pointed at claiming public lands removed, the Senate decided to actually increase the amount of land for sale, further threatening protection for clean water, clean energy, and the what can we do in such a time? My take: be it city council, state legislature, even the White House, we need to elect outdoors people to office. We need skiers, hunters, wildland firefighters, dog park users, e-bike riders–anyone who prioritizes the beauty of our natural world–in it's more than that. We have to build our coalition. Millions in this country, billions the world over, still don't have the ability to take part in the overly gatekept outdoor world. If the public lands and the pursuit of happiness outdoors stand a chance at longevity against current headwinds, it is in a democratized outdoor culture. And as it stands now, the outdoor lifestyle is mostly enjoyed by a certain few with the means to take part–an oligarchy of sorts. Sound familiar? Many are working to change this, but this work remains yet unfinished. Building our ranks can seem counterintuitive. Trailheads are packed post-Covid, and our mountain towns have become busier than ever even as local voting blocs have been pushed out by buyers from cities who could afford second homes. But the more folks who have a stake–the more middle-class voters who can remain in mountain towns, the less NIMBY our approach to those with means who do come–the better chance we stand at coming together, influencing policy, and protecting what is to many of us our greatest wilds are eminently worthy of protection. Out there, where a cell phone tower can't ping you, one finds solidarity not only with nature, but themselves and others. Running in Couloir's October 1997 issue, the late ski guide and writer Alan Bard poignantly spoke to the power of beautiful, wild places. 'It becomes important then, in fact essential, to savor and share these places and feelings,' he wrote. 'When we travel far afield to ski, we often find not just some intoxicatingly remote landscape but the convoluted topography of our own souls.' Today, bound by smartphones and online echo chambers, the world desperately needs the grounding power of the before us have long taken to promulgating an outdoors ethos, or have even lobbied in Washington for stronger protections for the natural world. Summer camps nationwide have for decades taught the next generation the power and poise that one can learn from being self-sufficient in the wilderness. Edward Abbey–though insensitive, problematic, and now overly-worshiped by a gear-heavy, Instagram-bound outdoor culture he would have abhorred–himself took a more philosophical if extreme route, endlessly writing on the wilds while fantasizing how Karo syrup and a little sand might work together to diminish a bulldozer's engine. Perhaps, in a few hearty souls, Hayduke indeed there's Protect Our Winters (POW), arguably the best-known, most professional advocacy group in all the outdoor canon. A bonafide lobbying outfit, POW and their affiliates have even testified before Congress, working from inside the establishment for the benefit of not only climate change awareness, but a slew of other pressing environmental issues. The groundwork is there. What remains is the mobilization of the outdoor culture at a large enough scale to propel our rank to office. And people are looking for an alternative to the staid political status quo. In the wake of his spat with Trump, Musk polled X users, asking if a new party should emerge out of this schism. Of the millions who responded, 80 percent did so in the what about a movement borne not out of a rivalry between oligarchs, but on inclusion, humanity, nature, and a shared belief in the transcendence of those tenets?That would be something to rally around. Why Aren't We Electing Skiers as Politicians? first appeared on Powder on Jun 17, 2025
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance travels to Los Angeles to meet Marines, visit federal command center
Vice President Vance is set to travel to Los Angeles on Friday, a day after a federal appeals ruled President Trump could retain control of the California National Guard in response to the protests over his immigration raids. Vance 'will tour a multi-agency Federal Joint Operations Center, a Federal Mobile Command Center, meet with leadership and Marines, and deliver brief remarks,' according to his office. The vice president's office did not provide further details about the visit. An aide to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) office said there was no communication with the vice president's office about the trip. 'The Governor would welcome the opportunity to meet with the Vice President in service to Californians. We're always open to working together — which makes it all the more disappointing that the White House chose not to engage with us directly ahead of the visit. We have yet to be officially notified that the Vice President is even coming,' spokesperson Brandon Richards said in an emailed statement. Around 200 Marines armed with rifles, riot control equipment and gas masks have been deployed to the streets of Los Angeles and more than 2,000 California National Guard troops are also on the ground. Trump on Friday morning touted the 'big win' in the courts and bashed Newsom, whom he has been sparring with since he first called in the National Guard to Los Angeles. 'The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared, but this is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done,' Trump said. Newsom argued Trump's decision to federalize soldiers without consulting him was illegal and asked the courts for an emergency order to block the move. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, a Clinton appointee, initially ruled in California's favor, but the emergency injunction was overturned by the Ninth Circuit on June 13. The three-judge panel then unanimously extended its pause in an unsigned, 38-page decision released Thursday night. Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D), as well as other Democrats, have bashed the president for using the National Guard and Marines to quell the protests and argued last week that the federal enforcement stoked chaos on the ground. Updated at 12:11 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.