logo
Lawsuit challenges closure of ‘Immigration Services Ombudsman' and other oversight offices by Trump administration

Lawsuit challenges closure of ‘Immigration Services Ombudsman' and other oversight offices by Trump administration

Time of India25-04-2025

A lawsuit has been filed in a US district court (district of Columbia) against the US department of homeland security (DHS) challenging the Trump administration's decision to close various offices that helped immigrants.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The lawsuit was filed by advocacy groups -
Southern Border Communities Coalition
,
Robert F Kennedy Human Rights
and Urban Justice Centre.
The Trump administration has closed three oversight offices, viz: Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL), Office of the Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Ombudsman, and Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman (OIDO). The lawsuit is demanding the restoration of these three offices.
The Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Office was established by Congress to investigate complaints involving constitutional rights, such as privacy invasions or excessive force used by Border Patrol agents, or facial recognition technology used at airports. The CIS Ombudsman's Office helped immigrants who had problems obtaining work permits or applying for green cards. And the Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman monitored conditions in detention facilities and handles complaints involving excessive force, sexual abuse, and inadequate medical care, among other issues, explains a joint press release.
on how the CIS Ombudsman Office helped immigrants – which included students undertaking optional practical training (OPT), H-1B visa holders facing processing delays of their extensions and green-card applicants.
Rajiv S Khanna, managing attorney at Immigration.com had illustrated, 'In one instance, an engineer from Bangalore had his H-1B extension pending for 11 months despite multiple service requests.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
His employer was considering termination, and he faced losing his home. After the Ombudsman's intervention, approval came within two weeks.'
'Eliminating these three offices both undermines the ability of individuals to rein in the overreach of DHS, and violates the constitutional principle of separation of powers, flouting Congress's express determination that these offices must exist,' said Karla Gilbride, deputy director of Public Citizen Litigation Group and lead counsel on the case.
'The Department of Homeland Security is required by law to review and assess information alleging abuses of civil rights and civil liberties. The decision to shutter these offices is an illegal attempt to undermine key civil rights protections and remove vital accountability mechanisms within DHS at a time when they are sorely needed,' she added.
'The decimation of these offices does not make anyone's lives better or safer – what it does is target the innocent and those who have been placed in vulnerable circumstances.
The closure of these offices is part of the Trump administration's targeting of immigrants in this country and weakening of protections and resources afforded to them. We will continue to use every legal tool we have to protect people and our democracy,' said Skye Perryman, President & CEO of Democracy Forward, which is also representing the advocacy groups in the lawsuit.
"RFK Human Rights has filed complaints with CRCL and OIDO for hundreds of people abused in immigration detention centers across the country, urging investigations into systemic sexual abuse, medical neglect, and deliberate infliction of severe pain amounting to torture,' said Anthony Enriquez, VP of US Advocacy and Litigation, RFK Human Rights.
'Congress created and funded oversight agencies to prevent these abuses and no president has the power to single-handedly rewrite those laws," added Enriquez.
'Border communities have been calling for real accountability as we endure racial profiling, excessive use of force, arbitrary searches and other abuses by border agents, and the Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties was one of the few paths for us to seek justice for these gross violations of human rights,' said Lilian Serrano, Director of Southern Border Communities Coalition.
She added, 'Shutting down these oversight offices within DHS is a blatant attempt by the Trump Administration to shield the department, including CBP—the nation's largest law enforcement agency—from accountability. The administration cannot erase accountability by dismantling an office Congress created to protect our rights.'
"By gutting and closing these offices, the administration has effectively placed survivors of domestic violence in an untenably dangerous position,' said Alessandra Rosales, supervising attorney of immigration law at Urban Justice Center.
She added, 'The humanitarian remedies created by Congress for immigrant survivors are a crucial tool in their healing and rebuilding. Removing the mechanism for oversight and enforcement of these legal protections will permit agencies to violate with impunity the civil rights of vulnerable people who have already endured unspeakable trauma and tragedy."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BJP sending Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini to divide society in Punjab, says LoP Partap Singh Bajwa
BJP sending Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini to divide society in Punjab, says LoP Partap Singh Bajwa

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

BJP sending Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini to divide society in Punjab, says LoP Partap Singh Bajwa

Chandigarh: Punjab leader of opposition Partap Singh Bajwa on Sunday accused BJP of "attempting to create divisions within Punjab's society by sending Nayab Singh Saini to campaign in Ludhiana". Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Bajwa said Saini's very presence in Punjab was "a cruel reminder of BJP's anti-Punjab policies and its continued efforts to weaken the state's unity". Condemning Saini for his "repeated attacks on Punjab and its people ever since assuming power in Haryana", Bajwa, in a written statement, said, "The people of Punjab have not forgotten the tragedy in which Haryana Police fired upon peaceful farmers protesting for their legitimate rights. " The Congress leader also highlighted "the killing of 22-year-old farmer Shubhkaran Singh, who was shot by Haryana police while protesting at Khanauri (Punjab-Haryana border) in February 2024." He said BJP, through leaders like Saini, made several attempts to snatch Punjab's waters, ignoring the legal, historical, and moral rights of Punjabis. "Such moves directly attack the livelihood of our farmers and the very backbone of Punjab's economy," he said. Accusing Saini of "politicising" the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB) water-sharing issue, Bajwa stated, "Saini brazenly accused Punjab of denying Haryana even drinking water. "

The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again
The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again

Economic Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again

ET Online Pakistan has entered Donald Trump's mind and occupied some head space by doing what it does best - please, pamper and satisfy all needs of the moment, be it delivering terrorists or minerals. Like it or not, Pakistan is in the room, if not at the table, even as Trump and Modi will bump into each other at the ongoing G7 Summit at Kananaskis, Canada. It anticipated contours of Trump's second coming better, adjusted its posture, made the right offers and made them early. The effort is bolstered by more than 10 different lobbying firms working the system, including one headed by Trump's former bodyguard Keith Schiller.A unique quirk: Trump seems to like generals in uniform. Be sure he's thinking of army chief Asim Munir and not Shehbaz Sharif when he talks of Pakistan's 'great leaders' in his frequent remembrances of the India-Pak ceasefire he 'crafted'. A detail: contrary to reports in the hyper media, Munir was not invited to attend the parade to celebrate 250 years of the US army. India is struggling to adjust to a presidency that is less institutional, less structured and less focused. It's about getting the Kremlinology right, the sophisticated art of reading cryptic and crypto signals, and flying close to the sons (even Barron Trump). Outrage - however satisfying - will not help get over the Trump hump. Nor would cancelling defence orders in a fit of pique and losing the long game. Better to use the relationship to build capacity. It's good to remember that US-Pak relations were factored in when India decided to strengthen relations with Washington back in the day and negotiate the nuclear deal. They have remained a reality even though New Delhi thought it had put Pakistan in the diplomatic isolation ward. It kept bouncing back with American and British help and a permanent cadre of sympathetic bureaucrats, including retired ambassadors, in both capitals. Official India learnt to deal with the pain even if IT cell warriors and rabid TV anchors didn' says an analyst, the question remains the same: 'Does India want to - or will it - give Pakistan a veto on US- India ties?' The answer from New Delhi so far seems to be 'no' even as anger rises and political pain grows. Pakistan will do anything to please Trump and Sons. India will Pakistan's play. Over the past few years, with the Afghanistan war over and US interest waning, the army-ISI combine realised that Pakistan was no longer a frontline state. Joe Biden paid little attention and never dialled Islamabad. As American focus moved to the Indo-Pacific and rivalry with China, Pakistan knew it wasn't going to be part of the Quad, although it made some half-hearted elite understood they couldn't vie with India. But they were 'happy just to be heard and not be considered irrelevant'. The militablishment went back to the original drawing board - counterterrorism cooperation - to keep parts of the US government engaged. The easiest doors to open were at the State Department and was dismissive of Pakistan. But note that his administration approved $450 mn to 'sustain' Pakistan's F-16 fleet, including engine hardware upgrades and classified software support. The package was said to be for counterterrorism operations. In a replay, Trump approved $397 mn in February for the same fleet, despite announcing a wide freeze on foreign aid. He made an the background, Rawalpindi slowly took control of Pakistan's China policy from the politicians and worked to dispel the notion the country was (completely) in Beijing's camp. Americans wanted to believe the myth for their own reasons. For the Pakistan army, maintaining ties to America, enjoying the free military training and keeping tabs on Pentagon's thinking have always been priorities. To say nothing of serving as an important window for China in to the point, Pakistani generals never let US Centcom lose sight of the fact that their country was/is always available as a strategic staging area for US operations. Which brings us to the present. Munir and Centcom commander Michael Kurilla go back a long way. Both assumed their current positions in 2022 and have hosted each other more than shouldn't be a surprise that last week, the American general called Pakistan 'a phenomenal partner' in the fight against IS-Khorasan. Kurilla clearly thinks the military partnership with Pakistan can, and should, exist separately from the one with was the first person Munir called to say that the Abbey Gate bomber Mohammad Sharifullah, a.k.a. Jaffar, had been caught. He then requested that the message be passed on to the president. Result: a special mention in Trump's address to so it will go. Until it won't. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. How a nudge from Cyrus Mistry helped TCS unlock a USD1 billion opportunity Operation Sindoor, Turkey, Bangladesh played out as India hosted global airlines after 42 years Benchmarked with BSE 1000, this index fund will diversify your bets. But at a cost. How individual bankruptcy law can halt suicides by failed businessmen Explainer: The RBI's LAF corridor and its role in rate transmission Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 32% in 1 year Defence stocks: Black & white, and many shades of grey. 10 stocks with an upside potential of up to 30% Stock Radar: 40% drop from highs! Swiggy stocks make a rounding bottom pattern; time to buy the dip?

Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict
Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict

Economic Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict

Donald Trump said the US was not behind Israel's recent strike on Iran but warned of a strong military response if Iran targets American assets. Trump expressed interest in peace talks, mentioned Putin as a possible mediator, and referenced past success in global negotiations to urge for a resolution. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US Denies Role in Latest Strike Mediation by Russia Iran Retaliates Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Iran Requests US Condemnation Israel Warns Iranian Civilians Past Negotiations Car Bombs Explosion FAQs US President Donald Trump addressed the conflict between Israel and Iran in a recent interview with Rachel Scott of ABC News. He said the US did not take part in Israel's military strike on Iran but "it's possible we could get involved." However, he warned that any attack on US forces by Iran would result in a severe response. Trump also mentioned potential diplomatic efforts to resolve the ongoing Trump stated the US had no involvement in Israel's attack on Iran. The attack took place overnight. Trump made this statement on Truth Social. He warned that if Iran targets the US in any way, the American military would respond with full an interview with ABC News, Trump said Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to mediate the conflict. Trump said he was open to that idea. The conversation between Trump and Putin occurred over a phone launched missile attacks following Israel's operation named 'Rising Lion.' Reports say at least 10 people died, including two children. Over 200 people were injured. One strike in Bat Yam killed at least six Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi asked the US to condemn Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear sites . He said Iran does not want to escalate the war. He claimed the strikes were acts of warned residents living near nuclear facilities to evacuate. An Israeli spokesperson said that staying near such sites could be dangerous. The message was shared through social media mentioned past negotiations that involved Iran. Talks broke down in early June. He said Iran and Israel can still reach an agreement. He compared this situation to past efforts involving India and Sunday, car bombs exploded near government buildings in Tehran. Iran blamed Israel for the attack. He emphasized the goal is to remove threats, not destroy Donald Trump said the US did not take part in the recent Israeli strike on Trump said peace is possible and suggested Russia could help mediate the talks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store