2025 NBA Awards predictions: Most Valuable Player, Defensive Player of the Year, and more
The NBA announced this season's awards finalists on Sunday. Is Shai Gilgeous-Alexander a lock to win his first MVP award?
At the end of the season, we asked our 10-person NBA voting panel to predict the winner for each individual award. Here were the results:
Voting breakdownStephon Castle, Spurs: 100%
Back-to-back NBA Rookies of the Year in San Antonio? A year after Victor Wembanyama took home the award, it appears Castle is on his way to becoming the fourth Spur to receive the top rookie honor (Tim Duncan and David Robinson also won the award in 1998 and 1990, respectively). The No. 4 pick in the 2024 draft received every single one of our panel's votes.
While the rookie class as a whole has been underwhelming, Castle had a strong first year. He led all rookies in points and field goals made, as well as steals, showing his two-way potential. The future is bright in San Antonio.
Voting breakdownKenny Atkinson, Cavaliers: 80%J.B. Bickerstaff, Pistons: 10%Mark Daigneault, Thunder: 10%
The Coach of the Year race is typically one of the hardest awards to predict, given the number of standout candidates every year. Kenny Atkinson, in his first year in Cleveland, led the Cavs to the East's No. 1 seed, with his team jumping out to a 15-0 start to the season. J.B. Bickerstaff, in his first year in Detroit, led the franchise to a historic turnaround; after finishing last season with the NBA's worst record at 14-68, the Pistons won 44 games in '24-25 and made the playoffs.
Meanwhile, Mark Daigneault led the Thunder to a franchise-best 68 wins, an NBA-best 12.7 net rating and the No. 1 overall seed in the playoffs, yet he wasn't named one of the three finalists for the award. Ultimately, our voters see Atkinson's work on the sidelines being rewarded.
Voting breakdown Evan Mobley, Cavaliers: 60%Draymond Green, Warriors: 40%
With Victor Wembanyama's season ending early due to a blood clot, the race has been wide open since the All-Star break. Heading into the final days of the season, it appeared it could come down to: Evan Mobley vs. Draymond Green.
Mobley, who was named to the All-Defensive First Team in '22-23, has been the defensive anchor for a dominant Cleveland team this season. Green, meanwhile, had been making his case (on and off the court) as the Warriors' do-everything defender. In the latest BetMGM odds, Green (-500) had actually pulled ahead of Mobley (+400). This could be too close to call.
Voting breakdownPayton Pritchard, Celtics: 90%Malik Beasley, Pistons: 10%
The defending champion Celtics appear to be a lock to bring home more hardware this season. Our panel sees Pritchard winning the Sixth Man award with ease, with the fifth-year guard averaging 14.3 points and 3.5 assists in 28.4 minutes off the bench for the Celtics, while shooting 40.7% from 3. Pritchard would become the fourth Celtic to win the Sixth Man award, joining Malcolm Brogdon (2023), Bill Walton (1986) and Kevin McHale (1984 and 1985).
Voting breakdownDyson Daniels, Hawks: 70%Cade Cunningham, Pistons: 20%Deni Avdija, Trail Blazers: 10%
A candidate for DPOY, Daniels appears to have a better shot at the Most Improved Player award. After being traded from New Orleans as part of the Dejounte Murray deal last summer, the third-year guard had a breakout season in Atlanta, leading the league in steals (3.0), but also improving as a scorer. Daniels averaged a career-high 14.1 PPG and shot a career-high 49.3% from the field.
Cunningham received votes for his impressive season in Detroit, earning his first All-Star selection and leading the Pistons to the playoffs. Avdija turned heads with his play in Portland this season, averaging 16.9 points and 7.3 rebounds for the Blazers. He wasn't named a finalist of the award.
Voting breakdownJalen Brunson, Knicks: 60% Nikola Jokić, Nuggets: 20%Stephen Curry, Warriors: 10%Darius Garland, Cavaliers: 10%
Yes, the Clutch Award is still on the ballot. In its third year, the award seeks to celebrate the player who performs the best in high-pressure moments. This season, Brunson led the league in points per game and field goals per game during crunch time — defined by the NBA as the final five minutes of a game with the score being within five points.
Voting breakdownShai Gilgeous-Alexander: 90%Nikola Jokić, Nuggets: 10%
As you might've heard by now, this year's MVP race was one of the best contests ever — it just might not be all that close. While Jokić had arguably the best statistical season in NBA history, SGA appears to be running away with his first MVP award. Last year's MVP runner-up, Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City to the best record in the NBA — and an 18-game lead over Jokić's Nuggets in the standings. If he wins, SGA will become the first guard to earn MVP honors since James Harden in 2018.
Interestingly enough, when we posed the question to our panel on who win the MVP award (not who win), the results were much closer: 60% for SGA to 40% for Jokić.
Co-MVPs, anyone?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
6 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Analysis: After refusing to bottom out, the top is near for Pacers
As an exasperated NBA continues its never-ending quest to stamp out tanking, here come the Indiana Pacers rising from the debris of mediocrity, right on cue. There is a long-held belief in the NBA that the worst place to be is stuck in the middle: never bad enough to be in a position to draft top talent, but never quite good enough to compete for championships. It's Interstate 405 in Los Angeles, and it's rush hour. The league has increased its efforts in recent years to abolish tanking. It can use the Pacers as proof that it is possible to win big without it. Indiana is returning to the finals for the first time in 25 years after plenty of seasons spent stuck in the middle, but it has never entered a season trying to lose. Oh, there have been plenty of losses along the way. Indiana won 25 games in Rick Carlisle's return season, but it was a year derailed by injuries. In this case, intent matters. The Pacers began the 2021-22 season with playoff aspirations but became sellers at the trade deadline, sending Caris LeVert to the Cleveland Cavaliers for picks and acquiring Tyrese Haliburton from the Sacramento Kings in a separate deal that reshaped their future. At no point did the franchise enter a season with the idea of playing for lottery odds instead of wins. Not when Larry Bird was there as an executive, not when Frank Vogel coached, not when Carlisle was there the first time, and certainly not now. They have been tempted. The Pacers came close to acquiring Russell Westbrook's massive expiring contract in 2022 and picking up a first-round pick for the team owner Herb Simon's willingness to pay him. But such a move would have been a concession that the Pacers were giving up and bottoming out. The deal collapsed when the Lakers refused to add another first-rounder, and Myles Turner remained in Indianapolis. Now they are thrilled to still have him. Players never compete intending to lose, of course. But front offices can rig rosters so winning is nearly impossible. The Pacers never did that. In fact, throughout the last quarter-century, they have been more of a model for exactly how not to compete for an NBA championship. They made the playoffs in nine of the 10 seasons from 2010-11 to 2019-20 but advanced to the conference finals only twice. They were eliminated in the first round five consecutive years -- the definition of milquetoast. That was during the era of superteams and when LeBron James reigned in the East. Now the Pacers are thriving with healthy organizational development. Bennedict Mathurin and Jarace Walker were top 10 selections. The rest of this roster was constructed with midround picks or lower, aggressive trades, economical free-agent signings and a touch of patience. They resisted the urge to give up on Turner too soon. They gambled on Haliburton when they traded away Domantas Sabonis, who made a pair of All-Star Games while with the Pacers. They gambled on Pascal Siakam, trading three first-round picks for a player who was close to free agency. Siakam was the most valuable player of the conference finals and is still wearing Pacers colors. The Pacers have not paid the luxury tax since 2006. They have not picked in the top five since 1988. Yet they played for the NBA Cup and advanced to the conference finals last season, and now they are four wins from an NBA championship. Rarely have teams beaten a pair of 60-win teams to win a title. The Houston Rockets were the last to do it, in 1994. If the Pacers conquer the Thunder -- Game 1 of the NBA Finals is Thursday night in Oklahoma City -- Indiana will become the first team in NBA history to beat a pair of 64-win teams on the way to a ring. They eliminated the 64-win Cavaliers in the second round, and the Thunder won 68 games this season. Similarly, Indiana can eliminate seven All-NBA players in this postseason. It ended the seasons of Giannis Antetokounmpo, Donovan Mitchell, Evan Mobley, Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns. Still to come are Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jalen Williams. Considering Haliburton was a third-team All-NBA selection, the Pacers could eliminate half of the remaining All-NBA players this postseason. They might not be the dominant monsters of dynasties past, but this has a chance to become a historic run of success nonetheless. This is exactly how the league wants teams to build now. What did not seem feasible when stars were teaming up in desirable markets now might be the best path forward: try hard, compete, draft wisely and organically develop talent the hard way. It is how the Denver Nuggets won two years ago. It is how the Pacers are doing it now. The last two lottery winners cashed in odds of 3% or less to win the No. 1 pick, an indication the current system is working as the league intended since flattening the lottery odds again in 2019. In the seven lotteries since, a team with the best odds won the first pick four times. The other three winners were long shots. Losing assures nothing. Tanking will probably never be abolished, but the NBA is much closer to its end goal than it was a decade ago. The Pacers never tried to lose. Now they're on the cusp, finally, of winning big. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
NBA Wire Roundtable: Who will win 2025 NBA Finals between Thunder, Pacers?
NBA Wire Roundtable: Who will win 2025 NBA Finals between Thunder, Pacers? The Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers will square off in the 2025 NBA Finals. The championship series will feature a historic juggernaut and a team that caught fire at the right time. The Thunder enters as a heavy favorite. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has translated his MVP season to the playoffs. Meanwhile, Jalen Williams and Chet Holmgren have played better as the postseason has progressed. Meanwhile, Tyrese Haliburton has headlined an unlikely run. The Pacers have utilized late-game heroics and hot outside shooting to get to this point. Before Game 1 begins, Thunder Wire conducted an NBA Finals roundtable with other NBA Wire site managers. Here's who they predicted will win the championship: Clemente Almanza, Thunder Wire: Laying everything out, it's very easy to understand why the Thunder are viewed as the title favorite. They had one of the greatest regular seasons ever with a 68-14 record. That dominance has carried over to the playoffs, besides a couple of hiccups. The Thunder are just on another level. That's been the case all season long. The Pacers deserve credit for getting this far. They got hot at the right time. But OKC is a machine. It made the bloodbath Western Conference look like a swimming pool. They're in the same company as some of the greatest teams ever and should join that NBA pantheon with a championship, barring one of the most surprising upsets in sports history. Prediction: Thunder in 5. Robert Marvi, LeBron Wire: This championship series could be a bit more competitive than some are expecting it to be. The Indiana Pacers surprised plenty of people with the ease with which they got past the New York Knicks in the Eastern Conference finals. They have the ideal offensive style to overcome the Thunder—a hard-core fast-breaking offense that looks to push the pace consistently, even after made baskets. But as good as Tyrese Haliburton has been—and he is a very dangerous player—the Pacers don't have a true superstar. The Thunder, on the other hand, have the regular-season MVP in Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, a borderline All-Star in Jalen Williams and plenty of depth. They also have a defense that many are starting to call historically great. There will be times when the Pacers seriously challenge Oklahoma City. But Oklahoma City should win it all without a ton of difficulty. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Justin Quinn, Celtics Wire: This series is the NBA version of the philosophical thought experiment of which will win, the immovable object vs. the irresistible force. In this finals matchup, we have the best transition offense in the league facing off with the best transition defense. We have a pair of ball clubs that can play several ways with versatile lineups and aesthetically pleasing styles of play. It may not be in big markets, but do we really believe that matters in this digital age? When it comes to the on-court product, it would be a shocker of historic proportions for the Pacers to win this series and hang a banner, but they have also done little else besides shock us in every round of the postseason to date. For that reason, I think Carlisle et al. will find a way to push this series to six or maybe even seven games, but until my eyes are shown evidence to the contrary, I just don't see how Indy will find a way to defend SGA AND keep from being turned over at a fatal rate, even as good as they may be at that wrinkle of the game. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Tommy Call III, Warriors Wire: The Thunder have been the best team in the NBA for a reason. They won 68 games fueled by the rightful MVP and a nasty defensive group in a tough Western Conference, and throughout the playoffs, they've appeared to answer any question you could possibly have about their experience, taking out the likes of Nikola Jokic, Anthony Edwards and others on the way to the NBA Finals. The Thunder deserves to be in this position, and deserve to be the favorite. However, they're running into an opponent that might be just as hot as them. Similar to the Thunder, the Pacers can send five different players at you who can score 20+ points on any evening. The Pacers feel like they have the pieces to match the Thunder in a lot of ways. Yet, what separates the Thunder in this series is that defensive trio ot Lu Dort, Alex Caruso and Cason Wallace. How do the Pacers solve that puzzle? Is Tyrese Haliburton's heroics enough? Maybe for a game or two, but in a seven-game series? It seems unlikely. While this series has all the different moving parts for a fun and exciting series, the Thunder just feel like too much for any team to handle right now, including the Pacers. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Sharif Phillips-Keaton, Nets Wire: To start off, it should be clear that this is the Finals matchup that we may not have predicted, but it's the one we deserve. The Thunder have been the NBA's best team throughout the season and the Pacers have been one of the best teams in the league since the All-Star Break. Much has been made about whether the league is best-served in this series, but it's important to note that the Finals will have the league MVP (Shai Gilgeous-Alexander) in it and will also have an Indiana team that plays at one of the fastest paces in the NBA. With that being said, this matchup will come down to which team can impose their will on the other. The Thunder are arguably the most dominant team in the league on both ends of the floor and the Pacers appear to be in the next tier when it comes to offensive and defensive rating. Ultimately, this series will come down to if Tyrese Haliburton and/or Pascal Siakam can raise their game to match what Gilgeous-Alexander is going to do. Prediction: Thunder in 7.
New York Times
31 minutes ago
- New York Times
Pacers vs. Thunder live updates: 2025 NBA Finals Game 1 start time, picks and predictions
Hello basketball fans and welcome to our live coverage of Game 1 of the NBA Finals between the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder from Paycom Center. The series projects to be a battle between arguably the NBA's most dynamic offense and the league's best defense. Both franchises, each led by their star lead guard, are searching for their first NBA title in their current city. Indiana last appeared in the Finals in 2000, losing to Kobe Bryant, Shaquille O'Neal and the Los Angeles Lakers in six games. Oklahoma City made the Finals in 2012, led by the young trio of Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and James Harden, but ultimately fell to the 'Heatles', the Miami Heat. The Athletic will have you covered with all things NBA Finals throughout the series, anchored by our live coverage and analysis from our award-winning writers, so stay tuned.
