Iranian MP calls for nuclear bombs
US President Donald Trump would not dare threaten to bomb Iran if Tehran had nuclear weapons, Ahmad Naderi, a member of the Presidium of the Iranian Parliament, said on Monday.
A day earlier, the US president threatened Iran with unprecedented bombing if it doesn't accept a nuclear deal.
'It will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before,'
he told NBC News on Sunday.
Iran could follow the example of North Korea to bolster its security in the face of the threat, Naderi suggested in a post on X.
'Observing Trump's behavior and speech during his first term with North Korea shows that having a nuclear weapon has brought security to Korea,'
he said.
Trump wouldn't make such threats if Tehran were similarly armed, Naderi asserted.
READ MORE:
North Korea reveals nuclear-powered submarine
'For a long time, many elites and sympathizers of the country and the [Islamic] Revolution have been calling for the bomb to be tested and announced. If we were also armed with nuclear weapons, Trump would not dare to threaten bombing,'
he said.
Despite threatening North Korea with
'fire and fury like the world has never seen'
over Pyongyang's nuclear program in 2017, Trump instead went on to engage the country diplomatically during his first presidential term.
After several meetings, denuclearization talks later collapsed over disagreements on sanctions relief and North Korea's nuclear program. Pyongyang has since continued to conduct missile tests, including of its nuclear delivery systems.
READ MORE:
Tehran responds to Trump's threat
Tehran's nuclear program has also been a bone of contention in US-Iranian relations for years.
In February, a month after the start of his second presidential term, Trump announced a renewed push for
'maximum pressure'
on Iran.
After the US president's recent escalation in rhetoric, Tehran rejected direct talks with Washington, citing a loss of trust following Trump's unilateral withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018. The international agreement was envisioned to scale down the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
Earlier on Monday, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned that Tehran would retaliate against any US attack.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ex-Trump advisor calls for seizure of US senator's passport
US Senator Lindsey Graham should be thrown in jail or have his passport revoked for 'stirring up' the Ukraine conflict, former adviser to President Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, has said. Bannon made the comment after Graham, along with US Senator Richard Blumenthal, visited Kiev last week. There they met with Vladimir Zelensky and discussed, among other things, additional sanctions on Russia and further cooperation between Ukraine and the US. Immediately after the visit Kiev lunched mass drone attacks on multiple Russian airfields, claiming to have damaged over 40 warplanes, including strategic bombers. Moscow has not confirmed the loss of any aircraft and claims to have shot down most of the drones. Bannon and other critics of US involvement in the Ukraine conflict have since speculated that Graham may have encouraged Zelensky to launch the 'audacious' attack, which they claim could have led to a serious escalation, given that it targeted Russia's strategic aviation. Speaking to NewsNation's Chris Cuomo on Monday, Bannon claimed that by meeting with Zelensky, Graham was giving Ukraine 'false hope false hope that we're there to support them in engaging Russia in a kinetic conflict. 'We are not,' Bannon stressed, adding that the US was getting 'sucked' into the Ukraine conflict by people like Graham and could soon find it 'tough' to get out. 'We can't have Lindsey Graham, and particularly Zelensky, leading us into a third world war with a deep strike into Russia,' Bannon insisted, suggesting that US authorities should either 'cancel [Graham's] passport and don't let him back in the country, or put him in jail if he comes back.' Following Monday's attack, which targeted sites from Murmansk in the Arctic to Irkutsk in Siberia, a number of military experts pointed out that Kiev does not have the technical capability to conduct drone strikes that deep into Russian territory. Guillaume Ancel, a writer and former French army lieutenant colonel, told Le Monde that the attack is 'possible and conceivable only with the support of a powerful satellite communications system,' based on intelligence provided by the US. Throughout the Ukraine conflict, Moscow has repeatedly described the hostilities as a Western proxy war against Russia and has condemned foreign military assistance to Kiev as counterproductive to the peace process.
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
US intel behind Ukrainian attack on Russian planes – ex-French spy
Ukraine would not have been able to remotely attack strategic Russian aircraft parked deep inside Russian territory without direct intelligence and satellite support from the US, a former officer in the French military has claimed. Ukrainian drones struck airbases across Russia on Monday in a coordinated attack known as 'Operation Spider's Web', targeting sites from Murmansk in the Arctic to Irkutsk in Siberia. Kiev has claimed that around 40 Russian military aircraft were damaged or destroyed, including Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range bombers. Moscow has not confirmed the claims, reporting that most of Kiev's drones were shot down. The strikes were reportedly carried out using commercial trucks rigged with explosive-laden drones that had been smuggled inside Russia. Kiev's operation involved piloting FPV drones thousands of kilometers from the front lines, Guillaume Ancel, a writer and former French army lieutenant colonel, told Le Monde on Wednesday. 'This is possible and conceivable only with the support of a powerful satellite communications system,' he said. 'Since the Ukrainians don't have this mastery, if they were able to act remotely, it's certainly thanks to the United States.' Ancel suggested that Kiev 'would not have been able to carry out the operation without information from American intelligence.' While some in the West have hailed Ukraine's latest drone operation, Stephane Audrand, an international risk consultant and reserve officer, has stressed that it would not actually have much of an impact. Despite its spectacular nature, 'Operation Spider's Web' 'will not change the tactical balance of power on the ground or the course of the war, because these weapons are not used on the battlefield,' Audrand told Le Monde. Throughout the Ukraine conflict, Moscow has described the hostilities as a Western proxy war against Russia and has condemned arms supplies to Kiev as counterproductive to the peace process. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also recently acknowledged the nature of the conflict, stating: 'Frankly, it's a proxy war between nuclear powers – the United States, helping Ukraine, and Russia.' Moscow has vehemently condemned Ukraine's continued drone strikes into Russian territory in recent weeks, claiming that they undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts to end the conflict. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has claimed that the latest attacks are an attempt to derail the peace process.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Trump still uses personal phone
US President Donald Trump continues to rely on his personal cellphone, despite repeated warnings from aides and security experts about foreign surveillance risks, The Atlantic reported on Monday. The phone remains Trump's main link to the outside world, connecting him with friends, family, lawmakers, corporate leaders, celebrities, world leaders, and journalists, sources close to the president told the outlet. He also often answers calls from unknown numbers, reportedly viewing them as opportunities for spontaneous conversations, they claim. 'He likes to call people. He likes to be called,' one adviser reportedly said. Another noted that 'probably a ton' of people have Trump's personal number, while a third estimated the figure at 'well over 100.' President Trump at Mar-a-Lago on the phone working. An absolute machine 🔥 Trump reportedly uses multiple devices, with at least one dedicated to social media. Several sources claim Trump often leaves lengthy voicemails and inquires if recipients have shared his messages with relatives and friends. They also claim Trump distrusts White House landlines, fearing eavesdropping by what he sees as the 'deep state.' 'His perspective was, 'I can't trust anyone on the White House staff, so I have to use my cellphone,'' a former adviser told the outlet. Security officials have long warned Trump that personal phones are vulnerable to hacking and wiretapping. In late 2024, the FBI claimed Chinese hackers had breached US telecom networks, allowing them to eavesdrop on calls involving Trump and other political figures. Despite the concerns, the president reportedly dismissed the warnings. 'He'd just reject it and say, 'It's not true,'' a former adviser said. 'He'd say, 'My phone is the best on the market.'' Advisers eventually gave up trying to limit his phone use, the sources claimed, although one said the devices had been upgraded with additional security features. The White House declined to confirm those details. 'We will not discuss or disclose security measures regarding the President, especially to The Atlantic,' Communications Director Steven Cheung told the outlet in an emailed statement. The White House recently had issues with the magazine after an Atlantic editor gained access to an internal chat involving senior Trump officials discussing a strike against the Houthi militants and then writing a story about it. Cheung defended Trump's approach, saying his use of a personal phone makes him 'the most transparent and accessible President in American history.'
