‘World stood still' in aftermath of Omagh car bomb, inquiry told
A former newsagent in Omagh has told how the 'world stood still' in the moments after a massive car bomb devastated the town centre in 1998.
Giving evidence to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry, Jim Sharkey said members of his family were told that he had been killed in the confusion which followed the explosion that blew in the front window of his shop and knocked his wife out of her shoes.
Mr Sharkey said he had been working with his wife Celine in his shop in Market Street in the Co Tyrone town on the day of the bombing.
He said they became aware of a bomb alert further up the town but had continued to serve customers.
The world stood still for 30 or 40 seconds. Then all the noises filled my ears. The screams, the alarms, the ringing
Jim Sharkey
Among the people he saw that day were Geraldine Breslin, Ann McCombe and Sean McGrath, who were all killed by the blast.
Referring to Mr McGrath, he said: 'He was a great bloke. Someone I would have gone to for advice.'
Mr Sharkey added: 'Next thing I knew the front window just came in around us.'
He said he was blown off his feet by the explosion and his wife was blown out of her shoes.
He added: 'A young boy was at the drinks fridge, a stone or a piece of shrapnel narrowly missing him.
'He ran out of the shop so scared.
'The world stood still for 30 or 40 seconds.
'Then all the noises filled my ears. The screams, the alarms, the ringing.'
Mr Sharkey said he went outside and was 'running about in a daze'.
He said his oldest son was in the street and shouted to him, but he didn't hear.
He added: 'I went back to the newsagents and all I could see in the street was bodies lying everywhere, a lot of people screaming, ambulances arriving.
'When I came back onto the street I met Kevin Skelton. He kept saying 'Mena, have you seen Mena? I'll never forget the look on that man's face, I'll never forget it.
'His wife, Philomena, was found dead in the S D Kells shop on the opposite side of the road from my newsagents.'
Mr Sharkey was taken to hospital, which he compared to a 'war zone', and discharged later on the Saturday.
He said: 'I had been talking to Geradline and Ann outside my shop. If they had stopped where they were outside my shop, which was only yards away from the bomb, maybe they might have been safe.
'Just after the bomb, my late sister, who had been walking across the bridge, she met someone who told her that I had been killed.
'My children were going to mass the next morning and they were greeted by the late Father (Kevin) Mullan. He said to them he was sorry to hear about their dad.'
I don't go into the town centre now late on a Saturday afternoon or early evening any more. I avoid it, it brings back so many memories
Mr Sharkey told the inquiry he still suffers from nightmares and was diagnosed with tinnitus.
He said: 'It was so warm that day we had the back door open of the shop and that saved our lives.
'I think we would have been sucked out onto the street if the back door had not been open.'
Mr Sharkey said he returned to his shop a few days later but soon decided to give up the business, adding: 'Following the bomb I just couldn't face going back there any longer.
'I don't go into the town centre now late on a Saturday afternoon or early evening any more. I avoid it, it brings back so many memories.
'Omagh itself became so quiet. It wasn't the same Omagh, it wasn't in my eyes anyway.'
'I don't know, I hope so.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
22-05-2025
- ITV News
Government asked to detail risk of naming civil servants' in Omagh inquiry after proposed redaction
The Government has been asked to urgently inform the Omagh Bombing Inquiry if any civil servants have been put at risk because their names are on documents given to the probe. The inquiry has been sitting in Belfast to hear a government application for the identities of junior civil servants to be blanked emerged that 700 documents containing up to 8000 pages can't be disclosed to other participants due to issues surrounding redactions. The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Bereaved families and their legal representatives have expressed their opposition to any redactions as they believe it may block getting the answers they want. Michael Gallagher, who's son Aiden was killed in the 1998 said: "The Secretary of State is a core participant as I am, and this is an independent public inquiry. That means independent of government. "So he should be assisting the inquiry, as should the other core participants like ourselves and not redacting and restricting the information to the families. "This was really a fight for the truth and the truth is always worth fighting for." Counsel for the inquiry Paul Greaney KC said redactions are slowing the legal process down: "The need to resolve the issues of redaction has, as an objective fact, placed a brake on the work of disclosure of the inquiry." A barrister for the Secretary of State had argued that unredacted names of junior civil servants put some in danger of attack by dissident republicans. Counsel for the inquiry is objecting to blanket redactions, but says it must be informed if anyone is at risk"And they must tell us immediately, by which we mean early next week at the latest, if there is any such case. "And identifying which document any such person is named so that the issue can be addressed." The PSNI made submissions suggesting that the names of suspects in the bombing and other linked attacks who were never charged be redacted, but police didn't make a formal application. Inquiry chairman Lord Turnbull said that can be dealt with on a case by case basis. After a ruling on the redaction issue is heard, the inquiry will return to Omagh next month to hear opening statements from core participants.
Belfast Telegraph
21-05-2025
- Belfast Telegraph
Government approach to Omagh bomb hearing ‘risks undermining public confidence'
Counsel to the inquiry Paul Greaney KC told a hearing in Belfast that it was 'highly unfortunate' that legal papers relating to the redaction of names were received on the evening before the public session. Mr Greaney also said that as the hearings related to transparency, he would have thought the Government 'would have been scrupulous to avoid the impression that it was behaving in a way that was procedurally unhelpful and possibly even unfair'. The hearing was told that applications from the Government and the PSNI to redact names of junior civil servants and bombing suspects from documents released to core participants in the inquiry is 'putting a brake' on its work. The Omagh Bombing Inquiry, chaired by Lord Turnbull, is holding procedural hearings in Belfast which relate to submissions to redact information from materials. The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. Earlier this year the inquiry heard personal statements from those affected by the massacre. On Wednesday, Mr Greaney said there were two issues which the latest hearings would deal with. The first relates to a Government submission that the names of junior civil servants should be redacted from documents they provide before they are released to core participants. The second relates to a PSNI application to redact the names of suspects who have not been charged from documents. The barrister said the inquiry would see the documents in unredacted form but the issue was whether they should be redacted before they are given to core participants. Core participants in the inquiry include the families of those who were killed in the bombing as well as multiple people who were injured. He said the issue of whether the names would be disclosed unredacted during oral evidence hearings would be dealt with at a future point. He said: 'The current position of HMG (His Majesty's Government) and PSNI is putting a brake on the work of disclosure of the inquiry.' Setting out the background, Mr Greaney said the inquiry legal team had written earlier this year to the Government, asking it to make any applications for redaction by March 14. He said: 'Even at that early stage, in March of this year, as many as 80 documents were having to be withheld from disclosure.' The barrister said the Government made an initial application on March 31, then withdrew it and made a revised application for redactions of the names of junior civil servants on April 15. He said the inquiry's legal team proceeded on the basis that this was the Government's position. Mr Greaney added: 'It was therefore with considerable surprise and some frustration that at 4pm on 20th May, so yesterday and therefore the day before the hearing was scheduled to start, and moreover in circumstances in which we suggest it ought to have been anticipated that members of the inquiry legal team and the chairman and indeed core participants and their representatives would be travelling to Belfast, in those circumstances a skeleton argument was emailed to the inquiry legal team by the Crown Solicitor's Office on behalf of the Northern Ireland Office. 'The inquiry legal team regard the unexpected service of a skeleton argument at such a late stage as highly unfortunate.' He added: 'This inquiry is about whether the Omagh bombing could have been prevented by UK state authorities. It is also notable this hearing concerns issues that could be described as ones involving transparency. 'It might be thought that HMG would have been scrupulous to avoid the impression that it was behaving in a way that was procedurally unhelpful and possibly even unfair. 'It seems to the inquiry legal team a risk that the approach taken by HMG to this hearing will undermine public confidence in HMG's approach to this inquiry.' The barrister said there had seemed to be 'a chaotic rush to provide materials at the very last minute'. Lord Turnbull will hear legal submissions from a number of interested parties on Wednesday and Thursday.
Leader Live
21-05-2025
- Leader Live
Government approach to Omagh bomb hearing ‘risks undermining public confidence'
Counsel to the inquiry Paul Greaney KC told a hearing in Belfast that it was 'highly unfortunate' that legal papers relating to the redaction of names were received on the evening before the public session. Mr Greaney also said that as the hearings related to transparency, he would have thought the Government 'would have been scrupulous to avoid the impression that it was behaving in a way that was procedurally unhelpful and possibly even unfair'. The hearing was told that applications from the Government and the PSNI to redact names of junior civil servants and bombing suspects from documents released to core participants in the inquiry is 'putting a brake' on its work. The Omagh Bombing Inquiry, chaired by Lord Turnbull, is holding procedural hearings in Belfast which relate to submissions to redact information from materials. The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. Earlier this year the inquiry heard personal statements from those affected by the massacre. On Wednesday, Mr Greaney said there were two issues which the latest hearings would deal with. The first relates to a Government submission that the names of junior civil servants should be redacted from documents they provide before they are released to core participants. The second relates to a PSNI application to redact the names of suspects who have not been charged from documents. The barrister said the inquiry would see the documents in unredacted form but the issue was whether they should be redacted before they are given to core participants. Core participants in the inquiry include the families of those who were killed in the bombing as well as multiple people who were injured. He said the issue of whether the names would be disclosed unredacted during oral evidence hearings would be dealt with at a future point. He said: 'The current position of HMG (His Majesty's Government) and PSNI is putting a brake on the work of disclosure of the inquiry.' Setting out the background, Mr Greaney said the inquiry legal team had written earlier this year to the Government, asking it to make any applications for redaction by March 14. He said: 'Even at that early stage, in March of this year, as many as 80 documents were having to be withheld from disclosure.' The barrister said the Government made an initial application on March 31, then withdrew it and made a revised application for redactions of the names of junior civil servants on April 15. He said the inquiry's legal team proceeded on the basis that this was the Government's position. Mr Greaney added: 'It was therefore with considerable surprise and some frustration that at 4pm on 20th May, so yesterday and therefore the day before the hearing was scheduled to start, and moreover in circumstances in which we suggest it ought to have been anticipated that members of the inquiry legal team and the chairman and indeed core participants and their representatives would be travelling to Belfast, in those circumstances a skeleton argument was emailed to the inquiry legal team by the Crown Solicitor's Office on behalf of the Northern Ireland Office. 'The inquiry legal team regard the unexpected service of a skeleton argument at such a late stage as highly unfortunate.' He added: 'This inquiry is about whether the Omagh bombing could have been prevented by UK state authorities. It is also notable this hearing concerns issues that could be described as ones involving transparency. 'It might be thought that HMG would have been scrupulous to avoid the impression that it was behaving in a way that was procedurally unhelpful and possibly even unfair. 'It seems to the inquiry legal team a risk that the approach taken by HMG to this hearing will undermine public confidence in HMG's approach to this inquiry.' The barrister said there had seemed to be 'a chaotic rush to provide materials at the very last minute'. Later, Lord Turnbull addressed Fiona Fee, senior counsel at the inquiry for Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn. He said he had been disappointed to receive written notes from her as he was boarding a plane to Belfast the previous evening. Lord Turnbull added: 'I should imagine you only instructed to prepare that note very recently and, if so, I would like to say that disappoints me in respect of the level of engagement with the inquiry which it implies. 'We are likely to be spending a significant amount of our professional lives in each other's company and I would hope we could do so in a harmonious, constructive and mutually respective manner. 'But it does seem to me those aspirations are unlikely to be easily achieved if core participants, or their representatives, engage with the inquiry in a manner which appears to demonstrate a lack of prioritisation or allows an impression to be gained of a disrespectful or a disorganised attitude towards the work of the inquiry.' Ms Fee said no discourtesy to the inquiry had been intended and it had been hoped the written note would assist its work. She said: 'We are genuinely dismayed that the service of the document has caused consternation and the fact that our attempts have had the opposite effect to that which was intended, and hoped for, is a matter for real and sincere regret and is taken extremely seriously.' The inquiry also heard submissions from a barrister for the PSNI. It will later hear submissions from legal representatives of the office of the Police Ombudsman, bereaved families and media organisations.
