
Union-backed Oakland school board majority ousts home-grown superintendent
The Oakland school board voted Wednesday to replace the district's long-time superintendent, giving her a payout to step aside at the end of this school year, officials confirmed, rather than wait until the end of her contract in the summer of 2027.
The 4-3 decision to push out Kyla Johnson-Trammell was announced as a 'voluntary separation agreement,' although the board did not immediately provide details of the deal.
Johnson-Trammell will remain with the district as 'superintendent emeritus' from July 1 through Jan. 15, 2026, according to a joint statement released by her and board President Jennifer Brouhard. It is unclear what Johnson-Trammell's role will be under the new title. An interim superintendent will be appointed by July 1, they said.
The new agreement nullifies the superintendent's current contract, which was extended in August until the summer of 2027 by the previous school board to ensure a smooth transition of leadership.
Brouhard voted for Johnson-Trammell's contract extension, but has recently led the effort to bring a new leader in as early as this summer.
'Superintendent Johnson-Trammell has done an extraordinary job over the past eight years, a historic tenure marked by stability, strong fiscal oversight, and improvements in student achievement,' Brouhard said in the statement, citing increased literacy, improved graduation rates and historic pay raises for educators, among other accomplishments.
Johnson-Trammell was not available for additional comment. Board members were not immediately available for comment given their ongoing presence at the public meeting.
The announcement regarding the superintendent at the beginning of the meeting, however, was met with loud boos in the La Escuelita auditorium where the school board meeting was held. Several parents and community members challenged board members to explain the decision, but were given no explanation.
Oakland parent Vivica Ycoy-Walton said the community was kept in the dark, without the opportunity for any input.
'I'm outraged because we were given no forward warning, no reasons, no anything,' she said, adding that Johnson-Trammell is a native Oaklander who has the trust of the community.
'We love her. She's done a lot of great things. I trust her,' she said. 'Somebody who was born, raised, went to school and went through every level of leadership to get to the position she is right now — that is somebody the city trusts. And she looks like us and she supports all of us.'
This was the third closed-door session over the last month about the fate of the superintendent, with the Oakland branch of the NAACP, district administrators and some board members speaking out in opposition to Johnson-Trammell's possible ouster. Others criticized a process that appeared to be an effort to remove the superintendent in secret without any public input.
'While it is normal for new boards to provide new direction, I want to be very clear: what matters is how we pursue that vision,' said board member Patrice Berry in an April 13 letter to the community. 'What matters is that we lead with a process that is structured, careful, and transparent. Unfortunately, that has not been our path in this process so far.'
The board's vote, made behind closed doors, comes at a pivotal time for the district, which has faced significant declining enrollment and a persistent deficit, backfilled in recent years by pandemic recovery funds and other one-time funding sources. That money is nearly gone.
The district has about 40% fewer students than in the 1990s, but has not shrunk its footprint to address the decline, leaving many schools with fewer than 200 students.
Johnson-Trammell, the superintendent since 2017, has pushed the board to spend within its means and confront the thousands of empty seats spread across a large number of schools. She was expected to recommend a plan to reduce the number of schools in June, as mandated by the previous board.
It's unclear if that will happen now. The board majority has the support of the teachers union, which has opposed school closures and budget cuts.
The union, the Oakland Education Association, has called for a strike authorization vote to protest what its leadership has said is a lack of transparency over district finances. If approved by voting members, the union has said it will be able to call a one-day strike on May 1.
When Johnson-Trammell took over, after working for 18 years as a teacher and administrator in the district, Oakland Unified was already facing a budget crisis, with mid-year cuts required. During her tenure, she has led through three teachers strikes, the COVID pandemic, divisive school closure battles and the ongoing fiscal oversight given the ongoing debt from a $100 million state loan required after the district ran out of money in 2003.
The district announced this week that it will make the final payments on the loan in June and it has a final audit report in hand, which is also required before the state returns all local control.
The audit found that the district is 'in the best fiscal condition in 22 years,' officials said in a statement posted on the ousd.org website, citing stable leadership as a primary reason for that.
But at the same time, there are big challenges ahead, district officials said. That includes facing the fact that attendance is below 85% in some settings and the city's schools lose 700 students every year during the elementary-to-middle school transition.
In addition, the public school system has 30 more schools than fiscally sustainable and only 6 of 77 schools are within sustainable size ranges, officials added.
'The report warns that without continued action to reduce costs and improve attendance, the District is at risk of needing another state bailout,' according to the statement posted on the Oakland Unified web site.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
30 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Aldermen call for hearing into Chicago police response to ICE demonstration
Members of the City Council's Latino Caucus are calling for an investigation into how Chicago police responded to the Wednesday demonstration outside a U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement office in the South Loop, where federal agents detained immigrants and clashed with aldermen. Twelve of the 14 aldermen in the caucus signed a letter condemning the high-profile showdown at 2245 S. Michigan Ave. The council's Committee on Immigrant and Refugee Rights — which Latino Caucus Chair Ald. Andre Vasquez leads — will hold a hearing 'to examine the extent of ICE's misconduct and determine whether the Chicago Police Department played any role in (Wednesday's) actions,' according to the letter. In a Wednesday evening statement, the Police Department denied that officers aided the federal agents. 'We condemn in the strongest terms ICE's unlawful detainment practices,' the statement from Latino Caucus members read. 'We stand united in calling for a full investigation into the conduct of ICE agents involved in this operation and for the immediate release of all individuals detained under these unlawful circumstances.' Vasquez told the Tribune the committee later this month hopes to call Chicago police Supt. Larry Snelling and Mayor Brandon Johnson's deputy mayors Garien Gatewood and Beatriz Ponce de Leon, who oversee community safety and immigration rights, respectively. He cited 'conflicting' information on the events at the ICE office and said 'we just want to make sure that protocols are being followed properly related to CPD.' Johnson on Thursday sidestepped questions on whether he had full confidence in the police response or whether it was appropriate for City Council to probe CPD's actions. 'Look, I think it's important that we assess the entire situation,' the mayor said while speaking to reporters at a National Immigrant Heritage Month event. 'And so assessing what happened to ensure that when the actions of the federal government come up against our values, that the full force of government is showing up in an emphatic way, but in a way that upholds our Welcoming City ordinance.' Johnson then pivoted to attack an easier political target, President Donald Trump, and shouted out the protesters as 'the resistance that we need.' 'We saw armed, masked men walk down our streets in broad daylight, and they kidnapped mothers and fathers. We saw them brutalize protesters and shove crying grandmothers into the back of unmarked vans,' he said. A source who spoke with Snelling said Chicago police officers were responding to an emergency call about a safety threat and realized upon arrival that their presence could look like they were partnering with ICE. Police leadership planned to scale back, the source said, but by then a mass gathering was convening so CPD had to stay. In his Wednesday statement, Chicago police spokesperson Tom Ahern said CPD began an emergency response at the courthouse Wednesday after receiving two calls of an officer needing assistance. At the scene, Chicago police officers spoke with individuals inside the building and in the large crowd outside 'to ensure the safety of all involved, including those exercising their First Amendment rights.' 'Officers arrived without knowledge of immigration enforcement occurring at the location,' Ahern said. 'At no point did CPD assist in immigration enforcement. All actions taken by CPD during this incident were in accordance with CPD policy and the City of Chicago Municipal Code.' The upcoming City Council hearing could potentially pit the Johnson administration against progressives on the issue of policing. His choice to tap Snelling for the top cop role in 2023 was widely lauded, especially from pro-law enforcement types who worried about his earlier 'defund the police' rhetoric before he ran for mayor. Johnson has since had Snelling's back publicly as Chicago sees a drop in crime, though the superintendent has broken with the mayor on the issue of ShotSpotter and a pending teen curfew ordinance in City Council. Ald. Jessie Fuentes, a progressive who participated in the Wednesday demonstrations, told the Tribune, 'We are concerned with police officers' prolonged appearance inside of the office where individuals were detained by ICE.' 'When CPD arrived and realized what the situation was, the responding Commander should have gotten his officers out and briefed the community,' Fuentes wrote in a text. 'Instead the Responding Commander was rude to electeds, did not coordinate his officers properly and now the perception is CPD was working with ICE.' A statement from The Resurrection Project, an immigrant advocacy group, alleged that at least 20 immigrants were detained by ICE during their check-ins — and echoed Fuentes' misgivings on CPD. 'We are deeply concerned to see that Chicago police provided material assistance to ICE, making this mass deportation possible by blocking traffic and providing initial crowd control,' the Wednesday statement said. 'The only people they protected were federal agents tearing our community members away from the people who love and depend on them. This kind of collaboration is an apparent violation of the Illinois Trust Act that degrades public trust in law enforcement.' By Wednesday afternoon, elected officials, including Alds. Anthony Quezada, Byron Sigcho-Lopez, Rossana Rodriguez-Sanchez and Fuentes had joined the growing number of protesters at the ICE office. The Latino Caucus statement said 'Quezada was physically assaulted by an ICE agent—struck with a baton and thrown to the ground multiple times' while Sigcho-Lopez, Rodriguez Sanchez and Fuentes told the Tribune they were also jostled.

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk hasn't stopped bashing Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
Elon Musk isn't done trying to kill President Donald Trump's"Big Beautiful Bill." For two days now, the tech titan has been posting — and reposting — on X about the bill's impact on the debt. Multiple independent forecasters have said that the version of the bill passed by the House last month would add more than $2 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Musk has taken to calling it the "Debt Slavery Bill," said the bill is at odds with the goals of DOGE, exhorted his followers to call members of Congress about to get them to oppose it, and repeatedly urged Republicans to scrap the bill and start anew. He also posted a promotional photo from the 2003 thriller "Kill Bill." — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 4, 2025 Republicans' response has been muted. Trump has yet to publicly weigh in on Musk's ongoing post-storm, while GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill are largely dismissing it. House Speaker Mike Johnson visibly rolled his eyes when reporters asked him about Musk's call for a new bill on Wednesday. "We don't have time for a brand new bill," Johnson said. "And I want Elon and all my friends to recognize the complexity of what we've accomplished here." Some Republicans have also insinuated that Musk may be upset about the fact that the bill phases out tax credits for electric vehicles that Congress passed under President Joe Biden. NBC News reported that Musk lobbied to keep those tax credits in place, and Johnson even brought up the credits when he initially responded to Musk's criticism on Tuesday. "I know that has an effect on his business, and I lament that," Johnson said. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. All of this comes after Musk's departure from the White House last week, which followed a media blitz in which he expressed disappointment about public perceptions of DOGE and the backlash faced by his companies, including Tesla. His criticism of the "Big Beautiful Bill" has been greeted warmly by Republicans who share his concerns about the deficit, but so far, his comments don't seem to have changed the overall dynamic within the party on the bill.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Don Johnson Talks Smoking Weed in the White House and Reveals How Much Money He Made Gambling with a U.S. President
During a June 4 appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Don Johnson opened up about his bond with former Presidents Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush The actor revealed that he has smoked weed in the White House and that he gambled with Bush Johnson has visited the White House under every president since Carter was in officeDon Johnson has had interesting friendships with several U.S. presidents, and he has done some interesting things in their presence! During a Wednesday, June 4, appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live, the 75-year-old Miami Vice alum shared that he has visited the White House under every president since the late Jimmy Carter was in office. The conversation started when host Jimmy Kimmel presented Johnson with a photo of himself with Carter, Chuck Leavell and Dickey Betts from 1975 at an Allman Brothers concert. "I don't remember that photo, but we were all stoned," Johnson said about the picture, which appeared to show Betts smoking. The actor was quick to clarify that he was not speaking about Carter, saying, "Well I don't know about him. I don't want to cast any aspersions on the former president. God rest his soul." However, Johnson clearly had a close bond with Carter. After working with the Allman Brothers on a concert during his 1976 presidential campaign, he said that they were invited to the White House. "Then the fun began," he said, prompting Kimmel to point out that "nobody has fun" at the White House. He then walked that back, saying, "I have heard Willie Nelson had fun there," referencing the fact that the country music star smoked marijuana with Carter's son on the roof of the building in the '70s. "Is that the kind of fun you had there?" he asked, clarifying, "Did you smoke at the White House?" Appearing slightly flustered, Johnson replied, "I don't know how to answer this. Well, yes ... I guess I did." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Another president that the star had a close bond with was the late George H.W. Bush. Johnson recalled representing the United States at the 1992 Winter Olympics in Albertville with the former president, whom he described as "fantastic." "He was a great guy," Johnson gushed. Kimmel questioned if Bush was a stoner, which Johnson denied. However, he said that the president had another playful vice — gambling. "He wanted to gamble when we played golf out at Camp David. And so I took his money," he recalled to laughter and applause from the audience. "I'll tell you something else: He's a trash talker, and he ran into a buzzsaw because so am I." While he did win money from the world leader, Johnson clarified that "it wasn't that much." "Eighteen or 20 bucks," he told Kimmel, adding, "But that's the best 18 or 20 bucks you'll ever get." is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! In his autobiography, Nelson wrote that he smoked with an employee at the White House. However, in 2020, Carter clarified that it was actually with his son James Earl 'Chip' Carter III. "When Willie Nelson wrote his autobiography, he confessed that he smoked pot in the White House one night when he was spending the night with me," the former president said in the documentary Jimmy Carter: Rock & Roll President. "And he says that his companion that shared the pot with him was one of the servants in the White House. That is not exactly true — it actually was one of my sons, which he didn't want to categorize as a pot-smoker like him." Read the original article on People