
Need for relook at Karnataka caste survey, says Veerappa Moily
As the Karnataka government is in a dock over the Socio-Economic and Educational Survey Report, which is based on 2015 data, senior Congress leader and former Karnataka Chief Minister
M Veerappa Moily
tells
Preetha Nair
that the government should take a relook at the data and consult all political parties to reach a consensus. Excerpts:
The special Karnataka cabinet meeting on caste census has been deferred without any resolution. What is the reason?
There was no consensus in the meeting as there were divergent views. Some of the ministers openly said that the population of large caste groups — such as Lingayats and Vokkaligas — was found to be lesser than what had been previously extrapolated. When I released the report of the Chinnappa Reddy Commission during my tenure as chief minister in 1992, the population of Lingayats was much higher than the current report. How can the numbers go down after so many years? Ideally, It can only increase. It is not correct to say that the numbers of the community have decreased. That requires reassessment.
Many, including Congress leaders and the Opposition, say that the report is 'unscientific'. Do you support the argument?
I agree to it partially. The survey was conducted in 2015, and there is a need for a resurvey. We will get an accurate figure only through a fresh survey. Else, the people will dispute the numbers. The government cannot rush into a decision in a situation, which is suspected by many communities. Now CM Siddaramaiah has to take his cabinet ministers into confidence. The opposition and the community leaders should also be consulted. After arriving at a consensus, they can implement it or go for a more scientific update of the survey. According to Supreme Court judgments, caste census has to be reviewed every 10 years. Even the Chinnappa Reddy Commission adopted by my government also said that it should be reviewed every 10 years. More than 30 years have passed now.
Has the survey exposed the divisions in Congress?
It is not appropriate to say division in the party. The Congress has run the show before. We have implemented backward class reports in every state. We have to find a solution for the stable social equilibrium by implementing backward class reports. There has to be more political consensus not only among the Congressmen, but also the opposition should be taken into confidence.
Do you think that the report, if accepted, will have far-reaching implications?
The contradictions in the data will have to be answered by the government. It will polarise the society and is politically dangerous. The survey has shown that there is an increase in Muslim population to the extent of about 4% or 6% while many other most backward people are shown less. That's why there is a doubt that the survey was not done scientifically.
The caste census has been Rahul Gandhi's key plank during assembly and LS polls. Do you think it will be a setback for the party?
I am sure Rahul Gandhi will also oppose an unscientific report without proper data. The cabinet is considering how to give a more proper and feasible report. On the basis of that, the proportion of the reservation can be decided.
Is the cabinet considering that option?
Yes, it is considering such an option, because many of the ministers belong to the most backward, more backward and backward sections. All of them will definitely raise their voice. They will have to find some formula by which it should be acceptable to all the people.
Karnataka is now the second Congress-ruled state, after Telangana, to conduct a caste survey.
Telangana has conducted the survey in a scientific way. Karnataka must follow it.
There are whispers that Siddaramaiah is downplaying the numbers of influential castes.
Maybe. The people raise such doubts in the absence of proper caste report. I think that there is a need for removing these suspicions in concrete terms, by means of a scientific survey by the government. That is the need of the hour.
The CM, after the cabinet meeting, said that there were no differences among ministers on the report?
It is an arbitrary statement. Why did he postpone the meeting then? That report was submitted eight years ago. Why could he not implement the report till now?
It is also being pointed out that there is an increase in quota of 7% for communities such as Kurubas, which Siddaramaiah belongs to.
The Kuruba community is classified as a 'more backward' category in the Chinnappa Reddy commission. The new survey report has classified it as 'most backward'. How can a 'more backward' person become 'most backward'?
It has been pointed out that lakhs of people have been left out in the survey.
Millions of people have been left out in the process, according to reports. How can we give social justice to those people who are deprived and vulnerable?
The survey recommends raising the OBC quota from 32% to 51%.
They have proposed this.
However, I find it questionable. The right course of action can be a door to door review of the survey and to find out the actual figure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CM distorted history: Venugopal
SLUG-India's Israel policy Kozhikode: AICC general secretary KC Venugopal accused chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan of twisting history by targeting the Congress party in his remarks on Israel during the LDF's Nilambur bypoll campaign. "The Congress party has always stood firmly and consistently for the liberation and rights of the Palestinian people since the time of Mahatma Gandhi. This position is not about winning votes or political gains," said Venugopal. He pointed out that the Congress' solidarity with Palestine has been unwavering throughout successive governments led by Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi and others. Every AICC session had passed resolutions expressing the party's support for Palestine, he said. Pinarayi Vijayan had recently criticized previous Congress-led govts at the Centre for moving away from India's long-standing policy of keeping distance from Israel. "Most recently, following the current crisis, AICC president Mallikarjun Kharge and Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi were among the first to take a strong stand against these developments. Six months ago, in protest against the massacre in Gaza, Priyanka symbolically brought a bag with the Palestinian emblem into Parliament- a move that triggered protests from Sangh Parivar. Not a single communist leader came forward to support her. But now, just two days before the elections, they've decided to bring this up," he said. Venugopal also recalled that it was Vijayan himself who met with the Israeli consul general in December 2022 and spoke about strengthening trade ties between Kerala and Israel, remarking then that such relations should be viewed positively. "What the chief minister is doing now is sheer opportunism. He is trying to use the issue to influence (bypoll)," alleged Venugopal.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Announce full loan waiver for farmers or step down: Cong
Nagpur: The Maharashtra Congress last week launched a blistering attack on the BJP-led state govt over its "failure" to announce a blanket loan waiver for farmers, and the delay in providing the promised Rs 2,100 monthly allowance to eligible women under Ladki Bahin scheme. Congress leaders said any further delay would trigger large-scale public unrest and warned the ruling alliance to either fulfil its commitments or vacate power. MPCC president Harshwardhan Sapkal demanded immediate action, stating, "If the govt cannot help farmers and our beloved sisters, they must step down. They are fooling people with committee talk. Wipe out farmers' loans now." He questioned the state's fiscal priorities, saying, "When it's about leading industrialists, there's no shortage of funds. But when it comes to our farmers and sisters, the treasury is conveniently empty. Why this double standard?" — Vaibhav Ganjapure


India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Meet Sanjay Dutt's ‘second father', who stood by him when no one else did, even helped to get him out of jail; He is…
Sanjay Dutt has never just been a movie star. For over four decades, he's been a symbol of talent, rebellion, survival, and second chances. His onscreen intensity made him a legend; his off-screen turbulence turned him into folklore. From blockbuster fame to courtroom headlines, Sanju Baba's life has played out like a film reel — dramatic, unforgiving, and deeply human. But behind the headlines and public trials lies a lesser-known chapter — one that speaks of unwavering loyalty and silent support. In the darkest phase of his life — when his name surfaced during the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts — Sanjay Dutt found himself alienated, even by those closest to him. His father, Sunil Dutt, then a Congress MP, found no backing from his own party. The noise was deafening, and help was scarce. And that's when the door opened — not from within Bollywood, not from Parliament — but from the residence of Shiv Sena chief Balasaheb Thackeray. Sanju didn't just admire Balasaheb — he called him Saheb and saw him as a second father. It wasn't politics; it was personal. In a rare moment of vulnerability, the actor once said, 'Whatever he has done for me and my family, I can never forget. I love Saheb like a father.' Back in 1993, when Sanjay Dutt was arrested for possessing illegal weapons and linked to the Mumbai blasts, Balasaheb Thackeray came to his defence through an editorial in Shiv Sena's mouthpiece Saamana . He insisted Dutt was innocent and being framed by the police, arguing the actor had procured the arms only for self-defence during the riots that shook the city before the blasts. Sunil Dutt, known for his Gandhian values, walked into the home of the fierce Sena supremo with just one request — help my son. And Balasaheb did. How? That remains behind closed doors, whispered in political corridors, but never confirmed. What's known is this: when the world turned away, Balasaheb stood by the Dutts. Their bond wasn't transactional — it was rooted in years of mutual respect. For Sunil, Balasaheb was a man of his word. For Sanju, he was a lifeline when few others showed up. Even today, when Sanjay Dutt looks back at those years, it's not just legal battles or media trials he remembers — it's the kindness of a man he called Saheb. Sometimes, the greatest rescue stories are the ones never fully told.