Dutch suggest social media ban for under-15s
AMSTERDAM - The Dutch government on Tuesday advised parents to forbid children under 15 from using social media apps like TikTok and Snapchat, the latest country to propose curbs over mental health concerns.
The advice, which is non-binding, comes after Australia and New Zealand proposed social media bans for under-16s, and several European countries have issued similar guidelines.
"Intensive screen and social media use can be bad for the (mental) health and development of children," said the Dutch ministry for health, wellbeing and sport.
"Think of sleeping problems, panic attacks, depressive symptoms, reduced concentration and a negative self-image."
The ministry distinguished between smartphone use, messaging apps such as WhatsApp and Signal, and social media apps like TikTok.
Children younger than their last year of primary school (typically 11 or 12) should not be allowed a smartphone, the government advised.
From secondary school (age 12 or 13), message apps should be permitted but no social media apps before 15, according to the guidelines.
"A step-by-step approach helps: first learn to communicate via chat, then get acquainted with social media," said the government.
The ministry also issued guidelines on screen time: none at all before the age of two, while children over 12 should not be in front of a screen for more than three hours.
Healthy screen use is more than just time limits, the government said.
"It's also about balancing screen time with other activities, using media together, and fostering positive online experiences."
The advice brings the Netherlands into line with other age guidelines in Europe, said the government.
Backed by France and Spain, Greece has spearheaded a proposal for how the European Union should limit children's use of online platforms.
France, Greece and Denmark believe there should be a ban on social media for under-15s, while Spain has suggested a ban for under-16s.
In the Netherlands, a children's advocacy group said earlier this month the "unchecked expansion" of social media platforms is driving an unprecedented global mental health crisis in kids and teens.
The KidsRights report said what it termed "problematic" social media use was on the rise, with a direct link between heavy internet use and suicide attempts.
However, blanket bans are not the answer, the group warned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
Helen Zille claps back at claims she's 'too old' to be Jozi mayor
Former Democratic Alliance leader Helen Zille has clapped back at criticism that she is 'too old' to campaign for the position of Joburg's next mayor. The 74-year-old has expressed her interest in 'saving' South Africa's financial hub after a string of leaders have left the city poorer. In 2008, the woman dubbed 'Godzille' won the World Mayor of the Year award for governing the city of Cape Town. On her X account, Helen Zille responded to concerns and criticism from the public over her mayoral endeavour. One was if her bid to govern Joburg was confirmed. Another was that she was 'too old' and belonged in a 'retirement village.' She responded: 'There are many young competitors for Mayor of Joburg who will be interviewed. The Selection Panel will fairly consider us all. DA has many young mayors and some not-so-young'. When one X user claimed her 'white privilege' influenced her decision, Helen Zille clapped back: 'I'm from Joburg, sweetie. I was born in Hillbrow, grew up in Joburg, and lived in Hillbrow again as a young professional.' Last week, Zille told eNCA: 'Joburg is my hometown. I was born in Hillbrow, which looks very different than what it does today. Joburg was a functional city that I love and believe is the powerhouse of South Africa. Its health and its functionality is make or break for South Africa.' She added: 'If Joburg doesn't succeed, South Africa does not succeed.' Speaking to the media, Helen Zille revealed she was capable of taking on the monstrous task of being Joburg mayor. The no-nonsense woman claimed that other DA candidates had been deterred by the prospect of low pay, long hours, and intense public scrutiny. Helen Zille is considering running for Joburg mayor. Images via X: @helenzille She told the Citizen: 'Whatever happens, this is the last roll of the dice for me and the very last roll of the dice for Johannesburg. So Johannesburg must just make damn sure that they make up their minds what they want.' Zille added that she was still consulting her family about possibly making the move to Johannesburg. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Foreign transfers are now flowing mostly North to South via remittances — World Inequality Lab report
A new study from the World Inequality Lab covers a lot of ground but one of the things that sticks out is that financial transfers are now moving mostly in a North-South direction – because of remittances. This is a striking contrast to the colonial era that defined the 19th century. The World Inequality Lab, a think-tank fronted by the economic historian Thomas Piketty, has produced a new study that looks at the unequal North-South wealth exchange through the prism of global trade flows and balance of payments over the longue durée from 1800 to 2025. Piketty is a prolific author and public intellectual whose work is focused broadly in readable and insightful ways on the history of inequality. Piketty's latest effort is typically trailblazing and is erected from the foundations of a vast new database on global trade flows and the world balance of payments from 1800 to the present. The study, co-authored by Gastón Nievas, covers a lot of ground but one of the many things that stands out is how financial transfers are now moving in a North-South direction – largely because of remittances. This is a striking contrast to the colonial era that defined the 19th century. 'No country or world region has ever received foreign income inflows approaching the magnitude of Europe's in the 19th century,' the study says. This accumulation of foreign wealth to the European colonial powers – an extractive process – had many taps: France imposed a large debt in Haiti in 1825 to compensate former French slave owners for the loss of their property(!), Britain saddled China with a debt from the Opium War, and there were also massive transfers of tax revenues from colonies to the metropolis. 'Today, financial transfers mostly flow from North to South, particularly through private remittances, rather than from South to North, via colonial transfers. For instance, sub-Saharan Africa received very large cumulated net transfer inflows between 1970 and 2025 (the equivalent of +64% of its 2025 GDP), approximately as much as the cumulated foreign income outflows (-55%),' the authors write. So one of the many trends the study has unearthed is that Africa's inflow of financial transfers since 1970 has exceeded its outflows, and this is mostly explained by wage and salary earners from the continent working abroad and sending part of their income home – and in a big way. These findings come against the backdrop of a rising tide of xenophobia and racism in Europe and North America, fuelled on the far right by the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory which holds that white folks up North are being 'replaced' by a tsunami of dark-skinned migrants from the South. Of course, there has been significant migration in recent decades from South to North, not least because of the labour market needs in advanced economies with ageing populations. Far-right shrills in the US and France who want to shut down such migration will shut down their own economies in the process. The findings also underscore the importance of remittances to regions such as Africa. For families these can be literal lifelines of income support, and multiplied many, many times they amount to vast inflows of capital which are at odds with perceptions of capital flight. Remittances, of course, can also create a dangerous economic dependency for the countries on the receiving end that can evaporate if the needs of the labour market change or an isolationist regime builds a wall. Lesotho offers an arresting example on this front. As this correspondent has previously reported, during the peak of South Africa's gold production under apartheid – which relied on a ruthlessly exploited pool of migrant, rural labour – remittances from the wages of Basotho working underground here amounted in 1987 to an astonishing 236% of the mountain kingdom's GDP. They now equal 21% of GDP, according to World Bank data – a 'remittance shock' without parallel in modern global economic history. South Africa's mines once employed almost 500,000 foreign workers. That number, according to the last available data, stood at 35,000 in 2022. This explains why so many Basotho are now 'zama zamas' at the bottom of the exploitative and transnational criminal pyramid of illicit gold mining. Lesotho's economy has not developed or industrialised in meaningful ways to provide jobs and domestic economic opportunities for its labour force. Exploited by the legal gold industry in the past, many of its young men are now exploited by the illicit sector in the precious metal. Does that stand as a warning for Africa more widely? Certainly there is a lot of talk these days about industrialisation and the 'beneficiation' of minerals and stuff like that. And remittance inflows to Africa are clearly important and at a scale larger than many have perhaps assumed. Africa notably between 1970 and 2025 had a cumulated trade surplus from primary commodities that equalled close to 200% of its GDP, but a trade deficit in manufactured goods equal to 169% of its GDP. It is surely no bad thing to develop your economy and raise the living standards for most of your population through processes such as industrialisation, and not just as a precaution if the remittance flows are suddenly staunched. But for now, remittances are flowing one way, and that in itself speaks to enduring global disparities in economic opportunity. DM
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Doctors slam trade union as working conditions in health sector deteriorate
A collective of doctors from across South Africa has lambasted the South African Medical Association Trade Union (Samatu) for failing to represent the interests of health professionals with many facing deteriorating working conditions. The doctors, from across South Africa, say their urgent call to Samatu to 'confront the deepening crisis' in the health system has fallen on deaf ears as junior doctors continue to face mass unemployment, and public-sector clinicians struggle with resource constraints and excessive unpaid overtime hours. On 26 May, 126 front-line doctors from more than 40 public and private healthcare institutions issued an open letter to Dr Cedric Sihlangu, general secretary of Samatu, calling for 'real' action towards addressing an exploitative health system. 'You call for dialogue – but dialogue with whom? With the very state that, year after year, has frozen posts, looted budgets, outsourced dignity, and now discards its doctors like broken tools?' the letter stated. 'Let us speak plainly. What is happening in Gauteng, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and everywhere else is not a technical oversight. It is the deliberate application of austerity in service of a political class that has no intention of delivering just, functional or universal healthcare. The goal is not to fix the system – it is to break it, hollow it out and contract it to the politically connected.' The letter also criticised the approach to the National Health Insurance (NHI) Act, stating that the NHI in its current form was not a path to equity, but a 'pipeline for centralised corruption, dressed up in the language of justice'. The collective questioned the union's efforts to 'build power from below', calling it a 'union of the few speaking on behalf of the many'. Among the changes it called for at the union were: The election of accountable leadership 'from below, rooted in struggle not ceremony'; The unification of employed and unemployed workers in one movement for workplace democracy; Preparation for 'real, coordinated action', rather than symbolic resistance; and Acknowledgement that the health system was not 'broken', but functioning to protect capital, contain labour and make politics profitable. 'Nothing to lose' Dr Simon Spoor, a spokesperson for the collective, said they had received no response from Samatu. He added that the network of clinicians had since grown to more than 1,000, represented on a WhatsApp group where they could share their concerns about problems in the health sector. 'The movement basically started with people beginning to get fed-up with the lack of response from our official doctors union, Samatu, who for years has been largely unaccountable and almost a non-entity when it comes to doctors and doctors' issues,' Spoor said. Samatu told Daily Maverick that it is aware of the open letter from the doctors' collective. It said that just 15 of the 126 doctors who signed the document were registered members of the union. 'Whilst Samatu would, on matters of collective concern, represent all doctors regardless of their union membership status, it is only fair that complaints similar to the ones encompassed in the letter be raised by members of our union only,' Sihlangu said. 'Samatu deems it frivolous for any doctor to claim that the leadership of the union is quiet on matters that affect doctors. More than other unions, and any other organisations that claim to represent the rights of doctors, Samatu has been at the forefront of addressing issues that affect healthcare workers, especially doctors, including bread-and-butter issues such as the unemployment of doctors.' On the matter of the NHI Act, Sihlangu said the union had been 'vocal' regarding its implementation, but added that there was a need for 'system change' in public healthcare. 'We need to allow the overdue systemic revolution in public healthcare, and currently that can only be done by allowing the NHI to take effect,' he said. Short-staffed and overworked Spoor noted that problems with the delivery of healthcare in the public sector are often blamed on individual workers or particular facilities. 'The system refuses to acknowledge the systemic nature of the problems we're facing, that the public is also kept in the dark about. It's reached the point where we can't, in clean conscience, allow it to go on any longer,' Spoor said. 'We're not doing this, in our own collective, just for ourselves. It's really for the patients that we serve. No doctor likes to… see your grandmother sitting there for six hours waiting to get treated for a heart attack… and if you do that on a day-to-day basis, it starts to grind you down. At this stage, we felt like we've got nothing to lose, and we have a moral duty, because if we don't speak out… then nobody will.' The open letter to Samatu was released shortly after unilateral policy amendments by the Gauteng Department of Health (GDOH) to reduce commuted overtime contracts for doctors. Samatu released a statement on 4 April stating that it had met with the department and ensured a three-month suspension of the implementation of the proposed changes, pending a consultation process. However, the collective behind the letter argued that the GDOH's actions are only a symptom of much deeper problems. 'Doctors have always worked more overtime hours than what they're paid for, but now they're pushing it so that they are expecting all doctors to work a minimum of 80 hours overtime a month… And in some places… they're expected to work up to 170 hours a month,' Spoor said. The accounts of doctors in the collective's network were shared with Daily Maverick under condition of anonymity to protect them from professional backlash. One doctor from the Eastern Cape said that overtime hours for certain specialities, such as ophthalmology and urology, were dropped at their health facility between April and May. This resulted in general practitioners having to handle specialist cases that came in after hours, as the required clinicians were not present. 'Their wake-up call was when patients started dying like flies… There were also bottlenecks in casualty because most departments would not accept patients over weekends due to lack of cover,' the Eastern Cape doctor said. Another doctor claimed that while they were contracted to work 80 hours overtime per month, they consistently worked between 100 and 114 hours. 'I am not compensated for the extra hours worked. I confronted HR at our workplace and was made to feel guilt for questioning why I am doing unpaid extra hours. He even said he is disappointed in me,' the doctor said. 'It's taking a toll on my mental health… because I have to study, do multiple courses that I will use to apply for a permanent post… but I am constantly exhausted and my time is being stolen by the hospital. 'I am human too, I am not a machine. I am not solely my job.' Spoor said that in 10 years in the public sector, he had never seen morale among doctors at 'such a low point'. Daily Maverick reached out to the National Department of Health about the reports of poor working conditions for doctors in the health sector but had not received a response at the time of publication. According to Samatu, 'the issue of commuted overtime downgrades started in Limpopo, and there is an ongoing litigation process between Samatu and the Limpopo Department of Health, whereby the High Court ruled in favour of Samatu and interdicted the implementation of a flexi-shift system. It cannot be that Samatu would be willing to advocate for doctors in Limpopo on this issue and not be willing to do it for those in Gauteng. Just like any organisation, we must strategise on how we tackle issues like this one, for the benefit of our members.' Making a change Samatu's election policy states that an individual can only be elected as a national office bearer when they have been a member of the union in good standing for eight years or more. Its constitution states that shop stewards can be elected at workplaces where the organisation has a minimum of 50 members. Spoor said these requirements exclude many doctors from accessing representation or leadership positions at the union. 'Our view is we need to build something new from the ground up,' he said, adding that the collective had plans to establish a voluntary association to represent doctors, with the aim of expanding into a 'fully fledged union'. 'We're trying to do this very democratically… but with a few basic assumptions that we all seem to agree on, which is that every institution should be able to have a representative… We want to set up a structure where leadership is recallable at any time and mandates can be made from the rank and file,' he said. Sihlangu told Daily Maverick that all members of the union qualify to contest for positions, provided their membership status is in order. 'Just like any other union, Samatu has a constitution that the organisation must adhere to, as well as the Labour Relations Act… Section 14(2)(a) to (f) of the Labour Relations Act clearly stipulates the requirements that must be met by every union to elect trade union representatives in workplaces,' Sihlangu said. DM
