
Startup CEO accused of spending investor cash on ‘call girls' after financial regulators barred him from Wall Street
The founder of a New York-based aerospace startup developing high-tech rocket thrusters that have garnered glowing press coverage and at least one contract with the U.S. Space Force is accused of plundering investor funds to underwrite pricey jaunts to Europe, jewelry for his wife, child support payments, and, according to the company's largest investor, 'airline tickets for international call girls to join him for clandestine weekends in Miami.'
Onetime stockbroker Christopher Craddock established RocketStar in 2014 after financial regulators barred him from working on Wall Street over a raft of alleged violations. Craddock held the firm out as 'an entity that intended to reinvent space exploration,' states a $6 million lawsuit filed by former CEO Michael Mojtahedi and obtained by The Independent.
'I was trying to find a way to enter the rocket market to ultimately mine asteroids, and I figured out the biggest problem wasn't the tech or the rockets, but getting to space,' Craddock told Popular Mechanics in an interview.
But, according to Mojtahedi's complaint, RocketStar 'is nothing more than a Ponzi scheme… [that] has been predicated on Craddock's ability to con new people each time the company has run out of money.'
'Craddock recklessly and lavishly misappropriated for his lifestyle almost every cent RocketStar received from investors, running the company into the ground by August 2024,' the complaint says. 'At that point, Craddock's 'keeping up with the Joneses' lifestyle caught up with him, investor funds dried up completely, and his house of cards collapsed.'
When Craddock was eventually found out, he fired RocketStar's entire board of directors and 'essentially barricaded himself' in the firm's Chrysler Building offices, the complaint states. Mojtahedi poured more than $1 million of his own money into RocketStar, only to see it flagrantly misused by Craddock, according to the complaint.
In an email on Friday, Craddock declined to comment on Mojtahedi's allegations and referred The Independent to Michael Ledley, RocketStar's attorney.
'The company denies the allegations and looks forward to vindicating itself in court,' Ledley said in a subsequent phone interview.
Jeffrey M. Eilender, who is representing Mojtahedi, told The Independent, 'Mr. Craddock promotes RocketStar as a pioneering force in aerospace technology and has solicited millions of dollars in investments from individuals such as our client, who viewed investing in RocketStar as an exciting opportunity.'
He said 'it was important to file this lawsuit not only to seek justice for our client, and the other investors who have lost millions of dollars combined, but to hopefully prevent new victims.'
A little over a decade ago, Craddock leveraged the physics degree he earned at Stony Brook University and 'reinvented himself as a space mogul,' Mojtahedi's complaint explains. In the years that followed, he joined a swanky Manhattan social club where he solicited funds from wealthy members, many of whom 'shared a lifelong fascination with space travel' and saw Craddock's venture as something of a thrill, according to the complaint.
One of those people was Mojtahedi, whom Craddock first approached in early 2023 to help bring RocketStar's nuclear fusion-enhanced plasma thruster engine technology to market, according to the complaint. However, it contends, the lies began almost immediately. For one, Craddock told Mojtahedi that the company had so far raised 'millions' in funding, the complaint goes on.
What Mojtahedi didn't know at the time was that Craddock, who claimed to be using the funds on product development and the pending acquisition of a Florida company that provides spacecraft propulsion and communications services to military clients, was instead blowing it on everything but — something Mojtahedi learned through bank records he eventually pried loose in a previous court action, according to the court documents.
In one instance, Craddock used investor money to fly 'a woman named Francesca' from Rome, Italy to Miami, the complaint states.
'While it is unclear from Francesca's public profile what, exactly, her profession is, her public social media account… features provocative pictures like the one below,' it says.
Craddock also gave a RocketStar AmEx to the head of the Florida company he said he wanted to acquire, according to the complaint. It says the Florida exec used the card, with Craddock's approval, to fly 'a woman named Radmila' from Milan, Italy, to New York City on 'multiple occasions.' The complaint says she was flown from Orlando, Florida to London, England on RocketStar's dime, too.
'The business purpose of these trips and the nature of goods and services these women provided to RocketStar is unknown, although it is unclear how they earned such fantastic paid vacations using… investors' monies,' the complaint states.
In 2023, according to Mojtahedi's resignation letter, which is attached as an exhibit to the complaint, RocketStar paid for an 'executive trip' to Venice, Italy. It says the charged expenses were all 'private and personal in nature,' such as a Friday night dinner for two at Hostaria Osottoosopra, which is described as a 'cozy and romantic' spot.
'The same goes for another cozy and romantic dinner on a Sunday night at Ristorante Marco Polo which is right across the canal from Piazza San Marco,' the exhibit says. 'According to one of the staff, the only business conducted in this restaurant at dinner time is the business of 'amore.''
Last year, RocketStar paid for another 'executive trip' to the Lombardy region of Italy, the exhibit alleges.
'There were numerous expenses that were of personal and private nature,' the exhibit states. 'For example, spending the Saturday night of 1/7/24 in one of the romantic suites in Villa Onofria in Brescia, Italy, right at the banks of Lake Garda [must have been] magical.'
Craddock also racked up huge bills on his RocketStar AmEx, and paid them off using investor funds, according to the complaint. Among other places, the complaint says Mojtahedi reviewed records showing Craddock used the card at Best Buy, FAO Schwarz, Midtown Comics, Medina Jewelry, and L'Occitane, the luxury cosmetics chain.
For his part, the Florida exec allegedly charged tens of thousands of dollars to his own RocketStar AmEx, including a large bill from Melbourne Family Dental, 'to cover his family's dental expenses,' according to the complaint, which says Craddock also paid the exec's monthly child support payments using RocketStar's corporate funds.
In the end, the acquisition Craddock had been pursuing 'turned out to be a farce,' the complaint states, calling it 'a scheme Craddock concocted, along with two of [the target company's] officers… to scam investors out of more cash.'
By June 28, 2024, RocketStar's bank account showed a balance of negative - $4,105.87, according to the complaint. The next day, Craddock told all RocketStar employees that they were being furloughed, the complaint states.
Craddock was removed from his position as CEO in August 2024 by the board of directors, amid an ongoing internal investigation into his alleged financial improprieties, and replaced, on an interim basis, by Mojtahedi, according to the complaint.
A source with knowledge of the situation told The Independent that RocketStar is taking legal action against the Florida company, which they said was responsible for the takeover falling through. The source said RocketStar was going through a turbulent period when Mojtahedi became disenchanted, and that many startups face similar issues involving bad advice and less-than-perfect documentation.
On December 24, 2024, after 'uncovering Craddock's fraud and complete disregard for corporate formalities,' Mojtahedi stepped down as RocketStar's interim CEO.
'I urge the board of RocketStar to employ this information to fulfill their fiduciary duty and hire a forensic accountant to get to the bottom of everything,' Mojtahedi wrote in his resignation letter.
As Mojtahedi says in his lawsuit, which was filed March 19 in New York State Supreme Court, had he known about even some of these issues, 'he would not have invested another dollar in RocketStar.'
Craddock is once again the CEO of RocketStar, according to the company's website. He now has roughly three weeks to file a formal response to Mojtahedi's allegations.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - TV-burdened WBD will struggle to cut the cord
NEW YORK, June 5 (Reuters Breakingviews) - David Zaslav's fleece vest provides limited protection from the chilling effect of his corporate balance sheet. The Warner Bros Discovery (WBD.O), opens new tab boss is trying to eject the collapsing traditional TV business, but $34 billion of mostly merger-related net debt complicates the plan. The time to split was yesterday. WBD, a $24 billion media conglomerate spanning CNN to Looney Tunes, flagged the possibility of a breakup last year when it restructured into two operating divisions: one that houses cable networks such as Discovery and another for its HBO streaming service and Warner Bros. movie studio. The step laid the groundwork to follow a similar path as cable operator Comcast (CMCSA.O), opens new tab, where CEO Brian Roberts outlined plans to move some TV assets into a standalone company. Financial engineering prospects keep getting tougher by the day. S&P Global, alarmed by the relentless decline in broadcasting and its drag on other businesses, downgraded, opens new tab WBD's credit rating to junk status. The company's stock price also has plummeted from a peak of about $77 a share in March 2021 to around $10. Zaslav is confronted with a conundrum. The spinoff cannot be sent packing with too much more debt than equity, which would tempt friction with bondholders. At 5 times estimated 2026 EBITDA of $5.5 billion, according to Visible Alpha, and if general expenses are evenly divided, the TV enterprise would be independently worth $28 billion. With 60% debt, the same proportion as now, it would be carrying $14 billion. On that basis, WBD's remaining $20 billion of net borrowing stays with streaming and the studio. Assume that business is valued at half of where Netflix (NFLX.O), opens new tab trades, or 16 times next year's EBITDA, and the assets are worth $56 billion. On paper at least, the math suggests WBD's equity would be worth twice as much as today once cleaved in two. And yet in that scenario, the HBO side also gets stuck with debt equivalent to 5 times its $3.5 billion in projected 2026 EBITDA. That amount of leverage – 30% higher than at the parent now – would potentially impede its ability to compete effectively by hamstringing investment in new programs and technology. These discouraging figures increase the chances of both companies getting frosty receptions from investors. Zaslav may want to warm up to the idea of selling the TV business instead. Follow Jennifer Saba on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Morgan Stanley markets $5 billion for Elon Musk-owned xAI in loans, bonds, sources say
NEW YORK, June 10 (Reuters) - Morgan Stanley is marketing a $5 billion package of bonds and two loans on behalf of billionaire Elon Musk-owned xAI, at the same time as a falling out between the world's richest man and the U.S. president plays out in public, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. As of last week, the bank started discussing a floating-rate term loan B at 97 cents on the dollar with a variable interest rate of 700 basis points (bps) over the SOFR benchmark rate, one person familiar with the matter said. It is offering a second option, loan and bonds at a fixed rate of 12%, the person familiar added. The terms are preliminary and will depend on investor demand, according to the source. Morgan Stanley held a meeting with investors last week in which some financials of the company were shared. Morgan Stanley is taking a different approach in marketing the $5 billion debt for Musk's xAi from previous transactions, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Morgan Stanley will not guarantee the issue volume or commit its own capital to the deal, the sources said. The 'best efforts' transaction, which means the size of the debt will depend on investor interest, is not an uncommon practice but shows banks are probably being more prudent lending in an uncertain macro environment. The people spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions with investors are not public. Morgan Stanley declined to comment, while xAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Banks were also likely choosing this approach to avoid putting themselves in a similar spot to when they committed to give $13 billion of debt to Musk to finance his $44 billion acquisition of X in 2022 and could not get out of that position for two years. The X financing is considered one of the boldest bets by seven banks led by Morgan Stanley who committed $13 billion in debt to the $44 billion acquisition by Elon Musk in October 2022. Soon after the deal to buy Twitter, as X was called at the time, the Federal Reserve began raising U.S. interest rates and Musk started restructuring the company. Banks typically sell such loans to investors soon after the deal is done, but in the case of X, they were stuck holding it for over two years. They could only dispose of that debt earlier this year capitalizing on X's improved operating performance over the previous two quarters as traffic on the platform rose before and after the U.S. presidential elections. Musk's role in U.S. President Donald Trump's return to office and public displays of his closeness to the most powerful position in the world also boosted interest for the debt from investors jockeying for some influential link to a new regime, as well as a surge in investor interest for exposure to artificial intelligence companies. Apart from selling debt, xAI has also been in talks to raise about $20 billion in equity funding, according to people familiar with the matter. Two of the people added the deal would value the company at more than $120 billion, while the other two people said figures as high as $200 billion had been discussed. Musk initially explored raising funds in parallel with a merger of xAI and social media platform X, but that plan did not move forward, two of the people said. What has changed in just the space of a few months is Musk's political sway over Trump after an acrimonious schism erupted between the two. That has cast a cloud over the future of the businesses owned by the world's richest man, which though private could be hurt if the federal government chooses to cancel contracts or grants to them. It has also heightened the risk of demand being reduced for any money that will be raised or investors asking for a higher risk premium on the new debt.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Weinstein jury set to keep deliberating after tensions spill into public
Jurors in Harvey Weinsteinn 'ssex crimes retrial appear to be moving past some interpersonal tensions and focusing on one of his three accusers as deliberations stretch into a fourth day Tuesday. At the end of Monday's session, jurors requested to start off Tuesday with electronic copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to Jessica Mann — the accuser with arguably the most complex history with Weinstein. During days of testimony, Mann said the Oscar-winning movie producer raped her in 2013 amid a consensual relationship that continued for years afterward. Weinstein's lawyers emphasized that she kept seeing him, accepting invitations and sending warm messages to him. Mann said she 'compartmentalized' the pain he caused her. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in the case. In addition to the rape charge, he's accused of sexually assaulting two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola. Weinstein didn't testify during the current trial, but maintained through his attorneys that he had completely consensual encounters with his accusers, who wanted his help building show business careers. Weinstein was one of the movie industry's most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges. The jury is made up of seven women and five men. Their closed-door discussions began Thursday and apparently have been fractious at times. One juror asked Friday to be excused because he felt one member of the group was being treated unfairly. Monday began with two jurors giving contrasting takes on the atmosphere in the deliberation room. First, the foreperson complained to the judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers that some jurors were 'pushing" others to change their minds, talking about Weinstein's past and going beyond the charges. The foreperson didn't specify what was said. Trial evidence has included some testimony about allegations outside the scope of the current charges, such as mentions of the groundswell of claims against the ex-studio boss in 2017. Another juror soon asked to speak to the court. In her estimation, things were 'going well' and jurors were 'making headway.' By the end of Monday, the jury as a whole said in a note that it was 'making good progress.' Weinstein originally was convicted in New York in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola's allegation was added last year, after New York state's highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial. Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named.