Berkeley's Shares Plummet As CEO Perrins Announces Move To Chairman
Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg
News of a personnel change at the top has caused shares in housebuilder Berkeley Group to sink in end-of-week trading.
At £38.52 per share, the FTSE 100 company was last dealing 7.2% lower on Friday.
Berkeley – which focuses on home construction in London and the South East of England – said that Rob Perrins will vacate his position as chief executive during the autumn. He will be replaced by chief financial officer Richard Stearn.
Perrins – who has held the chief executive position since for 16 years – will take over the role of chairman after Michael Dobson steps down after Berkeley's AGM on 5 September.
Berkeley commented that Perrins 'has overseen a period of exceptionally strong performance and value creation' since his appointment as CEO in 2009.
It added that his replacement by Stearn 'will uphold Berkeley's longstanding tradition and preference for promoting from within which maintains the culture and values of the organization and provides continuity and stability for the company, our people and shareholders.'
Alongside those boardroom changes, Berkeley announced full-year trading numbers that came in line with market forecasts.
Revenues crept 0.9% higher to £2.5 billion, during the 12 months to April as the UK housing market remained under pressure. The FTSE firm delivered 4,047 new homes over the period, up from 3,521 previously.
The builder's operating margin crept 0.6% higher, to 20.1%.
Pre-tax profit ducked 5.1%, to £529 million, while net cash dropped to £337 million from £532 million the year before.
Berkeley hiked the full-year dividend to 240p per share from 92p in financial 2025. Share buybacks totaled £130m, up from £72m.
Chief executive Perrins commented that the full-year trading statement 'represents an excellent operational performance with highly disciplined execution and close control of costs.'
He noted that 'we have added long-term value to the business, both in our land holdings and through our Build to Rent (BTR) platform, while returning £381.5 million to shareholders; a great start to the Berkeley 2035 strategy.'
Under its 10-year growth program, Berkeley plans to create a market-leading BTR platform alongside delivering on pipeline sites and investing in new land.
Perrins added that 'there is good underlying demand for our homes, with transaction volumes gradually improving over the course of the year.' But he added that 'consumer confidence remains finely balanced and a more meaningful recovery requires both improved sentiment and macroeconomic stability.'
On Berkeley's full-year numbers, analyst Aarin Chiekrie of Hargreaves Lansdown commented that while 'sales continued to tick higher over the year,' he added that 'they remain well below the group's long-term targets, showing there's a lot of work still to be done.'
He noted that 'a lot of this is outside of Berkeley's control though and will depend on further interest rate cuts and broader economic stability to help boost buyer confidence.'
Chiekrie added that 'with over 75% of sales for the current year already locked in, Berkeley looks well-placed to hit its full-year pre-tax profit guidance of at least £450 million.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
41 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
LME Imposes Rule Forcing Traders to Reduce Big Front-Month Bets
The London Metal Exchange set a new rule on Friday to force traders to reduce large positions, after the market was rocked in recent months by the arrival of some of the world's largest energy traders. The exchange said that, starting Monday, any trader with a position in the nearby month's contract larger than the total available stock would be forced to reduce its position by offering to lend it to other traders.
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
BBC Threatens to Sue Perplexity, Alleging 'Verbatim' Reproduction of Its Content
The BBC is threatening to sue AI search engine Perplexity for unauthorized use of its content, alleging the artificial intelligence company generates BBC's material "verbatim." In a letter to Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, as published by The Financial Times on Friday, the BBC alleges that Perplexity's default AI model was "trained using BBC content." The BBC said it would seek an injunction unless Perplexity stopped scraping BBC content, deleted all BBC material and submitted a "a proposal for financial compensation." The BBC declined to comment but said reporting by the FT was accurate. In a statement to the FT, Perplexity said the BBC's claims are "manipulative and opportunistic" and that the broadcasting giant fundamentally doesn't understand how the technology, internet or IP law work. Perplexity also alleged that the threat of litigation shows "how far the BBC is willing to go to preserve Google's illegal monopoly for its own self-interest." A US judge ruled last year that Google violated antitrust law to bolster its search dominance. Since Perplexity is an online search engine built on top of a large language model, it can answer pretty much any question asked. This means that it needs good quality information to give users satisfying answers. The BBC alleges that since Perplexity generates answers built on BBC content, that lessens the need for readers to go to the BBC directly. There's also concern that AI companies aren't using its journalism correctly and impartially, which could damage its reputation. The BBC alleges that 17% of Perplexity search responses had major issues, and "the most common problems were factual inaccuracies, sourcing and missing context." Perplexity didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. While this is the first time the BBC has gone after an AI company, it isn't the first time Perplexity has run into issues with publishers. Outlets currently suing or threatening to sue Perplexity for copyright infringement include The Wall Street Journal along with the New York Post, Forbes and The New York Times. An investigation by Wired last year alleged that Perplexity found ways to get around blocks and scrape its content. In the midst of these complaints, Perplexity launched a revenue sharing program with publishers last year, which includes Fortune, Time, The Texas Tribute and Der Spiegel. Publishers are becoming highly defensive of their content, with AI companies seeing valuations sore on the backdrop of increasingly narrow margins in media. OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, currently has a valuation of $300 billion and Perplexity's valuation has also soared to $14 billion. Perplexity investors include SoftBank, Nvidia and Amazon and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos. This is while journalism has struggled in the online age, with ad dollars being siphoned by Google and attention shifting towards social media apps. Since 2005, 2,900 local newspapers have closed in the US, according to a study from Northwestern University. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)
Entrepreneur
an hour ago
- Entrepreneur
New wave of Tech IPOs should find their home in London, says Head of Tech Sector at the London Stock Exchange
"Nvidia had $29 million of revenue at IPO, and Amazon had revenues of $16 million at the time they went public. London has all the potential to provide companies with this growth opportunity" says Neil Shah, Head of Tech Primary Markets at the London Stock Exchange. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Despite comprising only 1.4% of the 503 companies in the S&P 500 index of the largest US-listed businesses, the 'Magnificent 7' (Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla) were responsible for over 50% of the index's total gains - and over 75% of its earnings growth - in 2024. It's sometimes hard to believe how small some of those companies were when they first went public, especially when high profile US IPOs are now reserved for companies with revenues in the billions, not millions. "When I started out in investment banking at Thomas Weisel Partners in 2009," continues Shah, "there were software companies going public in the US with about $40 million in revenue. It is a very different picture today, that would just be impossible. It would probably still be impossible at $400 million in revenue. $400m of revenue a quarter, maybe, but not annually." But it is still possible in London. This may come as a surprise to the average Brit who may only come across the London Stock Exchange in the evening news summary of the FTSE 100 with its big banks, big pharma and miners. The London Stock Exchange team gets as excited about early stage growth companies as they do about unicorns. Most stock exchanges have left the messy business of young, growing scale ups to VCs or Private Equity. Not so in London. "AIM turns 30 this year. It is the world's most successful growth market and is run by the London Stock Exchange. Nominated advisers closely support companies not only through the IPO process, but thereafter. And some of the work required by a company to go public could potentially be done at a tenth of the cost of a US listing." "When companies choose to list in London, they can benefit from a full-time fundraising team in the form of the house broker retained by the company, meaning there is less of a burden on a company founder. And as public companies, they can also attract and incentivise talent in a liquid, transparent way that private companies cannot." Shah also believes that (along with a range of high-quality small cap funds and investors) Venture Capital Trusts, or VCTs - a unique British invention that combines the best of a Silicon Valley VC and a traditional small cap fund - offer an attractive alternative to more fashionable venture funding sources. The traditional venture capital model has fueled household name successes like Uber, Facebook and Zoom. But it has also given the world high profile failures like WeWork, Theranos and 23andMe. London's approach, where sensible valuations, supportive institutional investors and quality growth companies mingle, could be having its moment. AIM has supported some fantastic founder-led companies such as Craneware which went public with $15m of revenue in 2007 ($200m today) and Cerillion, which went public in 2016 with £14m of revenue and a £22m market cap. Today, it's worth over £450m. Nvidia founder Jensen Huang took to the stage at London Tech Week in mid June, saying "The UK has one of the richest AI communities anywhere on the planet... and the third largest AI capital investment of anywhere in the world." If Huang or Bezos were taking Nvidia or Amazon public today, they may be looking to the City, not Wall Street, for support. "British investors are really well-travelled. More than a third of our [London-listed] companies are international," says Shah. "It doesn't matter where you're from, you can be successful here."
