NATO chief comments on Putin-Trump phone call
The phone call on Monday between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, marks a positive development and continues to restore communication, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has said.
Talking to reporters on Tuesday, Rutte said it was a 'good sign' that the conversation took place and welcomed Trump's 'leadership' in efforts to resolve the Ukraine conflict. He added that the US president had 'broken the deadlock' from 'day one' since returning to office earlier this year.
Rutte acknowledged there had been 'no discussions with the Russians' until January, when Trump began to 'open lines of communication' with Putin.
Asked whether pressure on the Russian president should be increased, Rutte said, 'Let's be thankful that Americans are now taking this position, this leadership role.' He added it would not be helpful for him, as a NATO leader, to comment on every step in the process.
Both Putin and Trump described their latest call as productive and encouraging. The US president said he expected progress on the Ukraine conflict within two weeks.
According to a Kremlin statement, Putin thanked Trump for 'US support in resuming direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.'
Yury Ushakov, Putin's foreign policy aide, said the call was conducted in a tone of 'mutual respect,' with Trump expressing support for normalizing ties between Washington and Moscow.
Putin said on Monday that he and Trump agreed that the next step should be a memorandum outlining principles and a timeline for a peace settlement in the Ukraine conflict. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the next day that 'there is and cannot be a deadline' for completing the document.
Rutte's remarks come as NATO members seek ways to militarize and produce more weapons to be delivered to Ukraine. In March, the European Commission unveiled a plan to raise €800 billion ($896 billion) to 'rearm' the EU.
The Trump administration has consistently demanded that European NATO states increase their annual military spending to 5% of GDP, calling the longstanding 2% target insufficient.
Russian officials have condemned the steps being taken in Europe toward militarization, and dismissed claims that Moscow intends to attack either the EU or NATO. Moreover, Russia has expressed concern that, rather than supporting the US peace initiatives for the Ukraine conflict, the EU and UK are instead gearing up for war with Russia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump's border czar sending National Guard to quell California riots (VIDEOS)
The National Guard is already 'mobilizing' and will soon be deployed in Los Angeles County, following violent protests and attacks against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, President Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan has told Fox News. The unrest centered in Paramount, California, where federal immigration officers were staging near a Home Depot store on Saturday. Although no ICE raid took place at that specific location, the crowd of protesters eventually clashed with officers, prompting Border Patrol personnel and Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputies to fire tear gas and 'less-lethal rounds.' 'We're going to bring the National Guard in tonight,' Homan said on The Big Weekend Show. 'We're going to continue doing our job. We're going to push back on these people.' 'You can protest all you want,' he added. 'You've got your First Amendment rights, but if you cross that line of impediment, or you put hands on officers or destroy property, you will be prosecuted' 'American people, this is about enforcing the law,' Homan emphasized. 'And again, we're not going to apologize for doing it.' BREAKING 🚨: Federal agents are facing off with protestors in Paramount California in ongoing weekend protests. Local source there says it sounds and looks like a war zone, explosions @IRT_Media Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna said his deputies were initially dispatched in response to a 'street takeover,' but were later called in by federal authorities who said they were under attack. BREAKING 🚨: HUGE POLICE offensive against anti ICE protestors just unfolded, with police firing less than lethal, tear gas, and smoke canisters into the crowd. Hundreds try to flee, many are moving the crowd out. Paramount, CA 'Eventually, that crowd grew to between 350 and 400 people, and some began throwing objects at the agents,' Luna told reporters. He stressed that the sheriff's department 'had nothing to do' with immigration enforcement, but added: 'If federal agents… come under attack, we are going to support any other law enforcement agency that's asking for help.' LAPD officer and wannabe tough guy Zachary Adler is completely unhinged right now. He was putting his hands on people all night and now he's walking up to people threatening to shoot point blank. Fuck these pigs. Mayor Peggy Lemons of Paramount blamed federal officials for the panic, citing a lack of coordination. 'One of the big issues is just lack of communication from the authorities when something like this happens, so that we could have a better handle and be better prepared to educate our residents,' she said at a press conference. 'People are just frightened,' she added. 'And when you handle things the way that this appears to be handled, it's not a surprise that chaos would follow.' Here's another clip of the moment a protester went to kick back a gas canister and was met with a ton of fire from Border Patrol agents. One of those canisters hit me in the foot. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem called the unrest a 'riot,' warning that anyone who 'lay[s] a hand on a law enforcement officer' will be 'prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.' FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said authorities were reviewing footage of the clashes to identify those responsible. 'You bring chaos, and we'll bring handcuffs,' he said. The protests follow three immigration raids carried out in Los Angeles on Friday, which resulted in at least 44 administrative arrests. According to the White House, Homan is currently in Los Angeles overseeing the ongoing operations.
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Mission: Regrettable – Ukraine's drone strike blows up in its face
For most people, June 1st is a cheerful date – the start of summer, a celebration of children. But from 2025 onward, it may also be remembered as the day Ukraine launched its largest covert operation in Russia since the start of the conflict. While the full impact of the operation is still unclear, estimates suggest anywhere from a handful to several dozen Russian aircraft were damaged or destroyed. The precise details will likely remain shrouded in speculation. What is certain, however, is that the Russian military must rethink how it defends strategic facilities. The traditional approach – based on intercepting missiles and deploying advanced air-defense systems – has proven inadequate against cheap drones that can be assembled from off-the-shelf parts and launched from almost anywhere. That lesson is now painfully clear. But the military will draw its own conclusions. Our focus should be on the political meaning of what happened. Make no mistake – this was not just a military act. Like much of what Ukraine does, this was political theater, staged for a very specific audience: Donald Trump. Kiev's objective was simple. Derail the Istanbul negotiations and paint Russia as the intransigent party. How? By provoking a furious response – one that would make headlines, stir outrage inside Russia, and force Moscow to walk away from the table. The idea was to provoke a reaction that Ukraine could then parade before Washington. The message? 'See? We told you they don't want peace. Arm us more!' It's not the first time they've tried this tactic. From the attack on the Kursk Bridge to the shelling of Donbass civilians, Ukraine has repeatedly used provocation as a diplomatic weapon – seeking to engineer Russia's diplomatic isolation by sabotaging any steps toward negotiation. And yet, once again, it didn't work. Despite outrage from parts of Russian society, Moscow did not take the bait. Our delegation flew to Istanbul as planned. There, negotiators presented Ukraine with a memorandum reiterating the same terms previously offered. Not a step back. At the same time, humanitarian agreements were reached – including a new exchange of prisoners and the return of fallen fighters' remains. So did Russia 'turn the other cheek'? Hardly. Moscow has adopted a strategy one might call an 'Italian strike' – doing the bare minimum to deny our enemies a propaganda victory, while withholding the kind of breakthroughs that would reward bad-faith behavior. Yes, the humanitarian measures agreed upon in Istanbul are important. But let's not kid ourselves – they are not steps toward a peace settlement. Politically, the situation is unchanged. However, there is a deeper issue now at play – one with far more serious implications. On June 1st, Ukrainian forces didn't just target military bases. They targeted components of Russia's nuclear deterrent. Under our official doctrine, an attack on the strategic nuclear infrastructure is grounds for the use of nuclear weapons. Now, no one is suggesting we nuke Kiev over a few aircraft, no matter how advanced or expensive. That would be disproportionate. But here lies the paradox: If Russia does nothing, it risks undermining the credibility of its own deterrence posture, and that sends a dangerous message. In the Western capitals and among Ukrainian hawks, there are already whispers: 'If they didn't respond to this, maybe they'll tolerate even more.' That may sound absurd – but that's how these people think. Their fantasies become policy more often than one would like. So what is the answer? Let's be honest: repeating slogans like 'our response will be success on the battlefield' won't cut it here. Ukraine's leadership isn't acting out of military logic, but emotional desperation. Their calculation is political. So Russia's response must be political, too – emotionally resonant, unmistakably firm, and, above all, creative. This doesn't mean rash escalation, but we can't rely on the old playbook. Hitting the same military targets again and again achieves little. Striking Ukraine's energy infrastructure? Done. Launching another missile as a 'demonstration'? Predictable. Escalating to mass casualties? Unnecessary and, frankly, counterproductive. So what's left? Innovation. Russia must now think asymmetrically. That might mean a covert action so unexpected that it catches Ukraine completely off guard. Or it could involve striking symbolic targets that shift the psychological balance. The key is to remind Kiev – and its patrons – that nothing they do goes unanswered, and that the cost of provocation will always outweigh the benefit. In truth, Russia has spent too long responding conventionally to a conflict that is anything but conventional. Our adversaries deal in optics, symbols, and theater. To counter that effectively, we must speak the same language – without abandoning our principles or resorting to theatrics of our own. The June 1st attack was not a turning point. But it was a warning. Not just about drones or airfields, but about perception and power. The next move, as always, is Russia's to make. And this time, it must be something they don't article was first published by the online newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia indicated readiness to prioritize POW swap with Ukraine
The Russian delegation made it clear to the Ukrainian team during the latest round of direct talks in Istanbul that Moscow was willing to prioritize and expedite a prisoner exchange, as well as the repatriation of the dead, Deputy Defense Minister Aleksandr Fomin has revealed. His comment came shortly after Russia on Saturday accused Ukraine of refusing to accept the return of its own POWs and the remains of its fallen troops on 'strange' pretexts. A major prisoner exchange, focusing on those heavily wounded and those under 25, was among the key points agreed upon by Moscow and Kiev during the negotiations in Türkiye on June 2. Additionally, Russia unilaterally offered to repatriate the bodies of over 6,000 slain Ukrainian military personnel as a humanitarian gesture. Speaking later on Saturday, Fomin stated that 'while discussing this topic with the Ukrainian delegation [in Istanbul], we specifically emphasized our readiness to address these issues on a priority basis and as swiftly as possible.' He added that on returning to Moscow, Russian officials immediately began preparing for the swap. Fomin characterized the discussions on the matter earlier this month as 'productive' and yielding 'concrete agreements.' He stressed that Russian officials had relayed their proposals to the Ukrainians in advance and that Moscow had been ready to conduct the swap this week, having dispatched its technical team to the Belarus-Ukraine border to work out the specifics. 'Yet, we still have not received Kiev's agreement to conduct humanitarian operations,' the deputy defense minister explained, adding that Ukrainian officials did not show up at the meeting point. Fomin said that Kiev has yet to provide a reason for the delay in the swap. He expressed hope that Ukrainian authorities would soon act on Moscow's proposal, emphasizing Russia's readiness to honor the agreement reached in Istanbul on Monday. Following the first round of direct talks in Istanbul last month, Moscow and Kiev successfully conducted a large prisoner exchange.
