
Compliance-driven Namma Yatri eyes funds to expand across India
Namma Yatri is charting a compliance-first course amid tightening regulations, as the zero-commission ride-hailing app looks to raise funds in the next few months to bolster its business expansion, a top company official said.
The regulatory-first model has found support in some corners, but it also slows down expansion — a trade-off the Bengaluru-based company appears willing to live with. Currently, the company is in talks with partners in several northern, western, and eastern states — but isn't announcing cities yet.
'We don't play in any grey area when it comes to legality," co-founder Shan M.S. told Mint. 'Whether it's yellow board, white board, or bike taxis, we strictly follow regulations — no workarounds or legal interpretations."
Also Read: Ola rolls out no-commission model for cabs
With Karnataka's bike taxi ban taking effect on Monday, the company says it won't use loopholes to operate. 'In Bangalore, we are the only mobility company that has taken a 100% compliance stance — even under business pressure. At times, we are the only app not offering certain services, which means losing some user segments," Shan added.
The company clocks around 200,000 rides a day. 'Each state's implementation is owned by the respective states, so we don't control or own it," Shan said.
'There's been strong inbound interest from multiple northern states, including from driver representatives and local officials asking when we'll launch. But we've realized we don't want to be just another ride-hailing company," he added.
Tariff transparency
The expansion is being timed alongside a new funding round. While details remain under wraps, Shan confirmed the company expects to close it in the next quarter, citing 'significant inbound interest" from investors. This will follow its $11 million seed round in 2024 from Blume Ventures, Antler, and Google.
Namma Yatri's peers have also been caught in a regulatory dragnet over the 'advance tip" feature. The Central Consumer Protection Authority is investigating the matter and has already issued a notice to Uber, with similar notices to Ola and Rapido likely to follow.
The feature, which is also used by Namma Yatri, gives riders the option to add a tip in advance, which may encourage faster ride confirmations.
Also Read: TVS Capital revamps board, eyes tech-driven investment opportunities
Authorities are scrutinizing whether such tipping mechanisms constitute unfair trade practices or dark patterns, coercing users into paying extra before confirming a ride.
'I can confidently say we have no dark patterns. We have made it absolutely clear on our platform that tipping is voluntary. We don't nudge users unless no ride is available in the first 30–60 seconds…" Shan clarified.
Instead of algorithmic surge pricing, the app gives drivers the option to suggest an optional tip—usually ₹10– ₹20—in cases like heavy traffic or when a return ride is unlikely. Riders can accept or reject the tip.
'Instead of opaque algorithmic surge pricing, we provide a middle-ground: a modest, calibrated tip mechanism that gives both riders and drivers some agency," he said.
'If the entire industry agrees to scrap tipping and stick to base fares, we're open to it. But if others continue opaque surge pricing while we offer base fares, it's not sustainable — especially for our driver-first model," he added.
Growth, welfare and beyond
Namma Yatri is also aligning itself with Karnataka's new gig worker welfare rules. Under the Karnataka Platform-Based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Ordinance, 2025, platforms must contribute 1–5% of each transaction to a state welfare fund.
'In Bangalore, we are working on a model of setting aside a percentage of our revenue as our means to give back for driver welfare," Shan said.
The company's revenue operates on a subscription model where drivers pay a fixed fee to access the platform and keep 100% of the fare.
It was also the first ride-hailing service to fully integrate with ONDC, with all ride transactions routed through the open network.
Also Read: India's next 10-minute delivery? Domestic workers on demand
Shan believes this can eventually bring together public and private transport options like metros and buses into a single interface.
Looking ahead, Namma Yatri is piloting services in other verticals such as ambulances and shuttles, and testing AI-led localization to tailor services city by city.
While international ambitions remain on the horizon, Shan clarified they will follow only after the next funding round.
'The vision is to build in India and build for the world," he said, adding, 'Our approach is to be a technology enabler and unifier, not to displace existing players…"

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Mphasis, ex-employee spar in court over CEO impersonation, whistleblower claims
Bengaluru: A legal battle between Mphasis Ltd and an employee it recently fired for allegedly stealing proprietary information has been escalating over claims of impersonation, email threats, disobeying court orders, an unreturned laptop, and whistleblower immunity. The Indian information technology (IT) services company filed a complaint against Albert Rojas in a New York district court on 16 April for digitally impersonating chief executive Nitin Rakesh and threatening another employee, as well as allegedly disclosing proprietary information via duplicate websites. Rojas, who was a client technical specialist with Mphasis in the US, has denied the charges. In his reply to the court on 10 June, Rojas stated that he created duplicate websites to make the public aware of Mphasis's alleged cyber lapses, and so his actions were 'protected whistleblower activity" and permissible by law. No business was transacted through the duplicate websites, he said. However, on 15 June, Mphasis's counsel filed a second complaint with the New York court alleging that Rojas had violated the court's 9 June order as his duplicate website with a URL resembling the company's was still active. The court had on 6 May passed a temporary restraining order prohibiting Rojas from accessing and disclosing any company-specific confidential information. On 9 June, it passed a preliminary injunction order reiterating its restraining order and prohibiting Rojas from contacting Mphasis employees he had worked with. Also read | Infosys-Cognizant trade-secrets battle nears end as Dallas court passes order Mphasis had terminated Rojas's employment in March, accusing him of stealing proprietary company and client-related information from a company-issued laptop and transferring data to his personal systems without authorisation. It also issued a cease-and-desist notice asking him to return the laptop and sought clarity on third parties with whom he had shared company-specific information. On 16 April, the Blackstone-owned company approached the New York district court complaining that Rojas was misleading clients through his actions and that he had threatened one of its employees. 'On April 4, 2025, Rojas sent a threatening email to Waghmode from his spoof email ' stating that he would be back in New York City 'next week" and if he caught Waghmode 'on the street," he was 'legally obligated to kick [Waghmode's] ass for that Friday the 28th nonsense you pulled," Mphasis said in its court complaint. Mint could not ascertain details on Waghmode's identity or the incident mentioned in Mphasis's complaint. The genesis Mphasis said in its lawsuit filed in April that 'on February 28, 2025, despite being warned against doing so, Rojas forwarded confidential and proprietary information to his personal email addresses,...., in the form of a PowerPoint presentation prepared for Mphasis' client, QBE". QBE Insurance Group Ltd is a Sydney-based company that last year reported a data breach of sensitive personal and protected health information of an undetermined number of individuals. Mphasis said it immediately locked Rojas's account due to multiple security breaches and at the conclusion of an investigation into his repeated violations, terminated his employment in March. The Bengaluru-based company said Rojas also shared confidential files and presentations with colleagues not involved in the privacy breach investigation against him, adding that this too was a violation of the company's policies. Mphasis said Rojas did this despite signing documents prohibiting him from sending client-specific data to his personal systems and email as that could result in data loss. Rojas, in his reply to the New York court on 10 June, said Mphasis had declined to issue him a company laptop and that he had to use a laptop issued by QBE, which he claimed had technical difficulties. The technical glitches, he said, prompted him to use his personal system because the QBE-issued laptop allowed him access to both Mphasis and QBE networks. Rojas added that this dual access would cause cyber issues and expose confidential information to multiple users in addition to a blue screen, which is an error screen displayed on the monitor which leads to the system crashing down. 'Mphasis's failure to provision standard infrastructure (e.g., domain-joined laptop, VPN) rendered compliance impossible, while its selective policy enforcement and retaliation underscore inequitable conduct barring relief," Rojas said in his reply to the court. Also read | Mid-cap outperform larger peers yet again, threaten to eat their lunch Charges and countercharges Mphasis informed the court that after Rojas's employment was terminated he created an unauthorized website containing disparaging information about the company using Mphasis's letterhead between 12 and 15 March. Mphasis said that Rojas's duplicate website used the company's trademark and logo and he forwarded the website to employees of Mphasis using a 'spoof" email address impersonating its chief executive. 'Rojas removed Mphasis proprietary information from authorized company equipment and published the information on the website," Mphasis said in its first court complaint. Rojas, in his response to the court on 10 June, said his actions were within whistleblower permits as they were meant to make the public aware of Mphasis's alleged cyber lapses, which he claims he had brought up with the company's management on several occasions. 'These websites were noncommercial, intended solely for public-interest disclosure, and contained clear disclaimers, including: 'This is not an official Mphasis site. This site contains protected disclosures made pursuant to NYLL § 740 and other applicable laws. All information shared is for documentation, research, and public accountability."," Rojas said in his reply to the court. 'Defendant launched these sites only after Mphasis terminated his employment and ignored his multiple internal escalations, including formal complaints to the Ethics and Compliance Office and Whistleblower channels, regarding serious governance and security failures," Rojas said. He added that his use of the company logo and name should be classified as 'nominative fair use and parody". Also read | IT companies are hunting deals rather than waiting for clients to float tenders In additional responses to the court on 16 June, Rojas said the duplicate website address using Mphasis in its name now directs to a different website. "As of June 16, 2025, the domain has been fully purged of content and now redirects to which does not use the word 'Mphasis" in its domain name or in any disparaging manner," he said, adding that he had not stolen any proprietary information. "The core 'trade secret" I allegedly misappropriated is not proprietary code—it is the truth about a broken security process where two large offshore entities allowed credential puddle-jumping across systems, then shifted blame to a single individual," said Rojas, adding that the laptop had not been deactivated and that 'Mphasis retained a private investigator to track my location and intervene outside normal return protocols". The court trail The New York district court, as part of its temporary restraining order issued on 6 May, prohibited Rojas from 'using any email addresses impersonating Mphasis CEO Nitin Rakesh or an employee of Mphasis, including creating email domain names resembling that of Mphasis, its employees, or its Legal Department". Judge Jesse M. Furman also asked Mphasis to facilitate the return of the laptop and ordered for a forensic examination of Rojas's personal accounts. 'Rojas shall cooperate in full with Mphasis' counsel to arrange for a neutral forensic examiner selected by Mphasis to conduct an immediate forensic examination of Rojas' personal Mac computer, including all email accounts, cloud accounts, and other relevant software/hardware utilized by Rojas since March 13, 2025," the court said in its May order. In its preliminary injunction order issued on 9 June, the court reiterated its temporary order and prohibited Rojas from contacting Mphasis's employees or clients. 'Rojas shall cease contacting the client of Mphasis for whom he created content while employed by Mphasis, QBE, and its employees," Judge Furman said in his order. 'Rojas shall remove any websites using Mphasis in the domain name and cease creating websites disparaging Mphasis." Also read | Bosses of India's top three IT firms flag macroeconomic concerns Mphasis approached the court again on 15 June complaining that Rojas had violated the 9 June order. 'I am writing to put the Court on notice that Defendant has violated the Preliminary Injunction dated June 9, 2025 ('PI") by disparaging Mphasis on Plaintiff requests an Order ordering monetary sanctions against Defendant for Defendant's multiple violations of the temporary restraining order ('TRO") and the PI," said Kimberly Karseboom, counsel at Ogletree Deakins, which is the law firm representing Mphasis. Mphasis also denied Rojas's allegation in his duplicate website that the company had hired a private investigator to track him. 'Mphasis retained outside counsel who in turn hired private investigator Brad D. Kelly to locate me and retrieve a QBE-issued laptop. According to Brad Kelly's sworn declaration filed in this case, his assignment included recovering the device, even though Mphasis had already issued a 'No Due' clearance form. This effort appears designed to shield QBE from accountability for having failed to retrieve or manage an active corporate endpoint for over five months," reads a screengrab of Rojas's duplicate website attached by Mphasis as part of its 15 June complaint. 'Defendant has not only disparaged Mphasis and activated the website using its name in the domain in violation of the PI, but now has disparaged Mphasis' counsel with false accusations," said Mphasis' counsel. 'It is clear that Defendant has no intention of following court orders, including that of May 15, 2025 wherein Defendant was ordered to bring his personal laptop to the Courthouse for a forensic examination on May 29, 2025." Also read | Mphasis to lose FedEx business accounting for 8% of total revenue What's at stake for Mphasis Mphasis's revenue growth of 4.43% in 2024-25 was the slowest among its peers, many of which reported growth in double digits. India's seventh-largest information technology outsourcer was also the only company among its peers to report a decline in headcount. The Mphasis stock is down nearly 5% this year, while the Nifty IT index has lost about 9%. On Tuesday morning, Mphasis's shares were up by about 0.5% at ₹2,720.00 each on NSE. Mphasis has sought at least $5,000 in damages from Rojas. 'Mphasis has suffered damage and loss by reason of, and as the proximate result of, Rojas' conduct in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act described above, and the value of such loss to Mphasis exceeds $5,000.00 for a one-year period," the company said in its complaint. Rojas in his response has asked the court to dismiss Mphasis's complaint and sought punitive and compensatory damages including his legal fees. He has also asked the court to get Mphasis to reinstate him. 'Mphasis does not comment on the specifics of ongoing litigation," said Deepa Nagaraj, global head of communications, in a response to Mint's email on 15 June. 'At the appropriate time, or upon conclusion of the matter, details will be available through the court or via our legal counsel. We remain confident that the legal proceedings will validate our position," said Nagaraj. QBE did not reply to queries emailed on 11 June. Rojas directed Mint to his court filings and reiterated his stance.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Mukesh Ambani finds Aladdin! used by 200 institutes, manages Rs 1807417124099999, this company launches…
Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund, which last month got asset management licence from market regulator SEBI, on Monday introduced Aladdin, BlackRock's unique investment analytics and risk management platform. Jio BlackRock Asset Management Pvt Ltd is a 50:50 joint venture between Jio Financial Services Ltd (JFSL) and US-based BlackRock. 'Investing should be simple. And it should work for you. That's the belief that brought Jio Financial Services and BlackRock together. We've blended Jio's digital first approach with BlackRock's global investment expertise' to build solutions around what Indian investors truly need,' the mutual fund company said in a post on X. And for the first time ever Aladdin, BlackRock's unique investment analytics and risk management platform, is now available in India, it said. 'This is just the beginning. We are here to redefine investing by making it accessible and affordable for you. We are Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund,' it said. The full form of BlackRock's Aladdin is Asset, Liability, and Debt and Derivative Investment Network. This software is used by over 200 institutions worldwide. On a global level, Aladdin manages assets worth $21 trillion. The Aladdin software is utilized for portfolio analysis, risk management, trading, compliance, and operations-related activities. What Will investors Get From Aladdin? Now, customers of Jio Financial Services will also get access to BlackRock's Aladdin software with multiple benefits: Indian investors will be able to design institutional-grade portfolio strategies. They will gain insights into world class investments. Investing in mutual funds will become easier with the help of the Aladdin software. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), vide letter dated May 26, 2025, granted the certificate of registration to 'Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund' and approval to Jio BlackRock Asset Management Private Ltd to act as the asset management company for Jio BlackRock Mutual Fund. The company, on October 29, 2024, announced incorporation of two firms — Jio BlackRock Asset Management Private Limited and Jio BlackRock Trustee Private Limited – to carry on the primary business of mutual fund, subject to regulatory approvals. (With Inputs From PTI)


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump mobile phone is here: Price, features, and everything you didn't ask for
Memecoins are so passé; it's time for Trump mobile phones! In a move that has left tech enthusiasts and political pundits buzzing, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump unveiled the Trump Mobile service. What's the occasion? Well, the Trump kids wanted to mark the 10th anniversary of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign launch and do something special for their dad. Late Father's Day celebration much? Seems so! Late appreciation, new gimmick! Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump didn't just stop there. To make their dad proud and make America more tech-savvy, alongside the service – which is set to become available in September 2025 – the Trump kids introduced the T1 Phone—a gold-colored smartphone priced at $499, designed to cater to conservative consumers seeking a patriotic alternative in the tech market. What Is the T1 Phone? The T1 Phone is an Android-based device boasting a 6.8-inch AMOLED display, 256GB of storage, and a 50-megapixel camera. The device is marketed as being "Made in America," with the Trump Organization emphasizing domestic manufacturing and customer support. However, industry experts have expressed skepticism about these claims, citing the challenges of establishing the necessary infrastructure for smartphone production in the United States of America. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Blaydon-on-tyne: If You Were Born Between 1940-1975 You Could Be Eligible For This Life Cover Reassured Get Quote Undo How much does it cost? Priced at $499, the T1 Phone positions itself in the mid-range market segment. The accompanying mobile service plan, dubbed "The 47 Plan," offers unlimited talk, text, and data within the US, along with benefits such as 5G access, roadside assistance, and telehealth services. The plan is priced at $47.45 per month, which is seemingly a (not so) clever nod to Trump's status as both the 45th and 47th president of the United States. Made in America, really? While the Trump Organization promotes the T1 Phone as being "Made in America," the feasibility of entirely domestic production remains uncertain. Critical smartphone components like processors, displays, and camera sensors are typically sourced globally, and final assembly traditionally occurs in Asia. No wonder the claim of a fully US-made device is met with skepticism by industry analysts! The obvious meme factor The T1 Phone's gold-colored design and the "Made in America" branding are clearly aimed at appealing to patriotic consumers. However, the device's actual specifications and features place it in direct competition with established mid-range smartphones from companies like Samsung and OnePlus. The question remains: does the gold finish and political branding justify the price tag, or is it a golden gilded gimmick? Only time will tell! Trump's Meme Coin Gala a FLOP? Guests Reveal Bad Food, No Booze & Chaos | WATCH