logo
Drones drag Sudan war into dangerous new territory

Drones drag Sudan war into dangerous new territory

Yahoo08-05-2025

Paramilitary drone strikes targeting Sudan's wartime capital have sought to shatter the regular army's sense of security and open a dangerous new chapter in the war, experts say.
Since April 2023, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) group has been at war with the army, which has lately recaptured some territory and dislodged the paramilitaries from the capital Khartoum.
The latter appeared to have the upper hand before Sunday, when drone strikes began blasting key infrastructure in Port Sudan, seat of the army-backed government on the Red Sea coast.
With daily strikes on the city since then, the RSF has sought to demonstrate its strength, discredit the army, disrupt its supply lines and project an air of legitimacy, experts believe.
According to Sudanese analyst Kholood Khair, "this is intended to undermine the army's ability to provide safety and security in areas they control", allowing the RSF to expand the war "without physically being there".
For two years, the paramilitaries relied mainly on lightning ground offensives, overwhelming army defences in brutal campaigns of conquest.
But after losing nearly all of Khartoum in March, the RSF has increasingly turned to long-range air power.
Using weapons the army says were supplied by the United Arab Emirates, it has hit strategic sites hundreds of kilometres (miles) away from their holdout positions on the capital's outskirts.
Michael Jones, research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London, says the RSF's pivot is a matter of both "strategic adaptation" and "if not desperation, then necessity".
- Strategic setback -
"The loss of Khartoum was both a strategic and symbolic setback," he told AFP.
In response, the RSF needed to broadcast a "message that the war isn't over", according to Sudanese analyst Hamid Khalafallah.
The conflict between Sudan's de facto leader, army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and his former deputy, RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, has split Africa's third-largest country in two.
The army holds the centre, north and east, while the RSF controls nearly all of the vast western region of Darfur and, with its allies, parts of the south.
"It's unlikely that the RSF can retake Khartoum or reach Port Sudan by land, but drones enable them to create a sense of fear and destabilise cities" formerly considered safe, Khalafallah told AFP.
With drones and light munitions, it can "reach areas it hasn't previously infiltrated successfully", Jones said.
According to a retired Sudanese general, the RSF has been known to use two types of drone -- makeshift lightweight models with 120mm mortar rounds that explode on impact, and long-range drones capable of delivering guided missiles, including the Chinese-manufactured CH95.
On Thursday, rights group Amnesty International published a report that said "Chinese GB50A guided bombs and 155mm AH-4 howitzers" used by the RSF in Khartoum and Darfur were provided by the UAE.
- Sparing fighters -
The Sudanese government severed diplomatic ties with the Gulf state on Tuesday, accusing it of supplying the advanced weapons systems the RSF has used to attack Port Sudan.
Abu Dhabi has repeatedly denied arming the RSF, despite reports from UN experts, US politicians and international organisations.
According to Mohaned Elnour, nonresident fellow at the Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy, the RSF's "main objective is to divert the army's attention" and position itself as a potential government, which it has said it will form.
"It's much easier for them to attack quickly and withdraw, rather than defend territory," Elnour said.
Crossing Sudan's vast landmass -- some 1,500 kilometres (930 miles) from RSF bases in Darfur to Port Sudan -- requires long-range drones such as the Chinese-made Wing Loong II, deployed by the UAE, or the Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2 used by the army, according to Amnesty.
Both sides in Sudan are in a race to "destroy each other's drone capacity", Khair said.
Two years into the devastating war, the RSF has another incentive to rely on drones, she said.
"It allows them to spare their troops" after reports that RSF recruitment has dipped since the war began.
"Initial recruitment was high based on the opportunity to loot, and there's very little left to loot now," she said.
Both sides have been accused of war crimes including targeting civilians, but the RSF is specifically accused of rampant looting, ethnic cleansing and systematic sexual violence.
lom-nda-sof/bha/srm

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Navalny widow launches TV channel to fight Russia 'censorship'
Navalny widow launches TV channel to fight Russia 'censorship'

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Navalny widow launches TV channel to fight Russia 'censorship'

The widow of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny and Reporters Without Borders on Tuesday praised the launch of a television channel that aims to bypass censorship in Russia and preserve the Kremlin critic's legacy. The channel, called Future of Russia, will be broadcast via a free-to-air satellite platform run by the press freedom advocacy group Reporters Without Borders, known by its French abbreviation RSF. Navalny's team hopes to get greater exposure and better reach with the help of the satellite broadcasts, which will feature content that Navalny's team is producing for their YouTube channels in exile. "I think it will be a long collaboration," Yulia Navalnaya told reporters in a short statement in Paris. She said Navalny's team was doing "our best" to keep reaching Russians on YouTube but the Kremlin has often tried to block the Western platform. "There is almost full censorship in Russia, and under a dictatorship it is very difficult to spread information," she said. Since Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Moscow has outlawed all forms of public dissent and banned independent media and western social media. "We think it's really important that we are able to reach the Russian population as much as we can," said RSF head Thibaut Bruttin. The channel will launch on Wednesday, June 4, the day Navalny would have turned 49. The charismatic Navalny, Putin's main opponent, suddenly died in an Arctic penal colony on February 16, 2024. His family and supporters say he was killed on orders from Putin. Jim Phillipoff, project director of Svoboda Satellite at RSF, said the channel was important because it was bringing the content produced by Navalny's team to Russian-speaking broadcast audiences. He described the Navalny team as "pioneers" in countering years of Kremlin propaganda that combines "the glitz and glamour of western television" with Soviet-style messaging. "There's virtually no way to significantly penetrate the traditional television space in Russia except by satellite," Phillipoff added. Approximately 45 percent of Russians use satellite signals to watch television, he noted. With all top Kremlin critics either behind bars or in exile, Navalny's legacy has been fading in Russia. as/sjw/js

China's Chip Dreams Just Hit a Wall--But a New Tech Power Could Rise From the Wreckage
China's Chip Dreams Just Hit a Wall--But a New Tech Power Could Rise From the Wreckage

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China's Chip Dreams Just Hit a Wall--But a New Tech Power Could Rise From the Wreckage

Xiaomi (XIACY) just unveiled a big leap in its chip journeya 3nm self-designed processor called XRING O1, built by TSMC in Taiwan. But it might be the last of its kind for a while. A new directive from the US government now restricts the sale of advanced electronic design automation (EDA) software to Chinese companies, hitting the very tools that helped make that chip possible. Sources familiar with the matter say Xiaomi, along with companies like Lenovo and Bitmain, could be first in line to feel the impact. These firms have been quietly investing years into developing their own silicon, while relying on EDA software from US players like Synopsys and Cadence. Now, with access to future updates and tech support potentially cut off, that roadmap just got a lot bumpier. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with XIACY. The restrictions don't revoke existing licenses, but they do freeze the futureno upgrades, no fixes, no help. That's a problem, because keeping chips manufacturing-ready at TSMC demands constant fine-tuning with the latest software patches. So far, chips for smartphones and tablets appear exempt from the AI-level restrictions, but the writing is on the wall. The move signals a wider push to choke off China's long-term access to bleeding-edge chip development, not just hardware. While giants like Alibaba and Baidu also design their own processors, the exact fallout for them remains murky. But one thing is increasingly clear: China's chip strategy can't depend on foreign tools forever. That might be where the real story begins. Empyrean TechnologyChina's leading homegrown EDA providerhas been quietly building an alternative software stack. It's not yet on par with US offerings, but insiders say it's already usable for 7nm chips and above. Empyrean, along with firms like Primarius and Semitronix, saw their shares surge after news of the US restrictions broke. There's also a darker undercurrent: analysts point out that hacked versions of US EDA tools are already being used inside China. As one expert noted, It's very easy to reverse-engineer what you need. That reality helps explain why Synopsys and Cadence have seen lagging China revenues despite growing chip demand. Whether the US ban slows China downor pushes it faster toward self-reliancemay depend on how fast its EDA ecosystem matures. Either way, this fight just shifted from factories to source code. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Five killed and several injured after attack on UN aid convoy in Sudan
Five killed and several injured after attack on UN aid convoy in Sudan

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Five killed and several injured after attack on UN aid convoy in Sudan

Five people have been killed and several more injured after an attack on an aid convoy in the Sudanese region of North Darfur. The number of dead was revealed in a statement from the World Food Programme (WFP) and UNICEF on Tuesday. Earlier, it was reported that a UN convoy delivering food to El Fasher, North Darfur came under attack overnight, with initial reports indicating there had been "multiple casualties". According to the joint statement, the convoy of 15 trucks had travelled 1,120 miles from Port Sudan - and was trying to negotiate access to El Fasher when it was targeted on Monday night. "Multiple trucks were burned and critical humanitarian supplies were damaged," in addition to the deaths and injuries, the statement said. Aid deliveries have regularly been caught in the crossfire of the two-year war between the Sudanese Army and paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, leaving more than half the Sudanese population facing acute levels of hunger. Last week, WFP premises in El Fasher were targeted, damaging a workshop, office building, and clinic. Several medics were killed in a separate attack on El Obeid hospital in North Kordogan last month. Read more The joint WFP-UNICEF statement reads: "The WFP and UNICEF condemn an attack on a joint humanitarian convoy near Al Koma, North Darfur, last night. "Following months of escalating violence, hundreds of thousands of people in El Fasher - many of them children - are at high risk of malnutrition and starvation if supplies do not urgently reach them. "As is standard with our humanitarian convoys, the route was shared in advance, and parties on the ground were notified and aware of the location of the trucks. "Under international humanitarian law, aid convoys must be protected, and parties have the obligation to allow and facilitate rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian relief for civilians in need. "Both agencies demand an immediate end to attacks on humanitarian personnel, their facilities and vehicles - a violation under international humanitarian law." Humanitarian attacks continuing 'with impunity' The two agencies called for an "urgent investigation" into the incident and for the "perpetrators to be held to account". They offered their condolences to the families of those killed and their "heartfelt sympathy and support to all those injured". "It is devastating that the supplies have not reached the vulnerable children and families they were intended to," the joint statement concluded. "Attacks on humanitarian staff, aid, operations, as well as civilians and civilian infrastructure in Sudan have continued for far too long with impunity. "WFP and UNICEF colleagues remain on the ground despite the insecurity, but call for safe, secure operating conditions and for international humanitarian law to be respected by all parties. The lives of millions in Sudan, including in locations like El Fasher in Darfur, depend on it." This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store