Perspective: More LGBT-identifying people are religious than you might expect
When people think of a gay man, they often have an image of a coffee-drinking, well-dressed urbanite with a graduate degree who has never darkened the doorway of a church since he came out to his conservative, religious Midwest parents years ago.
Like any stereotype, there are probably people who fit it. But with more and more surveys including sexual orientation as a question, we are becoming more aware of the diversity of people who identify as gay. While some recognize that there is the occasional person who identifies as gay or lesbian who attends church, it's easy to assume they are exclusively attending a downtown denomination with a rainbow flag flying in its window where a female pastor gives a homily on global warming.
Again, while this does describe some, sexual and gender minority religiosity is much more diverse and extensive than most people realize. First, belying stereotypes about secular gay people, nearly half of all LGBT individuals in the United States are religious, according to a report by the Williams Institute at UCLA, with 1 in 5 identifying as 'highly religious.' Following trends in the society at large, older LGBT people are more religious than younger, and non-white are more religious than white, with a large majority (70%) of Black LGBT people identifying as religious.
Similarly, LGBT people in the South are much more religious than LGBT people in the North, with, for example, 3 out of 4 LGBT people in South Carolina identifying as moderately or very religious. So while, yes, there are gay Ph.D.s living in New York City who are in the stereotypically gay professions and who have not attended church in years, so too are there gay loggers and ranchers who attend church religiously.
But which church? While there are some churches that are not heteronormative — that is, they ordain sexually active gay clergy, solemnize same-sex marriages and do not treat homosexual behavior as a sin — they are in the minority. Furthermore, in a study I published a few years ago, I found that more sexual minorities affiliated with heteronormative faiths than non-heteronormative ones. So even among gay parishioners, those attending the rainbow-flag waving services are the exception, not the rule. Most go to more traditional churches.
But why? While some might see a contradiction inherent in sexual minorities attending a heteronormative faith, one study of Black, gay religious men found that many preferred their more traditional churches for a variety of reasons.
For example, some may not want to base their religious experience so centrally on their sexuality, some just because they were raised with it and feel more comfortable, their orientation and its teachings notwithstanding, with one respondent stating that 'I just prefer — I just want to stay with what I know, my regular old church, as long as he's not at the pulpit telling me I'm going to go to hell. I don't want — I think some people may feel like it's kind of like playing around with religion in some aspects.'
That's not to say that some churches oriented specifically toward sexual minorities don't have their place. For example, in Africa, a church in Kenya geared specifically toward gender and sexual minorities has been serving a community that has faced violence and abuse for over a decade (and has had to move 10 times).
While sexual minorities are less religious generally, even outside of formal religious practice, the vast majority of sexual minorities hold some kind of spiritual beliefs about God, and may pray even if they are not formally religious. I took the past 10 years of the General Social Survey, a large, nationally representative survey that asks a wide variety of questions, including some dealing with religious beliefs as well as sexual orientation, and calculated how many LGB Americans believe in God, finding that:
Only 11% of LGB Americans are atheists, and simply do not believe in God.
Twelve percent have a position that is somewhat agnostic, stating that they don't know, and there is no way to find out.
Twenty-one percent indicated that they believed in a 'higher power.'
Six percent indicated that they 'believe sometimes.'
Twenty-one percent indicated that they believe but occasionally doubt.
Twenty-nine percent believe in God and have no doubt about it.
In other words, about half of all LGB believe in God; if the 'higher power' option is included, that number grows to 70%, with only about 1 in 4 being atheists or agnostics. The belief in a personal God is also demonstrated by looking at how often they pray. According to the same survey, over 1 in 3 people identifying as LGB (transgender was not included as an option in the survey) in the United States pray daily and only a little less than 1 in 3 'never' pray. In terms of religious services attendance, about 1 in 5 of sexual minorities attend 'about once a month' or more, and a minority (44%) attend 'never.'
According to the same GSS survey, about 6% of the U.S. population identifies as gay, lesbian or bisexual. Since according to the U.S. Census there are 341 million people in the United States, that would equate to 20.5 million LGB-identifying people, according to the GSS survey, and 4 million LGB people attending religious services at least once per month, and at least 6.8 million prayers ascending to heaven from the U.S. every day from this same group of men and women.
Of course, they are not 'LGBT+ prayers' any more than other prayers are heterosexual prayers. As Elder David A. Bednar has said, 'We are not defined by sexual attraction. We are not defined by sexual behavior. We are sons and daughters of God.' As shown by the findings in the study above, for many sexual minorities, their lived religion is not reducible to how it interfaces with that one particular part of their identity, instead encompassing the totality of their relationship with God.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
12 hours ago
- UPI
On This Day, June 15: Supreme Court rules civil rights law protects LGBTQ workers
1 of 5 | Joseph Fons waves a rainbow flag in front of the Supreme Court after the high court released a decision that bans LGBTQ employment discrimination on June 15, 2020 in Washington, D.C. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI | License Photo On this date in history: In 1215, under pressure from rebellious barons, England's King John signed the Magna Carta, a crucial first step toward creating Britain's constitutional monarchy. In 1752, Benjamin Franklin, in a dangerous experiment, demonstrated the relationship between lightning and electricity by flying a kite during a storm in Philadelphia. An iron key suspended from the kite string attracted a lightning bolt. In 1785, two Frenchmen attempting to cross the English Channel in a hot-air balloon were killed when their balloon caught fire and crashed. It was the first fatal aviation accident. In 1846, the U.S.-Canadian border was established. File Photo by Chris Corder/UPI In 1877, Henry Ossian Flipper, born a slave in Thomasville, Ga., became the first Black cadet to graduate from West Point. The U.S. Army later court martialed and dismissed him, but President Bill Clinton posthumously pardoned him in 1999. In 1904, the excursion steamboat General Slocum caught fire on the East River in New York, killing 1,121 people. In 1934, the Great Smoky Mountains National Park was established on a tract of land straddling North Carolina and Tennessee. President Franklin D. Roosevelt dedicated the park on Sept. 2, 1940. In 1944, U.S. forces invaded the Japanese-occupied Mariana Islands in World War II. By day's end, a beachhead had been established on the island of Saipan. In 1987, Richard Norton of Philadelphia and Calin Rosetti of West Germany completed the first polar circumnavigation of Earth in a single-engine propeller aircraft, landing in Paris after a 38,000-mile flight. In 2007, a Mississippi jury convicted a reputed Ku Klux Klansman, James Ford Seale, in the abductions and killings of two black teenagers 43 years earlier. Seale was sentenced to life in prison and died in 2011. In 2012, an executive order by President Barack Obama would allow hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children to legally seek work permits and obtain documents such as driver's licenses. The program was called the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal civil rights law protects LGBTQ workers from being fired based on their sexual or gender orientation. In 2023, a British parliamentary panel concluded that former Prime Minister Boris Johnson intentionally misled the House of Commons when he told it there had been no lockdown parties in Downing Street during the COVID-19 pandemic. File Photo by Hugo Philpott/UPI
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Should boys start kindergarten a year later than girls?
Some districts, including New York City, have banned this practice (with exceptions), in part because these children already tend to be ahead in school, so it could contribute to a long-existing achievement gap by race and family income. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But a different way to address that issue, supporters of redshirting say, is to make it the national policy for all boys. That would make it accessible to more Black and Hispanic boys and those from low-income families -- the children least likely to be redshirted now but most likely to benefit, says Richard Reeves, president of the American Institute for Boys and Men. Advertisement Such a policy might sound far-fetched. The data is not clear that it helps in the long run. Children develop at different rates, and a universal policy is unlikely to serve them all. Crucially, kindergarten is usually the first year that parents have free child care, and without universal pre-K, this would force many parents of boys to pay for another year of private care. Advertisement But research shows that being a year older benefits children, especially boys, in one crucial way involving self-control -- and helps illuminate why many young children are struggling in the American school system. Redshirting has been happening in small numbers for decades. Malcolm Gladwell popularized it in his 2008 book 'Outliers,' noting that professional athletes were often old for their grade. The idea to redshirt all boys was proposed in 2022 by Reeves in his book, 'Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male Is Struggling, Why It Matters, and What to Do About It.' It gained momentum because of two changes to education. First, parents have become more competitive about educating their children, and redshirting has been a way to give them an edge in academics or athletics. Also, school has become more academic earlier -- meaning more time spent preparing for tests and less time learning through play. That has been particularly difficult for boys, who on the whole mature later than girls. The result is a gender gap in kindergarten readiness that continues through high school, with boys going to college at lower rates. Shrinking the gap early on could help in adolescence, too. Girls go through puberty about a year and a half before boys do and tend to develop the executive function skills crucial to school, like time management and self-control, earlier. 'I think the main reason for giving more flexibility is not because of kindergarten; it's because of those later years,' Reeves said. 'I actually think adolescence is when the gaps are biggest, or at least the most consequential.' Advertisement Joe Strickland, who taught middle school outside Savannah, Georgia, for 25 years, said he thought the policy would be 'the smartest thing the schools ever did,' because in his experience, boys and girls at that age 'are completely different.' The girls, he said, tend to be focused and interested in school. Many boys? 'Just general silliness, horse playing with each other, anything but focusing and concentrating on their work,' he said. Nicole Appell started her son in kindergarten at age 6, after his preschool teacher suggested it. At first, Appell, also a preschool teacher, was taken aback. He was already reading, but he wasn't emotionally ready, becoming easily overwhelmed and crying a lot at school. 'In hindsight, I'm so glad she did that,' said Appell, who lives in Seattle. 'It was really important. Being a little more mature means being able to handle the situations that happen at school.' Studies of redshirting have found pros and cons. Some research has found that any boost in achievement fades away as children get older. Redshirting could increase high school dropout rates because older students would reach the legal age for quitting school earlier. It could also disadvantage men by delaying their entry into the job market. Yet several large studies -- of nearly all kindergartners in three states -- show clear benefits to being older. In Florida, where children start kindergarten if they have turned 5 by Sept. 1, researchers compared those with September birthdays, who were relatively old for their grade, and those with August birthdays, who were almost a year younger. The older students consistently scored higher on tests in third grade and, to a lesser extent, eighth grade. They were more likely to attend college and less likely to go to jail as juveniles. The findings were true for children of all backgrounds, but especially for boys and for children from low-income families. Advertisement Researchers in Tennessee and North Carolina found similar results, including that redshirting reduced the male-female achievement gap. Studies in other countries have also found that older children score higher and have more self-confidence in school. One line of research provides a clue as to what exactly is benefiting older children. They stood out in a key skill: their ability to sit still, concentrate, think before acting and see tasks through to the end, a study of Danish children found. These traits, which girls tend to develop earlier, have been shown to be crucial to academic success. Thomas Dee, a professor at Stanford University's Graduate School of Education and an author of the study, said children develop this kind of self-control through pretend play, and older children probably spent more time doing that in high-quality, play-based Danish preschools. (He cautioned that the potential benefits of redshirting might not be realized if the extra year were spent in a less enriching environment.) This idea -- that these attention skills are driving the differences between older and younger students -- is backed by studies showing that the youngest students in a grade are more likely to be diagnosed with attention disorders. A study of 400,000 children in every state found that those with birthdays just before the kindergarten cutoff were significantly likelier to be diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder than those with birthdays just after the cutoff. A study of 1 million children in Britain found a similar pattern. Advertisement 'Age really matters,' said David Figlio, professor of education and economics at the University of Rochester and an author of the Florida study. Yet he also didn't think universal redshirting for boys was the answer. A better alternative to redshirting all boys, some researchers said, would be to make it optional for any student so that parents could choose whether it was right for their child, with advice from teachers and the option to attend an extra year of public pre-K. An easier change, some said, would be to make the cutoff date for kindergarten earlier, so all children would turn 5 at least a few months before they start. Teachers could group classes by birth month, with the older kindergartners together in one class and the younger ones in another. Also, schools could restore more of the play-based learning -- like dress-up, art and nature exploration -- that was much more common in kindergarten before 2000. 'Boys are half the population, so if we're doing all these things in school that we think are disadvantaging them, the answer isn't to redshirt,' said Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, professor of education and social policy at Northwestern. 'We can do something cheaper and better, like not overintellectualizing kindergarten -- more circle time, fewer worksheets about circles.' This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Juneteenth celebrations start as honor unveiled at historic Johnstown church
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. – On the corner of Haynes Street and Menoher Boulevard is a church founded by a group of Black Civil War veterans who moved from Maryland to Johnstown for work in 1873. It relocated a few times through its 153-year history, but now First Cambria AME Zion Church, 409 Haynes St., has taken its place on the National Register of Historic Places. A plaque showing the designation was unveiled Friday during a ceremony that began with prayer and singing among a group of about 50 people gathered in the church. The ceremony honoring the church also marked the start of Johnstown's Juneteenth celebrations through June 19. NAACP Johnstown Branch President Alan Cashaw said honoring the history of First Cambria AME Zion Church was a 'proper and respectful' beginning to the Juneteenth holiday observation. The men who founded First Cambria AME Zion Church in 1873 worked in a tannery in Johnstown's Woodvale section and worshipped in the loft of the tannery before outgrowing it. 'Our ancestors took hard jobs like working in the tannery and the steel mill for us to be in Johnstown,' Cashaw said. The church was added to the registry in April based on its associations with moments of historical, national significance. In 1923, during the Rosedale incident, when a deadly shooting of police officers sparked an ordered banishment of Black and Mexican people from Johnstown, the pastor of First Cambria AME Zion spoke to the community, 'calling for peace beyond the unrest and fear,' said Barbara Zaborowski, of Pennsylvania Highlands Community College. Zaborowski led the application process and gave a presentation Friday. Again in 1969, when a white officer shot Timothy Perkins, a young Black man in Johnstown, 'the church stepped up and called for calmer heads, and helped avoid additional violence,' Zaborowski said. Cashaw and African-American Heritage Society member Bruce Haselrig shared lesser-known parts of the church's importance as a pillar of the community. When Cashaw was a Greater Johnstown High School senior in 1969, he led a school walkout, he said – to the church – after the principal prohibited students from wearing dashikis, clothing important to African American culture. In 1984, Haselrig said, the church helped form the Johnstown Minority Scholars Club to raise awareness of academic excellence among minority students. 'It's always been a community church,' Haselrig said. 'The building is being honored, but it's because of the things that happened here, the pastors, the leaders, the families.'
