Keir Starmer calls Israel's recent actions in Gaza ‘appalling and intolerable'
Keir Starmer has called Israel's recent actions in Gaza 'appalling, counterproductive and intolerable', as the government comes under mounting pressure to take stronger action after the killings of dozens of civilians at aid posts in recent days.
The prime minister told MPs on Wednesday the UK was considering imposing sanctions on members of the Israeli government, but is so far resisting growing calls for a complete ban on arms sales and immediate recognition of Palestine.
Starmer was speaking after several attacks on aid posts in recent days left dozens dead and hundreds more injured.
The attacks prompted British aid charities to step up calls for urgent humanitarian and political action, and the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) described conditions in Gaza as 'worse than hell on earth'.
With protests taking place outside the Commons and growing unease from MPs inside it, Starmer said: 'Israel's recent action is appalling and, in my view, counterproductive and intolerable.'
He added: 'We will keep looking at further action, along with our allies, including sanctions, but let me be absolutely clear: we need to get back to a ceasefire, we need the hostages, who have been held for a very long time, to be released, and we desperately need more aid, at speed and at volume, into Gaza, because it is an appalling and intolerable situation.'
The ICRC president, Mirjana Spoljaric, said what was happening in Gaza surpassed 'any acceptable legal, moral and humane standard' that 'humanity was failing' and that the Palestinian people had been 'stripped of human dignity'.
Oxfam UK said conditions in Gaza had reached a 'level of inhumanity that is inconceivable in modern times'. It said there was a 'massive disconnect' between public despair at events in Gaza and what it called the 'complacency' of political leaders.
Oxfam UK's chief executive, Halima Begum, said: 'It is beyond comprehension that aid distribution points should be turned into killing fields.'
Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer said later on Wednesday that if Israel did not cease 'the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in this place'. He added: 'I will not say from the dispatch box today when that might be.'
Falconer was confronted on Wednesday by angry MPs from multiple parties, demanding stronger British action on sanctions, weapons sales and Palestinian recognition. Dozens of Labour and Tory MPs have recently signed letters to the prime minister calling for Palestine to be recognised immediately but have not so far received a response.
Paula Barker, the Labour backbencher, asked: 'What more evidence do we need to call this exactly what it is – a deliberate policy of annexation and genocide?'
Kit Malthouse, the Conservative MP, said: 'We're all, frankly, getting a bit fed up with the theatrics in this chamber. And, if I'm honest with the minister, it feels like the whole house is being played. He shows up, he mouths the words full of condemnation and being appalled, and very occasionally, the government leaks out just enough sanctions, frankly, I'm afraid, to keep the Labour benches from open revolt.'
Malthouse's Tory colleague Jeremy Wright added: 'I now believe it's necessary for the UK, hopefully, in conjunction with others, to recognise the state of Palestine. Why has it not yet?'
Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, successfully passed a bill calling for an independent inquiry into British involvement in Israeli military action in Gaza. The inquiry is unlikely ever to happen, however, because the government will not support a substantive vote that would enable one to be set up.
While MPs were debating in the Commons chamber, dozens of protesters gathered outside, one of whom was arrested after an altercation with a police officer at the gates of parliament.
Falconer confirmed to MPs the government is reconsidering its position on Palestinian statehood, and ministers are open to the idea of immediate recognition.
Government sources said one option is to make an announcement at or after a UN conference later this month being hosted by France and Saudi Arabia to talk about a two-state solution. The government is keen to secure compromises in exchange, including an agreement by Hamas to leave Gaza entirely.
On arms sales, ministers have already cancelled licences for many of the weapons Britain used to sell to Israel, saying it would only export 'defensive' arms in the future. The Guardian revealed last month that British companies had managed to export thousands of military items to Israel, including munitions.
Meanwhile, ministers are fighting a legal case to be allowed to continue making spare parts for American-made F-35s, which are used by Israel but also many Nato allies. They argue that stopping such sales could harm other non-Israeli partners.
The ICRG, which is in effect the guardian of the Geneva conventions governing the conduct of war, is carefully diplomatic in its dealings with warring parties and normally does not speak publicly about convention violations.
However, Spoljaric told the BBC in an interview that Israel's current actions in Gaza amounted to a 'hollowing out' of international law and not enough was being done by to end the war, stop Palestinian suffering and release Israeli hostages.
She highlighted the level of destruction and suffering in Gaza, and said the world was 'watching a people being entirely stripped of its dignity' and this 'should really shock our collective conscience'.
She added: 'State leaders are under an obligation to act. I'm calling on them to do something, and to do more, and do what they can, Because it will reverberate, it will haunt them, it will reach their doorsteps.'
On Tuesday the ICRC reported its Rafah field hospital in southern Gaza, which is close to an aid distribution site, received 184 patients in what it called a 'mass casualty influx.' It said 19 patients were dead on arrival, the majority with gunshot wounds. Eight more died of wounds.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Keir Starmer and Labour are accused of standing in the way of a ban on cousins marrying each other - after poll shows British people want it axed
Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour party are standing in the way of a ban on cousins marrying each other, after a new poll showed an overwhelming majority of Britons want to see it axed, a Conservative MP has claimed. Conservative MP Richard Holden last year introduced a private members' bill to ban the practice, which would bring cousin marriages into the same bracket as marrying a parent, child, sibling or grandparent. Now a new YouGov poll has revealed the British communities that are most likely to back first cousin marriages, with a large majority thinking the practice should be outlawed. The former Cabinet Minister and Conservative Party Chairman told MailOnline: 'This YouGov poll is clear. 'The overwhelming majority of Brits, including those of Pakistani heritage, want to see first cousin marriage banned. 'The fact Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party are standing in the way of ending an outdated practice rooted in misogynistic cultural practices shows that he's more interested in promoting cultural relativism than in ending practices that have no place in our country and isolate both individuals and communities from each other. 'If Starmer really believed in British values he'd back my bill, just like every community in Britain does.' Pakistani and Bangladeshi Britons are most likely to support the first cousin marriages, with 39 percent of those polled saying it should be legal. While 47 percent of the community say the practice should not be legal, this compares to just eight percent of white Britons who support first-cousin marriage. Six percent of black Britons say marrying a cousin should be legal, with nine percent of Indian Britons holding the same view. While marrying close relatives including siblings and half-siblings is illegal in the UK, marrying a first cousin is technically legal. Some 77 percent of white and Indian Britons believe marrying a cousin should be made illegal, compared to 82 percent of black Britons. Currently the UK follows the practice of 'genetic counselling', in which first cousins who are in a relationship are offered education about the risk of having children together and encouraged to receive extra checks during pregnancy. It is estimated that children of a first-cousin union have a six percent chance of inheriting a recessive disorder such as cystic fibrosis or sickle cell disease - double the risk of the general population. But some have warned that outlawing the practice completely risks stigmatising those already in first cousin marriages in the UK. Amongst these was Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed, who drew huge criticism last year for defending cousin marriage. Instead of banning it outright, he said a 'more positive approach' involving advanced genetic tests for prospective married cousins would be more effective in addressing issues around it. One of Britain's foremost experts on child health also defended the right for first cousins to marry, dismissing concerns about inbreeding. Professor Dominic Wilkinson, an NHS neonatologist and ethics expert at the University of Oxford, argued a ban would be 'unethical'. Instead, Professor Wilkinson backed calls for such couples to be offered special screening on the NHS to help them decide if they should have children. Such tests can cost £1,200 privately. They are designed to spot whether prospective parents are carriers for the same genetic conditions, such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy. It comes as data from 2023 showed in three inner-city Bradford wards, 46 percent of mothers from the Pakistani community are married to a first or second cousin, according to data published in 2023. The overall estimate for the cousing marriage capital of the UK in Pakistani couples was 37 percent ten years ago, and this figure has since dropped. Reasons behind the fall are thought to include high educational attainment, stricter immigration rules and changes in family dynamics. It compares to just one percent of white British couples. YouGov's data also revealed that those in London are most likely to support first cousin marriage, at 15 percent. The north followed at 12 percent, while in the Midlands it was ten percent. The south of England and Wales were the least likely to support it being legal, at six and seven percent respectively. Historically, first cousin marriages were extremely common amongst royalty and the British upper classes. It was seen as a way of firming up alliances and keeping wealth and land in the family. MailOnline recently revealed that no-one is tracking the rate of cousin marriages in the UK, with councils not recording any data on the issue. Studies have put Pakistan as having one of the highest rates globally at 65 percent of unions. This is followed by Saudi Arabia (50 percent), Afghanistan (40 percent), Iran (30 percent) and Egypt and Turkey (20 percent).
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How women blighted by cruel back pain may actually have hidden arthritis - as doctors reveal there's a simple drug cure that can end the agony. Special report by ETHAN ENNALS
Clair Evans believes her back pain began during her teens – but she has lived with the debilitating problem for so long that she struggles to remember a time when she wasn't in agony. The 47-year-old from Doncaster says her lower back became extremely stiff, and often the pain would radiate down into her legs. She also found that certain movements triggered excruciating spasms.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN POLLARD: Labour's created an atmosphere where the hard working middle class are now fair game for bigotry
That an eight-year-old can be refused healthcare on the NHS because of the school he attends is deeply troubling. It shows that the service once described by Margaret Thatcher 's Chancellor Nigel Lawson as 'the closest thing the English people have to a religion,' has become a battleground for class war where children seeking treatment are seen as the enemy of the proletariat. That includes my children. I am lucky enough to be able to pay for them to attend private schools. I pay the fees on top of my taxes, of course. Now it seems the NHS regards my kids as non-citizens to be shunned.
