Ebay worker who quit after failing to explain four minutes of inactivity on computer to manager's satisfaction loses WRC claim
The employee told the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) earlier this year that he had 'people dying left, right and centre' in his personal life at the time of the events that led to the warning, including a friend who 'went into the river in Navan'.
His former manager said: 'Anything over 60 seconds is considered work avoidance.'
A claim for constructive dismissal brought by the worker, Eanna Donoghue, under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against eBay Europe Services Ltd, has been rejected by the tribunal.
Mr Donoghue quit on March 5 last year, the day he was told a company appeals officer had decided to leave a written warning for 'work avoidance' on his personnel file – effectively barring him from seeking promotion for a time, he said.
He had been in the €41,000-a-year job for just short of seven years.
I couldn't take it any longer
The tribunal heard Mr Donoghue's former line manager, Niamh Seoighe, wrote to him on Thursday, December 21, 2024 telling him that she had observed on a screen recording that he closed off a customer issue by email in a minute and 36 seconds, but left the page open for a few minutes.
'I couldn't take it any longer,' Mr Donoghue said, telling the WRC the reprimand for 'work avoidance' followed a period when he had 'people dying left, right and centre' in his personal life.
'For some reason that was just ignored. A perfect record for seven years, and she [his line manager] still thought it was reasonable and fair to give me a warning on that incident,' he said.
Mr Donoghue's position was that the reprimand over the four-minute inactivity incident in January 2024, and informal 'verbal counselling' on November 28, 2023 for lateness, was linked to filing grievances, starting with complaints against two operations managers on November 16 that year.
He said he was aggrieved to get 'a warning for going to the bathroom for four minutes, for not closing off an email' when he claimed he had called out people 'doing 10 times worse' in the past.
ADVERTISEMENT
Learn more
Mr Donoghue had 'informal verbal counselling' for lateness in the months before the downtime issue arose, the tribunal heard. Three instances of lateness were officially recorded on Mr Donoghue's file. The company submitted he had actually arrived late on eight occasions.
The tribunal heard that Mr Donoghue had car trouble at the time and was trying to get from Navan, Co Meath, to Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, by bus. He told the WRC the Transport Minister had admitted to a newspaper: 'The NX [bus] didn't turn up.'
'That was out of my control, I couldn't get to work,' he said.
Mr Donoghue's position during a disciplinary meeting had been that he 'forgot to close the email' before taking a break, and that he might have 'gone to get a cup of tea,' counsel for the respondent Mark Curran BL said in cross-examination.
'To this day I'm not sure,' Mr Donaghue said. 'I took a couple of calls in this time.'
'You did say you took a personal call about the person in the river,' Mr Curran said.
'I took a personal call, but I'm not sure if it was in that four minutes,' the complainant said.
Ms Seoighe said in her evidence that she wrote to Mr Donoghue before Christmas that year looking for an explanation after observing on a screen recording from his computer that he had finished responding to the email but failed to mark himself as available for up to five minutes.
'It was call avoidance,' she said. 'If I'm going on the 'break unpaid' ops code, I'm being skipped; it's going to someone else on the team, they're getting additional calls,' she said.
'[For] idle time on an email, anything over 60 seconds is considered work avoidance.'
Her position was that the issue was exacerbated by Mr Donoghue's failure to use an hour specifically allotted for him to answer her queries on the downtime and because she 'had to follow up several times'.
The written warning given to Mr Donoghue by Ms Seoighe was upheld in a paper-based appeal.
In her decision, adjudicator Eileen Campbell wrote that she had 'every sympathy' for the difficulties Mr Donoghue had experienced in his personal life.
She wrote that Mr Donoghue 'appears to feel that he has been treated unfairly by the imposition of a first written warning for behaviour of a type he would have called out in respect of agents in the past'.
'When his team leader does her job and addresses an issue with the complainant he considers it to be unreasonable behaviour and alleges he is being targeted,' she wrote.
She noted further that Mr Donoghue quit 'without any attempt at raising a grievance' about the warning.
'I am not persuaded by the complainant that resignation was his only option,' she said, dismissing the complaint.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Baker who alleged he was subjected to racial slur in Polish wins €4,000
A baker has won €4,000 over being subjected to a racial slur in Polish by a colleague nearly six years ago. The award was made in a set of rulings published on Monday regarding a workplace dispute that arose in the spring of 2019. The worker, a black French man, alleged he was being bullied by predominantly Polish colleagues at an unidentified food and drinks company 'because he does not speak Polish'. The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) rejected various complaints of his alleging discrimination in breach of the Employment Equality Act 1998 on the grounds of race and disability. However, it found against the employer in respect of the racial slur incident in June 2019. READ MORE The worker gave evidence at a series of adjudication hearings, saying he 'felt threatened and isolated at work' during a period in early 2019 and felt he was suffering discrimination because he was 'black and did not speak Polish'. The worker said 'nothing was done' after he complained to his bosses in February 2019. The company's position was that it facilitated the worker by changing the start time of his shift and later changing his work location. It had also ordered his Polish colleagues to translate all work-related conversations to English, the tribunal was told. The complainant's further evidence was that after his transfer to the new work location he was subject to 'a particularly offensive and derogatory racial slur which was conveyed to him in Polish' on June 23rd, 2019. The worker who made the remark – which was not recorded in the tribunal's published decisions – left the employment the following day. The worker told the tribunal he 'did not know what it meant' until it was explained to him by a third party some months later, after which he filed his second complaint with the WRC. A head chef who gave evidence on behalf of the employer said 'nobody was subject to racial abuse' and that the workplace has 'zero tolerance' for bullying and harassment. The employer's position was that the complainant 'did not react well' when performance issues were raised with him. 'His response was to claim that he was being discriminated against and racially abused,' the company's representative submitted, adding that the firm had 'gone to great lengths' to support him. Adjudicator Andrew Heavey noted the accusation was 'vehemently denied' in the company's investigation process. However, he accepted the sworn evidence of the worker on the balance of probabilities. He wrote that despite the 'bona fides' and 'significant efforts' made by the employer to support the worker and address his complaints, it was still vicariously liable for the actions of its staff. He found the complainant was 'harassed on the race ground' on or about June 23rd, 2019, and directed the company to pay €4,000 in compensation for the discrimination. He rejected all other claims by the worker under the Employment Equality Act. Mr Heavey anonymised his decisions on the basis 'information of a sensitive nature relating to the complainant', which he believes 'deserves privacy'. He noted that when he held his final hearing into the claims last November, the complainant remained an employee of the firm and there had been 'no further issues'.
Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
Design & Crafts Council Ireland lost half of its workforce in 2024
About half of the staff working at Design & Crafts Council Ireland left the organisation last year. A total of 24 employees have resigned between the period 2021 to 2024. The figures were released under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act and seen by The Irish Times. Design & Crafts Council Ireland (DCCI) is the national agency for craft and design and, according to its website, it aims to 'support designers and makers to develop their businesses in a sustainable way, and advocate for the societal benefits of craft and design'. Its activities are funded by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment via Enterprise Ireland. The data released shows that one employee retired in 2020 while there was also a redundancy. There were eight resignations in 2021 as well as one redundancy. READ MORE There were seven resignations in 2022, alongside three redundancies and one retirement. In 2023, one employee resigned while another had their job terminated. Last year, there were eight resignations and three redundancies. DCCI said the average number of employees last year was 22. Overall staff numbers have averaged between 23 and 30 since 2020. During the period 2020 to 2024, three members of staff were part-time while all others were full-time. Four employees have brought cases to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC). 'DCCI is unable to comment on the nature of any of the cases, but all have been concluded,' it stated. Jim Sheridan of Fórsa trade union, which represents a number of DCCI employees, said WRC cases it was involved in related to 'various employment issues'. The council said that staff have left the organisation over recent years for 'a number of varied reasons'. 'They left in the main to pursue other interests, or to retire, while a small number availed of voluntary severance. Significant restructuring and change programmes in mature organisations often result in staff turnover of this nature,' it said. In relation to 2025, two new staff members did not successfully complete their probationary period and were not retained while a third employee 'left the organisation to take a role located closer to where they live'. The organisation also said there has been a 'very significant restructuring of its functions and its team' over the past four years in line with its new strategic focus. In 2021, DCCI worked with KPMG to develop a new five-year strategy for the organisation. The strategy was launched following 'extensive consultation with the sector and key stakeholders, and DCCI's board formally adopted this new strategic plan'. DCCI threatened legal action against glass artist Róisín de Buitléar over a critical feedback report she sent on behalf of up to 20 other members earlier this year. The report was in relation to their experience of participating in the Collect 24 exhibition in London. In 2022, nine former DCCI employees wrote to the Department of Enterprise and then tánaiste Leo Varadkar, as well as to the board, to flag their concern at the high turnover of staff and request a review of the organisation's HR and workplace procedures. Rosemary Steen stepped down as chief executive of the council last summer after more than four years in the role to become director of the Residential Tenancies Board (RTB). The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (DETE) said DCCI is an independent organisation that receives funding through Enterprise Ireland (EI), while a service level agreement is in place. 'This provides the framework for agreement of service levels and performance management in respect of the funding provided by EI on behalf of DETE to the Design and Crafts Council Ireland,' it said.
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
Keelings worker fired over claims regarding dead co-workers
The Keelings fruit and vegetable group sacked a warehouse worker after deciding he had brought the company into disrepute with 'false' posts on social media claiming excessive night work hours contributed to the deaths of two of his colleagues in 2013, a tribunal has heard. The worker, Rudolf Csikos, lost his job of 16 years with the north Co Dublin produce firm last December, and is pursuing a number of employment rights complaints against Keelings Logistics Solutions. The company maintains it was justified in dismissing him on the grounds of gross misconduct after an investigation which concluded he had 'acted recklessly by publishing false and misleading information' implying that Keelings was 'responsible for the deaths of two colleagues as a result of excessive working hours'. The LinkedIn posts were made amid a long-running legal row between Mr Csikos and his employer over alleged breaches of working time legislation. READ MORE A statutory complaint under the Organisation of Working Time Act originally filed in late 2019 by Mr Csikos remains live over five years later. Having been rejected as 'vexatious' by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), that ruling was quashed by the Labour Court on appeal and referred back to the WRC. In addition to a dispute over the payment of a Sunday premium, which Keelings maintains is covered by a collective agreement, Mr Csikos has alleged the company failed to comply with its legal obligations on the employment of night workers such as himself. 'The night working hours was breached by the company, and that's why it caused the people to die,' Mr Csikos said via a Hungarian-language interpreter at an initial hearing last week. When adjudicator Brian Dalton pointed out that Mr Csikos was not medically qualified and there was no medical evidence before him, Mr Csikos said his assertion was that there was a 'possibility'. The company's representative, Emily Maverley of the Irish Business and Employers' Confederation (Ibec), said the Keelings workers referred to by Mr Csikos in his posts 'passed away, unfortunately, in 2013', some 11 years before the posts. Giving evidence last week, company disciplinary officer Alan Morrissey said the posts were 'damaging to the Keelings name, and our customers and other stakeholders'. 'There was no going back. I asked Rudolf did he think he made a mistake. He was quite happy in what he said and did,' he said. Asked whether he was aware of the allegations Mr Csikos had aired about his working hours, Mr Morrissey said he didn't 'get into it', but said he believed Mr Csikos had referred to the posts as a protected disclosure. Lauren O'Brien, head of people for Keelings Logistics, said at an earlier hearing in the case last week that she was 'concerned' after seeing the first post, which the tribunal heard Mr Csikos posted on LinkedIn at the end of October 2024. 'It was seriously defamatory to several ex-colleagues, accusing us of being responsible for the deaths of two colleagues,' Ms O'Brien said. At a hearing on Thursday, the company investigation officer, Damien O'Brien, noted in his report that Mr Csikos continued to allege Keelings had broken the law and maintained his comments 'were not false' when they met on an unspecified date last year. He quoted Mr Csikos as saying: 'How many more people need to die?' and said Mr Csikos was 'consistent that his beliefs are honestly held' and that it was 'not the first time he has raised these concerns'. Mr Csikos, cross-examining Mr O'Brien, asked: 'Why did he not say that Keelings is keeping according to the law and is making progress to keep the law and do things according to the regulations?' Mr O'Brien replied: 'My objective was to investigate the two posts.' Mr Dalton said: '[Mr Csikos] is claiming two workers died. That's not something [the witness] could exercise any role in.' Mr Csikos said: 'In my opinion, it was that if the working hours are breached and the health and safety regulations are breached, we can draw a conclusion.' 'We have no conclusion on that, and that doesn't follow, because [Mr Csikos] is not medically qualified. We have no evidence that there's a correlation between the [alleged] breach and what he says has happened. He may speculate, and he may have an opinion. He cannot use this forum as an opportunity to make outlandish allegations,' Mr Dalton said. Mr Dalton said the matter was at an 'impasse' without further submissions being made to him about the company's working time records. He adjourned the matter and said he would seek a further hearing date in July. In addition to the original Organisation of Working Time Act claim, Mr Csikos's further complaints are under the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973, the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 and the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 against the company, arising from his dismissal.
