Sen. Joni Ernst sparks crowd's anger with ‘we all are going to die' response to Medicaid cut questions
Republican Sen. Joni Ernst was met with shouts and groans when she said 'we all are going to die' as she addressed potential changes to Medicaid eligibility at a town hall in north-central Iowa on Friday.
She had been consistent in her message throughout the contentious forum at a high school in Parkersburg, Iowa, as she defended the tax and immigration package that has passed the House and is now under consideration in the Senate.
Facing several constituents concerned about cuts to Medicaid, she defended the $700 billion in reduced spending, saying it would keep immigrants in the U.S. illegally and those who have access to insurance through their employers off the rolls.
Advertisement
Sen. Joni Ernst was met with shouts and groans when she said 'we all are going to die' when citing the potential changes that could be made to Medicaid eligibility at an Iowa town hall Friday.
IB Photography – stock.adobe.com
Then someone in the crowd yelled that people will die without coverage.
'People are not … well, we all are going to die,' Ernst said, drawing groans.
Advertisement
'So, for heaven's sakes. For heaven's sakes, folks.'
'What you don't want to do is listen to me when I say that we are going to focus on those that are most vulnerable,' Ernst went on.
'Those that meet the eligibility requirements for Medicaid we will protect.'
House Republicans last week muscled through the massive spending and tax cut package, dubbed 'the big, beautiful bill' at the urging of President Donald Trump, by a single vote.
Advertisement
Ernst had the forum held at a high school in Parkersburg, Iowa, while she also defended the tax and immigration bill that had passed the House and is now under consideration in the Senate.
WAAY 31 News
It now moves to the Senate.
Ernst made clear Friday that any measure that emerges from the Senate will look different from the House version.
Republicans have defended the new work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents and stepped up eligibility verification, saying the generated savings will sustain the program for vulnerable populations.
Advertisement
Democrats warn that millions of Americans will lose coverage.
A preliminary estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the proposals would reduce the number of people with health care by 8.6 million over the decade.
Video of Ernst's comment started making the rounds among Democrat elected officials and candidates. Ernst is up for reelection in 2026.
'This morning, Joni Ernst said the quiet part out loud:' Republicans do not care 'about whether their own constituents live or die as long as the richest few get richer,' said Ken Martin, chair of the Democratic National Committee, in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Legislature bumps right up against midnight deadline as they pass $55 billion budget
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (NEXSTAR) — It was a race against the clock as lawmakers tried to pass a budget package before the midnight deadline. Ultimately, they were able to get it done, getting the three branches of the budget package passed minutes before the start of June. The budget includes $55.2 Billion dollars in spending, and is balanced using just over one billion dollars in new tax increases. Democrats will also move money out of certain funds — like the road repair fund — to help fill some gaps in the budget. Ultimately, it's the same level of spending the governor proposed during his February budget address. Budget leaders warned of problems to come from potential federal cuts. 'This is a balanced budget,' Lead House Budgeteer Robyn Gabel said. 'This is a compassionate budget. This is a budget where we are planning and preparing for what we are afraid will be disastrous,' The budget fully funds the K-12 education obligation, but it will put a pause on a property tax relief grant program that was associated with K-12 funding. It only gave higher education a 1% increase instead of the 3% originally proposed. There is a significant cut to the number of state funded care hours that developmentally disabled people living in group homes get from the state. Experts in the field said the cut would amount to just over one less hour of care per person, per week. It also cuts the program which gives non citizens between the ages of 42 to 64 access to state sponsored health care. The version of the program for non citizens over the age of 65 is getting 110 million dollars to keep operating. Democrats went into budget negotiations having to fill a multi-billion dollar projected deficit, and they made a point of saying they would address potential cuts coming from Congress and the Trump Administration. Senate leaders said they did it without 'broad based tax increases.' 'There are no broad based tax increases in this budget,' Lead Senate Democrat Budgeteer Elgie Sims said. 'It's not an increase in the in the individual or corporate income tax increase. What you'll see is there are there's a recognition that there are there are we try to make sure that individuals pay their fair share and the corporations who are the most prosperous but most profitable also pay their fair share.' Instead, the budget will rely on a mixture of one-time revenue streams like tax amnesty programs and increases in certain 'sin taxes' on the sale of cigarettes and vapes, and sports bets. 'Pass taxes, crush people to the point where they want to leave our state or support the working men and women of Illinois?' Senator Chapin Rose (R-Mahomet) said during People are going to go packing, and my guess is they are going to send you guys packing.' Republicans were vehemently opposed to the budget, and they were incredibly frustrated with the process, as the full description of the proposed revenue plan did not come out until well into Saturday afternoon. 'They're going to pass it through the House and pass it through the Senate in less than 9 hours,' Senate Minority Leader John Curran (R-Lemont) said before the vote. 'That lack of transparency alone and that lack of being up with the people of Illinois should be more than enough reason for Governor Pritzker to veto.' The budget negotiations were slowed even further, as a totally separate revenue package full of tax increases was attached to the public transit reform legislation. In order to solve Chicago public transit's looming fiscal disasters and get downstate public transit systems the money to build out services further, Senator Ram Villivalam included a new delivery tax — referred to as an Environmental Impact Fee in the bill. The new tax would have charged a steady $1.50 Fee to all deliveries in the state, excluding deliveries of only medicine or groceries. They also considered a new rideshare tax on companies like Lyft and Uber in the transit fix. But the wheels fell off of transit talks, and the proposals did not pass. Ultimately, democrats were able to get the budget done, but there are still plenty of questions left to answer as they go into the summer. There is the possibility lawmakers come back later in the summer to address potential federal cuts, and that became even more likely now that they did not pass any form of transit reform. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Derrick Van Orden and Green Bay Packers can't just change rules to win
While reading the story about U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden wanting to eliminate spring elections in Wisconsin because the GOP candidates keep losing, I couldn't help but think of the parallels between that story and the desire by the Packers to eliminate the tush push from NFL games ('Van Orden calls to end spring elections, May 23 and 'Packers' proposal fails, as 'tush push' stays,' May 22). Both have the same approach: Can't win? Don't work harder to find a way to win, just change the rules. Whether it's gerrymandering districts, eliminating the Government Accountability Board, changing voter ID requirements or attempting to make drop boxes illegal, it's clear the Wisconsin GOP will stop at nothing to keep or regain power. No buts about it. David Standridge, New Berlin Letters: Republican Party and President Trump are becoming our country's biggest bullies Opinion: Rising housing costs could be pricing people out of college in Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden wants to change the rules again ('Van Orden calls to end spring elections,' May 23). Instead, he should be changing his party's platform to match what the majority in Wisconsin wants. We've seen all sorts of underhanded tactics from the Republicans to keep their stranglehold on the state — gerrymandering, limiting the use of drop boxes and early voting and also limiting the governor's power. Van Orden and other leaders need to realize that the purpose of their position isn't about holding onto power, it's about serving others, and by others I mean everyone. David Mancl, West Allis Here are some tips to get your views shared with your friends, family, neighbors and across our state: Please include your name, street address and daytime phone. Generally, we limit letters to 200 words. Cite sources of where you found information or the article that prompted your letter. Be civil and constructive, especially when criticizing. Avoid ad hominem attacks, take issue with a position, not a person. We cannot acknowledge receipt of submissions. We don't publish poetry, anonymous or open letters. Each writer is limited to one published letter every two months. All letters are subject to editing. Write: Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 330 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI, 53202. Fax: (414)-223-5444. E-mail: jsedit@ or submit using the form that can be found on the on the bottom of this page. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Van Orden's proposal to end spring elections is power grab | Letters
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Clarence Page: Hey, men, Democrats want your votes. They really do.
Where are the Democrats? What are they doing about the damage President Donald Trump is doing to … everything? I hear that a lot from my liberal friends these days, ever since Trump swept the battleground states six months ago and proceeded to dismantle government as we Americans used to know it. With the fury of a man who is trying to make up for the time he lost on the sidelines after losing to Democrat Joe Biden, Trump has been rolling out radical changes almost daily that seem to be aimed at retribution — one of his favorite words — more than decent governance. In the face of the onslaught, Democrats sound about as depressed as the party's approval ratings — 27% in a recent NBC News poll. That's the party's lowest positive rating in the network's polling data since 1990. Only 7% say their support is 'very positive.' Throwing more salt into their wounds is the simmering discontent among the party's core constituencies, upon whom the party has come to count for decades: young people, Black voters and Latinos, in particular. Trump made notable gains with these voters, a trend that — unlike 2016 — included Trump's winning the popular vote for the first time. Self-identified Democratic voters say by a 2-to-1 margin in the NBC poll that they would rather see their party 'hold the line on their positions, even if it leads to gridlock,' instead of looking for areas of compromise to, as the old Capitol Hill saying goes, get things done. As a self-described moderate liberal, I'm dismayed but not surprised by that angst-driven reaction. Trump's slash-and-burn approach to reform — on issues as varied as immigration enforcement to Medicaid to Veterans Affairs and COVID-19 shots, just for starters, will take a strong pushback just to land somewhere near the ever-elusive sensible center. Where are the Dems now? Of particular interest this time around, the party is trying to woo young men — diligently. The harsh Democratic reality includes downward long-term trends for Democrats while Republicans have been gaining ground in recent decades, particularly among noncollege graduates. Working-class voters have been turning away from the Democrats, long viewed as the party for working families but increasingly perceived as the party of college-educated 'elites.' Which leads us to the most significant new moves by the Dems' donor class and strategists: a $20 million 'strategic plan' called 'Speaking with American Men,' or SAM for short. That's right, guys. Like an old Uncle Sam poster, today's Democrats want you! Perhaps more than ever. The decline of men and concomitant rise of women in Democratic voting ranks has been observed for decades and is not expected to change drastically soon. Democratic pollsters are advising the party leaders to avoid taking the wrong lessons from the 2026 midterms, when many of them hope President Trump's excesses will backfire in favor of the Dems. That's wise. Trump's successes, including his victory last year, have tended to be larger than expected after the Democrats underestimated his popularity. As Anat Shenker-Osorio, a Democratic consultant told The New York Times, 'Voters are hungry for people to actually stand up for them — or get caught trying.' In other words, she said, 'The party is doing a lot of naval-gazing and not enough full-belly aching.' I, too, have heard that lament, particularly from Democrats in cities like Chicago who remember an era when the party seemed less concerned with trying to sound polite and more concerned with delivering the goods to its constituents. That's especially important at times like these when funding cuts for research, veterans and health care, among other issues, can mean life and death for them. Scott Galloway, a marketing professor at NYU and a prominent commentator, has gained a measure of fame for his speeches and research on the feeling of abandonment by the Dems that has been a major turnoff for the audience of the so-called 'Manosphere' of male podcasting. He argues that the party's focus on other demographics, like women voters, is important, but has fed a feeling of neglect and abandonment among young men. This development caught little attention in the era before podcasting. But today's electorate, like the news, is not what it used to be. Democrats will have to keep up with changing times before the party's candidates are overwhelmed by them.
