logo
‘Andor': Understanding the politics of sexual violence in ‘Star Wars' and its backlash from fans

‘Andor': Understanding the politics of sexual violence in ‘Star Wars' and its backlash from fans

The Hindu24-04-2025

A curious phenomenon has always plagued the Star Wars fandom. It's this frustrating reverence for rebellion and the fantasy of resistance neatly repackaged for family-friendly consumption without the stomach for reality. But in the third episode of Andor's second season, showrunner Tony Gilroy commits an act more transgressive than anything we've witnessed so far from this galaxy far, far away, by making fascism cross the line and exposing it for how systemic, grotesque, and gendered, it always has been.
The scene in question involves Adria Arjona's Bix Caleen, a woman already brutalised by the Empire in season one, cornered once more by a predatory Imperial Lieutenant Krole. He offers her freedom in exchange for sex, and when she resists, he attempts to take what he wants by force. She kills him in self-defence. 'He tried to rape me,' she screams, and the word is finally spoken aloud in a franchise that had relegated it to subtext in the galaxy's coded vocabulary of oppression until now.
Then, almost predictably, came the backlash. For some viewers, this was a bridge too far — as if genocide, torture, slavery, and child murder were within the acceptable bounds of imperial evil and sexual violence somehow exceeded the mythic palette. 'It has no place in Star Wars. Period. Unnecessary,' read one viral post. 'Vader wouldn't tolerate that s**t nor does the Empire condone it'. The irony of invoking Anakin Skywalker's iconic masked war criminal who strangled subordinates for sport and once slaughtered a room full of children as some sort of galactic HR enforcer is of course almost too rich to parody.
SA in SW feels unnecessary. You can portray power dynamics and making the audience hate the empire in other ways without taking it to such a disgusting place.
Vader wouldn't tolerate that shit nor does the Empire condone it.
It has no place in Star Wars. Period. Unnecessary. — StarWarsTheory (@realswtheory) April 23, 2025
What these criticisms seem to reveal isn't simply discomfort with the act itself but a willful misunderstanding of the Empire itself. Fascism, historically or otherwise, is invasive, bureaucratic, and yes, it is often sexually violent.
Gilroy seemed to have anticipated the pushback. 'The history of civilisation, there's a huge arterial component of it that's rape,' he told The Hollywood Reporter. 'All of us who are here — we are all the product of rape.' It's a staggering admission for a Disney-backed storyteller, but also an honest one. Gilroy's Empire is systemically evil and is far from interested in giving us fascists with boundaries who politely abstain. 'I mean, armies and power throughout history [have committed rape]. So to not touch on it, in some way… it just was organic and it felt right.'
What Gilroy understands, and what many fans refuse to reckon with, is that sexual violence is not an aberration of war; rather, the logic of power taken to its inevitable, fleshly conclusion. Yet, amid the disbelief, a barrage of infantilised fans clutch their lightsabers and argue canon over consequence. For them, the Empire can enslave but not rape. Jabba can chain Leia to his throne in a bikini, but say the word aloud and the illusion shatters, as though Star Wars has always been a bloodless, ahistorical fantasy free of the grim textures of real-world power. What they truly object to is not the act itself, but its clarity, and that kind of cognitive dissonance feels dangerously naive.
It's also deeply privileged. Because, for countless women crossing borders, surviving war zones, or living under suffocating regimes, what happens to Bix is routine. To ignore that reality, even in the context of speculative fiction, is to perpetuate the silence that survivors have long been forced to live within. What Andor achieves in just one very necessary scene is not gratuitous trauma, but fidelity to lived realities. It's bold enough to enquire what it actually means to live under occupation and demonstrates the mechanics of how evil operates and preys on the powerless.
To depict this is not to sully the franchise. It is to elevate and stretch its familiar mythology into terrain that reflects the complexities of the real world. Andor is the first time Star Wars has truly asked: what does resistance cost? For Mon Mothma, it's her daughter. For Bix, it's her body. For embittered fans watching, it might just be the comfort of pretending that evil comes without violation.
Perhaps that's what some fans truly mourn. Not the supposed loss of innocence in the franchise, but rather the loss of their insulation from reality. They came for pew-pew space battles and got a mirror reflecting something that made them wince.
To those squirming in their seats, good. In some imagined, syntax-challenged wisdom of Master Yoda: 'Discomfort the enemy is not. The teacher, it is.' When it's firing on all cylinders, Star Wars was never just a bedtime story about hope. It was also about the machinery that hope has to claw its way through. If Andor has the guts to call that machinery by its true name, then it isn't 'too political' or 'woke'. It's just finally doing what Star Wars has always promised but seldom delivered throughout its PG-13 existence — telling the truth, no matter how much it burns going down. After all, the galaxy was never that far, far away.
New episodes of Andor stream every Wednesday on JioHotstar

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hollywood Vs AI: What is Midjourney? Here's all details about Disney and NBCUniversal suit against AI firm over copyright infringement
Hollywood Vs AI: What is Midjourney? Here's all details about Disney and NBCUniversal suit against AI firm over copyright infringement

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Hollywood Vs AI: What is Midjourney? Here's all details about Disney and NBCUniversal suit against AI firm over copyright infringement

Two major studios have taken legal action against an AI firm. Disney and NBCUniversal have filed a lawsuit against Midjourney. They claim the AI company used their copyrighted characters without approval. Studios File Federal Lawsuit On Tuesday, Disney and NBCUniversal filed a copyright infringement lawsuit. The case was filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California. The lawsuit focuses on Midjourney, an AI image tool. The studios allege that Midjourney created and displayed many images copied from their copyrighted works. These images were available through Midjourney's website and shared with paying users. Unauthorized Image Generation The studios said they contacted Midjourney earlier to stop these actions. But the company continued to update its image service. New versions of the tool reportedly produced clearer images. Many of these images resembled characters owned by Disney and NBCUniversal. The lawsuit claims that these actions violate copyright laws. Also Read: Stellar Blade PC Version: How to pre-order game? Here's release date, platform, specifications, PC requirements and more What is Midjourney? Midjourney, an AI image generator , allows users to type image descriptions. The AI then produces pictures in seconds. It is one of the most widely used text-to-image tools and has numerous users. Subscriptions start at $10 per month. Its highest-tier plan costs $120. The service had around $300 million in revenue last year. It had 21 million users by September 2024. Disney and NBCU believe this success came by using protected content. Live Events Copyright Concerns The lawsuit includes examples of characters, such as Deadpool, Spider-Man, Darth Vader, Elsa, Olaf, Buzz Lightyear, Shrek, and more. The companies argue that Midjourney has not paid for the right to use these images. They also stress that using copyrighted content without permission affects the creative industry. They say AI must follow the same laws as other technology. Also Read: Call of Duty: Is Warzone going to shut down after Black Ops 7? Here's all about Blackout 2 rumors Studios Demand Accountability Disney and NBCUniversal say Midjourney has copied their work and distributed it without payment. They want the court to stop the company from using their intellectual property . The studios believe this case is part of a larger issue. They say protecting copyright is important to support creative work in the US. FAQs What is Disney and NBCUniversal's main claim against Midjourney? They claim Midjourney used their copyrighted characters without permission to create and share images through its AI platform. Why is this lawsuit important for the entertainment industry? It raises concerns about AI tools using copyrighted material without consent, which could affect the creative economy and copyright law enforcement.

Major movie studios join fight against AI as Disney, Universal sue image-generator Midjourney
Major movie studios join fight against AI as Disney, Universal sue image-generator Midjourney

First Post

time4 hours ago

  • First Post

Major movie studios join fight against AI as Disney, Universal sue image-generator Midjourney

The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, alleges that Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorised copies' of their iconic characters read more Disney and Universal have launched the first copyright lawsuit by major studios against artificial intelligence. Reuters Disney and Universal have filed a copyright lawsuit against the popular artificial intelligence (AI) image-generator Midjourney. This marks the first time major Hollywood companies have entered the legal battle over generative AI. Copyright infringement claims The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, alleges that Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorised copies' of their iconic characters, such as Darth Vader from Star Wars and the Minions from Despicable Me. The studios described Midjourney as a 'quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism,' stating that piracy remains piracy, regardless of whether the infringing content is created by AI or other technologies. Additionally, the studios claimed that the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to implement technological measures to prevent such image generation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Midjourney's counter In a 2022 interview with AP, Midjourney CEO David Holz likened his image-making service to a 'search engine' that pulls in a wide array of images from across the internet. He compared the copyright concerns surrounding the technology to how such laws have evolved alongside human creativity. Holz argued that just as individuals can learn from others' pictures to create similar works, AI systems should be afforded the same consideration. Growing frustration against AI developers Major AI developers generally do not disclose their data sources, maintaining that the use of publicly accessible online text, images, and other media to train their systems is protected under the 'fair use' doctrine of American copyright law. The studios' lawsuit joins a growing number of legal actions against AI platform developers, including OpenAI and Anthropic, in both San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first significant copyright trial involving the generative AI industry is currently underway in London, with Getty Images challenging the artificial intelligence company Stability AI. With inputs from agencies

Disney, Universal sue image creator Midjourney for copyright infringement
Disney, Universal sue image creator Midjourney for copyright infringement

Economic Times

time4 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Disney, Universal sue image creator Midjourney for copyright infringement

Disney and Universal sued Midjourney, alleging its AI image generator illegally replicates iconic characters like Darth Vader and Shrek. Calling it a 'bottomless pit of plagiarism,' the studios seek an injunction and damages, claiming Midjourney used their copyrighted works to train and monetise its tool. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Walt Disney and Comcast's Universal filed a copyright lawsuit against Midjourney on Wednesday, calling its popular AI-powered image generator a "bottomless pit of plagiarism" for its use of the studios' best-known suit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios, making and distributing without permission "innumerable" copies of characters such as Darth Vader from "Star Wars," Elsa from "Frozen," and the Minions from "Despicable Me".The studios claim the San Francisco company rebuffed their request to stop infringing their copyrighted works or, at a minimum, take technological measures to halt the creation of these AI-generated the studios argue, Midjourney continued to release new versions of its AI image service that boast higher quality infringing recreates animated images from a typed request, or the suit filed by seven corporate entities at the studios that own or control copyrights for the various Disney and Universal Pictures film units, the studios offered examples of Midjourney animations that include Disney characters, such as Yoda wielding a lightsaber, Bart Simpson riding a skateboard, Marvel's Iron Man soaring above the clouds and Pixar's Buzz Lightyear taking image generator also recreated such Universal characters as "How to Train Your Dragon's" dragon, Toothless, the green ogre "Shrek," and Po from "Kung Fu Panda.""By helping itself to plaintiffs' copyrighted works, and then distributing images (and soon videos) that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters -- without investing a penny in their creation -- Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism," the suit alleges."Midjourney's infringement is calculated and willful."Disney and Universal asked the court for a preliminary injunction, to prevent Midjourney from copying their works, or offering its image- or video-generation service without protections against infringement. The studios also seek unspecified suit alleges Midjourney used the studios' works to train its image service and generate reproductions of their copyrighted characters. The company, founded in 2021 by David Holz, monetizes the service through paid subscriptions and generated $300 million in revenue last year alone, the studios is not the first time Midjourney has been accused of misusing artists' work to train their AI systems.A year ago, a California federal judge found that 10 artists behind a copyright infringement suit against Midjourney, Stability AI and other companies had plausibly argued these AI companies had copied and stored their work on company servers, and could be liable for using it without ruling allowed the lawsuit over the unauthorized use of images to proceed. It is in the process of a 2022 interview with Forbes, CEO Holz said he built the company's database by performing "a big scrape of the Internet."Asked whether he sought consent of the artists whose work was covered by copyright, he responded, "there isn't really a way to get a hundred million images and know where they're coming from."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store