Health roadmap shows declines in Wayne County teen birth rates, drug overdoses, deaths
Wayne County residents are experiencing better overall health and well-being compared to the Ohio and national averages, according to the 2024 County Health Rankings & Roadmaps report.
The report is a nationwide analysis conducted by the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
The county shows lower rates of smoking, obesity and premature death compared to Ohio and national averages, and its residents benefit from strong community conditions that contribute to overall wellness.
The percentage of adult smokers in Wayne County is 17%, compared to 20% in Ohio and 16% nationwide, according to the report.
Notable improvements include a significant decrease in teen birth rates and a reduction in drug overdose deaths.
While specific numbers for Wayne County were not available, Ohio's teen birth rate stands at 15.4 births per 1,000 females aged 15-19, slightly higher than the national average of 13.9 births per 1,000, according to the CDC.
Statewide, unintentional drug overdose deaths fell by 9% in 2023, outpacing the 2% national decline, according to state data.
Wayne County has fewer primary care physicians per resident than the state and national averages, and mental health concerns persist, with residents reporting slightly more poor mental health days than the Ohio average.
The county has a population-to-primary-care-physician ratio of 2,500 resident to one physician, significantly higher than Ohio's 1,330 residents to one doctor, and the national ratio of 1,310:1, highlighting a shortage of providers in the area.
Wayne County residents report an average of 5.4 poor mental health days per month, compared to 5.1 days in Ohio and 4.7 days nationally.
Health Commissioner Nicholas V. Cascarelli said population health is more than what happens in a doctor's office.
'We have a really good built environment conducive to healthy lifestyles,' he said. 'But that's not to say we're without our issues.'
According to Cascarelli, the county's lower rate of premature deaths has been aided by a decline in overdose fatalities, but obesity remains a concern.
Premature death, measured as years of potential life lost before age 75, averages 7,200 years per 100,000 people in Wayne County, compared to 8,500 in Ohio and 7,300 nationwide.
'Adult obesity still continues to contributes to years of life lost,' he said.
The adult obesity rate in Wayne County is 35%, compared to 34% in Ohio and 32% nationwide, according to the Roadmaps report.
Wayne County, classified as a micropolitan area, has a population of 116,510, with 55.8% of residents living in low-population-density areas.
The rural environment plays a role in shaping health outcomes, with access to green spaces, lower pollution levels and community-driven initiatives contributing to positive trends.
"We always encourage people to eat right, stay active, and get vaccinated when appropriate. If you need to work on something, don't try to make wholesale changes overnight, incremental improvements are more sustainable.' Cascarelli said.
Known as the social determinants of health, the factors include education, employment, income, housing stability and community resources.
Wayne County's population also differs demographically from the state average. Below is a comparison:
Wayne County
Ohio
% Below 18 Years of Age
23.8%
21.9%
% 65 and Older
19.5%
18.7%
% Female
50.0%
50.7%
% American Indian or Alaska Native
0.2%
0.3%
% Asian
1.1%
2.8%
% Hispanic
2.5%
4.8%
% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0.1%
0.1%
% Non-Hispanic Black
1.6%
12.9%
% Non-Hispanic White
93.1%
76.7%
% Disability: Functional Limitations
30%
31%
% Not Proficient in English
1%
1%
Children in Single-Parent Households
11%
26%
% Rural
55.8%
23.7%
Population
116,510
11,785,935
The Wayne County Health Department has taken steps to improve community well-being, partnering with Wooster and Orrville on projects such as park improvements and a farmers market in Orrville. It also provides immunization services and operates as a hub for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).
Collaborations between Wooster and Orrville have led to programs aimed at improving local parks and launching a new farmers market, expanding access to recreational activities and fresh, healthy foods, the health commissioner said.
Cascarelli advised residents to focus on preventative health measures, including staying active, eating a balanced diet and keeping up with vaccinations.
'People need to listen more to their physicians,' he said. 'They're there for your best interest, just as the health department is here for the entire community's well-being.'
This article originally appeared on The Daily Record: Population Health Institute study shows Wayne numbers improving
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Onion
an hour ago
- The Onion
CDC Publishes Female Body Hair Guidelines
ATLANTA—Stressing that the rules were formulated for the safety of all Americans, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new guidelines Thursday governing female body hair. 'Effective immediately, women nationwide are advised to remove all hair from arms, legs, underarms, and genital areas or suffer the legal consequences,' said CDC spokesperson Jamie Reardon, stressing that failure to comply with the newly issued weekly waxing schedule for women 18 and over would result in a $50 fine for every hair spotted that was over a millimeter long. 'Even so much as a thin landing strip or faint peach fuzz on the cheeks should be reported to authorities. That is, unless the woman in question has written approval from a male family member. But why would they do that? It's true that body hair doesn't cause diseases, per se. But it does look very gross.' This reportedly represents the first significant revisions to U.S. female body hair guidelines since 1977, when CDC director David Sencer urged all women to grow a full and unapologetic bush.
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
RFK Jr. Purges CDC's Vital Vaccine Advisory Committee
On Monday afternoon, the head of HHS enacted a "clean sweep" of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is continuing his ideological purge of the federal government. The Health and Human Services Secretary just terminated all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)—the outside experts who help steer the country's vaccine policies. Kennedy announced the firings late Monday afternoon in an editorial published by the Wall Street Journal. He argued that by 'retiring' the ACIP's current members, he would restore the public's trust in vaccines. However, RFK Jr. himself has long overexaggerated the dangers of vaccination, and experts worry that he will stock the ACIP with anti-vaccination proponents. 'Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines…trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives,' said Bruce Scott, president of the American Medical Association, in a statement provided to Gizmodo. 'With an ongoing measles outbreak and routine child vaccination rates declining, this move will further fuel the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses.' The ACIP is a panel of outside experts assembled by the CDC. Their recommendations, formally adopted by the CDC, greatly influence which vaccines are routinely provided to the public. States often mandate that children receive vaccines universally recommended by the ACIP, such as the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, before they can enter public school, for instance. Insurance plans are also typically required to cover ACIP-recommended vaccines without any cost-sharing. For two decades, RFK Jr. has regularly misrepresented the evidence on vaccine safety and other important health issues. And it didn't take long for him to signal that he would undermine the country's vaccine policies. In his opening speech as the head of HHS in mid-February, Kennedy stated that he would form a commission to investigate the childhood vaccine schedule as a potential culprit of chronic disease (no strong evidence supports a connection between the vaccine schedule and a population-level rise in chronic illness). Kennedy has previously argued that the ACIP's current and former members were rife with conflicts of interest, such as having received money from vaccine manufacturers. During the Senate committee hearings this January, for instance, he claimed that 97% of ACIP members had these conflicts—an unsurprisingly misleading claim. Kennedy was wrongly citing a 2009 report that found 97% of financial disclosure forms from people on advisory committees in 2007 had at least one error or omission, such as missing dates. Kennedy's latest WSJ editorial correctly describes the 97% statistic, though he still appears to imply these omissions are largely undeclared financial conflicts (the 2009 report found that 15% of members did not comply with ethics requirements during their committee stints). Aside from eliding the truth about the ACIP's ethical standards, Kennedy seems to have outright broken his promise to Senator Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana) that he would 'maintain' the ACIP without changes—a promise that secured Cassidy's pivotal tiebreaker vote in early February to further his nomination through the Senate. On a X post late Monday, Cassidy acknowledged many people's fears that the ACIP will now 'be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion.' But Cassidy didn't acknowledge the broken promise, only stating that he would continue talking with Kennedy to 'ensure that this is not the case.' Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion. I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the — U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (@SenBillCassidy) June 9, 2025 Of course, there's little reason to believe that RFK Jr's antivax agenda will be meaningfully constrained by anyone in the government. He's already enacted a renewed investigation into the debunked link between vaccines and autism—an investigation that will be led by notorious vaccine skeptic David Geier. Kennedy and the Trump administration have also impeded the development of newer, possibly more effective vaccines for both flu and covid-19, and are attempting to place testing roadblocks that will make future vaccine approvals harder to secure.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
HHS justifies decision to stop recommending Covid shots during pregnancy with studies supporting the shots' safety
The Department of Health and Human Services is circulating a document on Capitol Hill to explain its decision to remove the Covid-19 vaccine recommendation for pregnant women — citing studies that largely found the shot is safe. The document, which HHS sent to lawmakers days before Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced his plan to fire the panel that advises the CDC on immunizations, says that studies have shown that women who got the vaccine during pregnancy had higher rates of various complications. And it claims that 'a number of studies in pregnant women showed higher rates of fetal loss if vaccination was received before 20 weeks of pregnancy,' footnoting a research paper on vaccination during pregnancy. But Dr. Maria P. Velez of McGill University, the lead author of one of the studies, told POLITICO in an email that 'the results of our manuscript were misinterpreted.' The 2023 study shows a slightly higher rate of miscarriages among women who were immunized against Covid-19 during their pregnancies. But, Velez said, that after adjusting for 'variables that can confound a crude association,' like 'age, rurality, neighbourhood income quintile, immigration status, comorbidity' and other factors that could affect the outcome, Canadian researchers found 'no association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and an increased risk of miscarriage.' Raw numbers don't account for significant differences among the groups being compared — such as underlying conditions and when during pregnancy the people were vaccinated, said Katelyn Jetelina, an epidemiologist who's consulted for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Scientists, including the Canadian researchers, use statistical methods to adjust for those factors, she said, which is how they determined the vaccine wasn't associated with miscarriage. In a statement, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon pointed to the raw study data, which showed a slightly higher rate of miscarriage in the first half of pregnancy for women who were vaccinated against Covid compared with those who weren't. 'The underlying data speaks for itself — and it raises legitimate safety concerns,' he said. 'HHS will not ignore that evidence or downplay early pregnancy loss.' Nixon added that HHS and the CDC encourage people to talk to their providers 'about any personal medical decision.' Vaccine researchers and obstetricians criticized the decision to remove the recommendation for pregnant women, and researchers cited in the HHS document largely dismissed any connection between Covid vaccination and miscarriages. 'Given that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is associated with serious maternal and neonatal morbidity, the current study can inform healthcare providers, pregnant women and those considering a pregnancy about the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in relation to miscarriage risk,' Velez and her co-authors wrote in the study. That research was based on health-system data from Ontario, Canada, and aligned with similar population studies in the U.S., Scotland and Norway. Similarly, HHS cited an April 2022 study in its document concerning mRNA vaccination in people undergoing in-vitro fertilization, which also found no adverse effects on conception rates or on early pregnancy outcomes. 'Administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines was not associated with an adverse effect on stimulation or early pregnancy outcomes after IVF,' the New York City-based researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Mount Sinai West hospital wrote in the study. 'Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in women who are trying to conceive.' The HHS document also includes an incorrect link for that study, instead leading to a different study — also cited in HHS' document — by Israeli researchers that found the vaccine 'appears to be safe during pregnancy,' with no increase in preterm labor or in newborns with low birth weight. That February 2022 study did note a possible increase in preterm birth rates for women vaccinated during the second trimester, and the authors suggested future investigations of outcomes based on the timing of immunization. HHS' assertion about significant risks to pregnant women 'contradicts the bulk of published studies,' said Dr. Paul Offit, an expert who has served as an outside adviser on vaccines to the FDA and the CDC. HHS deviated from past practice when it changed the Covid vaccine guidance last month, announcing the decision without the endorsement of an existing outside panel of expert advisers. Dr. Steven Fleischman, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told POLITICO at the time that he was disappointed by HHS' decision, and pointed to data showing that newborns can benefit from maternal antibodies from the vaccine for protection from Covid. 'In fact, growing evidence shows just how much vaccination during pregnancy protects the infant after birth, with the vast majority of hospitalized infants less than 6 months of age — those who are not yet eligible for vaccination — born to unvaccinated mothers,' Fleischman said.
