logo
Bay Area chefs nervously eye Trump tariffs as SF Restaurant Week kicks off

Bay Area chefs nervously eye Trump tariffs as SF Restaurant Week kicks off

Yahoo05-04-2025

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. - Bay Area food lovers have reason to celebrate. San Francisco Restaurant Week is back, bringing with it prix-fixe deals at some of the city's most celebrated eateries. But this year, for restaurateurs, the festivities come with a side of anxiety.
The backstory
A sweeping round of tariffs announced this week by the Trump administration has left many in the culinary industry scrambling to assess how rising import costs could affect their operations. For some, the impact could be minimal, but for others, it could be significant.
What they're saying
"Our suppliers have advised us to adjust our prices," said Tracy Goh, chef-owner of Damansara in San Francisco's Noe Valley.
"They are very apologetic about having to adjust theirs as well. It will definitely hurt me."
Goh's Malaysian restaurant sources key ingredients, like coconut milk, from overseas. Imports coming from Malaysia will now be taxed at 24%. Despite the challenges, Goh is focused on the present, and the additional diners Restaurant Week is expected to bring.
"I'm very excited to see some foot traffic," said Goh.
At Bombay Brasserie in Union Square, the kitchen is bustling as chefs prepare for the restaurant's first Restaurant Week service. The Indian restaurant, known for blending traditional flavors with French influences, is offering a special menu.
Across the city, meals being offered by participating eateries during SF Restaurant Week range from $10 brunches to $90 three-course dinners.
"These are the best times of the year, because of the best deals that you're getting," said Pulkesin Mohan, general manager at Bombay Brasserie and Taj Campton Place. "Usually these rates are not available."
Still, Mohan acknowledged the tariff concerns that are currently looming over the industry. Goods imported from India are currently slated to face a 26% tax. Fortunately, Mohan said much of the restaurant's ingredients are purchased locally.
"We are watching the tariffs very closely," said, Mohan. "Some of the prices might increase. Some might come down. But it's too early to say how things will eventually pan out."
The Golden Gate Restaurant Association, which organizes the annual event, is urging diners to show support during this uncertain time.
"It's a chance to get out there and try places that are new to you, but also visit some favorites," said Amy Cleary, spokesperson for the association.
As for the long-term impact of the tariffs, Cleary echoed the industry's cautious optimism.
"I think people are sort of in that wait-and-see moment," she said. "It's a major concern, but no one knows yet exactly how high prices will go or when the changes will take effect."
For now, Restaurant Week runs through next Sunday — and participating chefs are putting their best plates forward, tariffs or not.
SF Restaurant week runs through Sunday, April 13.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects
Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is coming under fire for seeking to rush through a major piece of legislation that grants cabinet sweeping powers to quickly approve major projects. Government House leader Steven MacKinnon put a motion on notice Thursday that would push Bill C-5 through the House of Commons by the end of next week — leaving just one day to hear from civil society groups, stakeholders and experts. Critics charge the move is anti-democratic. In a fiery exchange in question period, Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin accused Prime Minister Mark Carney of trying to "steamroll" a bill through the House that would greatly expand his own powers. "The prime minister has no right to impose C-5 under closure when the bill gives him exceptional powers unlike anything that we've seen before," she said in French. "Is that the prime minister's intention, to bypass Parliament and govern by decree like Donald Trump?' MacKinnon pushed back by saying "Canadians and Quebecers spoke loud and clear" in the last election for action to shore up the economy, in part due to the illegal trade war initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump. "We are acting in a democratic way," he said, noting the bill delivers on election promises laid out clearly in the Liberal platform. The bill includes controversial provisions that could allow cabinet to skirt existing processes and laws to fast-track approvals for projects the government deems to be in the national interest. The government aims to streamline disparate processes to limit approval timelines for big projects to a maximum of two years, boosting investor confidence. When asked about the timeline at a press conference Thursday, Energy Minister Tim Hodgson said the legislation needs to pass quickly to shore up an economy being undermined by Trump's tariffs. "We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadians' jobs are at risk. Canadians' livelihoods are at risk. And quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk," Hodgson said. But NDP MP Leah Gazan said in the House of Commons foyer Thursday that the bill isn't going to build the economy out because it will trigger a series of court challenges. She called on the government to extend the time frame of the public study and do more to consult with Indigenous Peoples — something she said got shortchanged in the bill. "I'm calling on the prime minister to slow it down, to not rush a bill that has this much consequence through in five days," she said. Hodgson pointed to support for the bill from the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, which represents more than 100 First Nations seeking to have their own projects advanced, and said he is consulting privately with stakeholders. "I can tell you I've got multiple conversations going on with different rights holders and business leaders as part of my department's efforts to ensure that consultation is robust," he said. Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty said there will be a meeting between the Prime Minister's Office and First Nations leaders, citing the wildfires as one reason it has been delayed. "I also want to acknowledge that because there are many communities in a critical state of wildfire and evacuation, that time will be taken to have that dialog," she said. "I know that it is the intention of the Prime Minister's Office to sit down with First Nation's leadership directly and to have the economic discussion and hear from them." But Anna Johnston, staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said the drive to push the bill through quickly is "incredibly concerning" because the government has done "very little engagement" so far on such a major piece of legislation. "The biggest concern is that it's going to give cabinet the power to approve projects before they have any information about them beyond what the proponent has decided to give the government," she said. "There's a reason why we have decisions at the end of environmental assessments and regulatory processes. It's so that governments can make informed decisions about projects that have the potential to harm Canadians and to harm the environment." Stuart Trew, a senior researcher with the left-leaning think tank Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said the bill is "destined to end up in court" and "really bump up against the government's commitments to reconciliation with First Nations." "It seems geared to let the government ram projects through, without adequate study, without all the usual considerations about the impacts on endangered species," he said. "We should raise our eyebrows any time a government claims a national emergency in order to rush through legislation with implications as significant as this does." The legislation also looks to break down internal trade barriers and make it easier for workers to take jobs in other provinces. MacKinnon rejected a call from the Bloc Québécois this week to split the landmark legislation in two. That would have allowed the House to speed through the less contentious internal trade provisions while putting the controversial major projects portion under the microscope. Carney has vowed repeatedly to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers by Canada Day, 19 days from now. The House has been sitting for just three weeks and is currently scheduled to rise next week on June 20. MacKinnon said in a scrum on Wednesday that he has not tried to get consensus from the other parties to have the House sit any later. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press

BPCE Is Nearing an Almost €7 Billion Deal for Novo Banco
BPCE Is Nearing an Almost €7 Billion Deal for Novo Banco

Bloomberg

time30 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

BPCE Is Nearing an Almost €7 Billion Deal for Novo Banco

Lone Star Funds has decided to pursue a sale of Portuguese lender Novo Banco SA and has entered into exclusive discussions with French banking group BPCE, according to people familiar with the matter. The US private equity firm and BPCE are working on finalizing terms of a deal, which could value Novo Banco at almost €7 billion ($8.1 billion), the people said. The move means an initial public offering of Novo Banco is likely off the table, the people said. An agreement may be announced as soon as Friday, though talks could still drag on longer, the people said.

Popular nationwide beauty chain files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
Popular nationwide beauty chain files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Miami Herald

time30 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Popular nationwide beauty chain files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The beauty industry has faced economic challenges and financial distress over the last five years since the Covid-19 pandemic temporarily derailed most retail industries. Companies have dealt with rising labor and product costs exacerbated by inflation, increased interest rates, cautious consumers who are watching their budgets in uncertain economic times, and fierce competition. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Some of the biggest names in the beauty business suffered from the Covid-19 fallout and filed for bankruptcy protection, including Revlon, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in June 2022, and Avon, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2024. Related: Popular local Dairy Queen rival files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Beauty technology company Cutera filed for a prepackaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 5, 2025, to reduce its debt by $400 million, and award-winning cosmetics company SBLA Beauty filed for Chapter 11 protection on March 11, 2025, to reorganize its business and restructure its debt. Also, telehealth company Hims & Hers Health shut down its acne treatment dermatology business, Apostrophe, also on March 7, 2025, after buying the San Francisco-based company four years ago for about $190 million. The company, however, did not file for bankruptcy protection. Hims & Hers transitioned away from the Apostrophe brand and encouraged patients to try its brand's treatment options, the company revealed on its website. Another skincare brand Futurewise Inc. revealed that it discontinued orders on its website beginning March 24, 2025. "Goodbye for now," the skincare brand wrote on its website. "After a lot of thought, we have made the hard decision to sunset Futurewise. Futurewise, which offered its skincare products Slug Boost, Slug Cream, Slug Balm, and Face Melt, for its "slugging" practice of skincare, also did not file for bankruptcy. In addition to skin care products, spa services for weight loss, non-surgical body improvements, slimming, and toning are also a major part of the beauty industry. One beauty service chain in Tuscaloosa, Ala., faced severe financial issues, filed for bankruptcy, and closed its business. Medical spa Body Oasis filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 6, 2024, and shut down all of its operations, reportedly leaving customers in limbo, ABC-33/40 News reported. Finally, national spa services chain Contour Spa LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to reorganize its business, facing significant debt obligations. Related: Huge auto parts company files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Orlando, Fla.-based company filed its petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida on June 11, while at least 23 affiliates filed their petitions the following day. More bankruptcy: Iconic auto repair chain franchise files Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular beer brand closes down and files Chapter 7 bankruptcyPopular vodka and gin brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The debtor listed $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities in its petition, including over $562,000 owed to Lanco Equities, over $344.000 owed to Kash Advance LLC, over $339,000 owed to Formentera Capital Group, over $377,000 owed to Liberta Funding LLC, and over $239,000 owed to American Express. The company has authorized CEO Roger A. Farwell to seek approval of a debtor-in-possession financing agreement, according to RK Consultants. Contour Spa offers its Cryo Slimming sessions using its slimming and toning protocols designed to reduce cellulite, tighten skin, achieve permanent fat loss, and minimize stretch marks. The spa service also offers its Cryo Facials, which can be obtained for free through its $99 introductory offer, according to its website. Related: Major trucking company files Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store