logo
Gary council overrides Melton veto on Beckman school development

Gary council overrides Melton veto on Beckman school development

Chicago Tribune07-05-2025

The Gary Common Council continued to greenlight plans for a development at the shuttered Alfred Beckman Middle School — even after the mayor expressed opposition.
Gary Mayor Eddie Melton vetoed an ordinance the council passed that allows for rezoning at the former school site. The ordinance allows the middle school to rezone from R2 residential to planned unit development, or PUD, and B3-1, which allows for shopping centers or large stores.
Melton addressed the rezoning on WLTH April 30, where he recapped his second State of the City address. Melton also went live on Facebook while he was on WLTH.
'I'll keep this simple, I didn't sign that ordinance when it passed,' Melton said. 'So, essentially, it has been pocket vetoed. If they want that to pass, the council will have to override that pocket veto.'
The council overrode Melton's veto in a 6-3 vote Tuesday night. Council members who voted against overriding the veto were President Lori Latham, D-1st; Dwayne Halliburton, D-2nd; and Myles Tolliver, D-at large.
Tolliver previously said his biggest concern with the development is that it would be in a residential area. Latham is a member of Gary Advocates for Responsible Development, a local activist group that has been outspoken in opposition to the project.
'GARD is concerned about sustainable economic development of the city as a whole and properties located in dense residential districts and is opposed to projects that would put those residents and neighborhoods' health, safety and viability at risk,' said a previous GARD statement.
Council members who voted to override the veto included Mary Brown, D-3rd; Marian Ivey, D-4th; Linda Barnes Caldwell, D-5th; Dwight Williams, D-6th; Darren Washington, D-at large; and Kenneth Whisenton, D-at large.
Brown and Whisenton have both previously expressed concerns about Gary's tax base and have said projects like this are the best way to help the city. Williams previously said he believes Gary needs more jobs to keep younger generations in the city.
Washington previously told the Post-Tribune that the city needs to look at its taxes, especially as communities start to see the effects of Indiana's property tax bill, Senate Enrolled Act 1.
On Tuesday night, Washington spoke about Melton's veto.
'I was a little set back and disappointed in Mayor Eddie Melton's comment on WLTH,' Washington said. 'I can speak for myself and for Linda Barnes Caldwell … we were not contacted about the mayor's disapproval of the Beckman project. (For) two and a half months, I contacted, left a message for the mayor, and never heard anything from the mayor about his disapproval.'
If Melton had expressed concerns before, Washington said it might have been a different result.
Washington has also asked for more communication between the council and Melton's administration, saying projects at abandoned schools won't happen without the council's approval on rezoning, and all council members need the same information.
'I want each councilperson to be able to know about each and every project that has been articulated by the administration, so we can make an accurate vote,' Washington said. 'I don't ask council members and tell council members how to vote. I ask council members to get all the information, and it is the responsibility of the administration to make sure that we have that information.'
Melton's administration was unable to immediately send a comment Wednesday.
The development previously received an unfavorable opinion from the Gary Rezoning department and plan commission. Corrie Sharp, primary contact for the Gary Rezoning department, met with developers to address project concerns, including building height and traffic in the area, according to Post-Tribune archives.
The final, updated ordinance included a new timeline for the project, with demolition within eight months, development must commence in 18 months, and the primary structure must be completed within three years of ordinance passage. The final ordinance also addressed traffic concerns, saying trucks must enter and exit off 22nd Avenue and leave 23rd Avenue open for car access.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can You Trust Anybody?
Can You Trust Anybody?

Wall Street Journal

time32 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Can You Trust Anybody?

Who can you trust anymore? Just before leaving office, President Biden railed against a 'tech-industrial complex' claiming, 'The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit.' Hmmm, was he referring to the coverup of his own health decline and the sharp-as-a-tack charade? Can we trust presidents? The press? Anyone? We're told to trust the process. Trust the system. Even trust the science. Trust always starts with a belief in truth and adds in a little integrity, reliability and character. Often, it's more faith than belief. Being trustworthy is the first attribute of Boy Scout Law. How quaint. We're told to trust 'experts.' I like to say, 'I trust them about as far as I can throw them.'

ABC News suspends correspondent over X post attacking Trump, Stephen Miller
ABC News suspends correspondent over X post attacking Trump, Stephen Miller

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

ABC News suspends correspondent over X post attacking Trump, Stephen Miller

ABC News on Sunday suspended a senior correspondent following a since-deleted social media post where he criticized White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and President Trump. Shortly after midnight on Sunday, senior national correspondent Terry Moran wrote on X that Miller is "richly endowed with the capacity for hatred." Moran continued, "He's a world-class hater." Moran also lambasted Mr. Trump, claiming his hatred is "only a means to an end, and that end [is] his own glorification." The post was removed early Sunday morning and Moran has not publicly said anything since. An ABC News spokesperson confirmed that the news division suspended Moran pending further evaluation of the incident. "ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others," the spokesperson said in a statement to CBS News. "The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards." The White House went on the offensive against Moran on Sunday, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt responding to Moran's comments, Sunday, calling it "unhinged and unacceptable." Miller posted on social media that Moran's "full public meltdown" shows that the "privileged anchors and reporters narrating and gatekeeping our society have been radicals adopting a journalist's pose." Vice President JD Vance also weighed in, calling Moran's post a "vile smear" on Miller and that it is "dripping with hatred." "As it happens, I know Stephen quite well," Vance continued. "And he's motivated by love of country. He's motivated by a fear that people like Terry Moran make rules that normal Americans have to follow, but well connected people don't." In April, Moran interviewed Mr. Trump in the president's first major broadcast appearance in his second term. Moran has been with ABC News since 1997, and has covered the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and the Iraq war. In December 2024, ABC News settled a defamation suit with Mr. Trump, agreeing to contribute $15 million to his presidential foundation and museum. The lawsuit, brought on by Mr. Trump, accused anchor George Stephanopoulos of acting with "malice or with a reckless disregard for the truth," for incorrectly reporting that a jury found Mr. Trump liable for rape in the E. Jean Carroll case, rather than sexual abuse. Mr. Trump is also suing CBS News accusing the news organization of election interference for "deceitful" editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 campaign. CBS News calls the claims "false. "

Why Elon Musk's Attack On Trump Might Be A Genius Move
Why Elon Musk's Attack On Trump Might Be A Genius Move

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

Why Elon Musk's Attack On Trump Might Be A Genius Move

Is Musk the next Kingmaker? To many watching, Elon Musk's decision to publicly insult President Trump seemed self-destructive, if not outright irrational. After all, Trump is not merely a political contender; he is the sitting President of the United States. And his administration holds the keys to massive government contracts awarded to Musk's companies, including Tesla, SpaceX, Starlink, and The Boring Company. From electric vehicle subsidies to multi-billion-dollar defense and aerospace deals, Musk's empire is deeply intertwined with Washington policy. So why provoke the President? Why risk alienating the one person who could shut off the federal faucet? At first glance, Musk's recent behavior—mocking Trump's persona and publicly undermining his hallmark tax bill—seems reckless. But what if it is not? While some of this may sound far-fetched, it is not without basis—and not without bias. With significant financial exposure to both Tesla and SpaceX, there is naturally a tendency among investors and observers alike to view Musk's actions as part of a broader strategic play rather than a misstep. It is a theory shaped by both market history and hope. And given Musk's repeated success turning volatility into advantage, it remains a plausible—if highly speculative—possibility. What if the world's richest man is executing a deliberate and calculated power move—not for short-term gain, but for long-term positioning? Consider the numbers. In late 2024 and early 2025, Musk reportedly spent over $300 million supporting Trump's return to the White House—through media platforms, political donations, and influence networks. That support may have helped secure Trump's narrow path to reelection. Within months of Trump's victory, Musk's net worth surged by over $150 billion—a staggering 500x return on his political 'investment.' Arguably, it was the fastest rise in personal net worth in recorded human history. That type of asymmetric gain does not happen by accident. It happens by design. And Musk is still only 53 years old—a young man by political standards. He has decades ahead of him, along with a seemingly endless stream of ideas, energy, and capital. He may not be eligible to run for President himself (as a naturalized citizen), but he is more than capable of shaping who does—and what ideas dominate the political conversation. Importantly, Musk now controls X (formerly Twitter), one of the most powerful social media platforms in the world. With it, he can shape narratives, amplify allies, and control the flow of political discourse at a scale no traditional media outlet can match. He also has virtually unlimited capital at his disposal—far beyond the reach of any political action committee or super PAC. In effect, Elon Musk could become the most influential political kingmaker of our era. And let us not forget: many have underestimated Musk before—and paid dearly. Short-sellers have repeatedly tried to bet against him, only to be humiliated. Tesla has suffered steep declines, but time and again, the stock has rebounded with explosive force, wiping out billions in short positions. Betting against Musk has become a high-risk proposition, bordering on financial self-destruction. He thrives in volatility. He welcomes chaos. And he has mastered the art of turning doubt into dominance. During his brief but highly publicized 'Spring Internship' in the White House, Musk likely absorbed far more than just headlines. He got a firsthand view of how political messaging is crafted, how power is distributed, and how influence is accumulated—not just through policy, but through provocation, platform control, and personal brand. And perhaps this is not personal—it is transactional. Musk left the White House with what many interpreted as a symbolic 'golden key': access, influence, and alignment. Yet, within days of departing, he turned sharply critical. This timing suggests not a spontaneous outburst, but a calculated pivot. Some speculate that Trump's decision to reject Musk's preferred candidate for NASA Administrator may have played a role. Others point to the fact that Tesla—despite leading the EV revolution—was excluded from new vehicle credits in Trump's proposed tax package. The omission could cost Tesla billions. Was Musk's shift ideological? Possibly. But more likely, it was about money and control. And Trump likely understands that. To be clear, President Trump is doing nothing wrong in this exchange. In fact, he has remained composed, focused on his policy agenda, and largely above the fray. He appears presidential. And perhaps he recognizes what others may not: the proverbial sandbox is plenty big for both of them. There is room in American politics for powerful forces to compete—and coexist. Critics may call Musk's approach erratic, but history has shown that he often plays the long game better than anyone. Maybe this public feud is not a mistake. Maybe it is a strategic play to build influence, control narratives, and shape the next decade of power and innovation. Maybe, just maybe—it is genius. -------------------------- Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please refer to the following link for additional disclosures: Additional Disclosure Note: The author has an affiliation with ERShares and the XOVR ETF. The intent of this article is to provide objective information; however, readers should be aware that the author may have a financial interest in the subject matter discussed. As with all equity investments, investors should carefully evaluate all options with a qualified investment professional before making any investment decision. Private equity investments, such as those held in XOVR, may carry additional risks—including limited liquidity—compared to traditional publicly traded securities. It is important to consider these factors and consult a trained professional when assessing suitability and risk tolerance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store