logo
Mainers deserve investment in our health and stability — not family separation

Mainers deserve investment in our health and stability — not family separation

Yahoo21-04-2025

Voces de la Frontera gather alongside allies in Milwaukee for a protest on May Day, 2021. (Photo by Isiah Holmes/Wisconsin Examiner)
Maine voters send our elected officials to Washington to solve problems — not make them worse. But Congress is moving forward with budget plans that would harm the health, stability, and well-being of Maine's families, aging residents, and immigrant communities. Fortunately, Sens. Susan Collins and Angus King and our representatives have the opportunity to reject these dangerous proposals and fund real solutions.
The proposals being advanced by Congress would slash funding for healthcare and food assistance that Mainers rely on and funnel billions into expanding the Trump administration's capacity to separate families and put immigrants in detention — severely compromising our communities' health, safety, and stability.
As the oldest state in the country, Maine communities rely on Medicaid and a strong healthcare system to stay healthy. More than 350,700 Mainers rely on Medicaid, which faces billions in budget cuts under these proposals. These cuts could cause devastating damage to our healthcare economy. Community health centers — serving 204,000 patients at 174 clinics across the state — would likely have to close their doors, costing over 2,200 jobs.
Our families also depend on food assistance, but the current budget proposals threaten to take it away. On top of the USDA cuts that pull food from the shelves of distributors like Good Shepherd Food Bank, Congress's proposals would sharply cut Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funding, which feeds over 172,200 — or one in eight — Maine residents.
While these budget plans make devastating cuts to programs that Maine's young and old depend on, they authorize Congress to allocate billions to separate families and uproot workers who call Maine home.
Immigrants are integral members of our state's communities, but Congress's budget proposals include up to $350 billion — potentially up to a half-trillion — to drastically expand the Trump administration's ability to detain and deport our immigrant neighbors. The administration's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency recently put out a request for proposal for new detention centers — potential contracts totaling up to $45 billion. The funding to pay for them would come directly from taxpayers.
The devastation from this inhumane investment would be felt most acutely by our families and economy. Over 20,500 children in Maine have at least one immigrant parent. As of 2023, nearly 53,450 immigrants live in Maine — and though they make up only 3.8% of the state's population, immigrant workers account for nearly 5% of the state's labor force, filling critical gaps as older generations retire. In 2023 alone, Maine's immigrant residents paid $625.8 million in taxes, contributing to the Medicare, Social Security, and other programs that Mainers depend on.
Instead of taking taxpayers' dollars away from healthcare and nutrition to fund family separation and tax breaks for the wealthy, Congress must invest in solutions that enhance the health, stability, and family unity of all Mainers. They should invest in less costly, more supportive services like legal representation that uphold the right to due process and help people navigate the immigration system without taking them away from their families, communities, and jobs. And they should maintain and support our nation's longstanding investment in healthcare and food assistance.
The stakes for our communities couldn't be higher, and the budget decisions made by Congress this spring will have long-lasting consequences. As Maine's members of Congress move forward with their debates on budget reconciliation, we urge them to remember this: the health and stability of our communities is in your hands; we send you to Washington to solve problems and deliver solutions that give every Mainer a fair shot at building a safe, healthy, and meaningful life.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's fresh White House portrait sparks interest amid controversy over National Portrait Gallery leadership
Trump's fresh White House portrait sparks interest amid controversy over National Portrait Gallery leadership

Fox News

time25 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump's fresh White House portrait sparks interest amid controversy over National Portrait Gallery leadership

Nearly six months into his second term, President Donald Trump has a new portrait posted to the White House website. White House officials posted an eight-second video to social media on Monday, showing the new portrait being hung on the wall at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House Campus. In his previous presidential portrait, which was unveiled just days before taking the oath of office for his second term, Trump could be seen wearing a blue suit coat, white button-up shirt and blue tie. The president showed no expression in the previous portrait, compared to an official portrait taken of him in 2017, in which he was smiling. In the portrait unveiled on Monday, Trump is wearing a blue suit coat, white button-up shirt and a red tie. In both images, he has an American Flag pinned to his coat. The president also shows little expression in the new portrait. White House officials told Fox News Digital the photo was taken by White House photographer Daniel Torok. As of Monday evening, the photo is hanging in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, and it will eventually start rolling out to other offices and federal buildings. Trump's new portrait was unveiled just days after he announced that he was firing Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery, for being a "strong supporter" of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). He announced Sajet's termination in a post on Truth Social on Friday afternoon. "Upon the request and recommendation of many people, I am hereby terminating the employment of Kim Sajet as Director of the National Portrait Gallery," the president wrote. "She is a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position. Her replacement will be named shortly. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" A White House official told Fox News Digital that Sajet had donated $3,982 to Democrats, including the presidential campaigns of former President Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton. Sajet also reportedly donated to other Democrats, including former Vice President Kamala Harris. The White House also pointed to the gallery's photo of Trump, which was curated by Sajet. The caption of the photo reads, "Impeached twice, on charges of abuse of power and incitement of insurrection after supporters attacked the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, he was acquitted by the Senate in both trials. After losing to Joe Biden in 2020, Trump mounted a historic comeback in the 2024 election. He is the only president aside from Grover Cleveland (1837-1908) to have won a nonconsecutive second term."

Jerome Powell To Step Down? X Abuzz With Rumors, But Polymarket Bettors Are Not Buying It
Jerome Powell To Step Down? X Abuzz With Rumors, But Polymarket Bettors Are Not Buying It

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jerome Powell To Step Down? X Abuzz With Rumors, But Polymarket Bettors Are Not Buying It

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Bettors on Polymarket were not convinced about Jerome Powell's exit as rumors circulated that the Federal Reserve Chair would step down on Monday. What Happened: The odds for the betting contract titled "Will Trump remove Jerome Powell in 2025?" remained unchanged at 12%, despite strong speculation on X regarding his resignation. According to the rules, the market will resolve to "Yes" if Powell ceases to be Fed Chair before Dec. 31. Over $838,000 has been wagered on this outcome as of this writing. Note that Polymarket, which operates on the Polygon (CRYPTO: POL) blockchain, is unavailable to U.S. residents due to regulatory restrictions. Trending: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Widely followed X handles have been amplifying rumors that Powell will resign on Monday, despite no evidence supporting this possibility yet. The Fed didn't immediately return Benzinga's request for comment. Why It Matters: These developments come days after President Donald Trump summoned Powell to the White House. Trump informed the central bank chief that he was making a "mistake" by not lowering interest rates. Powell maintained the Fed's independence, stating that monetary policy "will depend entirely on incoming economic information. The rates have been kept steady at 4.25% to 4.50% for the third consecutive meeting. Tensions between Trump and the central bank over the direction of interest rate policy have persisted. Trump has continuously called for further cuts, arguing that inflation is no longer a pressing issue. While Trump has taken potshots at Powell, he stated earlier that he had 'no intention' of firing the Fed Chair. Read Next: New to crypto? Get up to $400 in rewards for successfully completing short educational courses and making your first qualifying trade on Coinbase. A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: Sign up for the Gemini Credit Card today and earn rewards on Bitcoin Ether, or 60+ other tokens, with every purchase. Photo Courtesy: on Send To MSN: Send to MSN This article Jerome Powell To Step Down? X Abuzz With Rumors, But Polymarket Bettors Are Not Buying It originally appeared on

Donald Trump Shoots Down Rumor He Applied to Harvard
Donald Trump Shoots Down Rumor He Applied to Harvard

Newsweek

time32 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Shoots Down Rumor He Applied to Harvard

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump said Monday that it is "totally FALSE" that his administration's legal entanglements with Harvard University are connected to him not being admitted to the Ivy League university. Newsweek reached out to Harvard for comment via email Monday. Why It Matters Trump and his administration have cracked down on Ivy League institutions like Harvard and Columbia University since he took office in January, accusing the universities of perpetrating antisemitism by allowing pro-Palestinian student activism on campus. The Department of Homeland Security terminated nearly $3 million in grants to Harvard after the university defied a list of demands that included discontinuing its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, reforming student discipline policies and implementing a mask ban. The Trump administration also recently said it would pull the certification for Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), which allows the university to enroll international students. A judge issued a temporary restraining order to halt the new policy. What To Know "Michael Wolff, a Third Rate Reporter, who is laughed at even by the scoundrels of the Fake News, recently stated that the only reason I'm 'beating up' on Harvard, is because I applied there, and didn't get in," Trump wrote on Truth Social Monday. He continued: "That story is totally FALSE, I never applied to Harvard. I graduated from the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania. He is upset because his book about me was a total 'BOMB.' Nobody wanted it, because his 'reporting' and reputation is so bad!" While appearing on The Daily Beast's podcast last week, Wolff claimed that the president is targeting Harvard because he didn't get into the school. "It's also odd because so many of the people around Donald Trump went to Ivy League universities," Joanna Coles, Chief Content Officer and Creative officer for The Daily Beast and host of the outlet's podcast, said last week. "Several of them went to Harvard Business School. Obviously, JD Vance proudly went to Yale. So, it does seem particularly odd, but perhaps he's also trying to stuff it to them, too." "It's important ... not to lend too much calculation and planning to anything he does," Wolff replied. "But the other thing is that, by the way, he didn't get into Harvard." "Donald Trump didn't get into Harvard," Coles repeated. "You know, so one of the Trump things is always, you know, holding a grudge against the Ivy Leagues," Wolff said. Newsweek reached out to Wolff via his publisher, The Crown Publishing Group, by email Monday for comment. First Lady Melania Trump also recently shot down a rumor that the youngest Trump child, Barron Trump, applied to Harvard and was denied admission to the university. "Barron did not apply to Harvard, and any assertion that he, or that anyone on his behalf, applied is completely false," the first lady said in a statement to The Palm Beach Post. Barron Trump recently finished his freshman year at New York University's Stern School of Business. President Donald Trump can be seen arriving for a House Republican meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) President Donald Trump can be seen arriving for a House Republican meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) What People Are Saying White House spokesperson Taylor Rodgers said in an email to The Daily Beast last week: "The Daily Beast and Michael Wolff have lots in common—they both peddle fake news for clickbait in a hopeless attempt to amount to something more than lying losers." "The President didn't need to apply to an overrated, corrupt institution like Harvard to become a successful businessman and the most transformative President in history," Rodgers said. Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisianna last week on X, formerly Twitter: "Here's what I hear President Trump saying: Harvard is an overpriced indoctrination mill. "The purpose of higher education is to make you think—not make you feel comfortable. Harvard doesn't practice that." Harvard President Alan M. Garber in part in a statement after their recent legal win: "The court has granted Harvard's motion, allowing the University to continue enrolling international students and scholars as the case proceeds. A hearing has been set for next Thursday, May 29, to determine whether the temporary order should be extended. "This is a critical step to protect the rights and opportunities of our international students and scholars, who are vital to the University's mission and community. Many among us are likely to have additional concerns and questions. Important updates and guidance will continue to be provided by the Harvard International Office as they become available," Garber said. What Happens Next It is believed that the Trump administration will continue to fight Harvard in court as the school is within the 30-day window to contest the administration pulling their SEVP certification.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store