
Okinawans split over whether US bases are worth the burden – DW – 05/19/2025
Japan pays the US $1.4 billion each year for the bases in Okinawa, which underpin their military alliance. But does the presence of American troops actually benefit the local population?
Okinawa, Japan's only subtropical prefecture, has long been popular with tourists who flock to the island for its warm weather, pristine beaches and turquoise seas.
But beyond the picturesque Pacific landscapes and visitors enjoying water sports, the islands are also known for the heavy US military presence since the end of World War II.
Tokyo views the more than 30 American military facilities that cover around 25% of Okinawan land as crucial to safeguarding national and regional security and underpinning the US-Japanese alliance.
To many Okinawans, however, the US presence feels more like a painful legacy of an occupation that keeps the island and its residents in chains.
The US occupied Okinawa after WWII, returning it to Japan in 1972 Image: Chermaine Lee/DW
A history of anti-base sentiment
Just weeks before my trip to Okinawa, multiple sexual assault allegations against US military personnel were exposed.
The reports brought up painful memories of the 1995 gang rape of a 12-year-old Okinawan girl by three US soldiers.
Over 80,000 Okinawans took to the streets at the time to protest the US military presence.
The arrest of an American suspected of killing a local woman in 2016 also sparked massive protests.
Under intense pressure, Japan agreed a deal with the US to return the land used by the Futenma base to Okinawa. While about 4,000 members of the US Marine Corps have been transferred to Guam, thousands more remain, and the return of the land is still very much a pipe dream for Okinawans.
When I passed by the site at Henoko Bay, about a dozen protesters had braved the rain to stage a sit-in against the military facilities. Senaga Kazuo, one of the protesters, said they come every weekday to "prevent the expansion of US bases."
"Women in Okinawa were sexually assaulted; Kadena and Futenma [bases] created a lot of noise…US [soldiers] come to Okinawa for the US, not for Japan or Okinawa," he told me.
A public poll from two local universities in 2023 showed that 70% of Okinawans found the concentration of US military bases in the prefecture to be unfair.
Despite the public discontent, US and Japan's defense cooperation is as strong as ever. In February, US President Donald Trump's administration renewed the security pact with Japan amid the growing threat from North Korea and escalating tensions between China and Taiwan.
More than a dispute over islands — Japan's fear of China
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Do the US bases protect Okinawa?
Expecting the same anger from other locals, I headed into Okinawa's main city Naha. The people I spoke to there, however, were mostly indifferent to the US military — with some even supportive.
A female shopkeeper at a local jewellery stand, who preferred to remain anonymous — a sign of the sensitivity of the issue among locals — told me that she thinks the US would protect them if a war breaks out.
This view was shared by fashion store worker Ms Kina, who also withheld her first name. She told me that she used to hate the US military, but now she hopes it can protect the island in potential conflicts.
Despite the anger provoked by the sexual assault cases and crimes committed by some American soldiers, some Okinawans still don't want the US forces to leave.
"Violence happens everywhere, but it's not a reason to drive anyone away," Meikawa Suiko, a silver-haired restaurant owner, told me.
While the US-Japan pact ensures the American military would help defend Japan, would local Okinawans be a priority for protection?
Image: Kyodo/IMAGO
Kozue Akibayashi, professor at the Doshisha University specializing in militarism and gender, told me that's a false narrative that the Japanese government has long fed Okinawans.
"The US military is not here to protect the Okinawans. But [the narrative] is like a fantasy floating around … It's a very deep-rooted myth, not only with Okinawans, but worldwide — that militarization is the only method to assure your safety," she said.
Akibayashi cited the failed evacuation plan right before the US invasion at the Battle of Okinawa in 1945 that resulted in 100,000 civilian deaths. "Those [plans] didn't work and [Okinawans] were not prioritized," she said.
In late March, Japan launched a plan on how to evacuate some 120,000 people from Okinawa in case of a war involving China, which has multiple disputes in the region, including over Taiwan and the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands which are claimed by Tokyo, Beijing and Taipei.
The US bases do make Okinawa a target for China, according to Paul O'Shea, senior lecturer at the Centre for East and Southeast Asian Studies at Sweden's Lund University.
"There are hundreds, maybe thousands of Chinese missiles trained on US bases on Okinawa. This is a well-understood and inevitable cost of the bases," he told me.
However, O'Shea pointed out that the bases also have a deterrent effect and "contribute to maintaining the peace."
The presence of US forces and hardware in Okinawa is a highly divisive issue Image: Chermaine Lee/DW
Economic burden or lifeline?
In addition to the security and diplomatic benefits, the Japanese government says the US military bases in Okinawa are justified because of the economic lifeline they provide to the region.
Despite its popularity with tourists, Okinawa is Japan's poorest prefecture. Average incomes are only 70% of the national average and job opportunities are limited, contributing to a poverty rate of 35%.
The prefecture, which accounts for less than 1% of Japan's total land area, hosts around 29,000 American soldiers, over 70% of the total stationed in the East Asian country.
Japan currently pays $1.4 billion (€1.24 billion) to the US on average each year for the troops and bases, the biggest overseas deployment of American troops. Trump has been pushing Tokyo to pay even more.
Despite these issues, the bases in Okinawa have created jobs and economic benefits for the islands: the American Village shopping district generates 33.6 billion yen (about $231 million, €205 million), while over 3,300 people are employed in the area, according to government data from 2015.
Wataru Nishino, who works at a tourist center near the American Village, told me that these benefits do help boost America's image, especially among young people who "don't have such bad impressions of the US military because we have more chances to get to know them."
"My friend's father works on the base, while another is mixed race [of Japanese and American descent]. They create job opportunities for us — if our English is good we can work on the base," he said.
But Okinawa's mayor Denny Tamaki, an opponent of the bases, has said that the jobs they provide only contribute to about 5% of Okinawans' income, while the land the bases occupy, if returned, could generate nearly $7 billion (€6.2 billion).
"Why is Okinawa the poorest prefecture? The land, labor and resources spent on maintaining the bases could have been used in other more productive ways, and over time, Okinawa's economy could have grown beyond the bases," O'Shea said.
Edited by: Karl Sexton
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Froze Nobel Prize Winning Lebanese-American Scientist's Grant. Then China Offered Him Funding at Any School
A Nobel Prize winning Lebanese-American who left his war-torn country for America in 1986 now has the opportunity to take his research to China after the Trump administration froze his federal grant. After earning his doctorate, Ardem Patapoutian became a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California, San Francisco. In 2000, he joined the Scripps Research Institute as an assistant professor, and since 2015, he has also served as an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. In 2021, the renowned molecular biologist and neuroscientist was awarded the Nobel Prize for his discoveries of receptors for temperature and touch. Dr. Patapoutian joined a growing number of American academics speaking out after President Donald Trump's administration cut more than $1.5 billion from the National Institutes of Health's budget in February, leaving institutions like Scripps Research with a $38 million shortfall. After warning his Bluesky followers that the cuts would undermine biomedical research and push talent out of the U.S., Dr. Patapoutian told The New York Times that within hours, he received an email from China offering to relocate his lab to "any city, any university I want," with guaranteed funding for 20 years. Although Dr. Patapoutian ultimately declined, citing his love for his adopted countries, he warned that emerging scientists may have no choice but to leave, placing future U.S. scientific breakthroughs and research at risk. Originally published on Latin Times


DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Gaza civilians struggle as aid fails to reach north – DW – 06/03/2025
Civilians in northern Gaza face severe food shortages as aid fails to reach the area. Families are making do with one meal a day — and lack many essentials like clean water and cooking gas. Before the war, Hazem Lubbad was a university student, supporting his studies while working as a waiter at a restaurant in Gaza City. For the past 19 months, he has been hunkering down with his extended family in Sheikh Radwan, a neighborhood in the northwest of Gaza City. Many neighboring areas, such as Beit Lahiya and Jabalia, have been ordered by the Israeli military to 'evacuate' and move south. The area faces constant Israeli airstrikes and shelling, residents say, as well as a desperate struggle to find enough food. Moving around the area is dangerous, too. "We eat whatever is available, one meal a day, from morning until late at night. Sometimes it is lentils; sometimes it is pasta," the 21-year-old Palestinian said in a video message from Gaza. Food has been in short supply throughout the war, Lubbad said. Now, some food has begun to trickle into Gaza after an 11-week blockade imposed by the Israeli government, but residents say it is still not reaching the north. Children in Gaza live a life in constant fear To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Israelclosed the crossings and halted all aid deliveries into Gaza on March 2. Israeli officials said that Hamas was stealing aid and using it to supply its own fighters, without providing evidence to support this claim. Hamas, which is in charge of Gaza, is considered a terrorist group by Israel, Germany, the US and several other countries. Civilians face daily struggle for food amid war "There has been no flour for a month and a half to two months. A kilo of flour on the black-market costs 80–100 shekels (roughly €20-24 or $22-28), and the situation we are living in does not allow us to buy it," explained Lubbad, adding that no one in the family has a regular income anymore due to the war. Lubbad said that they had set up a basic solar-powered phone charging station where people could recharge their phones in exchange for money. "Without this money, there's no income," he said. This means that he cannot afford to buy much in the markets, where prices have skyrocketed. According to residents, some of the aid that recently entered Gaza was looted by desperate and hungry people. Others are selling food at inflated prices. Israel has not allowed foreign journalists into Gaza since it launched its war following the Hamas terror attacks in 2023, so DW often has to rely on talking to Gazans over the phone. Residents in the north are also watching with horror at the news of almost daily killings of people trying to reach food distribution sites in southern Gaza. These sites are run by a private American-Israeli company called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and secured by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a private US-backed aid group, recently started operating in Gaza Image: AFP/Getty Images The United Nations and other humanitarian organizations have rejected the new food distribution system, arguing that it would be unable to meet the needs of Gaza's 2.3 million inhabitants and would allow Israel to use food as a means of controlling the population. There are no distribution sites in northern Gaza and for people in the north it would be too far and dangerous to get to them. The UN said it is permitted to bring in a limited number of trucks with flour, which is only allowed by Israel to be distributed to bakeries, as well as some other supplies, such as medical items and baby food. UN-OCHA speaks of 'deprivation by design' "It is engineered scarcity," said Jonathan Whittall, head of UN-OCHA, in a briefing with journalists in Jerusalem last week, adding that aid should reach all civilians wherever they are — and should not be limited. "This new scheme is surveillance-based rationing that legitimizes a policy of deprivation by design. And it comes at a time when people in Gaza, half of whom are children, are facing a crisis of survival." There is a widespread shortage of food as well as clean water and cooking gas. People resort to burning rubbish or pieces of wood salvaged from bombed-out buildings to cook. Resumed Gaza aid deliveries fail to alleviate hunger To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video On Tuesday, in another of such incident, news agencies, quoting local officials, reported there had been 27 deaths after Israeli forces opened fire near an aid center. People have to walk for many miles to reach these sites, which are located near Israeli militarized zones. Earlier on Tuesday, the IDF put out a statement. "During the movement of the crowd along the designated routes toward the aid distribution site — approximately half a kilometer from the site — IDF troops identified several suspects moving toward them, deviating from the designated access routes," it said. "The troops carried out warning fire, and after the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced toward the troops." It added that the military is "aware of reports regarding casualties, and the details of the incident are being looked into." The military also said that it "allows the American Civil Organization (GHF) to operate independently in order to enable the distribution of aid to the Gazan residents — and not to Hamas." The International Red Cross (ICRC) said that its field hospital in Rafah had received "a mass casualty influx of 184 patients" on Tuesday morning. Nineteen cases were declared dead upon arrival, the statement said, and eight died shortly after. The majority of cases had suffered gunshot wounds. What is happening at the new distribution points for aid? Last week, DW spoke to a young man who had been displaced in southern Gaza and who had managed to obtain two food boxes from a GHF distribution point. "Anyone could carry as much as they could. There were no instructions about the number, no checks, or anything," Muhammad Qishta said by phone, adding that the boxes contained rice, sugar, flour, halva (sweet sesame paste), oil, biscuits, and pasta. "Since there were no clear instructions about which streets to take to get in and out of the area, some people entered streets they didn't know were off-limits, and there was gunfire. I ran quickly and didn't see anything, but I heard the sound of gunfire," 30-year-old Qishta said. In Sheikh Radwan in northern Gaza, Hazem Lubbad and his relatives are staying put. They do not want to leave their area because "everywhere is the same bad situation. Everywhere is dangerous." Explosions are ongoing in Gaza — as are food shortages Image: Amir Cohen/REUTERS For now, Lubbad said they have also resorted to grinding pasta and lentils to make bread. "We make 20 pieces of pita bread daily and divide them among 13 people. Each person gets one or two pieces of bread per day. This helps us until we find something else to eat." Until recently, they were also able to buy dukkah, a spice mixture used as a dip for bread, but it is running low. The canned food they stocked up on when it was available has also run out, Lubbad said. "For the children, it is extremely difficult," he said. "One meal a day is simply not enough, but there is no food for more than one meal." Hazem Balousha contributed reporting Edited by: Jess Smee


Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
'Incompetent' FEMA Chief Who Didn't Know U.S. Has a Hurricane Season Now Claims It Was a Joke
The Department of Homeland Security has released a statement claiming that the acting head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency was making a joke when he said he didn't know that the US had an official hurricane season. Acting FEMA head David Richardson, who assumed his position in May, was allegedly kidding when he remarked that the US did not have an official hurricane season. He made the statement during a briefing with staff on Monday, according to Reuters. "Despite meanspirited attempts to falsely frame a joke as policy, there is no uncertainty about what FEMA will be doing this Hurricane Season," a spokesperson for the DHS said in a statement to The Hill. "FEMA is laser focused on disaster response, and protecting the American people," the spokesperson continued. They also stated that the agency is "activated in preparation for Hurricane Season" under Richardson. The Atlantic hurricane season officially began on the first day of June, and will last until the final day of November. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced that it is expecting six to 10 total hurricanes, including three to five major hurricanes, marking a particularly intense season. "Suffice to say, disaster response is no joke. If you don't know what or when hurricane season is, you're not qualified to run FEMA. Get someone knowledgeable in there," said Representative Bennie Thompson, the senior Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee with oversight of FEMA, in regards to Richardson. Other legislators also weighed in on Richardson's ill-informed comment, questioning his competence after he replaced former FEMA administrator Cameron Hamilton, who was removed from the position in May. "Wait WHAT?! People are bracing for storms and this man just found out the weather exists?! This is what happens when you hire vibes over qualifications." Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) said on X. Wait WHAT?! People are bracing for storms and this man just found out the weather exists?! This is what happens when you hire vibes over qualifications.