Timing of transfer portal opening can be tough on coaches still in tournament
Coaches still playing in the NCAA Tournament have to split their time between preparing their teams for the Sweet 16 and talking to potential transfers who have entered the portal. Such is life in college basketball.
Dawn Staley is one of those coaches, and she said it's a huge challenge.
"I think the timing is all screwed up," the South Carolina coach said Thursday. "It really plays on your ability to compartmentalize. If you aren't — I mean, most coaches are, but if you are not really good at it, it can sidetrack you. But for us, the main thing, the main thing at this point is trying to win another national championship."
The portal opened Tuesday and 595 women's basketball players entered in the first 24 hours, according to the NCAA. That's two and a half times more than the 233 players that entered in the same time frame last year. There were 757 men's basketball players in the portal in the opening 24 hours this year, which was also more than double last season.
This is the first year that the portal opened up this week. Last year, it opened a day after the NCAA Tournament selection show.
As of Friday morning, there were over 1,000 women's basketball players in the portal. One name not in the portal yet, but entering soon is Florida State guard Ta'Niya Latson, who led all Division I players in scoring this season. Her representatives at Klutch Sports Group confirmed to The Associated Press that she was exploring her options to transfer. Latson's decision was first reported by ESPN.
The portal has exploded over the last few years with name, image and likeness (NIL) money becoming a major reason for players to transfer.
"A lot of kids are leaving because of it, but at the same time, I feel like you have to follow your heart instead of the money," said guard Te-Hina Paopao, who landed at South Carolina as a transfer last year from Oregon. "Just be able to have fun with the game and create those relationships that I've created, and just be able to fall in love with the game again, and continue to play the game that you love."
Paopao isn't alone in her sentiments.
Sedona Prince, who transferred twice in her career, starting at Texas before going to Oregon and now TCU, feels that players shouldn't just be after getting the most NIL money.
"I would say in this new era, I mean, right before [revenue] share and stuff, don't go for the money," Prince said. "It's just going to fail. I know a lot of kids are trying to get paid, as they should. That's how it should be. That's how it always should have been. But be very smart."
Maryland forward Saylor Poffenbarger started her career at UConn before transferring to Arkansas and then the Terrapins. She knows all too well about how the transfer portal works.
"When I went into the portal the second time, I had to pick the things that were important to me," she said. "It's hectic. Everyone throwing numbers, everyone's throwing this, everyone throwing that. You kind of just have to stay true to you and ... pick a school that aligns with your morals because at the end of the day, you're you and the school's not changing for you when you enter them."
While students enter the portal when their season is over, the current timing makes it difficult for the roughly 10% of programs still playing.
One problem is currently that there's no better time for the portal to open.
The Student Athletic Advisory Committee agreed to reduce the length that the portal was open from 45 days to 30, which allowed changing the timing to this year's date. Some coaches wanted a close date no later than May 1 because of final exams and summer school enrollment so that players could be eligible at their new school.
With the 30-day window and May 1 deadline, the portal had to open before the Final Four ended.
So Staley and the other coaches in the Sweet 16 have to multitask even more than usual.
If players don't understand that Staley may not have all the time to recruit them right now because the Gamecocks are trying to win a championship, then they might not be the right fit for the program.
Staley said she was going to call a few players after finishing with her media obligations on Thursday.
"You still have to do it," she said. "Yes, I'm going to call somebody when I leave here. A few people. Just because you got to let them know, 'Hey, we're thinking about you.' We got this run we're trying to [finish] but you are a priority for us."
UCLA coach Cori Close has noticed another problem with the timing of the portal opening: Schools are now quicker to fire and hire coaches before the portal opens so they don't get behind.
"I think we have been rushing hires so that we could get people in place before the portal, which has distractions from their current teams," she said. "I am going to be advocating in the offseason that we make another shift.
"I don't think it's in the best interests of our game and the best interests of our kids and the best interests of our coaches to have that being a distraction in the most magnified time."
Reporting by The Assocaited Press.
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience Women's College Basketball
recommended
Get more from Women's College Basketball Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
44 minutes ago
Democrats criticize latest effort by Congress to regulate college sports as setback for athletes
WASHINGTON -- The latest effort by Congress to regulate college sports generated predictable partisan outrage on Thursday, with Democrats saying Republican-led draft legislation would claw back freedoms won by athletes through years of litigation against the NCAA. Three House committees are considering legislation that would create a national standard for name, image and likeness payments to athletes and protect the NCAA against future lawsuits. Last week, a federal judge approved a $2.8 billion settlement that will lead to schools paying athletes directly, and NCAA President Charlie Baker said now that his organization is implementing those major changes, Congress needs to step in and stabilize college sports. Baker said he supports the draft legislation that was the subject of Thursday's hearing by a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee, but there was little indication that any bill advanced by the House would generate enough Democratic support to surpass the 60-vote threshold in the Senate. 'I'm deeply disappointed for the second year in a row, Republicans on this committee are advancing a partisan college sports bill that protects the power brokers of college athletics at the expense of the athletes themselves,' said Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass. Trahan noted that if the NCAA or conferences establish unfair rules, athletes can challenge them in court, with the settlement of the House v. NCAA antitrust case the latest example of athletes winning rights that they had been denied historically. 'This bill rewrites that process to guarantee the people in power always win, and the athletes who fuel this multibillion-dollar industry always lose,' said Trahan, who played volleyball at Georgetown. The NCAA argues that it needs a limited antitrust exemption in order to set its own rules and preserve a college sports system that provides billions of dollars in scholarships and helps train future U.S. Olympians. Several athletes are suing the NCAA over its rule that athletes are only eligible to play four seasons in a five-year period, and on Tuesday, a group of female athletes filed an appeal of the House settlement, saying it discriminated against women in violation of federal law. On the Senate side, a bipartisan group including Republican Ted Cruz of Texas has been negotiating a college sports reform bill for months, but those talks are moving more slowly than Cruz had hoped at the beginning of this Congress. The draft bill in the House would create a national standard for NIL, overriding the state laws that critics say have led to a chaotic recruiting environment. That, too, was criticized by Democrats and by their key witness at the hearing, Ramogi Huma, executive director of the National College Players Association. Huma argued that the NCAA wants to get rid of booster-funded NIL collectives that another witness, Southeastern Conference associate commissioner William King, characterized as 'fake NIL' or 'pay for play.' Instead, Huma said the collectives are examples of the free market at work, noting that before players won NIL rights through a court case, boosters could only donate to athletic departments. Tom McMillen, a former Democratic congressman who played in the NBA after an All-America basketball career at Maryland, took a dim view of the bill's prospects. 'I think they're trying to come up with something and pull in some Democrats. I just don't know if that's going to succeed or not,' said McMillen, who for several years led an association of Division I athletic directors. 'There's a real philosophical divide, so that's the hard part. It's hard to bridge. And there's a zillion other issues.' The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla., said the draft legislation already had some bipartisan support and he was open to changes that would get more Democrats on board. 'I will consider some of the suggestions, the legitimate suggestions that were made,' Bilirakis said, 'and I will be happy to talk to lawmakers that truly want to get a big bill across the finish line.'
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Democrats criticize latest effort by Congress to regulate college sports as setback for athletes
WASHINGTON — The latest effort by Congress to regulate college sports generated predictable partisan outrage on Thursday, with Democrats saying Republican-led draft legislation would claw back freedoms won by athletes through years of litigation against the NCAA. Three House committees are considering legislation that would create a national standard for name, image and likeness payments to athletes and protect the NCAA against future lawsuits. Last week, a federal judge approved a $2.8 billion settlement that will lead to schools paying athletes directly, and NCAA President Charlie Baker said now that his organization is implementing those major changes, Congress needs to step in and stabilize college sports. Baker said he supports the draft legislation that was the subject of Thursday's hearing by a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee, but there was little indication that any bill advanced by the House would generate enough Democratic support to surpass the 60-vote threshold in the Senate. 'I'm deeply disappointed for the second year in a row, Republicans on this committee are advancing a partisan college sports bill that protects the power brokers of college athletics at the expense of the athletes themselves,' said Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass. Trahan noted that if the NCAA or conferences establish unfair rules, athletes can challenge them in court, with the settlement of the House v. NCAA antitrust case the latest example of athletes winning rights that they had been denied historically. 'This bill rewrites that process to guarantee the people in power always win, and the athletes who fuel this multibillion-dollar industry always lose,' said Trahan, who played volleyball at Georgetown. The NCAA argues that it needs a limited antitrust exemption in order to set its own rules and preserve a college sports system that provides billions of dollars in scholarships and helps train future U.S. Olympians. Several athletes are suing the NCAA over its rule that athletes are only eligible to play four seasons in a five-year period, and on Tuesday, a group of female athletes filed an appeal of the House settlement, saying it discriminated against women in violation of federal law. On the Senate side, a bipartisan group including Republican Ted Cruz of Texas has been negotiating a college sports reform bill for months, but those talks are moving more slowly than Cruz had hoped at the beginning of this Congress. The draft bill in the House would create a national standard for NIL, overriding the state laws that critics say have led to a chaotic recruiting environment. That, too, was criticized by Democrats and by their key witness at the hearing, Ramogi Huma, executive director of the National College Players Association. Huma argued that the NCAA wants to get rid of booster-funded NIL collectives that another witness, Southeastern Conference associate commissioner William King, characterized as 'fake NIL' or 'pay for play.' Instead, Huma said the collectives are examples of the free market at work, noting that before players won NIL rights through a court case, boosters could only donate to athletic departments. Tom McMillen, a former Democratic congressman who played in the NBA after an All-America basketball career at Maryland, took a dim view of the bill's prospects. 'I think they're trying to come up with something and pull in some Democrats. I just don't know if that's going to succeed or not,' said McMillen, who for several years led an association of Division I athletic directors. 'There's a real philosophical divide, so that's the hard part. It's hard to bridge. And there's a zillion other issues.' The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla., said the draft legislation already had some bipartisan support and he was open to changes that would get more Democrats on board. 'I will consider some of the suggestions, the legitimate suggestions that were made,' Bilirakis said, 'and I will be happy to talk to lawmakers that truly want to get a big bill across the finish line.' ___ AP college sports:
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
College World Series 2025: How to watch the tournament this week
If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission. Pricing and availability are subject to change. Gavin Turley and the Oregon State Beavers are among the teams playing in the NCAA College World Series, here's how you can tune in to every game. (John Rivera/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) The Men's College World Series returns to Charles Schwab Field in Omaha this week with eight baseball teams competing for the NCAA Division I championship title. The teams who have made it into the World Series this year are Murray State, who are competing in the World Series for the first time, along with UCLA, Arkansas, LSU, Coastal Carolina, Arizona, Oregon State and Louisville. The majority of games throughout the tournament will air on ESPN, and you can stream every game on ESPN+. Here's everything you need to know about the 2025 College World Series including the brackets, schedule, streaming information and more. How to watch the 2025 College World Series: Dates: June 13-23, 2025 Advertisement TV channel: ESPN, ESPN2, ABC Streaming: Hulu + Live TV, DirecTV, ESPN+ When is the College World Series? The College World Series runs from June 13 through June 23 (if necessary). Which teams are in the 2025 College World Series? There are eight teams in the College World Series: Arizona (44–19) Arkansas (48–13) Coastal Carolina (53–11) LSU (48–15) Louisville (40–22) Murray State (44–15) Oregon State (47-14-1) UCLA (47–16) Bracket 1 consists of Louisville vs. Oregon State and Arizona vs. Coastal Carolina. Bracket 2 consists of UCLA vs. Murray State and LSU vs. Arkansas. What channel is the College World Series on? The College World Series will air primarily on ESPN, with one game airing on ESPN2 and another on ABC. The entire tournament will also be available to stream on ESPN+. College World Series schedule: All times Eastern Advertisement June 13 Game 1: Coastal Carolina vs. Arizona, 1 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ Game 2: Oregon State vs. Louisville, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ June 14 Game 3: UCLA vs. Murray State, 1 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ Game 4: Arkansas vs. LSU, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ June 15 Game 5: Teams TBD, 1 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ Game 6: Teams TBD, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN2, ESPN+ June 16 Game 7: Teams TBD, 1 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ Game 8: Teams TBD, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ June 17 Game 9: Teams TBD, 1 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ Game 10: Teams TBD, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ June 18 Game 11: Teams TBD, 1 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ Game 12: Teams TBD, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ June 19 Game 13: Teams TBD, Time TBD, ESPN, ESPN+ (if necessary) Game 14: Teams TBD, Time TBD, ESPN, ESPN+ (if necessary) June 21 College World Series championship series, Game 1, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ June 22 College World Series championship series, Game 2, 1:30 p.m. ET, ABC, ESPN+ June 23 College World Series championship series, Game 3, 6:30 p.m. ET, ESPN, ESPN+ (if necessary) Stream the College World Series on ESPN+ ESPN+ Over the next ten days, you can catch all the College World Series action live on ESPN+. ESPN+ grants you access to tons of events that are simulcast across the suite of ESPN Networks and ABC, as well as exclusive ESPN+ content including live events, fantasy sports tools and premium ESPN+ articles. You can stream ESPN+ through an app on your smart TV, phone, tablet, computer and on $11.99/month at ESPN More ways to watch the College World Series:
